SHE HAS GOT SOME PRETTY MAJOR ELEMENT OF SARASWATI IN HER .. THIS WAS TRULY NEW AND UNIQUE KNOWLEDGE REALLY EYE OPENING !! .... THANK YOU FOR THIS NEENA RAI. REGARDS
In skanda Purana in one of seven kandas Vishnu Kanda under that 8 topics are there one of it is ayodhya chapter which also explains about ayodhya in depth 💟
Very good presentation. For those who want to listen inHindi all these and more are available in a series of Valmiki Ramayan discourses done Sixty years back by Swamiji SriAKANDANANDSSARASWATHIJI Maharaj. Available in RU-vid (sound only).Anand vrindavan and sujay sukla.(35 days)2.Thulsi and Kamban aren't translations. They are independent renderings for BHAKTHI.
A VERSION OF WHAT THAT SHTAGHNII MIGHT HAVE BEEN CAN BE SEEN IN THE MOVIE ' BAAHUBALI' DURING THE WAR SCENE WITH THE ARROW LAUNCHING MACHINES , LAUNCHING THOSE ARROWS ENMASSE .
I think it's a good attempt by the author and I will definitely purchase her book as support. But she is too quick to just shutdown the versions of Tulsidas and Kamban as non authentic. Tulsidas was a sage who had direct vision of Hanumanji himself.
What you call versions are : called COMMENTARIES . THERE IS ONLY ONE VERSION Of Valmiki RAMAYANA . You are Right when you say that all the thousands of Commentaries are NOT ITIHAASA . There will be as many versions / commentaries as there are people on Earth
Start of the talk is with mocking other “kathavachak”. Well the purpose of kathavachak’s is totally different..to invoke Bhakti. So there was no need to mock them.
@@Shreekumarji lol either you didn’t understand what is he saying. When you are right you don’t need anyone’s approval. And it seems you don’t know his work in SURYASIDHANTA. He is open for debate. There is a debate between him & mr pandit on Mahabharat dating on Sangam talk. As he always says THE CLAIM WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE CAN BE DISCARDED WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE
@@Wickyleo lol don't be such a fanboy. And saying someone doesn't understand just because someone isn't fully convinced is the most retarded explanation ever. There are many researchers each with their own findings , Nilesh is just one of many.
@@Shreekumarji wow you cant discard his 25 years of research like that, and he has showed all the evidences, it should be verified of course. he proposed these dates based on astronomical evidences mentioned in mahabharat and ramayana. i want you to listen those points made by him before reaching to the conclusion .
No not at all, there is something called referential interpretations of text ..MOKSHA has been center of itihas 'x Nowhere shukraachaaray has narrated progeny be shurda Born from inter caste marriage... brazenly inappropriate
I forgot the name but there is 1500 year old Buddhist text that says brahmins marry with any caste and don't maintain purity of their blood... and caste word comes from portugese casta...there is no word for caste in sanskrit
Tough for hinfuwalas to get their Sanskrit right because,when they write in these languages the halanth is placed in the reverse.I have heard Sanskrit Bharati teachers repeatedly stress when not to put the halanth when they teach Sanskrit through hindi
This GALI ki pratha RAJASTHAAN MEIN BHI HAI... wahan PAPAD par gaaliyaan KHOD KAR BHEJI JAATI HAIN BETI KE SASURAL MEIN... Please GO & INVESTIGATE OTHER CULTURES TOO... EACH ONE HAS ITS TRADITIONS... But You are NOT GOING TO DO THAT because YOU ARE EDUCATED by the WEST. And MAY BE YOU WILL NOT LIKE TO LISTEN, that EVEN BEFORE YOU WERE BORN, I told in my English Lit. class, that the writings of Charles Dickens & Prem Chand as alike: Charles Dickens is the Munshi Prem Chand of england & Prem Chand id the Charles diclens of India. AND NO ONE EXCEPT YPU CONSIDER TILSI'S MANAS AS ITHAAS
