Queen Elizabeth II's Historic Visit to China (1986) 

Can you tell me the name of the Chinese song at the starting of the video

I was just 1 year old and 3km away

Haha, I was also born in 1980 in Jiangsu. Now I'm in the 40s. Time's really flying.

i love you❤

The apartment would easily be worth over $100m today

what has she done to the history, let me think....nothing....

秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.

Yes Queen Elizabeth looked gorgeous when she was younger back she was alive.

Just think this time last year was the last whole month with Queen Elizabeth 2 in England.

秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.

There are man-made things visible from "space" but the Great Wall isn't one of them...at least not without special equipment.

😢 ni como preguntarle

秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.

Yo digo exactamente lo mismo. SE la ve muy incomoda.

The commentator is funny. 9:28 The commentator doesn't think much of the royal dragon throne.🤣 9:40 The interpreter with the limitless words.🤣

Can you tell me the name of the Chinese song of the beginning of the videos

​@@minnielee3399can you tell me the name of the Chinese song at the beginning of the video

@@seemasonigra829 Sorry I don't know it.

It doesn’t matter,coz UK is now a basketcase with homeless all over the London streets with decaying tube stations which is no comparison to the trains ,not even mentioning the bullet trains in China.

its called phak yur mamz

江南絲竹八大名曲 又名: Eight Masterpieces of Kong-Nam Folk Music

1.歡樂歌 Song of Joy 2.云慶 Celebration in Yunnan 3.四合如意 All is Happening as Desired 4.行街 Walking on the Streets 5.中花六板/薰風曲 Medium Fancy Six Beat 6.三六/梅花三落 Three Six 7.慢六板 Slow Six Beat 8.花三六 Fancy Six Beat

Thannk you ​@@user-ul4jp5ct8g

秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.

What is the name of the Chinese song at the starting of the video

Why should she cringe? Children dancing like robots were done all over the world 😂😂😂😂😂

How about the moon in the Commonwealth, is it rounder than in China?

I found the children's performance rather charming. That is what you do when you honour somebody who is held in high regard. You make too much of it.

以前是看着像…现在嘛…自己体会

当时一点也不像，整个社会朝气蓬勃，人民生活有目标，而且一天比一天好。

@@user-nb6qo7fu5j Yes, the camera captured that vitality and the strong feeling of hope, present at that time. We can now blame the sinister designs of the US and the collective West and how things are turning out today:- an observer from NZ.

@@user-nb6qo7fu5j 你现在感觉不朝气蓬勃生活没目标只能说明你自己这些年太失败，中国现在不缺朝气蓬勃生活有目标的人

Puyi died in 1969

有可能😂

Kissenger support China.

Poor but dignified.

@@francisheperi4180 By flattering Brits?

She is quoted as saying that she liked ''sensible shoes''. 😊

Indeed.

There is no translation provided by yutube, so I can't understand it and I won't be emotional. I like the history of China, rich or poor.

Large portions of snobbery and humour... British toffee-nosed humour, in equal measure. 😬

In Chinese, queen could also be translated to "王后/皇后“ ”refers to the emperor's/king's wife. In China and Japan, a ruler of the nation is considered an "emperor/empress".

@@joei8236 Nope. The video translated the Queen into "Empress" is because the Brits demanded the Chinese in HongKong to call their own monarch in the same way the Chinese would call the Chinese Emperor. They probably hired their translator from HongKong who was used to call her this way.

There were inappropriate snide remarks.

There is definitely some of that in the video, but there is a lot of british humor in it, too.

A little bit of both: snobbery and humour, British humour. 😬

I admire about the queen. I strongly believe there are many people who believe like me

Uffffff

Maybe you ,don't care but many people do ! Who are you to speak for people ? The Queen je dead but I still admire and love her ! I am French...

女王是善良的、宽容的、乐观的、坚强的人。当年的欢迎活动虽然是中国政府组织的，但是人们从内心尊重这位女性。今天，大多数中国人依然对女王充满敬意❤🙏

nobody cares about you😂