Submit your FEATURE Film Screenplay: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/competitions-feature Have a short screenplay you wish to turn into a film or get feedback from Oscar-winning screenwriters? Submit it to our shorts competition: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/competitions-shorts Have an idea for a TV series? Have you written a TV pilot for it? Submit it to our screenplay competition: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/competitions-tv Download Free Screenplays here: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/scripts Visit our website for all things screenwriting: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/
He has the 'balls to admit it' once someone else mentions it. That's not really the same. Still a great director in his own right, but that doesn't mean he doesn't 100% shamelessly steal from other great directors.
100%. Nailed it. Different medium but I'm a big fan of Oasis. Noel Gallagher has always gotten shit for using ideas from other people's songs. Stealing. What I love is he says "yeah, I heard that section of that song, liked it, took it and made a much better entire song from it". Works for me. No one is purely unique.
He also admitted that the script got influence from The Killing (1956), starring Sterling Hayden, another heist movie, one of the first movies Stanley Kubrick directed. P. D: Can't believe how old Tarantino is now, I'm not ready yet to see his final film.
Such and amazing move the killing I saw it on classic tv Channel he sure did get inspiration from it if you have a chance check out lone wolf and cub its definitely got kill bill vibes
@✪Hidden I definitely agree with everything you said, I can't see the release day of his final film, it will be a great farewell but also a great loss for cinema, but I think he deserves it, he's not in his 30s anymore, he's now in his 60s.
Yes! What most tend to misunderstand is everything we consume is influenced or "stolen" from something else. There are probably hundreds of movie references and themes Tarantino has subconsciously put in his films that make them what they are! That's why they're masterpieces.
Peter Weller was doing a short film and he wanted to do a shot that he loved in Goodfellas. So he called Scorsese to ask permission. And Scorsese said to Weller “Use whatever you want, there isn’t an original shot in that movie.”
Reputedly, when Akira Kurosawa saw Sergio Leone’s A Fistful of Dollars, he sat back in his chair at the end of the screening and said, “A very good film. Where’s my 15%?”
Right? Im sure Shakespeare is wonder where is 15% cut. I love Kurosawa he was very much inspired by Shakespeare. Throne of Blood (Macbeth) The Bad Sleep Well (Hamlet) Ran (King Lear) "No idea's original, there's nothing new under the sun It's never what you do, but how it's done" -Nas
Pretty different tbh. The ending is the same but the context leading to the ending is different Fistful of dollars is nearly a shot for shot copy with exact sequences through the entire film being copied
.. And KUROSAWA WON ! By law, he eventually got all the royalties from the Leone film on the Japanese market. The difference is the Italian maestro didn’t make his very trade-mart out of it, like QT. (It’s quite well-known about ‘Once upon a Time in the West’, that both his young writers, obsessive cinephiles Bertolucci & Argento, secretly filled the treatment with references to their own favorite western classics. So, Leone remained mostly unaware of that childish joke until he read the first serious reviews, after the release)…
@@halfxbreed23 The concept of originality itself is a little misunderstood I think. Everybody is influenced by others, you take influence from the people you look up to and then do your own take on that. Kubrick started by doing film noir thrillers like the countless ones that were around in the 50s and Coppola started with Roger Corman doing low budget horror movies, with the years they perfected their style and started incorporating their own ideas of how this already preexisting concepts should be done. Gangster movies were already a big thing before The Godfather but they were never done like it before.
All good art is created like this. This the same as Dave Grohl talking about how he used disco beats in Nirvana. Everyone can listen to disco and watch hundreds of foreign movies but there's only one Dave Grohl and one Quentin Tarantino.
Tarantino has done this in every movie he's made, he's a massive film buff who literally owns the entire film store he first worked at. Which means he's seen the more obscure, and foreign movies that unfortunately alot of Americans haven't seen yet so of course he sees some stuff he likes and decides welp I'll use that. I don't think it's quite stealing, but then again some things are shot for shot added. Atleast it's specific moments and not entire plots or characters.
It is a bit stealing, alright, but I don't think Tarantino cares about his movies being anything other than f-ing cool. In a talk between movie directors he proposed "police story 3" as the movie he would send to space for aliens to find. (Nearly all other agreed on 2001 space odissey because ART). His argument as why that would be a sensitive choice: " I don't care if you're green or have 6 limbs, if you see Jackie jumping through that glass you are going to be like in awe of what that brother did right there" (or sth like that) He's very good at having fun doing cinema. Would watch him a thousand times before Villeneuve
He reminds me so much of a producer to a hip hop song. The way he watches movies and chips them up in his mind and creates something entirely new in his head is like a J Dilla beat
@@garnetnard4284 it's a perfect analogy if you understand anything about hip hop and appreciate it as an art form. Like a hip hop producer, Quentin Tarantino unashamedly "samples" small parts of other movies and turns them into something completely new and unrecognizable.
Really? I think he’d be less than impressed… he had a original idea and concept and this “hotshot” comes out of nowhere and riffs on it? Where I’m from they used to call that biting someone else’s style and it was frowned upon. As a filmmaker myself I’d be mad as hell if someone did that to me. Just saying.
@@MightyMightyMaino dumbest fuxking thing I’ve read all day. Ringo Lam is nowhere near the filmmaker Quentin is. All your favorite directors borrowed from their favorite films.
Yeah. At least Tarantino makes it interesting. Joker, for example, relies too heavily upon, and doesn't do justice to, its inspirations. Garbage film. Also, did you notice two references to certain 70s films in Pulp Fiction? (one is during the Butch/Vincent confrontation and the other is when Marsellus' is standing over the wounded rapist cop)
I know exactly what he means; often while songwriting, I'll take a short sample of melody or chord structure from a song I like, then play with it and change it and mold it and expand around it until it's unrecognizable from the song it came from; then when I point it out to you, that part will be obvious, but until I do, it's hidden enough that you'd probably never know. I did this with a small line of melody from "Feed The Birds" from Mary Poppins, and turned it into a song called "Save Me and Love Me".
This is the aspect people don’t understand about Tarantino’s films. He is not at all hiding that he’s borrowing ideas from other movies. There’s absolutely zero chance of that with how blatant it is. What his movies do is take these premises and indulge on them, celebrate them, and then in turn celebrate the transformative magic of movies and moviemaking. Reservoir dogs is essentially just a movie where you get to know the characters. It’s like if you take the robbery and robbery planning scene from goodfellas, then extrapolated and dissected it for a feature length picture.
What makes Reservoir Dogs interesting is that it never actually shows the heist. It only shows before and after the heist. It is about the cause and effect of the heist for the characters not about the actual heist.
All films and art, music, etc, are derived from older pieces. Whether it be music or painting, artists will make original works with inspiration from those that came before them.
QT always admitted he's borrowed, lifted, emulated other films. Ultimately creative talent must stem from inspiration AND trial an error. Nothing worse than one attempting to sound/look like their heros and falling flat. BAD EXAMPLE: recent film 'Den of Thieves' is a poor man's HEAT & Usual Suspects.. down to it's CRINGE worthy "twist-ending" (ok tho' fallin short of Mann's HEAT shoot out it was highlight of film). GOOD EXAMPLE: Little Richard's song "Keep A' Knockin" drum intro.. John Bonham of Led Zeppelin clearly used it for intro to their song Rock and Roll... but which do we like more? ANOTHER GOOD EXAMPLE: QT's camera pan during EAR SLICE was borrowed from Pay Phone scene in Taxi Driver. BOTH songs BOTH films are classics ..but which one of both sets impacted us more? People/critics undeservedly made QT the poster boy for cinematic theft and violence in film.. must be exhausting to continually defend oneself against such false claims. I really hope he continues making movies past #10.
Musicians take from other songs and make changes to create an entirely different song. It's called "Artistic License." Tarantino took an idea that was only part of a different movie and created something completely different. There's a huge difference between borrowing part of an idea, and actually stealing someone's idea. Almost every artist gets inspiration from other people's work. No harm.. No foul.
@ADah Bafa yes, watching SW and watching The Hidden Fortress are different experiences but it's well known Lucas used it as a basis. It follows the exact same beats, dressed up in sci-fi.
The title of this video is clickbaity and misleading. Everybody ‘steals’ ideas to a degree. That’s what adaptation is, or to a lesser degree, just being influenced by something. But Tarantino did not PLAGIARISE it. The scenes are different. The characters are different. The story is different. The films are different.
Apparently there are these exercises that ppl can do (usually when young) where you push your tongue forward on your palate and it pushes your face forward and makes you more attractive and keeps you from having a concave face. QT might have benefited from it.
I love how deep he explains all aspects of his movies!! Also, I love how he's willing to have intelligent conversations with people who have different opinions than himself!! A lot of celebrities aren't like that anymore!!
The last 10 minutes? There’s a lot of scenes from this movie that he stole. I respect that he’s honest about it though. Almost every director steals from other places.
QT made his story from the last 10min of 龙虎风云. In terms of narration, he chose a very different way to tell the story. Reservoir Dogs the movie puts each character in the room firstly, and streamly shows threads to audience to know who they are and what they want. Until the middle of the movie when audience have already knows what is happening here, the fighting show is on. This is a brand-new way to for movie, it is more likely from Hitchcok and other suspense novels.
Like Sam Hyde has said, his work is buried underneath so many influences that it has become his own. Whether you take one taste from one influence or saturate from several, what matters about your art is that it is essentially yours. It's your enchilada, you can use others' ingredients and techniques so long as you don't take their entire recipe
Both reservoir dogs and Pulp Fiction were absolutely ground breaking when they came out. Tarantino references all kinds of cinema so there are familiar notes but the overall presentation was completely unique.
I hate when people complain about Tarantino "stealing". It ain't called stealing, its called good art. He's a massive film buff and just expresses his love of cinema in every frame of every one of his films. That's what makes him great.
Tarantino has never been shy about his influences and about burrowing ot points, ideas, sometimes entire scenes. But he always makes it his own and his movies are nothing if not original.
Tarantino has literally never pretended that he exclusively thinks movies up from scratch. His movies are homages to the films he himself loves, and he’s always willing to sing the praises of those films.
I see Tarantino almost like a hip-hop producer, using old school samples to create something completely new. Also he became known when Hip-Hop started to become huge. He makes collage of other films. What he brings though is really unique and interesting dialogues and very good writing characters.
He stole a lot from naked lunch to make pulp fiction. Like A LOT!!! One of the best books I’ve ever read. FYI there’s gay stuff in it so if you’re in the closet don’t read it. Those passages where he takes lines from the story you’ve already read to make the brion gyson cut ups are some of my favorite lines in any medium, ever. Edit* I often wonder if the homosexual parts of pulp fiction were deliberately made grotesque to appeal to the audience of that time. Naked lunch was literally (among many other things) a comparison between vanilla homosexual encounters and murderous and violent heterosexual encounters. I’ve never heard it spoken of as such but to me it was a great way to show that it’s not the hole you stick it in it’s the way you treat the other person you’re having sex with that makes it good or bad.
This is how everything advances. People build on the progress of others. That's the beauty of human advancement. Use something as a basis and build on it
He didn't admit stealing the idea from it, in the first 20 seconds he literally says there was a scene he took from it, but just a snippet, not the whole idea or movie
That actually gives me an insight into tarantino’s process: his films always have a certain mood to them, different for every film. Maybe that’s what he starts with-a mood and an aesthetic that he develops the film around.
All the Chinese webtoons? All of their cartoons comics literally are the same. They all have black haired male leads with red eyes living in the North. And a revenge quest
QT is such a film/movie geek even people who thought they were to had to reconsider alot after a single conversation with him lol. And his enthusiasm and passion about the art is completely sincere. I like QT, I do think hes overrated, but damn if Im not happy he came on the scene when he did. Thanks Quentin, even though you were never able to top Reservoir Dogs I had fun watching you try.👍
The entire movie A Fistful of Dollars is basically a remake of Yojimbo by Akira Kurosawa. It doesn’t change the fact the sequels For A few more dollars and the good the bad and the ugly were original and great.
Every film director has taken or stolen from other film directors, only uncreative people will say that the great directors of our time or the past 50 years will say they stole when in fact great creators take inspiration from other great creators from the past to make a modernized version, and to me that's not stealing that's showing respect, I'd love to be an innovator of cinema so well respected that future creators use that to make their creation even better, or just as great as the past generation.
There is nothing wrong with inspiration, this is what movies are lacking these days, without inspiration there would be no good music or movies, everyone subconsciously takes ideas off other people and they’re liars if they say they don’t! Maybe this is why movies suck now days because they’re afraid of not being original
He didn't "steal" anything. Non creative people don't understand that "pure originality" is impossible and every creative person "steals" from multiple sources, that's what makes them creative. Trying to be purely original will always lead to subconscious "stealing"
There are several ideas to Reservoir Dogs and Tarantino has borrowed them an put them together into something new. One important idea in R.D, perhaps more important than City of Fire, came from Stanley Kubrick's "The Killing".
I love when film makers make entire films because of one small thing (except in Tarantino's case being 10mins lol). Like you sometimes watch a film and you just get to THAT scene where you "yeah this was the whole reason they made this" and it's just impressive to see the work that goes around building a coherent story to fit that in.
I love Asian Crime Movies! Especially, S. Korean Crime flicks. "I Saw The Devil" started it all. American directors and producers copy S. Korean movies quite frequently and the movies they copy are never as good at character development, action sequences and the fine details that make S Korean movies the cream of the crop. Hong Kong Flickr r gr8 too
On another note, The Departed won Best Picture among multiple academy awards and was almost a shot for shot remake of Infernal Affairs, a Hong Kong Triad movie.
It was the 3rd movie he tried to make and no one would pay for True Romance or Natural Born Killers so he sold those scripts for stupidly cheap amounts of money just to shoot RD. Turning that 10 minutes into an entire movie was a brilliant way to save tons of money on sets and special effects and at the same time get your style across with tension and dialogue at the forefront.
All Tarants movies are like tributes and homages, pop culture and genre mash ups done out of total love, appreciation and respect for film and cinema in general.
At last the TRUTH ! And it has to come from Tarantino himself because nobody took the time to actually see and compare the two movies ! I was really tired of hearing for years that Reservoir Dogs is "litterally a remake" of City on Fire. If you've seen City on Fire, you can see some similarities near the end sure but it's mostly a very different movie (with a romance, goofy comedy bits and all that) !!!