Real Lawyer Reacts to It's Always Sunny (Hero or Hate Crime?)

Подписаться 3,2 млн

Просмотров 2,4 млн

50% 1

⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
The gang engages in a surprisingly accurate portrayal of an arbitration.
📚 Get Audible for 60% off for the first three months! legaleagle.link/audible
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)

Опубликовано:

8 дек 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 2,7 тыс.

@LegalEagle 2 года назад

Are there any legal IASIP episodes left to review?

@TheAzulmagia 2 года назад

To be fair, the third arbitrator just coming up with nonsense is exactly what the gang was looking for. They fired the previous two for trying to determine fair ownership rationally.

@lizdillinger 2 года назад

"Charlie is not a legal expert, even in bird law."

@SairajRKamath 2 года назад

The funniest part about this episode is that it's Mac's "coming out" moment. He doesn't do it out of personal struggle, catharsis or to inspire others - but to just win a lottery ticket. 😂😂😂

@DeathEatsCurry 2 года назад

"It's a 2 dollar scratcher, who cares" To be fair, this in essence sums up 90% of the gang's problems.

@Mr.PepeSilvia 2 года назад

"Even the kid with the balloon knew where to look" kills me every time

@communistpropagandist4608 2 года назад

"Im her boss and she makes less than minimum wage"

@javierganzarain4559 Год назад

I like how this trilogy is basically legal eagle slowly coming to terms with being an IASIP fan

@misslittledove Год назад

6:49

@margotp3687 2 года назад

I love that he started yelling about how sad Dee is along with the gang

@wfly81 2 года назад

Yeah, Frank's argument is basically how the entire gang works - "If by some accident, I actually do something in my life that helps someone else...then obviously somebody owes me something."

@Jermbot15

To be fair, that 3rd arbitrator was probably just a legal secretary told to make something up and get rid of them so that the support staff could go home.

@rbourne35 2 года назад

"The writers of the show must know what they're doing to write Charlie so insane from a legal perspective." Yes. I love the appreciation of writing comedy. Too many people just say somethings wrong but don't seem to understand that was intentional.

@ARVash 2 года назад

On the one hand her judgment was not based in law, but on the other she understood the situation well enough to know that they wouldn't challenge the ruling because she was working under their "moral" framework lmao.

@christopherlundgren1700 2 года назад

I think the arbitrator was operating under the kind of schoolground justice model that the gang was presenting. They didn't hire an arbitrator to tell them who, legally, owns the ticket; they were hired to tell them who "should" get it. They weren't going to accept a legal justification anyway, only one that they would find compelling enough to go along with it, like the lofty principles of "finder's keepers" and "I did you a solid".

@dylman9055 2 года назад

"the writers must know about law with how they write charlie to seem so insane from a legal perspective" -> charlie day is one of the two most active writers in the series -> charlie must know about law -> wait what?

@Wooskii1 Год назад

That's one of my favorite episodes and I've seen it a few times, but I just caught the full irony of the legal bill being $9,998 which Mac has to pay so he can receive a ticket that costs 2 bucks, but is worth 10 thousand, leaving him with 2 bucks profit, presumably to buy another ticket and possibly start the cycle again from the very beginning. I would love to see that sequel!

@noneofyourfckingbusiness8302 2 года назад

I can imagine by the third arbitrator the firm had a decent grasp of the Gang's lunacy and just made up an insane conclusion to this case to get them out of the building.