Тёмный

Quantum Entanglement: Explained in REALLY SIMPLE Words 

Science ABC
Подписаться 422 тыс.
Просмотров 649 тыс.
50% 1

Quantum entanglement is a physical resource, like energy, that is possible between quantum systems. When a coin spins on a flat surface, it’s in a state of superposition between its two faces-head and tails. Similarly, electrons in their natural state exist as a superposition of both up and down spin. Only when measured do they give a definite value of up or down, which, in technical terms, is referred to as the “collapse of the wavefunction”.
In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse occurs when a wave function, which was initially in a superposition of a few states, reduces to a single state due to interaction with the external world.
When a pair of electrons are generated, interact, or share spatial proximity, their spin states can get entangled, which is what scientists call the quantum entanglement of electrons.
Quantum entanglement was first recognized by Einstein, Podolsky, Roson and Schrodinger. In this video, we explain quantum entanglement in simple terms so that it becomes accessible to laymen and children who are interested to know about quantum entanglement
Intro - 0:00
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics - 0:34
Principal quantum numbers - 1:38
Spin quantum number and superposition - 3:08
Schrödinger’s cat experiment - 3:57
Quantum entanglement of electrons - 5:14
Applications of quantum entanglement - 6:27
References:
www.nist.gov/news-events/news...
plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt...
news.mit.edu/2018/light-ancie...
magazine.caltech.edu/post/unt...
export.arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/pa...
#science #animation #QuantumEntanglement
If you wish to buy/license this video, please write to us at admin@scienceabc.com.
Voice Over Artist: John Staughton ( www.fiverr.com/jswildwood )
SUBSCRIBE to get more such science videos!
/ @scienceabc
Follow us on Twitter!
/ abc_science
Follow us on Facebook!
/ sciabc
Follow our Website!
www.scienceabc.com

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

31 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 883   
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 года назад
Now that you have seen the video, let's have a poll. There has been so much debate about free and fair elections across the world. Do you think Quantum Entanglement can help in making elections a 100% fair and transparent process? (put your choice as a reply to this comment. If you have additional points, do make sure to put them in the comment) A - Yes B - Yes, but the relevant tech is impossible to make C - No
@genericname6669
@genericname6669 3 года назад
if Germany has done this, then they already have the technology, so why not!
@nicholasmtss217
@nicholasmtss217 3 года назад
Α
@78anurag
@78anurag 3 года назад
A
@Abhishek-fe7hc
@Abhishek-fe7hc 3 года назад
A
@fuzzylumpkin8030
@fuzzylumpkin8030 2 года назад
Sounds like something Deadpool would do
@raphaelserra7573
@raphaelserra7573 3 года назад
You are doing an EXTREMELY NECESSARY job for the world, mate. Even "scientific disseminators" cant reach your level of simplicity AND depth
@nikita6995
@nikita6995 3 года назад
Very true
@andyc9902
@andyc9902 2 года назад
Plain English movement
@toekneelee8455
@toekneelee8455 2 года назад
Albert Einstein - 'The definition of genius is taking the complex and making it simple.'
@toekneelee8455
@toekneelee8455 2 года назад
@@frankdimeglio8216 if Einstein was a Weasel I don’t know what that makes you? What have you done for the world other than filling it with stupid comments??
@samuraiunites2845
@samuraiunites2845 2 года назад
@@toekneelee8455 He is negligible
@manofmatix
@manofmatix 3 года назад
Genius are those who can make anyone understand what they know!
@cheeseshit999
@cheeseshit999 2 года назад
Quite literally not true
@fuzailahmad6674
@fuzailahmad6674 2 года назад
Fish
@cedriclouis8751
@cedriclouis8751 2 года назад
Thays called a teacher
@walterwhite5764
@walterwhite5764 Год назад
DID SCIENTISTS JUST QUANTUM ENTANGLE A LIVING TARTIGRADE
@Bless-the-Name
@Bless-the-Name Год назад
Genius are those who let the headless chickens run around flapping in painc.
@heyitsahuva
@heyitsahuva 2 года назад
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." -Albert Einstein
@earthculture214
@earthculture214 Год назад
"Accepting that Entanglement is a part of the natural world around us, has profound implications, it means that we must accept that an action in one place can have an instant effect anywhere in the Universe as if there is no space between them."
@lioness318
@lioness318 11 месяцев назад
But it is possible only in world of sub atomic particle not applicable to whole physics not on all of us 😊😊
@earthculture214
@earthculture214 11 месяцев назад
@@lioness318 It is possibly only in the sub-atomic world because our physics is not advanced enough to be able to provide the evidence that it applies to all of physics. This my opinion.
@Braun09tv
@Braun09tv 10 месяцев назад
​@@earthculture214I think there is something wrong, entanglement is just synchronization. Just look how particles get "entangled".
@crawdad
@crawdad 7 месяцев назад
⁠@@Braun09tvBut HOW do particles get entangled to begin with? That’s the part I don’t get. How do we know where an electrons partner is located? Have we performed entanglement between earths surface and somewhere outside our atmosphere or even orbit?
@Braun09tv
@Braun09tv 7 месяцев назад
@@crawdad I only know the crystal for photons. The word "entangled" alone is a bit stupid. What does it actually explain? Entanglement is nothing more than the process of synchronization in my view. The rest is about manipulation coming from particle detectors. Something is fishy, they seem to try to sell a complex synchronization event as some kind of spooky entanglement voodoo. Come on guys.
@BigNewGames
@BigNewGames 2 года назад
Electrons are waves when emanating from atoms. They are waves of potential particles (superposition) and don't become particles (real) until they strike something or are measured (collapse of wave). This is why only one attribute of the electron can be measured in our slow mass time. When the potential particle is in the form of the wave (EM field) it does not exist in our slow mass time. Only when the electron is measured, strikes an object or is observed does it become a tiny bit of information represented as a particle or what we mentally perceive as something that is real within our slow mass time. Prior to the particle being measured is potential information within the wave. The particle because it converts to information upon measuring cannot be measured again because it already converted into information. The same particle can never be measured again. So only one attribute of a potential particle can be measured, hence uncertainty principle. Quantum entanglement happens because all the potential particles within the wave don't exist in our slow mass time until they are measured. So, if you measure a pair of electrons out of the field at the same moment they will take on opposite spins because they are one and the same particle but are being measured on different sides of the same EM field, their fields are entangled. Imagine the source being at the center with the field of potential particles forced to rotate to the left. One particle has a left spin while the other has a right spin because all the potential particles in the field would contain the same information. This is why when the spin of one particle is manipulated prior to measuring all the other potential particles in the field they all will take on a different spin. To test this hypothesis, instead of measuring a pair of particles in the field place 4 different measuring devices in a square with the source in the center. Then at the same moment measure 4 different particles from the field. I predict that each particle will have a different spin instead of taking on opposite spins. The measured particle to the left of the source will spin to the left, the one to the right of the source will spin to the right, the one to the top of the source will spin to the top and the one to the bottom of the source will spin to the bottom. In order to achieve this the particles have to measured at the same moment. The spin of the particle is not the only attribute that can be measured. The potential information can be color, velocity, trajectory, spin, temperature and even the kinetic energy the particle produces when striking the measuring device. All this potential information is contained inside the field but only one attribute can be measured at a time because the electron is so tiny and it takes all the potential information to make the particle appear real to us in our slow mass time. Energy waves (light) travels at c thus exist outside our slow mass time. It doesn't become part of our reality until it comes to rest relative to the speed of light, IE strikes an object, reflects, refracts, is measured or observed. Let's talk about a holographic universe because that's what this all infers.
@grogdizzy5814
@grogdizzy5814 Год назад
This makes more sense than the video
@TronElec
@TronElec 8 месяцев назад
So the space time entangle ment concept is nothing but a misatke?
@Hinus23
@Hinus23 3 месяца назад
Could you please explain what you mean by "slow mass time"?
@MickB52s
@MickB52s 29 дней назад
Time is the largest factor then in determining a end result/ the concept of time and particle velocity would suggest a pattern of results...base off this on could chart a list of results that could be tuned for computing a YES/NO/MAYBE factor
@winfordnettles3292
@winfordnettles3292 День назад
It is my understanding that what we observe as an "electron" is a first order observation of higher order interactions that manifest themselves as observables such as charge, velocity, and mass (gravity). The complex waveform may contain elements of second, third, fourth, etc. order functions that we can not measure until we take action in some form or manner to actually observe them. The action that we take to measure any value (momentum, energy, velocity, mass, etc.) actually causes to collapse of the waveform into a first order event.
@phildeseve
@phildeseve 3 года назад
Well done explaining this in a way lay people can understand. It seems the whole idea of spooky action at a distance hinges on acceptance of superposition, which I’m interpreting as the idea that since we don’t know something yet, all possibilities are true at once. I’d like to see a video explaining why people are convinced it’s not just one way or another and we just don’t know yet.
@josephmcknight721
@josephmcknight721 10 месяцев назад
Double slit experiment
@DavidByrden1
@DavidByrden1 8 месяцев назад
>> "I’d like to see a video explaining why...it’s not just one way or another" THIS video should have explained it. But instead, they talked about electron quantum numbers...which is not even in scope. You are praising this video and at the same time you're pointing out how they failed!
@phildeseve
@phildeseve 8 месяцев назад
@@DavidByrden1 yeah good point. I guess I just think it’s better than other videos I saw but still wish I could wrap my head around the one way or the other vs both part. Maybe I just don’t have the brain for it.
@DavidByrden1
@DavidByrden1 8 месяцев назад
@@phildeseve I've studied this area for a long time and I am convinced that most people have the brain for it. But it's very badly explained, almost every time.
@Ryanmock02
@Ryanmock02 2 месяца назад
I feel the idea of superposition is simply us not knowing the outcome from lack of information. Or perhaps evidence of free will? Seeing as how it isn’t decided until acted upon.
@StevenTaurielloShow
@StevenTaurielloShow 4 месяца назад
One of the best explanations of quantum entanglement I’ve watched. Good job man keep it up.
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 месяца назад
Wow, thanks!
@TheAditya1655
@TheAditya1655 11 месяцев назад
Never had such a simple explanation of so complex phenomenon. Thanks a lot
@IngVasiu
@IngVasiu 3 года назад
Great explanation! Now I really think I will never understand quantum mechanics.
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 года назад
You and me both!
@idkhahahaha
@idkhahahaha 2 года назад
SAME
@mattgraves3709
@mattgraves3709 Год назад
That was an outstanding analogy. But here's the biggest problem I have and maybe you can help me. How do two particles end up with the same relationship as your fast food order? What is the relationship between two entangled particles prior to our experiment?
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 Год назад
it is due to conservation
@KushagraPratap
@KushagraPratap 3 года назад
Feels good to see that everyone is Indian except the narrator in credits
@vishalsinghpanwar2972
@vishalsinghpanwar2972 3 года назад
Thanks a lot for such a simple yet efficient explanation.🙏👍
@ursulaansbach2244
@ursulaansbach2244 Год назад
I love exploring the quantum world and your videos are so clear and helpful. Thanks for increasing the fun.
@billant2
@billant2 5 месяцев назад
It's like half asleep, neither sleeping nor awake. heh
@FLYINGJERRY900
@FLYINGJERRY900 Год назад
This lecture simplified complex concept in beautiful way
@wisdomdavid8593
@wisdomdavid8593 Год назад
Your level of simplicity is amazing
@rippleeffects2397
@rippleeffects2397 3 года назад
Love this explanation! Thanks so much for this video:) Where can I find the original long version which explains so much more on this topic?
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 года назад
Thanks for your feedback! Please refer to the links provided in the description of this video for an in-depth explanation of quantum entanglement.
@cantcount0
@cantcount0 9 месяцев назад
Watch a video on Quantum biology by Prof Jim Al khalili. Really interesting. It talks about how quantum entanglement is perhaps used by animals like pigeons to navigate.
@willyoung2347
@willyoung2347 Год назад
Beautiful explanation, simple but in-depth understanding.
@MrCompassionate01
@MrCompassionate01 3 года назад
Thank you for making this video, this is far clearer to a layman like me than any other explanation.
@cptk3916
@cptk3916 3 года назад
Still pretty incomprehencable for me though...
@CoachJV-kf1dc
@CoachJV-kf1dc 6 месяцев назад
Trust you've purchased your XLM and XRP as recommended by the QFS?
@extcresources531
@extcresources531 3 года назад
The best video on Quantum Entanglement
@rahul4852
@rahul4852 3 года назад
Thanks for making vid on Quantum physics/mechanics
@eggaudio
@eggaudio 3 года назад
Such great Explaination! Thanks a ton! I wonder why this does not have more than a million views.
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@genericname6669
@genericname6669 3 года назад
Very clear and concise, should be top recommended video to watch before anyone deep dives into the individual Quantum theories, topics.
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 года назад
Thanks! Glad you liked it.
@genericname6669
@genericname6669 3 года назад
@@Scienceabc What i dont understand though, is how physicists and scientists have managed to 'tangle' a particle, and how have they managed to split single atom for wave experiments. that gets me the most, and how have they named Quark spins like up, down, strange, charm etc.. i mean how could they figure it out when we cannot "see" the subatomic particles
@sweetcandy1005
@sweetcandy1005 Год назад
Love the explanation in this video. Really helpful
@lalotz
@lalotz 2 года назад
I hope someone reads this in hopes to start a conversation. I had precognition since a little kid which had lead to search about this. Yes, I can see my own future through my own eyes in my future. So I'm here - entanglement, superposition and quantum teleportation/leap... hm.. I've concluded the only thing that links my present self to my future self is the consciousness of my mind, so if I take this information I can say: My mind entangles my consciousness of the present and of the future to create a superposition to transfer data which is quantum teleportation. Yes? Note: the only data I receive are from 2 senses. I can see and hear only. I can not read my mind, feel or smell what my future self is experiencing. The only data I can receive visual and auditory. Also, I can't pick what day I see in the future, it is random. It can be a situation that can happen in a month or years to come but it always happens, which has lead me to think "time" doesn't exist as a measurement on 4th dimension. Time works perfectly in day to day basis but I don't think it exists in teleportation or these leaps into the future. Also, (i struggled with this tremendously) the future is not written, it is not predetermined, i simply happen to see a random moments in my future life. It is like Forwarding my video to look at it for a few seconds and then Rewinding the video to the original point in my life. Anyway I wish I could understand why I can do this, why it happens....
@intuitivetasha113
@intuitivetasha113 2 года назад
Wow I believe you .. I always thought this as well you are not alone ... I am not able to see my future self tho.. can you get any useful Information from ur future self like lottery numbers and read those to me please thanks
@lalotz
@lalotz 2 года назад
@@intuitivetasha113 lol... yeah I wish but it seems I'm able to see some key moments in my life. Trust me I also thought about lottery numbers. I guess it won't happen to me.
@johnnychacon130
@johnnychacon130 2 года назад
I suggest reading "The first fifteen lives of Harry August."
@winfordnettles3292
@winfordnettles3292 День назад
What you may be "seeing and hearing" may actually be one of many possible future states of existence of your reality. In many religions of the world, the thinking is that each and every action of everything has an effect upon the path of what we perceive as "reality", or the NOW that we observe first order. Possibly where the concept of "karma" came about. It is anybody's guess just how much any one thing or action will cause our reality to deviate from what is the status quo or what we perceive as the norm.
@AshwinMaloo79
@AshwinMaloo79 11 месяцев назад
Dhanyavad Sir Ji 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@thekidwhodraws
@thekidwhodraws Год назад
Any science demo for a layperson that starts with “imagine a burger” is doing a good job
@robertmccoy7188
@robertmccoy7188 6 месяцев назад
Two questions. Ive pondered them for weeks and give up. 1) superposition is existing in every position at once. Entangled particles exist in the opposite state. How can they be every position at once AND opposite of each other? 2) how do particles become entangled? How do we know where the other particle is in order to measure it? It may be next to it. It may be across the universe. How do we know?
@filomenaderiu352
@filomenaderiu352 Год назад
Thank you., from someone who is physics disabled, you explained this very well.
@rawr333r
@rawr333r Год назад
Thank you. There's been so much b.s about manifestation and quantum entanglement. I appreciate this video. Thanks!
@gottyagames4857
@gottyagames4857 Год назад
This was worded really well, subscribed
@hermancevanloon5772
@hermancevanloon5772 9 месяцев назад
I like it very much! Please geven more Lectures on this stuff!
@blazedgamingkr1438
@blazedgamingkr1438 Год назад
Very well done. Although my favorite saying about quantum mechanics is "if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics". -Richard Feynman
@mack4228
@mack4228 Год назад
Thank you ! Well explained !!
@VivienneGilbert
@VivienneGilbert 2 месяца назад
extremely good. You lower my mental resistance to these ideas!
@CorvusHyperion
@CorvusHyperion 2 года назад
Love the drooping of Night Crawler's tail at 9:11 , haha.
@tonyzhang4488
@tonyzhang4488 2 месяца назад
Hi hi hi, I’m doing a very important school project and this helped me a lot, thank you
@alexlynch4473
@alexlynch4473 Год назад
If you could manipulate the spin of a number of entangled electrons could that be used to transfer information over any distance instantaneously? Up up down up is "A" up down up up is "B" etc So to send a message to a device which has the counterpart electrons you would manipulate the state of your set, the other set would instantly adapt and thus transfer the message
@nikita6995
@nikita6995 3 года назад
I like the way you explain. Keep up the good job👍👍
@divingdeepinthought7609
@divingdeepinthought7609 2 года назад
What an incredible video! Thank you for the amazing content!! 👏
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 2 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@shutupidiot16yearsago79
@shutupidiot16yearsago79 2 года назад
"If you think you understand quantum entanglement,you don't understand it", that's an entangled statment.
@chengalvarayansivanesan6270
@chengalvarayansivanesan6270 2 года назад
Excellent vedio.
@razgrizadler
@razgrizadler Год назад
finally an explanation easy enough for me to understand
@toddsmith4280
@toddsmith4280 Год назад
I think if you substitute the word synchronized for entanglement and the word possibility for superposition, it is much easier to understand.
@outlawfrom1899
@outlawfrom1899 3 года назад
Great video! Loved it 👍
@Jungeit
@Jungeit 4 месяца назад
I did not expect to understand this great job thank you
@g12196
@g12196 3 года назад
I have an embarrassingly simple question. It is stated that once a particle is entangled, if we measure one of them to have spin up we know with absolute certainty the other has spin down, then why is it surprising to get that same result when they are separated by a great distance? There is no need for information to travel btw them faster than light because no matter what state we measure the particle on earth to be, the one in the andromeda galaxy will always be the opposite. Said a different way, although it’s completely random before we take the measurement to know the state is spin up or down, there is no randomness at all btw the entangled pair.
@robertbrandywine
@robertbrandywine 3 года назад
Yes, that was called the Hidden Variables explanation which Einstein came up with. Congratulations! It was disproved as a possibility by John Stewart Bell in 1964.
@TheCucung
@TheCucung 3 года назад
I actually have been wondering the same thing. If one is spin up. then the other must be spin down? No matter how far the distance. I feel like i am missing something here
@g12196
@g12196 3 года назад
@@robertbrandywine Bell's experiment and all improvements since Bell only disprove local hidden variables, it does not disprove non-local hidden variables, NLHV. Also, Einstein did not dispute QM he believed the theory was incomplete as it does not explain all the relationships, or does not identify the underlying mechanisms in physical terms. QM has many unexplained properties, that particles are 0-dimensional points, yet have properties such as spin, charge, and mass, described only as mathematically but not physically. So there is the scaling problem, how to go from 0D point with no physical properties (realism) to scale up to larger physical macroscopic levels. Check out the Cordus pre-theory it's very interesting and I will be following it closely.
@robertbrandywine
@robertbrandywine 3 года назад
@@g12196 Thanks.
@silverrahul
@silverrahul 3 года назад
The surprising bit is that , before you measured one of them to have spin up, the other did not have spin down. But once you measure one to have spin up, the other instantaneously has spin down
@208935
@208935 7 месяцев назад
Very easy information, great video❤
@jeff7731
@jeff7731 3 года назад
maybe the electron is not spinning but rather observing it imparts a spin. the entangled particle is automatically spinning opposite simply because you didnt observe it. since they are always opposite. this means the information did not travel faster than light but rather was already in superposition and determined by observation alone.
@gibbethoskins8621
@gibbethoskins8621 Год назад
This might explain how myself and a friend often have dreams and simultaneous thoughts regarding each other that align with real events in each other's lives, despite now living on opposite sides of the world. This has happened a number of times at precise and profound moments that can simply not be explained rationally. One example for instance, dreaming about her injuring a specific part of her body, only to find out the next day that she had in fact injured that specific part of her body around the time of my dream. This is just one example but it has happened in a number of different ways with profound accuracy and timing.
@brunoalves-pg9eo
@brunoalves-pg9eo 3 года назад
I don't get it. Let's say we have 2 entangled particles which we don't know the spins of either of them. We measure the spin of particle A. And now we know the spin of Particle B. But are they still entangled? Can we now affect the spin of particle B by changing the spin of Particle A? Or can we force the measured spin to be one we want? If not this is useless and I dont see how we can use this property if we can't manipulate the spins.
@anthonyharvey8571
@anthonyharvey8571 2 года назад
Yes
@animax2422
@animax2422 Год назад
You can't
@danilo_88
@danilo_88 Год назад
I dont think it works like that.
@KomalK-wm4wo
@KomalK-wm4wo 2 месяца назад
Nice explanation. Few questions though- 1. When electrons are separated at Earth and one of them is sent to let's say Andromeda galaxy, we can measure the spin of electron in Andromeda galaxy with the help of electron at Earth. But my question is- When electron travels that far then it must have interacted with magnetic field of other bodies it came across in its path. Then this magnetic field should affect electron's spin. Value of M(s) for Andromeda electron should change. Then how can we predict its spin with help of Earth electron, if its M(s) has changed? 2. What if the Andromeda electron becomes part of other atoms/matter (like usually happens in electricity etc ). It will start vibrating according to the electrons of new matter. Will we be able to predict its properties of spin, vibration etc. with Earth electron then?
@mietekgpz
@mietekgpz 5 месяцев назад
I don't write comments but this one deserves it. Great job.
@mohammadhamed7162
@mohammadhamed7162 2 года назад
Omg that's really the best scientific video I've seen ever .... really I wish I would be a scientist in the future 😃😃😃 Please , give me more (cause I have an addiction of quantum theory and physics)
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 Год назад
6:11 maybe not exactly that info traveled >c, but the two particles shared one bit of information about spin. once that bit is known, both spins are known
@loveit7484
@loveit7484 2 года назад
Thank you for this video! Im trying to grasp this, but up untill your video I get lost! Ive subscribed. Need to rewatch. I love QM- as far as I understand it.
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 2 года назад
thanks for your feedback
@arrakis8320
@arrakis8320 Год назад
Great job man. It's a wonderfull task to explain a people like me who don't understand quantum physics but love physics. 😅
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc Год назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@kellandsmith9946
@kellandsmith9946 3 года назад
Got a question... would there be an amount of time for an entangled particle to disentangle?? Is there that level of precision to distinguish the time difference between two entangled light particles at relatively earth scale to maybe test to see if entanglement is a field of it's own like magnetism or something?? I mean I've heard the saying if you make one choice you sacrifice another so in a sense each of our choices are entangled together in a fabric of fate being woven moment by moment dissolving into each other depending on how you observe so what's worth it to blur into motion
@touyakaga5078
@touyakaga5078 2 года назад
Depends
@BarryKort
@BarryKort Год назад
Time dilation (due to gravitational gradients) suffice to progressively decohere any time-varying element of a characteristic. In terms of magnetic moment, one has to take into consideration Larmor Precession, which would not maintain exact phase-locked synchrony around an ergodic mean spin axis. Indeed, fMRI machines rely on the reckoning of Larmor Precession (which is amped by the use of very strong environmental magnetic fields).
@chanieweiss4288
@chanieweiss4288 13 дней назад
6:50 The narrator says 33 billion years but the caption says 15 billion years. You may want to double check that. Thank you for this comparatively simple explanation. I didn't quite get it, but it's more understandable thanks to this explanation.
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 11 дней назад
sorry about that, that's actually 33 billion years. We have fixed it now
@silverdragon710
@silverdragon710 Год назад
All this makes sense to me. Thank you!
@AbdulHaseeb-uz6rz
@AbdulHaseeb-uz6rz 2 года назад
Excellent👍
@yasglas
@yasglas 3 года назад
I appreciate all your videos and this channel
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc 3 года назад
Thanks! We are glad to know that you enjoy watching our videos.
@lioness318
@lioness318 11 месяцев назад
Very good explanation sir......😍😍😍😍
@anusha8093
@anusha8093 3 года назад
Thanks for such video...before i couldn't understand it by scrolling down the website but this animation made me understand so nicely Thank you🔥🔥
@Ti-JAC
@Ti-JAC Год назад
I love it , I only wish I can be around longer (like 1 more billion years) to see where we go with this knowledge.
@olivia.carousel
@olivia.carousel 11 месяцев назад
This is so well explained
@GGBLoveJUSTLovePhysics
@GGBLoveJUSTLovePhysics 4 месяца назад
Great Thank you very much!
@freel0077
@freel0077 4 месяца назад
when two particles are entangled , they loose status of super positioning INDIVIDULAY and behave like a super particle collectively in a single wave function. ok , then upon measuring ( upon wave function collapse ) , either separated thousands miles , a definite value of one particle indicate value of other. , both were already entangled to each other , like in classical physics , pair of gloves are entangled , by knowing the status of one glove , either apart thousands miles , one can determine the status of other glove. Actual question is how a single wave function spread throughout cosmos and comple two quantum particles to act under a single wave function, which is still unanswerable.
@theintegratedguy9528
@theintegratedguy9528 Год назад
Excellent video!
@nyChannel09
@nyChannel09 Год назад
Help: 5:58 why are they stil entangled after NOT being in the same proximity to eachother anymore? Please dont use explanation such as hotdog and burger. I dont understand the entanglement in the first place, why they "start" to be entangled in the first place. The fact that they "have" to be close to eachother to develop the entanglement, should show us, that there is some interaction between the 2 that only takes place in close proximity to eachother?
@mauriciosanchez8287
@mauriciosanchez8287 Год назад
excelente, muchas gracias
@aerynsunn7500
@aerynsunn7500 Год назад
Oh this was a good one! Thank you!!!
@Angry_Indian24
@Angry_Indian24 Год назад
Thankyou for the upload 🙏
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc Год назад
My pleasure
@str8kronic
@str8kronic 3 года назад
If we measure the spin and find it to be a positive spin, then we know the particle in the Andromeda galaxy has a negative spin.....but what if we had the capability to change the spin on the earths particle from positive to negative...would the spin on the Andromeda galaxy change to positive?
@hsunteik
@hsunteik 3 года назад
I think it can only be created and measured once... Can't change or remeasure it as the information will be destroyed, but I'm not really sure about it...
@wesjohnson6833
@wesjohnson6833 2 года назад
No, Once measured the entanglement is broken
@the-lag-gamerita5446
@the-lag-gamerita5446 2 года назад
no.
@sryp3055
@sryp3055 Год назад
Im new to this kind of stuff but, in the example : 05:55 (I don't know if this is possible to happen or not) Is there possible that one electron on earth has a pair far apart (somewhere in the galaxy/existence itself)?
@isybeesy7148
@isybeesy7148 2 года назад
Thank you so much for this video it was great I understand evryfhing and I recommendet for you.
@nabilkholilulr990
@nabilkholilulr990 Год назад
Terimakasih telah menambahkan teks bahasa Indonesia di video anda. Saya sangat terbantu
@dragossorin85
@dragossorin85 2 года назад
Electron because it's so small is perceived as it is in a superposition state which in fact might be a high-frequency spin that could be detected as such in an electron if it would be amplified as a tennis ball for example, if somehow an electron could be amplified in size with a microscope or some other technics superposition should become readable as a high-frequency spin and used for the computational purpose, superposition might be an illusion induced by the fact that things at a very small scale are hard to be observed in they true state without a powerfull slow motion camera
@roadArt132
@roadArt132 11 месяцев назад
they can exist in their single state or in dual state depending upon perspective.. and there's a blind spot between one perspective and the next where they can exist as either. When a pair of electrons are generated, interact or share spatial proximity: this is pretty ambiguous. What context would a pair of electrons be "generated" in for them to acquire this relation between them? And why and how would a pair of electrons "interact" in order for them to acquire this same relation between them?
@pasan5gmail
@pasan5gmail Год назад
nicely explained video!
@RobynRuthThomas
@RobynRuthThomas Год назад
Wow. I wish I knew about this channel during school. I might have followed a different path
@criddo2568
@criddo2568 2 года назад
I said the same thing at the end, in the middle of this nice little infomation session!
@lionra4523
@lionra4523 3 месяца назад
Thank you!
@DeskScientiam
@DeskScientiam 3 года назад
Are two entangled objects always oppposite? For example, if an electron has an up spin then the other entangled atom will have downward spin, is it true for all cases?
@samsam2235
@samsam2235 3 года назад
That's exactly what quantum entanglement says.
@bridgetekcommunications332
@bridgetekcommunications332 3 года назад
But I think this is only at the electron level not the atomic level? Though an electron is part of an atom. But now I’d like to know if an atom has multiple electrons, are ALL of those electrons entangled with the other atom’s electrons or is it just 1 to 1? Also are electrons orbiting the same atom entangled with each other?
@user-kc7fv6ue4e
@user-kc7fv6ue4e Год назад
Great video! thank you!!
@Scienceabc
@Scienceabc Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@PMSAvenger1
@PMSAvenger1 2 года назад
Once electrons are entangled, can they be unentagled? In other words, if they are separated as you suggest and one is put in a lab on earth and another is in a lab on mars, is there a way they could become not entangled any longer so you don't be able to tell whether the motion is up or down? And, do all electrons become entangled, or can some stay in it's "singular" state?
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 Год назад
As soon as you measure the spin of particle A it is no longer entangled with particle B
@Cryptotone
@Cryptotone Год назад
@@nmarbletoe8210 does the spin of an atom stay the same after each observation or is it random?
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 Год назад
@@Cryptotone it gets randomized
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 Год назад
@@Cryptotone it's actually very interesting in detail. the spin does become randomized but the new value is entangled with the spin of the particle used to measure it if i understand it correctly, entanglmement never goes away, it is just traded from one particle to another
@BarryKort
@BarryKort Год назад
In the segment on the synchronized atomic clocks scattered around the world, that's approximately true if all the clocks were at mean sea level. But an atomic clock in Denver - a mile above mean sea level - will be ticking ever so slightly faster than the ones at mean sea level. Where the animation shows the pendulums are swinging in perfect synchrony, the one in Denver will have already reached its leftmost maximum and started swinging back down again as the ones at sea level are just reaching their leftmost maximum. Now apply this slight desynchronization to magnetic spin axis, where we admit of a Larmor Precession around the ergodic mean direction of the quantum magnetic spin axis. While the direction of the ergodic mean is fixed and unchanging, the phase of the Larmor Precession is time varying, and the presence of any gravitational gradients suffice to desynchronize the phase. This detail is what throws a monkey wrench into the derivation of Bell's Theorem. The derived inequality applies to the fixed term, but not to any time-varying perturbations around the ergodic mean.
@lukagobronidze8417
@lukagobronidze8417 2 года назад
great video thanks for making it! also I want to ask something and it would be great if anybody could clarify. so when entangled particles are in superposition i.e. - their spins are not determined, do they actually get determined when we observe or are they determined but we just don't know what they are before observation and because of that we call it undetermined, like in first example hamburger and hotdog are in fact in their own boxes and do not change positions (we would get the same result no matter the time of observation), its just we gain information, meaning that what is determined is not their actual physical position, but information about their position, so do I get it correctly? or its just examples simplicity and in quantum world spin actually is affected by our observation (and we would get different results at different times).
@escanor12223
@escanor12223 2 года назад
This also my question, did you get the answer?
@libEluLLah
@libEluLLah 2 года назад
i think it's the 2nd case because physics stops making sense at small scale
@nmarbletoe8210
@nmarbletoe8210 Год назад
They are undetermined until one is observed, then both are determined.
@chantalgosselin13
@chantalgosselin13 Год назад
@@nmarbletoe8210 my question arising from this is… if after their spin is determined. If A and B are seperated and A intersects with C (a new particle). Can A and C interact with each other, affecting their spin and therefore affecting B at a distant since A is connected to B? Therefore C could (indirectly at a distance) interact with B through A?
@me-jx5ct
@me-jx5ct 10 месяцев назад
​@@chantalgosselin13 No, the entanglement is destroyed after measurement. So if you measure A and it has spin up and therefor you know B has spin down, these are then definite properties. If A and C interact it is a new isolated system, and B is un effected, as far as I know.
@armarnijohnson7721
@armarnijohnson7721 Год назад
Question. I'm in no way a scientist or an expert, just generally curious of how the universe works. If quantum teleportation is possible, wouldn't that mean that teleportation in the physical sense would also be possible since john clauser, anton zeilinger and alain aspect proved the local universe isn't real. Essentially quantum entanglement is just the instantaneous travel of information. Wouldn't it be possible that physical material can teleport like atoms do since the physical material is just the information the atoms contain?
@pratikbhattarai1748
@pratikbhattarai1748 2 года назад
perfect explanation
@karlkarlsson9126
@karlkarlsson9126 Год назад
In Quantum Mechanics a particle is described by a wave, when a wave meets another wave they merge, and so you have two waves/particles entangled.
@simonsmith145
@simonsmith145 Год назад
Brilliant. I almost understand it!
@AdhvaithSane
@AdhvaithSane 2 года назад
Quantum Entanglement This single device has more processing power then your entire military infrastructure
@michaeld9682
@michaeld9682 2 года назад
In other words science has absolutely no idea how this works
@jaycollins7288
@jaycollins7288 7 месяцев назад
The bottom line here is we... at a fundamental level, are also energy, (information) which means that yes indeed we can teleport. This is a very common thing if you listen to Super Soldier Talk videos with James Rink.
@ramalingeswararaobhavaraju5813
Good sir
@thegiggler2
@thegiggler2 2 месяца назад
It's funny because the greatest physicists have stated over and over again that FTL communication isn't happening in entanglement. Glad they were disproven!
@winfordnettles3292
@winfordnettles3292 День назад
There will ALWAYS be more that we don't know than what we do know. It is the basic nature of knowledge.
@muhammadridho7680
@muhammadridho7680 3 года назад
Scientists: nothing is more faster than speed of light Also scientists: quantum entanglement information speed is more faster than the speed of light
@TorrentUK
@TorrentUK 2 года назад
Yeah, unfortunately this happens a lot when the science community tries to distil complex topics into something more consumable. Your statement about nothing can travel faster than the speed of light is completely correct and that is true of information too. The entangled particles are actually just one energy wave. When measured the 'two particles' referred to collapse to their respective states and would do so consistently with same given environmental conditions. In other words those states are to an extent predetermined and adhere the all the universal 'conservation of x' laws (energy, angular momentum, etc)
@NickGrittiFotografo
@NickGrittiFotografo 8 месяцев назад
No, you're wrong. Quantum entanglement does not transfer any information.
@winfordnettles3292
@winfordnettles3292 День назад
spukhaft fernwirkungen, I believe is the term to describe it by A. Einstein.
@jaypastrana416
@jaypastrana416 3 года назад
That's a nice way to put it.. But mostly, comicbooks already did this but not elaborately..
@swap2608
@swap2608 2 года назад
Super and most explained one
Далее
Carbonara under PRESSURE @Lionfield
00:44
Просмотров 3,9 млн
can you repeat it? #tatyanadiablo ##shorts
00:11
Просмотров 806 тыс.
Разница подходов
00:59
Просмотров 63 тыс.
ЭТО ВООБЩЕ НЕ БОЛЬНО !
00:15
Просмотров 320 тыс.
The Most Misunderstood Concept in Physics
27:15
Просмотров 13 млн
The Weird Experiment that Changes When Observed
6:23
Просмотров 924 тыс.
Quantum Entanglement Lab - by Scientific American
7:18
Pratik Cat6 kablo soyma
0:15
Просмотров 8 млн
wyłącznik
0:50
Просмотров 23 млн