RadioMaster MT12 surface radio control - Game Changing for R/C 

I switched as well and feel the same. Horizon is definitely feeling the loss of sales

4 in 1 is spektrum (aka rektum) compatible.

@@old-rcplane-phart I know that but will all the features of the original transmitter be supported on the Radio Master MT12? If so, how do you configure the Radio Master MT12 to support all features?

​@bitogre I assume the 4 in 1 & elrs are the same 'chip' as in my tx16s. That being said, 4 in 1 does bind to every reciever. I bound my tx16s to a Walmart $20 toy (I had to know), & a buddies generic rc tank. It should bind with any rx & 1 can setup more than the 'standard' mixes & features. Hope this helps.

@@old-rcplane-phart No, the 4-in-1 cannot talk ELRS as the 4-in-1 is in fact 4 chips (hence the name) but does include the chip needed for ELRS (which is based on LORA, not supported by any of the 4 chips).

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QYxj2KP2ANI.htmlsi=LLX_WmXdYXimBngd

Mt12 latency test. Seems fast enough for racing, what do you think?

@@kaptkronik135 it actually tested sub 5ms so yes I'd say so.

Not available yet. End of November.

Maybe the fact that you can control lots of different radio protocols

@@cazadon While my Radiomaster tx16s has the capability to command various radio protocols, this alone doesn't necessarily deem it "superior" to a Spektrum iX20. If your primary measure of superiority lies in the ability to handle diverse radio protocols, then indeed, it could be considered "better" in that aspect. However, in my perspective, this feature renders it distinctive rather than inherently superior. Appreciate your understanding.

@@1timeemailaddress811 depending on what protocols you are using has lower latancy, is a wheel style remote deisnged for surface and not an air controller that desinged for airplanes and heilcopter. has up to 16 channels. is all open source which means that you can conttrol everything about the radio for example if you want to change the layout of menus to fit your perferred way of having them which you cant do on your ix20. also if spektrum ever decieds to use planned obcelest your 1x20 is basically bricked how ever because mt 12 is open source it wont ever suffer from planned obcelesct as radiomaster does not own the software the community does and someone will contiune to surport older transmitters

@@cazadon Choosing the Spektrum iX20 as an example wasn't wise on my part, given that it's designed for air control. Let's instead compare the MT12 to a Futaba 10PX. I own the PT12 and have experimented with a Futaba 10PX. The 10PX impresses with its superior materials and build quality compared to the MT12. The display on the MT12 also pales in comparison to the one on the 10PX. It's not surprising, considering the 10PX is four times the cost. The term "open source" is often thrown around as if it's a necessity, but many everyday items we use are proprietary without hindering their usability. Examples include Microsoft Windows, Adobe Photoshop, Microsoft Office Suite, Apple macOS, gaming consoles, certain home appliances, specific car software, and closed-source web services. My point is that the MT12 is different, not necessarily better. Despite claims in RU-vid reviews, when it comes to controlling "regular" RC cars (usually requiring up to 5 channels for steering, throttle, traction control, and sometimes differentials), the radio doesn't offer a significant advantage over other premium surface transmitters. Reviewers need to assess this radio in an environment where its unique features truly shine, not with a Traxxas Slash or X-Maxx. In these scenarios, the touted features don't make a noticeable difference. I say noticeable because I agree, latency is "better" but the everyday driver is not going to notice it. BTW, I still rely on my Futaba 14MZ from 2004, so concerns about potential issues like being "bricked" due to the company's closure or UI changes don't bother me. Thanks.

@@1timeemailaddress811 there is also the cost of the mt12 and the features you get for that price