Real Bajirao Mastani ROOM TOUR AND MARRIAGE STORY ! 

Courtesy of some bad decisions (Peshwa Bajirao was prevented from building all floors in stone so the brick and wood floors after the 1st floor were vulnerable to fire), and poor upkeep by the Empire, which captured Shaniwar Wada, as most of it was destroyed in a fire of unknown origin in the 1800s. Really sad. It would be wonderful to have an architect digitally recreate what it might have looked like in its glory time.

Yesss right

Correct… he is a great king who never got defeated by anyone…not some ordinary man like you.. 😡

@@mexpaliwal1816 uûi

It’s Bajirao not Bhajirao 🤣🤣🤣

@@dikshanarula6067 galti insan se hi hoti h so usko sudharo udao mat yr

Point to be noted

She was definitely not 13 in 1729 bcz in 1729, Chhatrasal was almost 85 yrs old ( he died in 1731) So was she born to him when his age was 70-72? It is unbelievable to have a child at that age. He may have had her in late age but that has to be 50-55. Wo lagbhag Bajiraoke ageki to honihi chahiye.

Who didn’t even lost single war in his whole life 👍🏼

Hello I'm from Pakistan movie dekhii tii baji Rao Mastani Kya ap bta skty Yee real story h? Ap thorii story btayn inkii or inky bary ma kch

Ladai nhi pitata tha ye agr yaha aise disrespected word use krta

There was a little amalgation but it's bundeli Art. Example of amalgation were balcony, hamam.

@@rashisharma4327 in that case then Pushpa Kanyal Sawant is also correct. If there is amalgation then it is similar to taking the art from one time or era and combining / merging with another. Hence one should at best call it Bundella Mughal art or Mughal Bundella art - giving a true picture of what he is trying to convey specially if he was there for the historical value. Whereas if it is just a little portion of it like a balcony from the entire structure then even less so - like its basically bundeli art with some mughal touches or its mughal art with some bundeli touches. Another thing I would have preferred - if there was a sort of doubt as to what was done in the room they called kitchen but then they go in there and show just a little lamp window rather than any cooking space - that was a bit not a kitchen. Overall entire video was entertaining. thanks guys for putting it together. Better guide next time

Bajirao utilised Maratha army and Maratha treasure for this campaign. Bajirao was ambitious also. To us hisabse Chhatrasalko kuchh to dena tha hi. Par Bajiraone 1/3 kingdom manga hoga ye thoda exaggerationhi lagta hai.

Is it true...?

Bajirao Mastani love story is a historical truth. You Idiot don't add your own edition to the historical facts.

@@chandanshirodkar3069 What sacrifice Bajirao did for Mastani? Bajirao never allowed her to appear as his wife in public anytime. She was never taken to Satara, nor to any military expedition anytime. ( On the other hand, there are evidances of Kashi going with him on many occasions) Bajirao never wrote any letter to Mastani or anyone expressing his feelings about her. ( But he wrote regularly to his wife) There is much fuss about the Mastani mahal built at Shanivarwada and the house at Pabal. But Chhatrasal did give the total compensation of 5 lakh rupees to Bajirao. ( Cost of Shanivarwada in 1730 was about 17000 rs.) So compare now. Mastani was political obligation for Bajirao and he had to keep her anyhow. I am not saying that he did not have any affection for her. But that is natural bcz the woman did not have any support in Pune. Nothing can be proven from the actual historical documents. The little effort he took to keep her happily in Pune, is blown out of proportion in Marathi fiction and presented as divine lovestory. During his time, noone called it 'love'. He was actually defamed in Pune and Satara for keeping a woman without marriage. And from this defamation, his family ( mother and brother) was trying to save him. Mastani actually stayed at Shanivarwada from 1736 to 1739 and nobody threw her out even when Bajirao went on expeditios of Delhi, Bhopal and then to Malwa when Nadirshah invaded.(Nov 1736- June 1739) The whole tragedy happened after June 1739. The main reason for that was Bajirao's drinking habit ( which was also the reason for the threatening of boycott from his community as it was considered most horrible thing for a brahmin in 18th century). The family put the blame of his drinking habit on Mastani. Mastani faced the wrath of the family and Kashi fell severely ill, turned pale and weak in last 8 months bcz of his drinking habit. So Bajirao actually was the reason for sufferings of both Mastani and Kashi but even he is made victim along with Mastani in so called lovestory. How a person with all powers can be a victim? With due respect to warrier Bajirao Peshwe, he was a failure in his personal life only bcz of his inability to take decisions about his personal life ( if he really loved Mastani) Bajirao never took Rajmanyata from the king for Mastani ( when it was easily possible for him if he loved her so much) Bajirao never presented Mastani as his wife to anyone. (Bringing her to Shanivarwada as his wife actually proved boomrang) Bajirao did not do anything to take her out of housearrest on his own in the end.( Asking brother to free her is not great thing) In my opinion, Bajirao supported Mastani only till family was involved. When the community ( after boycott threat) and army ( after Patas episode) got involved, he surrendered bcz his reputation was at stake. He even refused to go to Pune after Naserjung battle and went to Raverkhed giving reason of military expedition to north leaving both the women in Pune. Do you think, this was right? He wrote letters to his brother, his mother and also to his son in those last 2 months but he did not bother to think about those 2 women, that is strange.

What not dare to do agar dare nhi hota to log aj bajiraomastani nhi kashibajirao bolte dare tha tabhi to Shaniwar wada me mastani mehel banwaya tha jo ab jal gya h ok to puri bt na pta ho to gyan na do ok nd cal Peshwa Bajirao

@@goodhuman5452 Idiot before argument read some historical facts. Than argue

Which nizam

no

Ruhani begum was persian mulsim and was dancer - Koi nizam ke beti nahi thi vo. Musalim kab se hinduo me shadi karne lage the.

Yes. There is nothing mentioned about her in Marathi historical documents. From there one can know that she was the mistress of Bajirao. She got one child from him named Samsher. She was braught to Shanivarwada and Peshwa faced defamation bcz of her. In the last year, she was kept under housearrest for obstructing his political duty. She died mysteriously after his death. You can not get more information about her than this from Marathi documentation. Uska swabhav kaisa tha, uska std. of living kaise tha, what did she do in Pune in those 8-9 years, kuchh bhi information nahi hai. Mastani Pune exactly kab ayi aur Punese kaise gayab ho gayi, noone can tell. Absolutely no records. So people have done lot of imagination. So there are lots of myths about Mastani jiska koi historical praman nahi. But lovestory has been created in Marathi fiction and made popular so people believe blindly in it. You will be surprised to know that certain popular stories about her are just bhakadkatha. 1- Mastani was a skilled warrier and she faught many wars with Bajirao. There is no historical proof to show that she faught any war. In fact, she was not even taken to any military expedition by Bajirao. 2- If you travel from Pune to Saswad, just before Diveghat, there is a village called Vadki and there is a lake there which is called Mastani lake in today's times and local people say that this lake was built by Bajirao for her. This is half truth. Bajirao definitely built this lake in 1732 and there is reference of the same on records but there is no mention anywhere that he built it for her or he named it Mastani's lake. But it has been made popular now. 3- The most shocking myth is about her kabar at Pabal. Mastani was granted mahsul from 2 villages of Pabal and Kendur for her living. There was a house built for her in the same village ( which was provision of her living in future in absence of Bajirao) The house still exists and there is a kabr in the premises which is called Mastani's kabr but actually there is no evidance to prove that it is Mastani's kabr. Bcz there was no wellwisher of Mastani in Pune who would build her kabr. This kabr was definitely not there till Panipat war, proving that it was not built by Samsher. After Samsher's death in Panipat war, his wife Meher started living at this Pabal house along with her son Alibahaddar who was just 2 years old in 1761. Alibahaddar finally shifted to Banda in 1780. Meherbai expired few months before his departure. So historians have strong feeling that this kabr belongs to Meherbai ( and not Mastanibai) and Alibahaddar built it in memory of his mother before shifting to Banda. Uska bhi pakka sabut nahi hai. But aaj usko Mastaniki kabr hi kaha jata hai.

@@goodhuman4232 True and as per Kashibai's maternal family they say that Mastani wasnt even allowed to set foot in Shaniwarwada and Kashi and Mastani never met

@@priyankakedare8894 But she stayed at Shanirwada from 1736-39. But offcourse, Shanivarwada was a complex of many structures and her residence was in one corner. So may be, she was not allowed to come to that part where the family stayed. In a letter written by Ambajipant Purandare in 1737, he mentioned- सौभाग्यवती काशीबाई आणि मस्तानी यांजकडे न्यूनता होत नाही, अधिकताच आहे.- so they shared good relations. Actually, we can not say anything confirmed bcz there is very negligible information about their personal lives. Also notice the difference in addressing two women by the chief caretaker of Peshwa family. It proves that the status of Mastani was that of a mistress only.

@@goodhuman4232 so you really think that peshwa bajirao would ever keep a mistress with him ?? Pity !! The truth is peshwa always treated her with respect and she was his wife and not mistress. Though people may have regarded her as a mistress but a man like Rau will never keep a mistress with him like a Mughal!!

And whether peshwa and Mastani had a real strong bond and love who knows?? Just because no documents are available it doesn't mean they didn't had intense relationship, otherwise they wouldn't have had a son together!

hanji

Sorry but the reason was Mask ke sath Camera focus nahi le raha tha. Ab thoda thumbs up kr dijiye 😇

Bajirao was characterless. He broke his own home. Mastani didn't break it. He broke his own home when he went with Mastani. Bajirao broke his own happy family. Yes he fell fir mastani and that's why mastani is related to it..but if anyone is a homebreaker here, that's Bajirao

So true, I will never understand why and how people at that time accepted people having more than one wife. If mastani would have been hindu so it might have not created this much fuzz, but again the pain for the first wife will remain the same. We are luck that hindu culture have abolished this so called pratha of marrying more than one wifi, otherwise women would have been more vulnerable😢

I think he grew up and participated in some war and was killed in it

She was never tortured. What you saw in the film is fake thing. She was put under housearrest but not chained and tortured. And she herself was responsible for her housearrest. The historic facts are never shown in the fiction. Bajirao was angry with his community ( for boycotting his family bcz of his dharmbhrashta acharan ie. drinking, consuming meat and keeping woman without marriage) So he was asked by his brother to go away from Pune for a while. Bajirao wanted to go on military expedition of Naserjung so he moved to Patas, a close town to Pune where he held a military camp so that armypeople could join. Few days after his departure, Mastani came to know that he was not in Pune. So she escaped from Shanivarwada and went to Patas. This created much fuss at Patas bcz the large army gathered at Patas. Bajirao sent her back from Patas to Pune and proceeded for the battle. This news spread so fast that Shahu maharaj had to take note of this episode. This was the most immature behaviour of Mastani. Kya ye bat filmme batayi gayi hai? This is how fiction hides real history. When she returned to Pune, she was put under housearrest. Think now, why Bajirao did not do anything to take her out of housearrest when it was easily possible for him.

@@goodhuman5452 from where I knew this ...about reading ur cmnt my curiosity increased a lot to know the real truth , and it's true in film most of the things r fake

@@mallikaartworld1767 You will know history only from historical documents. But for that you must know someone who has studied them actually.

Akang She was not at all tortured. It is filmy masala. How she died n when she died, no records are available. But her son was raised by his wife Kashi n family accepted him. He lived with them at Shanivarwada only. He was martyred in Panipat war along with Sadashivrao ( Chimaji's son) n Vishwasrao ( Bajirao's grandson)

Support me 👍

No Most follows Islam because of her mother Mastani is more Muslim than Hindu

@@vedanthsingh4949 bro go and watch interview of shadab ali bahadur who is descendants of mastani he Clearly said that mastanu was hindu .her mother was Muslim.dont believe on them if their descendants are saying this .then it must ne true that mastani was hindu

Father of Mastani was Hindu Rajput and Her Mother was Muslim but listen if any boy takes birth from Muslim mother then he follows Hindu and if any girl take Birth from Muslim mother then she follows Islam this was a true thing.

@@rajputchauhanwarrior2637 Anyways My Grand Grand Grand ,... Father was Prithviraj Chauhan ji

@@vedanthsingh4949 bro she was follower of pranami sampraday .and she was devotee of krishna. That's why she kept her son's name krishna. If u don't believe on me go and watch interview of shadab ali bahadur who is her descendant

Any historical evidence for this? Please give reference that Mastani was killed.

They never killed her. Also Kashi took care of Mastani's son like her own son. Also in most mughal families they forced the wife to convert and tortured them if they didn't. What about that?

​@@MeMe-dh7sc Tell the Rajputs why they send their daughters to a Mughal harem

​@@MeMe-dh7sc Aurangzeb treated Sembaji's wives with great care and raised his son Shahu, and he did not do it Maratha as happened with Mastani

These all are nonsense. It’s understandable Chatrasal gave marriage proposal of her daughter and in dowry one third of his kingdom.