You know what…. They should have done that!!!! Then it would be like a major glow up for mc Donald’s toys. Now a days they only give out reused advengers bobble head thing!
I don’t buy the „it’s for small kids „ excuse anymore. I have a 15 year old daughter and a toddler girl. My younger daughter absolutely hates dolls without articulation. She gets angry and frustrated when the knees don’t bend to sit down or the arms can not bend for hugging. Yes, she struggles with too much articulation like Barbie made to move. But she loves the simple click knees and single joints of Disney store dolls, for example. I don’t get why aside from the Disney store no company uses the simple click knees in the rubber like legs anymore. LOL has them but they’re very limited but it’s better than nothing. She’s not even two and already wants to brush hair and redress the dolls. I understand not everyone is the same but lots of kids like some articulation and want to redress the dolls. Small kids mainly play by copying what the people around them do. So they want the dolls to cuddle, to sit down, to ride a horse, whatever it is that the child sees. They play and learn through that. In general Id like siblings because many kids have siblings or cousins, even I,der friends etc., so they’d like playing stories with those . But why dress them exactly like the older sibling and in a style that no kids that age would wear?
They would ask me to play roblox on my phone, I kinda live. The weird thing for me that i just noticed recently is the choice to make them the same color as theyr older sisters, like... The sterlings, the Madisons, devious, none of them needs to be the same color to be related so why pull that now??? 💀 the designs could be better if they took that liberty and make more unique characters, idk.
@@sainttan that would be nice, but those dolls were thoughtlessly made. they paid no attention to the character of sunny or luna, the point was just to make cheap bite sized rh dolls :(
I don't mind this exist (not like I'm going to buy any of them), but hated that everyone has conveniently has a younger sibling. They could have gone for cousins; distant relative; or even adopted sibling.
Part of me wonders if they just scraped together characters from s1 and s2 with popular colors (pink, blue, purple, rainbow) because we dont even have a full rainbow: no green, no orange. It also makes me wonder if they added indigo in last minute to have more skintone variety, since the last releases lacked that. Because with indigo we got 2 purple dolls in one release (I GUESS shes purple cuz crystal was the purple doll in s2???), so it makes me wonder if this was originally intended 🤔(also she wasnt included in the OG leaks)
I'm gonna be honest, this looks like a crossover between a Chelsea doll and Rainbow High, and not exactly in a good way. I will admit though that I do like Indigo Bailey as a favorite and a little on Magenta Monroe but that's about it. I don't see why they made new little sisters for this series instead of using the Little Mint coloured girl in the show right now whose name escapes me at the moment but you get what I mean. They could have maybe also made the current characters as these younger versions of themselves that's younger than their Junior High selves. Also, the sudden introduction of little sisters that were never mentioned before kind of throws me off.
i think these dolls are … fine, for what they are. these are at least more honest about being targeted to children (vs the slime dolls, which are just. confusing all around). do i think the quality is not great? yes. do i think mga could’ve done a lot better? absolutely. will i be buying any of these? absolutely not! but these dolls are not For Me. and that’s ok! some small child may love these dolls. these may be their introduction to the worlds of fashion and fashion dolls. the things we adult collectors don’t like about these dolls - lack of articulation, plastic clothing, painted eyes, simple outfits - children probably don’t care about these things. articulated joints break easily, so i’m thinking there was a tiny bit of thought on mga’s part for safety and durability considering the child target audience. same for the simple outfits (fewer parts to fuss with) and molded plastic top choice (easier to clean). the poly hair however is truly an unforgivable choice, i do agree with that. children deserve good toys and we all know that poly hair is gonna be a tangled mess five minutes out of the box 😒
It’s giving a knockoff Shopkins Kindi Kids x Rainbow High collab. Violets “sister”’s hair looks like it carries lice and she radiates the smell of Cheetos dust, spit, and iPad.
I'm sorry, but I think these dolls are ADORABLE! Especially Daisy. That was the name of my pet rabbit...a little girl in a bunny's body. That's basically her if she were human. I miss her so much...😢
This is just more proof that they rather cater to the younger audience. This was so unnecessary. For Stella and krystal to be in this line, does this mean they will be in rainbow world? Will these little versions ever appear on the show like junior high? And for the love of God, where is poppy? Just give me a poppy doll please, I beg you
I agree, one hand Pice sign would have been better on sunny,I like styles braids.opal is cute, but that hair style has to do, I'll re do it.The only thing I like about willow is the purple color. I Hope MGA doll line gets better😮
I also thought about the rainbow high that will come out this time. It has such a long history, it's been loved, I think it's now established as an adult doll, not a children's doll. If so, I think it's time to pay more attention to the doll itself than incidental things such as pets and bags.
Yeah, these dolls are bad. But since the MH high g3 drop the rainbow high community really push for this. Did y’all really think y’all was going to get in set eyes , detailed fashions, and articulate joints for $10. Every time they drop the quality collectors still ran and bought the doll and they are buying these. So I don’t even know what to say anymore lol.
aww man :( i LOVE the og yummi land dolls, WHYD they have to make the reboot ugly (srsly what are those eyes)? there was so much potential. i just wish theyd make a repro or smth!!
The art style is cute and the dolls look okay but I know I would rather have their clothes all able to be removed so I could dress them in what I had on hand, though with plastic tops you can also just put another shirt over them. Aaaaand no boy/male aligned one *sighs* it's gonna be interesting to see how these dolls actually do.
I think it's time to increase the value of the doll itself. in that it's an adult doll. I think the importance of the elbow, chest line, pelvis, and joints is great along with the flexibility of the joints. I think I'll be very satisfied if that alone improves. I agree with everything you're talking about. Thank you very much for the good videos and good words. 😊❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
It's the too large forehead. That's probably why you like the blonde doll the best because her hair is swept over part of her forehead. I saw them in the store today and only liked the blonde one out of all of them but I still don't like them. Anyway, they're not cute. LOL Tweens... now, they're CUTE!
Honestly most of them are fine I don’t like them but like whatever, but again HOW did they manage to make Violet the UGLIEST doll AGAIN? (I know it’s not Violet but come on)
Nope, this is the last nail in the coffin for me. I have no plans to get anymore dolls from this company. As far as I’m concerned, MGA has totally destroyed a good thing they had going. I loved the old sh & rh dolls, but I guess they decided Not to be a successful brand with some of the most high quality dolls out there. Why? I see a big tombstone with Rh/sh in it along with MGA 🪦 😭😭
