Тёмный

Rare ON MARK B-26K COUNTER INVADER: "Airshow Counter-Insurgency Ops" 2019 

AeroDinosaur
Подписаться 5 тыс.
Просмотров 20 тыс.
50% 1

The highlight of this video is our operational footage of the Greatest Generation Aircraft museum's ("GGA") On Mark Engineering B-26K Counter Invader, named "Special Kay" at a Spirit of St. Louis Airport Airshow in September 2019. GCA is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.
Experience pre-start, engine startup, warm up, taxi-out, flybys, landing rollout, and taxi-in with a very brief cockpit "tour". However, beforehand we give a broad technical and historical overview of the B-26 Invader (the baseline airframe for the -K) as well as some of the B-26K Counter Invader historical and technical details. We also discuss all the confusing designations related to this aircraft.
Shortly after this video was uploaded I was contacted by Jim Reynolds, chief pilot for Special Kay and the museum. He thanked me for doing the video and kindly elaborated further on some of our presentation contained therein, and pointed out a few errors that he said were minor. His comments are summarized as follows, including a few of my additional comments:
Firstly, Vintage Flying Museum ("VFM") did not restore and does not operate Special Kay. They are simply the hangar landlord for GGA and their other aircraft, along with the Commemorative Air Force's ("CAF") B-29/B-24 Squadron. However, VFM's website states that their aircraft inventory includes the subject B-26K as well as the CAF bomber aircraft, among others which, for perhaps me only, resulted in a minor confusion.
Mr. Reynolds also addressed the B-26K's designation issues. For some background, the B-26K is best known for its operations with the 609th SOS (Special Operations Squadron) out of Nakhon Phanom, Thailand from1967 and well into 1969, under the call sign "Nimrod". The Nimrods flew exceedingly dangerous covert night missions over Laos, and were thus given no public recognition for their heavier-than-normal sacrifices. For political reasons, the Thai government required the B-26K designation changed to "A-26A" before allowing basing in Thailand, which is discussed in this video.
While the aircraft seems to be best know as the "B-26K", the Nimrod organization understandably prefers the official designation "A-26A". But that designation is easily confused with the original baseline airframe designated A-26 Invader which flew in World War II.
Nonetheless, GGA developed a great relationship with the current-day Nimrod organization, and a few of the Nimrods even helped GGA with the Special Kay restoration, along with some of the other Air Force/CIA/Cuban pilots who flew this aircraft in the earlier Congo uprising. GGA seriously wanted to commemorate the Nimrod squadron as much as, if not more than, aircraft itself, and the designation "B-26K/A26A" was ultimately decided upon.
Another correction is that I said that in 1972 a "civilian concern" pulled Special Kay out of Davis Monthan boneyard and flew it to to Georgia. To drill down, it was the Forestry Department of the State of Georgia who did that with three such aircraft, but it was a stillborn attempt to convert it to a fire bomber. Over time Special Kay wound up with a few private owners, and was subject to a "minimal effort" restoration out of Billings Montana that was reported to have appeared in a few airshows into the very early 2000's. After the last private owner died in 2005, the aircraft was acquired by GGA in 2011, where a complete restoration to 99% original military spec was ultimately accomplished by 2018.
Finally, in the video I make reference to the landing gear components of the Counter Invader as utilizing "KC-135 brake components". While this is, unfortunately, verbatim from at least one secondary source, the Counter Invader's main landing gear actually used C-119 components, including the wheels.
One more correction. One viewer who was with the 609th at NKP pointed out an error in our presentation when we said the internal bomb bay was rarely filled with bombs on missions. That is incorrect, he says that the internal bay was loaded on most missions with either 20 lb. frag clusters and/or M32 Thermite "funny bombs". See his comments in the comment section.
Thanks for watching and hope you enjoy it.
Authors, former aviation contacts, providers of current useful commentary and information, and those with business inquiries may reach us at:
John A. Reed
j.reed3930@sbcglobal.net

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 78   
@Kraals
@Kraals 2 года назад
Very detailed and informative video. In 1969 I was in the U.S. Air Force stationed at Takhli RTAFB. One night, a fellow airman and I were walking back to our shop and as we rounded a revetment one of these aircraft was parked on our ramp. Being an aviation nut I immediately recognized what it was. It must have just landed because the exhaust stacks were making the distinctive "tink tink" sound as they cooled down. The eight, .50s in the nose was an impressive sight. All these years I thought what I saw was an A-26, but now I don't know. I never did find out why it was at Takhli. It may have diverted from NKP due to a mechanical or weather. We had a CIA (excuse me I meant to say Air America) installation at one end of the field and aircraft associated with their mission usually parked on their ramp. I looked for it the following night, but it was gone. Before entering the USAF I worked at an airport and had the opportunity to tour an On Mark Marketeer, the executive conversion owned by the Magnolia Mobile Home Company. Very cool for the time.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
Thanks for watching and your positive comments. I had heard of the A-26's occasionally diverting over to Takhli for various reasons--I understand the A26/B26K also provided a lot of air cover for CIA ground operations in Laos and the rest of SEA, so it looks like you were in the middle of it. I agree with you--all the On Mark conversions, both civil and military, were pretty cool!
@lostcreek163
@lostcreek163 4 года назад
Was at NKP airbase in Thailand when they were doing their Thing! Flew the A-1 69-70. Boo On You! Sandy's were initially 602 SOS FIREFLY's at NKP prior to Hobos and Zorros!
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 4 года назад
I'm always glad to hear from those who were there, and certainly glad you survived it! One of my favorite authors is Richard S. Drury who released his book "My Secret War" in the late 1970's. He flew A-1's out of NKP during the same 69-70 time period you did. Also, I apologize about leaving out the FIREFLY's. Incomplete research on my part.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 3 года назад
I'm planning an A-1 Skyraider video for this channel and I would like to see if you'd be interested in a short phone interview sharing your A-1 flying experiences in '69-'70 out of NKP, to be featured in the documentary. If you are so interested please contact me at j.reed3930@sbcglobal.net -- otherwise no problem if not.
@lesregnerus6586
@lesregnerus6586 3 года назад
Was at NKP with VO 67 Navy 67 68.
@56thSPSk970
@56thSPSk970 2 года назад
Weren't the Hobos the 601st? I remember we'd call them the" six o' worst" jokingly of course.
@billbolton9258
@billbolton9258 4 года назад
I worked on Kay when she was owned by Lynch Air Tankers. I was fortunate enough to get a couple rides in her in the right seat. The sound difference you mention has nothing to do with the engines. An R2800 sounds the same, regardless of the dash number. The sound difference you hear is the prop. The K model has those HUGE paddle blades that make a really different sound. Those engines and props were removed from an old Martin that sits at the Billings MT airport. Special Kay is a truly beautiful plane, hope she flys for many years to come!!
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 3 года назад
Bill, sorry I missed your comment of 5 months ago on Special Kay. Thanks for your explanation on the engine sound differences. It must have been a lot of fun riding in the right seat!
@johnosbourn4312
@johnosbourn4312 3 года назад
What a great video! I also like your impressive collection of model aircraft.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 3 года назад
Thanks John--glad you enjoyed the program. I'm for sure a bit overboard on the aircraft models!
@terrybaird3122
@terrybaird3122 2 года назад
Gorgeous aircraft!
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
Agreed!
@billknudson7895
@billknudson7895 2 года назад
What a magnificent specimen she is! Thanks for the chance to see her fly.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
You bet, thanks for checking us out!
@grumpyoldfart1945
@grumpyoldfart1945 4 года назад
Really great video. I have always been a fan of the A/B-26 since I first saw them as a young boy when they were employed by the 183 TAC RECO Sqd of the MS ANG in 1953 at KHKS. It was real hot rod then. You mentioned that Special Kay had, at one time, been converted, or was to be converted into a fire bomber by someone in Georgia. In the early ‘70’s while a pilot for the Mississippi Forestry Commission, I had a trip to Macon, Ga., where our counterpart, the Georgia Forestry Commission people had a maintenance hangar for their large fleet of aircraft. I seem recall they used several TBM/F Avengers in a fire fighting role. As we taxied up, there were a couple B-26K’s that I was told they were going to use as fire bombers. I remember wondering if there was a way that I could wangle my way into that outfit and fly one of these wonderful beasts. However, my aviation career took a different turn and I never saw these airplanes again. Could one of these have been the ship that later became Special K? If so, a small world! Thanks again for a wonderful video.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 4 года назад
Glad you enjoyed! Yes it is a small world on the B-26K's you saw in Macon. Probably a 100% chance that one of them you saw wound up being "Special Kay". Luckily, you didn't land your dream job of flying one, you probably wouldn't have ever been able to pay the rent. Thanks again for the complement!
@robstuessy1292
@robstuessy1292 2 года назад
yes Aircraft 679 and 640 we're both there in Macon Georgia, A/C-640 is now at Ellsworth Air force museum, also neither A/C were converted into Air Tankers.
@terrymenees8109
@terrymenees8109 2 года назад
@@robstuessy1292 I remember seeing those two at Macon in the early 70s. My parents would take me to visit the airport when we visited my sister when she and her husband were at Warner Robins. If I recall correctly there was a B-17 there at the time being operated by a company out of Dothan Alabama…….I always wondered what happened to those aircraft.
@av8tore71
@av8tore71 Год назад
At KRFD is an A-26 (former Vietnam survivor) owned by Courtesy Aircraft im a ferry pilot for them. I can say I e never flown the A-26 as there is not many left Airworthy however, other warbirds I have and at 52 this is a bucketlist of mine someday
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
Thanks for watching--you got me beat--as a pilot I never flew a warbird except for given the controls for awhile on a Stearman flight.
@63grandsport11
@63grandsport11 2 года назад
Thanks for all your hard work 👍
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
Yes and thanks for checking us out!
@topturretgunner
@topturretgunner 2 года назад
Thank you AD for this great video. The A/B 26 Invader is a favorite of mine. It's said that the airplane likes to go fast and one would certainly think so. That laminar flow airfoil (see P-51 Mustang) makes for a fast airplane.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
Agreed! Thanks for checking us out.
@KenH737
@KenH737 4 года назад
Awesome model collection.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 4 года назад
Thanks, always been out of control, can't help myself!
@av8tore71
@av8tore71 Год назад
I bet the repaid for the door has not been fixed at the time of this video because there is an AD on the door opening in flight
@dutchvideomaker8120
@dutchvideomaker8120 4 года назад
Oooh what a beauty!
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 4 года назад
Me think so too. Thanks!
@davidherbst
@davidherbst 2 года назад
Great video! One of my favorite WWII era aircraft. I'd heard they'd been used in this role, but had never seen one like this. I'd love to see a video on the C-123. My dad flew them in the 50's. His unit picked them up at the factory, and flew them back to New Jersey, and then on to France.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
B-26 is one of my favorites too! I'd certainly like to do a video on the C-123 too, but need to contact the 1-2 organizations who fly one so I can get some footage. I think I'll do that! Thanks for watching.
@davidherbst
@davidherbst 2 года назад
@@AeroDinosaur thank you!
@56thSPSk970
@56thSPSk970 2 года назад
Great times, Nkp 70' & 71' 56th sps K9. I got an autographed copy of " My secret war" a truly great book. Although we never knew each other we were both there at the same time. Some great time at the "Fanny".
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
I'm glad you were able to find us and thanks for watching. Reaching military folks like you who were actually there is the most important thing to us. Also, "My Secret War" is one of my "top 5"--I've owned a hardbound copy since 1980--Drury is one of the greatest. Thanks for your service and THANKS AGAIN!
@guaporeturns9472
@guaporeturns9472 2 года назад
Another great video , as usual. You have an impressive collection of models and replicas as well. You build all those? Maybe you should do a video showcasing all your models some time? Just a quick overview of each one in the display.. a few words on each and a close up. Just a thought. Thanks fo all the time you put into this.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
Amazing--you've just read my mind. Next year I'm going to start doing a big series showcasing the model replicas (10-15 videos--but I'm not making the series title public yet--you'll find out when I start advertising it in my upcoming videos later this year). I built all the replicas and have around 100 to feature. Each video will focus on a particular engine size with discussion (such as starting with a video or two on the 1,200 hp R-1830, talk, then for example showing the C-47/DC-3 and B-24 replicas representing planes powered by that engine and discussing all the other airframes it powered--then follow with actual footage of some of them in action. We would do follow-on videos on each more powerful engine category and panning the relevant aircraft models, and always try to put in as much real operational footage as possible. I may build some kind of "set" to serve as a backdrop for the replicas. Hearing from a loyal viewer like you makes me think that this concept just might work!
@guaporeturns9472
@guaporeturns9472 2 года назад
@@AeroDinosaur Sounds great.. looking forward to it.
@pcowdrey
@pcowdrey 4 года назад
I worked at On Mark Aviation, Van Nuys as a young A&P mechanic in...1968?The B-26s sat out back and we had a gorgeous executive Douglas DC-7C in the hangar for extensive work. This was just before the upsetter, Bill Lear came along and everything changed.If you remember, Cessna even developed and flew the Model 620, 4-engine executive transport airplane...only made one and it got scrapped. Hard to even find good pictures of it now. Scrapping it was stupid.As to the editing, I'd really suggest more attention to sound editing. At times, the music almost overwhelms the voice. Nice video. I enjoyed it and I did hit "Like". =PC=
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 4 года назад
Thanks for your comment of 4 months ago, I overlooked it and just now saw it--sorry about that! I certainly agree with you on the music track in a few spots--I thought I had the sound track levels correct on those segments but obviously did not--and still I cringe about it. Glad you enjoyed the video anyway, and good to hear from someone who worked at On Mark! I don't remember Cessna's 4 engine 620, I'll look it up.
@av8tore71
@av8tore71 Год назад
I do know that Kermit Weeks has one that is almost airworthy Steve Himton has one flight in out in Chino, CA
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
Thanks for all your comments and info! Yes, Kermit Weeks had one restored at Chino. Steve Hinton test-flew it and both canopy doors opened during the test flight--just like you said they would. A problem with the early A/B-26s. Got it back down OK.
@icewaterslim7260
@icewaterslim7260 Год назад
I always called them A26Ks just so they aren't mistaken for the Martin aircraft. Probably adding to confusion just the same.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
Well, you can join me and everybody else as a member of the "B-26 Confusion Club." That is a big club! J.A. Reed
@jamesbulldogmiller
@jamesbulldogmiller 3 года назад
@29:27 “Carl, see if you can find what’s wrong..” “It ain’t got no gas in it.”
@DanielCPhillips
@DanielCPhillips Год назад
In defence of the Martin B-26 Marauder, it was always a hot rod, that required a higher level of skill from the pilot to fly. It did not have "bad flying characteristics" - it had flying characteristics consistent with being a very high performance aircraft, built to go as fast as possible. It was not designed to be the general purpose aircraft the Douglas A-26 was. It was heavy for its size, powerful, as slippery as an eel, and had high wing loading, consistent with its purpose of high speed. As a result,it was very unforgiving of low performance pilots. It needed to be flown at very precise speeds, particularly on landing where it had to be flown at at least 150 mph or 130 knots on short landing approach, and gently flared onto the runway at 120 mph / 104 knots - which is a much higher speed than most pilots were used to on other aircraft As the design was trying for the highest level of performance possible at the edge of the technology of the time, it was unforgiving of inexperience, ineptitude, incapacity or stupidity. The cost of the high speed was higher stalling speeds that go with it. Which is why when you put inexperienced pilots in it, do not train them sufficiently, or treat it with the respect that it needed - those inexperienced pilots did not live to become old pilots. With that being said - when those training problems were fixed, and some refinement of the early aircraft took place with slightly bigger wings, a slight change in the angle of attack of the wing, and bigger tail surfaces, the Marauder had the lowest loss rates of any US Bomber in WW2, and it fought in most of the theatres of war. In other words, if you were competent and respected the high performance nature of the beast - you had a better chance than any other bomber pilot or crew member flying other US aircraft of the time, to come home alive. The one in the National Air & 'Space Museum in Virginia is called "Flak Bait" - and this aircraft survived 207 operational missions over Europe, more than any other American aircraft during World War II. Personally, the fact that it brought you home alive the most, and that so many were made, brings home to me at least, that this was an excellent aircraft that simply required skill and respect to get the best out of it.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
I agree 100% with your assessment of the Marauder. It had a lower casualty rate and a better combat safety record (especially with the bigger wing) than other bombers. There was little aerodynamically wrong with it. My understanding is that its early problems including its poor safety record were mostly due to 1) it being a "hot" airplane as you say with the highest wing loading and fastest approach speed ever for a bomber, 2) unproven early-version R-2800 B engines with many lingering teething problems, 3) inexperienced trainees at the controls, and in many cases, less experienced instructors in the airplane due to 4) the panicked urgency of war. This is a recipe for disaster when an engine quit on takeoff--a regular occurrence in early training (you know, "One a Day in Tampa Bay"). This caused the crews and squadrons to be skeptical about the airplane and otherwise be afraid of it. Jimmy Doolittle began to put their fears at rest when he did whirlwind demonstration tours with the plane, doing engine-out takeoffs, slow flight, and aerobatics--at low level. Nonetheless, despite an excellent combat record, the plane was rapidly retired after the war in favor of the similar, more forgiving Douglas A/B-26. This was mainly due to the higher risk associated with attaining consistently high pilot proficiencies with the Martin (everybody who flew it had to be far better than average), as well as type redundancy. Thanks for your excellent comments and for watching! J.A. Reed
@ILSRWY4
@ILSRWY4 Год назад
No it was not a HOT ROD. Marauder's top speed was 287. An A-26 was faster... WAY FASTER, at over 355. The reason the Marauder was called the "Widow Maker" was because of its higher landing speed because of the high wing loading. The higher landing speed caused many experienced pilots to crash it on take offs and mainly landings. Anyway, the A-26 was conceived to replace the Marauder and the B-25, for which the Invader was better than both. Period.
@ILSRWY4
@ILSRWY4 Год назад
@@AeroDinosaur "the plane was rapidly retired after the war in favor of the similar, more forgiving Douglas A/B-26." The reason was more than just forgiving, the A-26 was faster than the Marauder.. WAY FASTER. And it had a heavier firepower with its internal wing guns, and optional wing gun pod attachments and multipurpose interchangeable nose guns with 6 or 8 50 caliber machine guns and also ability to carry 37mm and 75mm cannons, could carry a heavier bombload and had better self defenses, plus its speed, at 355mph. No Marauder could carry that much at 287mph. The Invader was just better all around.
@DanielCPhillips
@DanielCPhillips Год назад
@@ILSRWY4 Respectfully, the Martin B-26 was a 1939 design, starting deliveries in 1941. The Douglas A-26 started development in 1942, and only started being delivered in numbers in 1943-early 1944. That might not sound like a lot, however in war time the pace of development in between was enormous. Which makes your comparison between the two unrealistic, and taken out of context of the times in which these aircraft flew. The A-26 did its best service later in Korea, and surprisingly, in Vietnam, which is reflective of it being a later generation aircraft than its Martin predecessor. The Martin B-26 was a hot rod for 1941, but not so much in 1945,
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
@@ILSRWY4 Thanks for the excellent summary! JA Reed.
@ILSRWY4
@ILSRWY4 10 месяцев назад
Just so you know, Special K (and your little model for that matter) is not a B-26K. It is an A-26A. How? Because of the paint scheme they have it painted in. The SEA scheme. Med. Green/dark green/tan. Those aircraft would not be painted that sheme until they were deployed to Thailand and when they were redisgnated A-26A. B-26K were painted a solid dark green over light grayish/white. A-26A were painted in SEA scheme like you see Special K painted in.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 10 месяцев назад
Thanks for this information. That was brought to our attention years ago by the president of the museum that operates the plane (Greatest Generation/Vintage Flying Museum). The CIA Congo operations retained the original B-26K designation. Because of Thai objections to "B" = "bombers" operating in their country, the designation was changed to A-26A for SEA operations, which is also the appropriate designation for our "little model" as you say.
@ditzydoo4378
@ditzydoo4378 Год назад
A question: was there ever any thought to up engining the A/B 26 with Turbo props like the DC-3 Basler does???
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
Not to my knowledge, but that doesn't mean it wasn't attempted. Thanks for watching. J.A. Reed.
@ditzydoo4378
@ditzydoo4378 Год назад
@@AeroDinosaur thank you for the reply and video.
@mk23mod08
@mk23mod08 Год назад
There is still one on display in Touson AZ!
@JARREGULUS
@JARREGULUS Год назад
Yes, at Pima Air Museum. I took extensive photos of it when it was still parked on desert sand there in 1987. Thought that was the last one I would ever see, much less fly! Thanks for checking us out!
@ILSRWY4
@ILSRWY4 Год назад
And there is one at NM-USAF
@arrowsmith63
@arrowsmith63 3 года назад
We only put 100 gal in each wing tip tank and the bomb bay always had bombs in it. I was 609 May 69 until they left.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 3 года назад
Kenneth Arrowsmith: Thanks much for your comments. It's always good to hear from 609th crews who were there. I wasn't at NKP (only 13 years old then) so I have to get most of my information from published (and other second hand sources) which are not always accurate as you know. They say -- perhaps incorrectly as you point out -- that the bomb bay was not utilized that much. I'll be sure to reference your comments and correction in the description section for this video.
@arrowsmith63
@arrowsmith63 3 года назад
@@AeroDinosaur I do not know what the bombs were called but they were small and several on each rack. I will see if I can find out what they were. Also the tip tanks were to be empty when landing.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 3 года назад
@@arrowsmith63 Please do, I'd be very interested! Thanks for all your feedback.
@arrowsmith63
@arrowsmith63 3 года назад
@@AeroDinosaur Here is what the loaders told me. When we carried napalm on the wings we loaded frag clusters in the bomb bay. There were six 20 pound frags per rack. They could time it so that when the napalm ignited the six frag bombs exploded in the napalm. Other times we loaded two M32 thermite bombs (often called "funny bombs") and six of the M1A4 clustered. The funny bombs looked like a pale blue trash-can with fins on it. Funny bombs were the best truck convoy killers because it was an air burst bomb and spread little thermite bombs over a large area.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 3 года назад
@@arrowsmith63 Thanks for following up and for the good info. I wish I knew you at the time I was making this documentary--would have wanted to do an interview with you which would have added a lot of credibility. This week I will incorporate your info with the written description of the video.
@canuck600A
@canuck600A 2 года назад
Great video but the background music blocks out large portions of the narration.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur 2 года назад
I know, we've gotten plenty of complaints about that--the original video had the sound mixed better, don't know why that music got so loud after uploading. We have since dropped the music overlap with narration, and most of the music altogether.
@Mrfishlou
@Mrfishlou 2 года назад
The WWII B26 (called the B26 Marauder) was built by Martin, the later A26 (Invader) was built by Douglas, and was an evolution of the Douglas A20 Havoc. This video is of the Douglas A26. It is NOT a B26.
@Mrfishlou
@Mrfishlou 2 года назад
The B-26 was indeed prone to accidents, as its high power, high wing loading and high approach speeds necessitated lots of training and an absolute requirement to "fly by the numbers". It apparently also had some prop overspeed issues, and earned the dreaded "Widowmaker" reputation. However, its high speed and toughness also gave it one of the lowest combat loss ratios among all WWII aircraft. I guess you just had to survive the training...!
@Mrfishlou
@Mrfishlou 2 года назад
Ah crap - he explains all this AFTER all this typing!
@DELTAMARINE1
@DELTAMARINE1 Год назад
MY DAD FLEW IN THE B-26 ARMY AIR CORPS. BUT THIS IS A A-26 AND YOUR THING SAYS B-26K. THE B-26 HAD A MORE ROUNDED BODY AND STUBEY WINGS, THIS ARE TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS, SORRY, I KNOW IT GETS CONFUSING MY DAD ALWAYS SHOOK HIS HEAD WHEN SOMEONE WOULD CALL AN A-26 A B-26. HE ALWAYS TOLD ME THE B-26 WAS A FLYING COFFIN OR A WIDOW MAKER. BUT HE WAS PROUD OF BEING A PART OF IT WHILE MY UNCLE FLEW B-24's
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
Thanks for checking us out and sharing about your dad. In WWII the USAAF had the Martin B-26 ("B'" for "Bomber) with the stubby wings you mention which had a bad safety record, especially for trainees. When Douglas introduced the subject twin-engine attack plane of similar size during WWII (and safer to fly) it was designated by the USAAF as the A-26 ("A" for "Attack). Because of its poor safety record, the Army retired all its Martin B-26s immediately after the war, and the newer, safer Douglas A-26 remained in service--a similar airplane-. But it was then re-designated as the "B-26." Fast forward to the 1960s with the On Mark conversions of the B-26, that came out (subject of our video) the converted planes were at first designated the "B-26K." However, when introduced to southeast Asia, the Thai government would not allow them to be based there because "B" stood for "Bomber", and they did not want "bombers" to be based in their territory. So, the "B-26K" designation for the conversion was changed back to "A-26" or "Attack" plane--just like in WWII--full circle. With the "A" or "Attack" A-26 designation, the Thai government allowed the On Mark conversions to be based in their territory. J.A. Reed
@fishfuxors
@fishfuxors Год назад
AKA Naked Phanny.
@AeroDinosaur
@AeroDinosaur Год назад
You got it!
@mikeburton7077
@mikeburton7077 Год назад
Kill the music ,this spoils a great video
@JARREGULUS
@JARREGULUS Год назад
We’ve known about that annoyance for years and once it is in there it cannot be removed. We don’t use music anymore.
Далее
B-26K Walkaround Special Kay A-26
29:37
Просмотров 26 тыс.
Я тоже так могу
00:12
Просмотров 1,2 млн
RARE Consolidated PB4Y-2 Privateer ACTION!
34:42
Просмотров 19 тыс.
When A Gang Leader Confronted Muhammad Ali
11:43
Просмотров 6 млн
My Time With A26K Special Kay in the 60s
6:46
Просмотров 19 тыс.
A-26 Lady Liberty Documentary
22:43
Просмотров 37 тыс.
Inside the B-17 Ball Turret
18:59
Просмотров 2,6 млн
Жигулига 50.000$ 😨😨😨
0:33
Просмотров 350 тыс.