Rangarajan Narasimhan | "ராமர் பிறப்பு" ஆராய்ச்சி தேவையற்றது! சாஸ்திரத்திற்கு விரோதமான செயல்! 

And Vedic scholars need not be correct. In this eternal Maya anyone can make mistakes. Adi Sankara's Baja Govindam comes to my mind. Moodamathe

it is needed becoz tomorrow they say ram born n europe or never existed. roots are getting destroyed

Again what is "His Grace Rangarajan Prabhu". He seems to be enjoying all this adulation. He's just a fallile human being.

Is there a "swamy" in his name ?

60000 வருடம் ஒரு மனிதன் உயிருடன் வாழ்ந்தான் ஆண்டான் என்று சொல்வது அறிவற்ற செயல். உங்களை பார்த்தால் சிரிப்பு தான் வருகிறது,..

@@pbrpb4735 No Swamy in his name, so what, it was decision made by me to respect him, what is your problem.

@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749 No there is no Swamy to his name. Let him confirm it. Do not bluff. Some other sycophant also calls him His Grace and Prabhu. 🤣🤣

@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749 exactly sir, like that it's their wish to research and say certain findings based on their understanding. Why to spread hatred against them and calling them as nastikas?

True sir. How many periyarist think about humanity

This is more important due to our culture food and identity

In Vishnu Sahasranamam Sahasrakoti Yukadharina Om Nama Ithi means 108 kodi Yukam.Imagine how many years.🎉

Yeah right. So you know Sri Rama’s life day by day, everyday until 40th year? Seriously??? 😅 Have you read Valmiki Ramayana, sloka by sloka? Do you know how many Ramayana’s are out there ? What the 18 Maha Puranas say about Sri Rama avatharam ?

Yes u r correct. Reason: The purpose of Rama avatar is complete with the killing of Ravana. .Thereafter, Rama is only an ordinary king doing Raja Paripaalanam. Nothing unusual to report. That is why, the Ramayana Discourse ends with Pattabhishekam.

​​​​​​@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 Entire bharath refers the Rama Rajyam for the well being of its citizens. So the notable incidents must have been there till his going into sarayu river. 11000 is,a researchable number

Ridiculous to call him learned.

@@ramanraman6048 Learned has to clarify and do research he just asking to stop research .

Idiots will do something and say in public and my job is to correct them is it! Morons like you are dime a dozen, who dont know why they type what they type

Where did Valmiki mention the year of birth. Even name of the samvatsaram,kalpam and manvantaram have not been mentioned.

@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 please understand the basics. While we calculate the possible year of birth of one, from ithiasas based on the planetary positions , thiths etc we can try to estimate the year. Even in the inscriptions of kings particularly cholas they just mentioned the aatchiaandu of that particular king after meikeerthi but they will mention the Nakshatra, thithius etc based on that we can estimate the time. Do you think that Valmiki followed our year calculations to mention the year ?

@@historicpassionate2908 My contention is the details of Valmiki are incomplete. Please note Valmiki gave all details such as season, month,paksha,thithi and Nakshatram including position of planets. But not this. This is intriguing.

@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 ofcourse it's intriguing to find the hidden truths. I would suggest to watch nilesh oak's videos on dating an event or birth etc..

But giving wrong information like Dushyant was also wrong.

If they give public interviews and give wrong information, why should Rangarajan talk to them directly

Instead of typing here, why dont you talk to me directly?

Talking to Dushyanth requires lot of courage and knowledge. It is easy to criticize Dushyanth but hard to face him in a scholarly discussion head on.

@@OurTemples Why dont you talk to Dushyanth directly instead of shadow boxing in a cowardly way.

அவர் ஒரு வடகலை அடி ஆள்

Mr Maran . ..This fellow Rangarajan abused Sri Velugudi Krishnan with choicest epithets. Do you know the level of Scholarship of Mr Krishnan. He is a qualified CA. At the behest of his father Sri. Varadha Chariyar, he took up his upanyasaka life to promote and spread vishistadvaitham. What right Rangarajan has to criticise Mr Krishnan . Rangarajan is jealous of Mr Krishnan. Now he eats humble pie by prostrating before Mr Krishnan to support him. Such is the cunning nature of Rangarajan.

@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 It looks like you have been ill advised. I saw both videos targeting Sri Velukkudi krishnan. One when Sri Krishnan got first theertham before Jeeyar got. Second, when Sri Krishnan asked people not to fight for temples. Rangarajan and Velukkudi Krishnan are friends. That's why when Rangarajan requested, Sri Krishnan immediately uploaded the video. Thank you. Dhanyosmi

Firstly dont write whatever you "think". Get your facts right. Secondly, if an Acharya does research and it is well within the parameters set then there is nothing wrong. So, nameless people like you can write whatever you want but they will not count at all before Acharyas. Learn to be humble before taking Acharya's name just like that on social media

​@@OurTemples Practise what you preach Mr Rangarajan.

All pundits of Sri Ananda Teertha Shastra agree to the 24the tretayuga calculation on Srirama. How many pundits of dwaitha Vedanta have you spoken until now on this matter or for any matter at all . Which Vedas claiming for 120 lives ? Can you name one . The first avatara of Annadha Teertha is Hanumar . Every Rama Baktha in the world agrees Rama is still a Chiranjeevi.

@@sanathanamodel what is the timeline that vedas gives for each human? What it's anga Jyotisha shaastra says. If you don't know I would suggest to read. Does any veda claims that a man can live for 1000 s of years?

@@historicpassionate2908 yes

Do not cherry pick. Put out the entire description.

Even then it would be 5000 (present kaliyuga years used up) + 864000 (i.e Dwapara: 2 * 432000) + 1296000 (i.e: Begining of Treta - 3 * 432000)... still does not add upto 7000 years..

You are wrong. Rama Avatar will not come every Treta Yugam. Infact Rama Avatar will come only once in a Kalpam 1000 Chatur Yugam

@@Maran108 No rama avatar falls in every treta yugam. It's not on once in a kalpam. In bhagawad geeta bhagwan said " sambhavami yuge yuge " which are aware off. In every chathur yugam, all dasa avatar getting repeated

@varadansekar9177 No Varadan. You can check with your acharyan. Proof from Vayu and Matsya purana says Rama Avatar was in 24th chatur yuga. No Avatars in 25, 26 and 27 chatur yuga. There itself, your theory is invalidated. Thank you

@@Maran108 How can it be ? Dasa avatars repeated in all chathur yugas. I quoted bhagawad geeta " Sambhavami yuge yuge " which means in every yugam bhagawad avatar comes to protect dharma. Only in kali yuga, at the end of kali yuga thete will be kalki avatar

Dushyant sridhar fan I suppose? Pls enlighten us what makes him a Vedic scholar?

Yes..he is the,real nasthika who does not follow his gurus advice of decency in words and nonattachment.

​@@savantdudeI am.not a fan of Dushyant. He NEVER called himself as a VEDIC SCHOLAR. It is only media people who called him like that. On the same breath, there are fans of Rangarajan almost equating to Ramanujar. They eulogise him as if God Sent person to save Hinduism. He never refuted it. But enjoys it. How do you identify a person as Vedic Scholar. A person should first undergo training in a Vedha Patasala. To attain a certain degree of proficiency, you have to spend atleast 12-15 years. It is only beginning. There are various stages of learning. Kramam, jatam,ghanam. Only then you qualify to become a Ganapaadikal. But this is the first stage. The next stage to undergo training in Vedhabaashyam. When completed, he will be called Vedha Bashya Rathnam. At this stage the person is called VEDIC SCHOLAR. Apart from this, during the training in Patasala, he has to undergo training in rituals, learning Upanishads simultaneously. Added to this he has to a little bit of Dharma Sastra, pooja vidhis etc. If you want to become a siddhantha scholar, you have to undergo special training under reputed aacharyaas on Brahma Sutram, Ramayanam, Geethai, a couple of puranas besides works and commentaries of poorva Acharyas. Then you attain acharya sthanam. This is for Sanskrit. You have undergo classes separately for Divya Prabhantham both for learning text and for commentaries of poorva achariyar. In fact, Alawanthar nominated 6 Acharyas to teach Sri Ramanujar. Ramanujar underwent rigorous training under each one to be called Acharya. In the present disposition, it is virtually impossible to attain that stature. But psychopants call Rangarajan as a person who is born to keep the flag of Sampradaya alive. Based on the above, please rate Rangarajan.

@@savantdude Rangarajan Narasimhan is a DMK stooge. He ensures that DMK builds up a narrative that Parpan is divides the society and ensures that temples rituals is under the clutches of the Thenkkalai parpans.

Yes

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

டி. எம். க்ருஷ்ணாவிற்கு விருது கொடுக்க ம்யூசிக் அகாடமி முடிவெடுத்த போது ஊரிலிருப்பவர்களை எல்லாம் கூப்பிட்டு நேஷனல் சேனல்களில் வரிசையாக பேட்டி கொடுத்து டி.எம்.க்ருஷ்ணாவிற்கு எதிராக பேசிய துஷ்யந்தைவிடவா?

கூப்பிட்டது ஆச்சார்யர்களை. வக்காலத்துக்கு அல்ல. அவர்கள் சம்ப்ரதாய குருக்கள்.

​​@@nagarajanappurao2147 இதே ரங்கராஜன் வேளுகுடி கிருஷ்ணன் அவர்களை பேசாத பேச்சு இல்லை. அவரை வியாபாரி என்று தூற்றியவன். ஶ்ரீரங்கத்தில் இருக்கும் ஆச்சார்ய புருஷர்களை மிக கேவலமாக விமர்சித்தார். இவர் தான் வைஷ்ணவ தர்மத்தை காப்பாற்ற உடையவர் அனுப்பித்து வைத்ததாக நினைத்துக் கொண்டு இருக்கிறார். TVS chairman வேணு அவர்கள் மேல் அவதுறு பரப்பி, பின்பு கோர்ட்டால் கண்டிக்கப் பட்டவர். தேவை இல்லாமல் மற்ற உபன்யாசகர் களை பேசவிட்டு இவர் குளிர் காய்கிறார். இவ்வளவு பேசும் இவர் கிரமமாக வேத அத்யயனம் செய்து இருக்கிறாரா? அல்லது ஶ்ரீ ராமானுஜரின் ஶ்ரீ பாஷ்யத்தை முறையாக தகுந்த அதிகாரியிடம் காலக்ஷேபம் கேட்டு இருக்கிறாரா? ரங்கராஜன் is an attention seeking megalomaniac. Never ever listens to a contra view. His Uncharitable comments on Sadguru, Saideepak, Annamalai are all in very bad taste. See his reply comments. He will yell at those who post some thing he does not like. In my view he is an undesirable character.

லூசு, வழக்கு நீதிபதியிடம் தான் போகும்.

​​@@nagarajanappurao2147 அந்த சம்பிரதாய மஹநீயர்களை இவன் எவ்வளவு இழித்து பேசி இருக்கிறான் என்று தெரியுமா? He abused Velugudi Sri Krishnan with filthy words. Now surrendered before him. He spoke very ill of aacharya purushaas in Srirangam bordering on blasphemy. If you want to know about him collect all his previous posts and come to conclusion.

காது செவிடா? இந்த கணக்கை, ஸைவ வைஷ்ணவ ஆச்சாரியர் கள் சொல்லணும்.

புராண தகவல்களை திரித்து பேசுவதும் தவறே.

துஷ்யந்தன் வடகலை ரங்கராஜன் தென்கலை இது தான் சண்டையே

விஷயம் தெரியாமல் உளராதே

​@@rajarishi1235 Jayasree is Tenkalai. Don't talk nonsense

​​@@rajarishi1235இரண்டு கலைகளும் இந்த ஆராய்ச்சியைக் கண்டித்தனர். நமது சனாதனத்தை யாராவது கேவலப் படுத்தினால் கோபப்படுவதில் தவறில்லை.

கோவில், ௭ன்பது , வரலாற்று சாஸ்த்திரம் நடைமுறை, ௮டையாளம் ௭ல்லாம் சேர்ந்தது. ௮ப்பா, ௮ம்மா குழந்தைகள் சேர்ந்ததுதான் குடும்பம்.

Dushyanth should refrain from making discovery about the birth of Lord Ram.