How TF can Lavia be a 7 when he's played 4 matches and 116 minutes over two seasons??? Add on a €62 million price tag and it's a potential disaster signing. At best he's a 5, but could easily drop to 3/4 if he can't stay fit.
Because when he has played he’s been one of our best players. Pre season he was our best player and against City he was by far our best player in the game. And he’s only 20. His injuries are just letting him down. But Lavia is amazing
Because the dude is only 20 and already in contention to start ahead of a WC winning, 120 million midfielder because of his performances in those 116 minutes.
19:17 you’re saying Enzo doesn’t deserve the armband (He’s VICE CAPTAIN) it’s his duty to step up, he’s been here longer than most tbf, because this is a fresh team but there’s different type of leadership styles, Enzo is the most vocal when it comes to leading the team tactically we’ve seen that in the first couple of games on our streak this season, very similar to when Jorginho was Vice Captain, And it’s a Stretch but if my Captain is learning under the Guidance of a Great like Messi then… who better to give it to when there’s no actual experience in our side anymore to hold it🤷🏽♂️ 20:12 “lampard and Gerrard looked good for both” - never won a trophy with England Enzo - a World Cup and a Copa America, HE IS A WINNER, acknowledge that 20:25 “he doesn’t get assist” - Jorginho didn’t either but he damn well lead both Chelsea and Italy, even won a UEFA Men’s Award, (stats doesn’t always matter)
I honestly agree with you.... His personality suits his impact on the team. When playing in a game with team mates, you want such kind of a player, to draw challenges and be vocal and fight to win. But I agree with the channel that he is an ok player with exquisite passing. I dont care if he gets assists or not or doesnt even score goals. what id want for him to improve is reading and interception of passes in ball recovery. In my opinion, i think much later looking back we might look it in that his contribution was felt throughout the campaign
Yeah I agree with you on that, but I don't blame Auba. I genuinely think if he got game time and we didn't sack TT he'd have at least been a 12 to 15 goal a season asset for us which at his age isn't terrible.
I still want to give Badiashile time,the boy was so good when he joined,that harmstring injury affected him. And it was not ideal to play in a team last season when theree was just no stability. We were experimenting a new team. Let the boy stay. Be positive
Sterling is like the Torres signing but without the hope. You could see Torres trying his best but it not working, with sterling you could feel him think "everyone else is crap, Its not me, I played for man city"
Lavia is actually class he would start for us next to Caicedo if it wasn’t for him being injury prone. I think him next to Caicedo and Palmer at CAM would solve all our problems
Wouldn’t say Cole Palmer is Chelsea’s best signing since hazard just yet! Definitely the potential to be that but despite him being incredible since joining that title still belongs to Kante imo! Pfa player of the year in his debut season as we went on to lift the title and played a key role in the 2021 champions league win as well as multiple other trophy wins too.
Oof the disrespect to Petrovich, that was the worst take for sure) man came in for injured Sanchez, did his job and the team improved as well towards the end of the season, he certainly played a big part in that. At least a 6, i would give him a solid 7.
Sterling carried us for the first season. Your memory is short. He was bad at the end but gave us important goals .. rating 7 Kouliby was useless rating 2.
Love you guys and the positive attitude you bring when talking about our players, but most of the ratings are wayyyy too generous. You cant give a player an average rating when they have barely played for us. Either dont mark them or be honest that they are disappointing. Also giving Marc Cucurella a 9 is crazy when he has only been playing decent football for us for 6 months at best. He has improved massively but is still not near the level you guys think he is. Palmer and Jackson are the only players deserving of over a 7 maybe Caicedo.
Mudryk is 3 at best. And he doesn't have more goals and assists than Sterling. He's not even close to Sterling. For less than his transfer fee we could have gotten either of Olise, Gordon Doku, Kudus. AND Mudryk looks nowhere near getting to his best.
Mudryk is on 90k a week while Sterling was at 325, and Mudryk played 1 full season where he contributed to Chelsea final and semifinal in both cups (Newcastle, Leeds, Leicester, goals and great performances) also he killed Arsenal PL title run (people forget there's been not only a cross, but also a pen earned by Mudryk in that 2-2 game). So if he was not in Chelsea, Arsenal wins PL title and Chelsea is out in Carabao at 1/4 stage. Pretty decent for a benchwarmer who played avg 20-25 mins per game sitting behind Sterling
also, broski scored 7 goals last season and been benched all 7 times next game, should you be harsh on him with that great poch-management is an open question
@@Nelson_Joshua17 If they sold him right now, would you honestly say that signing him was a success? I would assume no. So so far he has been failure whether it be for injuries or the system
