RABBINIC JUDAISM is not Temple Judaism! 

In the Canaanite pantheon, idols were often worshipped with a name corresponding to their function. Ba'al literally means "lord", and those who worshipped this idol were literally worshipping the concept of lordship. Moloch literally means "king", and those who worshipped him worshipped the meaning of the word king. The word Yeshua simply translates to "salvation", and those who worship him worship the concept of salvation. When John refers to "the Word made flesh", he is talking about the fact that Yeshua embodied in his personhood the meaning of his name - the concept of salvation. And it's easy to see how this concept is related to the concept of a messiah. The real-world messiah who brought about the construction of the Second Temple was of course Cyrus the Great, and what he brought to the captive Jews was indeed salvation, deliverance, the ability to escape from a bad situation into a good one. The signs you point to are telling, because they explain what Yeshua was delivering the people *from*. He died, and after his death the animal sacrifices in the Temple were no longer received. The salvation which he represents is deliverance from the need for blood sacrifice as a means of atoning for sin. Indeed, this is precisely what the Ebionites believed. Those who worship the concept of salvation by following in the footsteps of this human idol have transformed the world dramatically. Salvation is about leaving something bad behind, and it is impossible not to see the ways in which those following Christian values have consistently delivered progress in both social and technological terms. And yet, as we witness those who believe in infinite progress seek deliverance from immutable aspects of their physical person, it's clear that we have reached the end of this particular road. What will need to come next is salvation *from the desire for salvation* - that is the ability to happily accept a good situation that might not be perfect but which is the best possible one given the constraints imposed upon us by material reality. From a Christian perspective, I imagine that the arrival of the end-time Messiah (who they will view as the Second Coming of Yeshua) will represent a cataclysm on the order of the contents of the Book of Revelation, because it will mean a dramatic shift in perspective. Whereas Christians have for the past 2,000 years sought to distance themselves from Jewish Law as much as possible, the outcomes of this project on the world at large clearly demonstrate the fact that "maximize individual liberty" is actually not the optimal strategy for cultivating widespread cooperation and maximizing human happiness. Someone will need to arise to save them from their worship of salvation. From the perspective of the Jewish people, who rejected Yeshua as per God's plan, it will likely be a surprise to see his purpose in eliminating blood sacrifices fulfilled. But the common eschatology here is much less bombastic than that of Christianity precisely because from a Jewish perspective the messiah will bring not salvation from the way things were, but rather restoration and continuation of tradition. Ultimately, these two faiths represent two fundamental and opposing aspects of human psychology - the desire for things to change and the desire for things to remain the same. In exposing the folly of worshipping change as an idol, this project will ultimately achieve its goal in uniting humans behind a common understanding of the value of cleaving to tradition, which, without such an eager exploratory drive to oppose it, will also appear far less stifling to those who derive greater joy from progress than from conservation.

The Yom Kippur ceremony was put in place after the deaths of Nadab and Abihu. Since Jesus took away that sin by His own offering, that ceremony was to be set aside.

@@MichaelPetek Jesus is a god-killer - that is his function within the larger cosmology. Yet despite many attempts, his followers will never succeed in destroying his own religion. He is a pawn, an instrument of the One True God who created him.

@@MichaelPetek "And this shall be to you a law for all time: In the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, you shall practice self-denial; and you shall do no manner of work, neither the citizen nor the alien who resides among you." "It shall be a sabbath of complete rest for you, and you shall practice self-denial; it is a law for all time." "This shall be to you a law for all time: to make atonement for the Israelites for all their sins once a year." It is clear that the sacrificial aspect of this ceremony became invalid after the death of Yeshua, given the fact that sacrificial offerings were no longer accepted. Yet God is emphatic about the fact that the self-denial aspect of Yom Kippur will be required "for all time".

Off topic question. What made you choose Roman Catholicism over Eastern Orthodoxy?

Take a look at One for Israel

Oh yes! And the channel: ‘Intellectual Catholicism’

The Schneerson episode mirrored the claims around Jesus... that branch of Judaism showed the contradiction in Judaism. They are open to all the divine claims of another yet not Jesus. Other sects within Judaism criticized the sect around Schneerson, but they are still seen as Jews.

May the Almighty guide your steps!

Catholicism is the same church that Jesus started. Protestants didn´t even exist, much less american churches. At first they were all jews. You can read in Acts how they had bishops, presbiters (priests), some married and some "like Paul" meaning single (which stayed the custom for the west). They even had a ritual of imposing hands to make new priests. Catholicism has also, like rabbinic judaism, oral tradition. When Paul spoke against tradition, it was when jew converts still relied for salvation on the Law of Moses which meant that Christ sacrifice was in vain. When he spoke of traditions to keep (greek word paradosis), he relied on oral and writen tradition, which they taught to the people jews and gentiles. That is why Ignatius of Antioch, disciple of John, in his Letter to the Smyrnæans wrote (d.c.107): "Where the bishop is to be seen, there let all his people be; just as wherever Jesus Christ is present, we have the Catholic Church". Protestants centuries later translated that word paradosis into "doctrine" just to make the efford of denying "tradition", but now in the 21rst century you can check out interlineal bibles yourself.

If you believe that the absence of a temple means the end of Judaism, then you must also believe that Second Temple Judaism is not a continuation of First Temple Judaism, since the temple was destroyed prior to the Babylonian Exile. We who believe in the possibility of continuity of practice in the absence of a Temple are those who are capable of drawing a direct lineage from First to Second to Third Temple Judaism.

@@DavidDHorstman This is a misunderstanding - For one, the first destruction was simply nothing like the second destruction. There is no physical Temple on the mount, there are no levitical sacrifices, all of which is crucial for the Old Covenant - and it has been this way for 2000 years. In 33AD the New Covenant was initiated in which is Third Temple Judaism, thus ofc I don't believe Judaism ended, but instead is what today is known as the Catholic Church.

@@lukewilliams448 In your understanding then, "Third Temple Judaism" means rejecting Jewish Law and not rebuilding the Temple?

​​@@lukewilliams448Also, Daniel 7:27 says the 4th Kingdom, the Roman Empire, would be given to the saints of the Holy One. So, if where you worship doesn't look like the converted Roman Empire, it's NOT the true Church of the Messiah.

@@DavidDHorstman That is not my understanding, no. The sacrifice of Calvary fulfilled the ceremonial and sacrificial part of Jewish law and perfected it in the New Covenant, the most important example is in the sacrificial part of Jewish Law, in the Old Covenant it is the Levitical priesthood which offered bloody sacrifices in the Temple, but in the New Covenant it is the Priesthood of Christ which offers the Eucharist (in an unbloody manner) which is the Body and Blood of Christ (the sacrifice spoken of by Malachi). The moral law remains completely, but Messiah took on himself the punishment that the Law calls for. The Third Temple was raised on the third day, it is the mystical body, the light to the nations that converts the world to the one true God - essentially Temple Judaism made universal for all nations to come to God.

You should watch the content by Suan Sona and Michael Lofton regarding the papacy.

@@TheJewishCatholic Suan Sona is a respectable person, However Micheal loften was good. He had great guest speakers now he’s to arrogant for his own good. There is a book I would recommend to you if you are ever interested. It’s called the Rise and Fall of the Papacy. I really struggled with the different types of mass the Catholic Church has. You have trad Catholics, old Catholics, new age Catholics, Eastern Catholics (which the priest can have a wife) The Catholic Church teaches that priest are to remain unmarried but if you’re an eastern Catholic priest you can have a wife… norvus ordo may as well be a Protestant church service. It’s sad the direction the church is headed.

@@jrtoler69orthodoxy isn’t orthodox. Priest aren’t supposed to be married the Bible teaches and even the fathers of the church like Jerome and others condemn those who want that rule to be changed. “Orthodoxy” is composed of 16 autocephalous churches with an ethnic emphasis and at war with each other which are unable to meet for an ecumenical since they abandoned the Papacy, only a father can call the brothers to the table to solve their issues. While Catholicism isn’t exempt of scandal and issues this same scandals and corruption are present in “orthodoxy” at an even greater proportion. Reconsider coming back to the true faith since is a Christian dogma that no one can get saved outside this house.

@@RedWolf5 umm no, priest not being married got changed later on. And you say that they aren’t supposed to married, well what about the eastern rite Catholics who have married priest? Also papal supremacy has NEVER been a thing, Papal primacy yes. And why would you want 1 man to govern a whole body of people vs having different patriarchs to do it? You see leaning on one for the job other than Christ is wrong. If that man is in error then he is leading the whole church to error, with the patriarchs you can’t lean on just one persons understanding which makes less room for error. Catholicism has its beauty and admit that, but it has gotten away from what the church is supposed to be. Mass looks more and more like a circus. I still love the rosary but I have a prayer rope too.

@@jrtoler69If you think one man could lead the Church into error, then you doubt the power of the Holy Spirit. What’s your opinion on the Eastern Orthodox Church changing teachings on divorce and remarriage, contraception, and ordination of deaconess’s? Not to mention the veneration of Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus.

I think you touch on the heart of the dichotomy. But to reduce the function of Judaism to merely the physical sacrifice in the temple is to distort history. The laws in the Torah were also observed by Second Temple Jews as a means of proactively preventing sin, though the precise mechanism of their function was unknown to observers at the time. What we see in practice is a division between these two aspects of Jewish worship. On the one hand, the spirit of physical sacrifice as a means of atoning for past sins committed is upheld by the Christian tradition. On the other, the spirit of deep ritual observance as a means of preventing future sin is upheld by the Jewish tradition. Over these past 2,000 years each side has carried out the difficult task of reverse-engineering the given aspect of this ancient faith separately and on their own terms. The Christian establishment has committed major sins in the name of its beliefs, including often against the Jewish people, as a means of getting all of that bloodlust out of their system. See the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, the Conquistadors. A modern-day Christian is as tame as a lamb, the sort of person prepared to live in eternal peace in the world to come. And this is because this stream focused its efforts on trying things and making mistakes, within the context that all of their sins have been paid for by a singular blood sacrifice (that of Jesus). By contrast, the Jewish establishment has gone to great lengths to refine and build upon the ritual and legal aspects of Judaism as a means of getting this aspect of Ancient Israelite religion to function entirely without sacrifice. Hopefully you can see how this neatly parallels the Christian effort to get the sacrificial aspect of Ancient Israelite religion to function entirely without observance of Jewish Law. In short, the question you pose is a false dichotomy - the answer is both.

​@@DavidDHorstman What enormous sins have Christians committed against Jews?... Btw, Look at the book of Daniel, which prophecies EXACTLY when Messiah would come. Jesus fulfilled that prophecy exactly. ​​Also, Daniel 7:27 says the 4th Kingdom, the Roman Empire, would be given to the saints of the Holy One. So, if where you worship doesn't look like the converted Roman Empire, it's NOT the true Church of the Messiah.

@@wms72 I'm referring to things like the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and so forth.

​@@DavidDHorstman The first Christians were also persecuted Jewish people anyways.

⁠@@DavidDHorstmanWhat about the enormous sins Jews have committed against Christians? Blood libels, the Holodomor, well poisonings, facilitation of replacement of Christian populations in the West?

The end of temple worship and the end of sacrifice are not synonymous. The Third Temple will be built.

@@DavidDHorstman these prophecies have been fulfilled. “Destroy this temple and in three days i will raise it up. “

@@jperez7893 Right - Jesus' death brought about the end of ritual sacrifice. Which is why Judaism has evolved to no longer require it. I'm not sure why you think that continuing the legacy of something which Jesus himself abhorred is going to bring favor upon you.

@@DavidDHorstman Not a single prophecy in entire Bible about 2nd Temple being destroyed and another one being built *NOT ONE*

@@pepepena1937 Oh hello again - I believe you've attacked me in precisely this same way before. Tell me, where in the Bible does Jesus instruct his followers to attack the Jewish people in hopes of crushing their dreams? Call me ill-informed, but your behavior here seems to broadly contradict everything that he taught.

I’ll have to get together with him soon!

The Latin Rite is effectively the Temple Sacrifice re-establishef by Christ fused with the Traditions and Customs of Latin Culture .

@@TheJewishCatholicWhat is the name Catholics call God? Can they pronounce the sacred name?

@@AsenathMoonthere is not restriction in pronunciation… but the true pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton is obscure so you will not really hear anyone claiming a pronunciation. We do know that Yeshua is the name given to the Logos, the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity. I have my personal views on the name but I don’t make it public.

I recommend you check out the information laid out by Jimmy Akin. He goes over the dates (birth and death) of Yeshua of Nazareth. He does over a lot of data that confirms what I’ve stated here.

Absolutely!

because the temple is destroyed. what type of stupid question is that? all sacrifices have ceased because there is no temple for them to take place at. and Jesus did not rebuild the temple in order for that to resume.

@@alxhnaiv He says the Talmud said 40 years before the destruction, the signs ceased.

Don’t worry, apparently this individual didn’t watch the video. Well, they were not sure. They believe there were no more truly righteous people. They note that the last Tzadik (righteous man), Shimon the Righteous, passed before this all went down. Then they claim that the temple was ultimately destroyed because the Jews had unwarranted hatred…. Which is partially true. The majority of the rabbis hated Yeshua because they thought He was a fraud.

@@Jim-Mc no, it was simply because there was no proper place to do the offering. and that has remained the case. don't believe everything you hear online. you can look up what I'm saying to see if I am lying or not, you know?

@@alxhnaiv While I understand that a sect of Cohanim is prepared to resume ritual sacrifice at any time, I suspect that worship at the Third Temple will more closely resemble worship in a contemporary synagogue.

Im a former Messianic and most people that usually go into Messianic Judaism are Protestants and that's a problem because they have been detached from the original Apostolic churches (Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity) So when they see Rabbinic Judaism or Judaism as a whole they are attracted to it because their understanding of basic Christian theology is so weak they jump over to Judaism. I've seen a few deny Jesus/ Yeshua and it's sad and hope they repent their denial before its too late.

@@famicommike9014 sadly you’re right. I’ve seen close friends of mine who were in the Messianic Jewish movement and Hebrew Roots eventually end up in Talmudic Judaism and deny Yeshua.

​@@ThaKingzsouljahPR777it's because a lot of them come from a weak Christian background and if they see their faith as a Messianic get destroyed by an antimissionary then they'll jump to Judaism. And a lot of those antimissionaries convert a lot more former Christians and Messianics by selling them Rabbinic / Talmudic Judaism which I myself ALMOST fell for. And some of their tactics are almost as bad as hazing but spiritual.

@@famicommike9014 you’re not wrong. I thank The Lord for The Holy Spirit for preserving me in His Truth.

@@ThaKingzsouljahPR777 or at best and I've seen them do this is they will destroy a Gentile's faith where they are part of that Noachide stupidity that was created to keep Gentiles from becoming Jews. Blessed O Lord, Their God, King of the Universe. I'm just opening up and sharing this because I've seen this myself too and glad my faith in Yeshua was preserved from the rabbinic or talmudic lunacy.

Glad you have found the content useful. I have spoken about it. In the form/and part of a review. Somewhere in the videos 😅

Let's not forget Tobit 12:9. It is a flawed criticism.

Both of those scriptures simply tell us what God would rather us do. He would rather us be obedient, he would rather us be merciful, he would rather us be giving because doing such things, righteous things, fills us with God’s graces. They create a snowball effect of living holy lives. Against righteous deed, there is no law. This is why we are called to live by the Spirit, to have ability to reject sin.

@@TheJewishCatholic I am skeptical of that interpretation given the words of Pope Leo the Great. Quote"Let no one therefore, dearly beloved, flatter himself on any merits of a good life, if works of charity be wanting in him, and let him not trust in the purity of his body, if he be not cleansed by the purification of almsgiving. For “almsgiving wipes out sin,” kills death, and extinguishes the punishment of perpetual fire." Good works done is grace take away sin. Now there is the thing. In the OT times this grace came from the future sacrifice of Yeshua which is outside time as well as taking place in 33AD.

Doing what is just and right is NOT what temporal punishment means! Temporal punishment is the consequences of sin, which may involve sufferings and trials. After repentance and Confession, temporal punishment can be remitted through personal penance, and/or a plenary indulgence. Personal penance, in some cases of lives of the Saints, sometimes involves a lifetime of voluntary austerities, fasting, etc., what St. Benedict called “a perpetual Lent.” (RB 49) But as St. Benedict also said, few have such virtue. Plenary indulgences can be granted by the Church because of her God-given authority to bind and loose. They usually involve doing an act of piety, such as praying certain prayers, or works of mercy and charity, or an act of penance, plus going to Confession, receiving the Eucharist, and being detached from all sin. By the grace of God, we should always be doing what is right and just, and not consider it a drudgery or a punishment, but doing it out of love for God and neighbor.

@@MarilynBoussaid-yd1vk Doing what is just and right includes penance, fasting, alms. It must be done after turning from sin in order to regain our life (righteous state) back as stated in the verse.

Very cordial 👍

Daniel 7:27 says the 4th Kingdom, the Roman Empire, would be given to the saints of the Holy One. So, if where you worship doesn't look like the converted Roman Empire, it's NOT the true Church of the Messiah.

@@wms72 You make an interesting point. Here we have Jesus, a Jewish man, who dies right before the Roman Empire scatters his people, and goes on to become the center of a religion which would both conquer and outlive the Roman Empire. It's almost as though, in shifting the field of battle in this way, he sought to create an opportunity for the Jewish people to conquer via spirit those people who once conquered them by might. Baruch Hashem.

My brother, you're so close to the truth and you know it. Keep searching your Jewish sources, no matter where you look you will find Him.

@@DavidDHorstman have you ever read Daniel 7:25 regarding the last of the 10 horns? Daniel 7:25 And he will speak words against the Most High, and he will oppress the high holy ones **and he will think to change the times and the law** and they will be delivered into his hand until a time, two times, and half a time. Where have I heard that before? Hebrews 7:12 For when the priesthood is changed **the law must be changed also** Perhaps Hebrews 7:12 was the fulfillment of Daniel 7:25? Your thoughts?

😁

I see what you are saying.

Glad it was helpful!

I'm inclined to agree with your approach of watching and waiting. But I don't think it's a simple either-or. Keeping the commandments is challenging. Even the most observant of Jews make mistakes sometimes, and indeed, there is no universal agreement on what the ideal set of practices actually is. This is of course the point - the task to be completed during the exile is to distill out the essence of the Law in a manner our ancestors clearly failed to do. I cannot imagine a world in which everyone adopts these practices. It just seems completely unrealistic, and moreover, I would say that it's unnecessary. The Commandments bring freedom - following them allows you to train your instincts and become capable of righteous action completely independently. But there are many in this world who would prefer to follow someone else's example, to define themselves not as an independent entity but a cell in a larger organism. These people have reached agreement that the best thing for them to do is to follow the example of a Jewish man, cleaving to his words as closely as if they had come directly from God himself. And indeed, even those outside the faith pretty much universally agree with the secular distillation of his teachings, including the famous "all men are created equal" which would feel right at home in Paul's letter to the Galatians (and which would appear completely nonsensical to any member of any pre-Christian society anywhere in the world). I understand why it is necessary for Christians to try and dunk on Judaism - their faith provides them a means of channelling their bloodlust into theological combat, to transform their desire for domination into domination by proxy vis-a-vis the Christian religion (or even their specific denomination within it, depending on the person). But as a Jew it's clear to me that the task they are completing is nothing more and nothing less than preparing the world for the leadership of Moshiach. And indeed, I expect that when he does come, everyone subscribing to Christian theology or even Christian secular philosophy will follow after him as though he really were the "second coming" of a guy who died 2,000 years ago.

Only the intro.

May Adonai bless you and keep you

Perhaps some day. If God wills it.

Your comment is all over the place and you seem to be making several assumptions and points. While I wish I could reply to it all, there is no time. But I implore you learn about the Catholic Faith from actual Catholic sources. Check out the Catechism of the Catholic Church to know what we actually believe and practice. If for nothing more than to not make claims that make you appear uninformed in the topics you attempt to cover.

Wow. What a distorted opinion of the Church found by Jesus. The Catholic Church. Make an effort to read study official Catholic magisterial teaching.

I never claimed the Talmud attributed this to Yeshua of Nazareth. I stated two facts: 1) the sacrifices stop being accepted 2) Yeshua began His public ministry. Both happened at the same time and while you may want to call it a coincidence, I see too much that points to the contrary.

No one reverted… were were fulfilled in the Catholic Faith God gave us.

​@@TheJewishCatholicנכון ! I was alluding to the "Third Temple Movement," חבר.

@@TheJewishCatholicWhat temple is Paul talking about in regards to lawless one?

@@pepepena1937this could be “interpreted” in many ways. It could be a physical temple or it could be a figurative temple. Figurative because there is no “seat” in the Temple. Figurative because the idea is that this “man” makes himself to be God though opposing God and the commandments of the Lord and thus the “temple” can refer to the hearts of the people where God is meant to reign. But it could be physical.

@@TheJewishCatholic Actually there’s no prophecy of Second Temple being destroyed and another one being built. What’s the Catholic take in regards to Jesus body, do they believe the body itself is GOD or what dwelled in that body? Similar to the Ark of the covenant except made of flesh and bones made by GOD instead of wood made by man

He won’t lol. But it would be nice.

​@@TheJewishCatholic If he converted to Christianity than just by association thousands of Jews trusting his intellect and conversion would convert. Same with Denis Prager.

Great excuse 😂😂😂

I would offer that this act of destruction occurred because the Jewish people were righteous enough to begin the process of learning to connect to God without the ritual sacrifices occurring at the temple, and that it will be rebuilt as a center of prayer and song once this process has been completed.

Rabbinic Judaism didn’t exist at that time. It was Temple Judaism. As for the Church, it is a continuation of Israel, not a replacement. It is comprised of Jews and folks of all nations, all united as Israel in Christ. This is what we learn from Ephesians 2.

@@TheJewishCatholic There is legal continuity from Israel before the destruction of the Temple and Israel afterwards. The only change was that the destruction of the Temple put into abeyance, by reason of impossibility of performance, those commandments which can be performed only during the existence of the Temple. Such a development is valid in any legal system. The Torah as given by the beit din today is true law for the Jews, and the beit din of three (the only one that can be convened today) has an authentic jurisdiction for them. The Jewish courts were at times recognised as public courts in Christendom, notably in Hungary under King Bela IV and King Matthias Corvinus.

You can claim it is legitimate…. But the authority goes from Moshe all the way down to the GREAT COURT until the King Messiah Yeshua comes in and hands it down, legally as King Messiah, to the Apostles. From there to the Bishops. The Messianic Kingdom is ONE. There can be no two contradictory and simultaneously valid bodies of authority. Either one is legitimate or the other. I’ll side with King Messiah Yeshua. Under His rule, all are united, both Jews like me and those grafted in from other nations. We, the united are Israel, the People of God.

​@@TheJewishCatholicThe authority of Jesus Christ extends over ALL nations, each with its own legal system, and subject to the Divine moral law which binds all. So, either you are born of a Jewish mother and subject to the entire Torah and to the jurisdiction of the beit din (and to the courts of the nation where you live), or your mother isn't Jewish, in which case you are bound by the law of God common to all nations, and to the courts of the country where you live. When you are baptised, you are placed under the jurisdiction of the Church and (if Jewish) removed from the jurisdiction of the beit din. Christ rules the nation's through ALL these authorities. Remember that we read in Acts that Paul was falsely accused of urging the Jews to forsake Torah observance.

@@MichaelPetekI’m sorry, I simply can not agree. This is reaching too far. But I am curious, what are you? As in, what religion or Faith? Also, are you also Jewish?

*sigh. These arguments are weak. They also sound very familiar…. Like the ones made by that guy that thought I was making videos “specifically for” him, Yehuda Yisrael. As for the 1st point, which is the only one actually related to my video: the point of the statement that “the temple was not fully destroyed” is more of a prophetic argument. It is to say that while HaShem had allowed the Hebrew people to be overtaken, He always intended them to go BACK to that system… which is why they did after only a few years. THIS galut, is different. This time there is no stone left upon another from the Temple, just as Yeshua of Nazareth had prophesied and there is no going back to that system… because we are now in the age of the Messiah… just like even some of the sages hoped. (Avodah Zarah 9a). That system was part of the Mosaic Covenant…. We have entered a New Covenant. Not only did some the Sages expect it to have had already begun, as I just said, but even Daniel’s prophecy also demonstrate this. Now, modern rabbis will attempt to tap dance around Daniel 9 and even the Sages…. But it is undeniable, this galut is not like the last because this one is under a new governing Covenant. Make all the arguments you want but that will not make the Mosaic Covenant valid and operational. It’s time to move on and accept the New Covenant that instituted by Yeshua the King Messiah.

@@TheJewishCatholic Why should I believe that some Greek book says something about a certain Jesus? Sorry, you have circular logic.

@@mosherothmistrovsky2290you are either ignorant about the New Testament Scriptures or you are simply willfully blind regarding the facts. Either way, one day you will meet Yeshua. I hope when that time comes, you are a devoted follower.

Yea…. That’s just how things tend to get online

@@TheJewishCatholic I made a response to this last one.

Protestants hate Jesus and spit on the Bible

Terrible Tu Quoque fallacy. Incomparable situations. Shows how much you know about both systems.

@@TheJewishCatholic I’m telling you that your overall argument is terrible and that the rabbinic argument is equally as terrible. Goes to show you how well your reading comprehension is.

@@613mitzvoth still incomparable. Still shows you are not familiar with at minimum, Catholicism.

@@TheJewishCatholic Fundamentalists are hilarious. A corpse is supposed to come back and you think it’s not comparable to ruins from 2,000 years ago.

​@613mitzvoth There is no corpse , Jesus Christ is the Living God and your temple is never coming back

Incorrect interpretation. That is not saying that alms giving us used as a way to pay for sin and relinquish punishment. It means, as is clear by just reading the rest of the verse, that being a person who gives alms will keep you away from (save you from) death/sin. Why? Because those who give alms are full of life, they are unselfish, they love those around them, they are merciful. In short, they display love of neighbor in a real way.

@@TheJewishCatholic Color me skeptical brother. Tobit 12:9 For alms does deliver from death, and shall purge away all sin. Those that exercise alms and righteousness shall be filled with life: It says sin is purged? Pops St Leo agrees with this interpretation. Quote"Let no one therefore, dearly beloved, flatter himself on any merits of a good life, if works of charity be wanting in him, and let him not trust in the purity of his body, if he be not cleansed by the purification of almsgiving. For “almsgiving wipes out sin,” kills death, and extinguishes the punishment of perpetual fire." I don't see how your interpretation jives with Leo? I will grant Leo is not infallible here. But he is Pope Leo so his view carries weight.

Watch Samuel Shamoun regarding the Trinity.

@@TheJewishCatholic But yeah, thats what he believes. What about you tho?

@@tarno_bejo_ I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages. God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father; through him all things were made. For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man. For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets. I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.

AMEN

@@TheJewishCatholic What does lord mean? You know that, adam is son of god (Luke 3:38) Ephraim is the firstborn son (Jeremiah 31:9) David is even begotten son (Psalm 2:7). Right? Matthew 12:39-40 says, 3 days 3 nights. From friday night to sunday morning is not even 3 days 3 nights, you know. Either way, many things you mention dont seem biblical. Let alone based on torah.

🤦🏻‍♂️

Acts 11,26

@@padresilviorobertomic I'm sure you can read. Acts 11:26 doesn't say CHRISTIANITY

@@TheJewishCatholic Acts 24:5 Yeshua is LORD!

Take your sectarianism back to the valley of hinnom where you were conceived on a pagan altar…. 1 Peter 4:16 = YOU ARE DONE.

It is also my suspicion that these past 2,000 years have represented the third period described there, that the impending 7th millenium will be that of universal rest and world peace. Did Jesus make any reference himself to this 2,000 year period? I thought he preached that the age of peace was imminent.

​@@DavidDHorstmanlol "the Kingdom of Heaven is among you" that means you MUST convert and submit bit people have freewill to choose

@@user-tz1fd1hl8t Really now - I must convert? And if I don't, what, there will be big spooky TeRRiBLE cOnSEQuEnCeS. Great sales pitch, lol

@@user-tz1fd1hl8t That's certainly one way of interpreting it. The other is simply that he was mistaken. Happens to the best of us.

Ha, so without realizing it, the talmud confirms Jesus as Messiah.

Thanks 😄

Daniele, I understood perfectly what you laid out, with all the specifications. This is all I want to tell you, that the Rabbi who discovered my Jewish identity, told me, insistently, that there is no other valid oath for us Jews, other than the Torah. He wrote it to me, in letters, font - 33. I understood the irony. They kept communicating/insisting me to return to their community, following the example of Rabbi Akiva's dedication. Although, I made it clear to him that the Torah speaks of Yeshua, who already came for us, almost two thousand years ago, the rabbi, (the rabbis) did not (want) to hear of such a thing. He did not want to accept the historical records, their essence. We, who are members of the Catholic Church, must also understand that the hardening of the hearts of our Mosaic Jews, according to Holy Scripture, did not end two thousand years ago. It continues to this day, as some rabbis speak very badly, this publicly, to the Savior Jesus Christ of Nazareth. So, they are not abstract things and only to be discussed, they are happening. And today. Only the Lord can break this barrier of stubbornness, to our fellow identitarians. Obviously, we have a duty to pray for their conversion. A popular one, Rabbi M.F., said about Jesus, that He suffered only then, but we, the ever, continue to suffer to this day and after two thousand years. Do you understand the irony? The sphere of influence, the social status in the community, is more important than the truth. This has happened and I notice, I understand, that it has been happening for centuries. This is the advantage of free will, which they make perfect use of in their choices. I have not found any comment, among the rabbis, regarding the Prophet Isaiah, Cp 55, related to HaShem's way of acting, different from the expectations or preferences, the whims of man, in fact the Jews, proven throughout the entire content, both of the Torah , as well as of all the Holy Books. Our brothers want El-Shaddai to act according to their preferences. I have not found any rabbi to present this aspect, in any extended lecture, public or private. I also deduce this from the Siddur, which I go through periodically. It's true, I prefer my Christian stubbornness. For our fellow Mosaic Jews, I pray that the Holy Spirit will enlighten them, see perfectly and accept the "TRUTH" that will truly set them free.

@@PAX1357I’m happy the message was clear. And yes, it is indeed true, our people have become blinded in part. This is why some see, and some don’t. “Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”;” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭11‬:‭25‬-‭26‬ ‭ But we continue to reach out and bring as many as we can.

@@TheJewishCatholic Perfectly true. It is our duty, Jewish and Christian, to be elements of Yeshua, for the salvation of all our fellows. I pray, daily, and wish for the day to come as soon as possible, when the old veil will be removed from the eyes of all our fellow Jews.

​@@PAX1357 Amen ✝️

I am a part of the Latin Rite because here in Japan we only have the Latin Rite. But there are more rites within the Catholic Church such as the Byzantine, Alexandrian, Syriac, Armenian, Maronite, and Chaldean.

Praying to Sancte Iacobe Minoris for the creation of a Hebrew Rite

Never heard of him but I’ll try to find the book

Thank you! Your support is appreciated. May the Almighty bless you greatly!

I’m assuming you are not Catholic.

@@TheJewishCatholic I'm not. Ex-rabbi here lol

@@erikeliezerWhat are you now?

@@pepepena1937 Nothing honestly. I feel very burnt out after living such a stringent life for so long.

The idea that Jews don’t need Christ is absolutely insulting. He is OUR Messiah. Ask any Hebrew Catholic such as myself and we will all tell you, become Catholic is the most Jewish thing a Jew can do. This is not a Spanish Queen exiling people or threatening their lives, this is not about forced conversion or using force, this about me (and other Jews like me) speaking to our fellow Jews through terms we understand to demonstrate what our people have been missing. Please remove this evil idea that suggests that my people are just fine without the King of the Jews. If you or a non Jewish Catholic feels bad about speaking to Jews about Christ, that’s something may want to consult with the Lord about. As for me “… I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭1‬:‭16

@@TheJewishCatholic I understand that your faith leads you to see Jesus as the Messiah for all, including Jews. However, it’s important to recognize that the concept of supersessionism can be hurtful to those who hold the Jewish faith and identity dearly. Many believe that their covenant with God remains unaltered and that their religious practices and beliefs are complete in themselves. While sharing our faith is a part of many religious traditions, it’s also essential to respect the beliefs of others and the integrity of their religious identity. Engaging in open, respectful dialogue allows us to learn from one another and grow in understanding, rather than asserting one belief system as superseding another. I am friends with a lot of Jews and they don't like it when Catholics/Christians push Jesus on them. I love your work and channel so not putting it down. I just felt that title of this video could rub people the wrong way. You put a disclaimer so I totally get it if that wasn't your intention.

@@veronicajordan945I changed the title for you. But here is what we can not do: deny Yeshua to those from whom He came in the flesh. I am completely against the idea that “the church replaced Israel”. That is false. The Church is the continuation and fulfillment of what God began with Abraham. I am not forcing Yeshua on anyone. I make videos and people are free to watch or ignore. But I will proclaim the Jewish Messiah to my Jewish brethren and the world.

@@TheJewishCatholicThe fact that you worship a man as God incarnate is an insult to God and any form of Judaism both ancient or modern. You’re not fooling anyone but yourself. Jews who do not accept your false doctrine are not the bad guys.

1) I never spoke against all the customs, traditions or the Mosaic law itself…. Rather the inefficiency of Rabbinic Judaism when it comes to the most essential aspects of Temple worship, sacrifices, atonement, the priesthood and court systems. 2) Incomparable subjects. The 2000 years refers to the millennia of false solutions to the aforementioned elements. Yeshua could take 4000 more years to return and the Catholic Faith will continue to operate as it has because it actually has the elements needed in the New and Eternal Covenant.

@@TheJewishCatholic I really appreciate your response and have been following your journey for years. And, I agree that there is no divine sanction to follow any new Rabbinical Halacha. What I am trying to get at is that the Rabbinical response to the lack of temple worship is - on its own admission - a kind of temporary "place holder" until the temple is rebuilt and the sacrifices reinstated. Any statements about "prayer, charity, and good deeds" being substitutes for the Yom Kippur ritual should be understood in this context. And, the logic is: God has always desired the heart and true repentance, and that the temple worship was always just a means to get close to God and help people repent and demonstrate God’s graceful forgiveness. Therefore, even when there is no temple, we look to the Psalms and forefathers and prophets as examples of how to serve God without animal sacrifices. (Through prayer, repentance, acts of kindness, etc…) This actually agrees with the New Testament. I mean, nowhere in the New Testament do we have the argument that Yeshua is necessary BECAUSE there is no temple. Rather, he is necessary because the temple is INSUFFICIENT. Rabbinical Judaism, in THIS sense, is correct that God is more interested than mercy and repentance than ritualistic worship. I recognize, of course, that Rabbincal Halacha is often taken to an extreme and then becomes ritualistic worship.

@@jonorisin73while I do appreciate your civil discourse, I will simply have to disagree. Both systems can not be legitimate at the same time. This is a matter of covenants. All covenants build on one another but when a new one is established, we can not chose to downgrade to a previous “version” to suit our liking… most especially when it is unable to be kept as commanded. Rather we see that God is good, and provides a way for all to come to Him and serve Him in the new and Eternal covenant in which Yeshua serves as High Priest offering His sacrifice to the Father in the Heavenly Temple. This is why there is no need for either the levitical priesthood or the earthly Temple. All this is made clear in the letter to the Hebrews.

@@TheJewishCatholic I agree that there is no substitute (or alternative path) for what God has revealed and established. And, I agreed that Rabbinical Judaism claims TOO much when it claims for itself divine sanction. I see your point that it is misguided since it misses God’s revelation about the New Covenant, by His son. So, in that sense, yes “illegitimate.” Honestly though, even as a believer in Yeshua, I struggle with the idea that the New Covenant REPLACES the Old, and that the Mosaic law is now “done away with” (ie. for Jews). In the New Testament, I see some parts (ex. Hebrews+some of Paul’s statements) that sound that way, and I see other parts (ex. James in Acts 21:24) that sound as if the New is “layered unto” the Mosaic law (for Jews), albeit NOT for salvation. And, when I read the Tanakh, through and through it sounds as if the Mosaic law is meant to be kept forever. 

 I know you’ve thought a lot about this, as have I. Perhaps you’d like to discuss this in a video chat sometime? Perhaps it would make an interesting video on your channel… God bless.

@@jonorisin73I wouldn’t mind a conversation. May the Almighty will it. Email me (I think you can get my email from my instagram page). We will set something up for a later date