Real Time with Bill Maher: Overtime - March 4, 2016 (HBO) 

facts

Never liked hecklers in a theater. They are the same people who go home and complain about how the studio ruined the film. Can you make up your mind already?

+Y Tehrani I mean '''''How can you not love' - thnks A. Afif for correction. My editing skills need work.

+ram150482 The only highlight from the panel.

+ram150482 Absolutely fantastic. She is so well-spoken and honestly just down to earth.

+ram150482 Love her in this panel and also in her interview from earlier in the show.

+ram150482 Yup.

+gespilk I don't care who she is, she made valid points.

Probs

+iviewthetube Guardian had a piece on this. Some closet Drumpf supporters wrote in telling why they're voting for him. Most were single issue, but all were vacuous in their reasoning. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/03/secret-donald-trump-voters-speak-out

+Kaimosae My breaking point was the "Assad must go" campaign. I normally had voted Democratic, but after the mess that Kerry, Hillary, McCain had produced in Syria, that was the last straw. I am voting anti-establishment. I am voting Donald Trump.

+Kaimosae Great article. Thanks for sharing.

+iviewthetube vote Sanders if you want anti-establishment. Trump's gonna fuck up the US and might even bring about the Apocalypse (by antagonizing Russia or China). It's NOT worth it!

+playyourpart -- nope. No one else, I think.

+playyourpart same thought

+playyourpart I bet they'd fuck hard

+playyourpart They probably fucked and smoke weed together

+playyourpart They certainly had chemistry going on, probably the THC. But yeah, i heard Maher say to her that he thought she would be a great co-host and i was thinking exactly that. Seeing them together was like a couple of playful teens :) She turns him into a "Tickle-me" Bill, and he can give her some logic and stability, i think theyd be nice together. haha, never thought id be saying this.

+Eirikr Sanford Exactly, I felt the same way. I really enjoyed her presence on the show, I hope Bill brings her as a Panel guest in future episodes. Man, if only others felt and thought the way she does, violence would go down drastically.

I think there are more of us who feel the same way then we all think. However, the weapons used against us is to make us feel like we are alone or uncommon or we don't have a voice at all. through the internet and other means, people are beginning to wake up to the reality that we are being played and constantly another layer of veil is placed over our eyes. that's a true crime against humanity, which is to keep the dark and alone to our own thoughts and our own demise.

Sorry about the grammar. I'm using Google voice :) God bless you Fabri

Yes it seems that this is happening more and more, but thankfully we do have our weapons, that being the internet and our own voice. We can spread the truth and show people what is really going by using facts and proof. Both of which the righties don't seem to understand very much. We have to pass on this information to the next generation as well. It's imperative that we have our voices and opinions be heard. The lies have to end now.

+Fabricio Beninkoff I have hope for the people on the right. There are being opened to what's been really going on and how they were duped. how they were misled to vote for policies that would directly benefit themselves, it was an atrocity. I do not say that the people on the left have all of the ideas. Far from it. but I have seen how the people on the right have systematically voted for policies which directly hurt them all for an American dream, but what they realized is not their American dream... But the American dream of the dupers. They really created this fake wealth in the rights' mind... And had them voting as if they Are billionaires. I don't like labels. but the American people will see how they were played on the left and on the right, and then realize we are an American family and we need to get rid of the cancers and the viruses in our political systems, then we can start building bridges between our races and cultures and religions and make amends for what happened. then we can move on and say the sins of our fathers would not be the sins of our grandchildren. Once that happens, we are free

Kartikeya Srivastava Yea she is right...After 10yrs we wont even care about the hijab...we need to move on but yea they need to be educated

+Sleepy .Time packed and ready for deportation.

+Knaughty F she lives in Toronto.

imiss toronto doesn't matter where she lives. these are time bomb people. Remember San Bernardino?

Knaughty F like i said, she lives in Toronto.

imiss toronto Again, doesn't matter where she lives.

+rdelrosso2001 She is impressive, indeed.

+rdelrosso2001 I saw her on The Young Turks I think a few years ago, she is very intelligent and has some great views on alot of issues currently at the forefront of the worlds problems. She's also got an earring in her nose! :D

because bill is terrified of Muslims?

+Jordan Thickstun Clearly you've seen very few episodes of Real Time.

+Jordan Thickstun I'm thinking - just the opposite. Do you watch the show?! Also, Bill is helping her become better known.

+Benzene Nice user name and picture haha. You deserve more credit for that

I don't get it. It's the chemical structure of Benzene obviously, but what's the joke?

To me, that is the joke. Like, it's just goofy to have the username as benzene and just the chemical structure as the picture makes it goofier to me. As in it's just an absurd thing to do. It's probably not as funny as I think it is haha

Brandon DeFalco Well, thanks for appreciating my idiosyncratic sense of self! :)

+BAHB420 as bad a Trump is I think Cruz is far worse, stick with Bernie or HC as second choice.

That is the most accurate picture of the situation I've read!

I agree as an independent. Cant vote for establishment. Especially the ultimate evil Hillary. Only choice is independent Trump. Bernie is awesome but his tax plan would destroy the future of this country.

That kind of thinking is what got Hitler elected. Vote Green or Libertarian or just stay home election day you childish fucknuts.

+Carlo Von Sexron Say that to my murdered aunty and her children; the perpetrators of that murder being extremists allowed in legally by liberal bigotry - clearly demonstrated in your hateful comment.

+magicbologna It wasn't the scarf. Its the Niqab which covers the face.

shapiro has a face for tv......not radio

Ari Shapiro = Yummy !!! 😍

+ulfragnarsson Indeed. Every single time I see a photo of someone I've been listening to on the radio for ages...it's a weird sort of discombobulation.

Who cares? He works for NPR, which means he is a cunt.

+Tracie Amber Wilkinson what is wrong with public radio?

+hefftatious i missed the bit when Sarah Silverman said something even coherent. She sounded more like the left wing Palin

As a Canadian, it burns bad that our new leader the dipshit lefty twat feminist allows the niquab at all in Canada.

+30stmFantasy interestingly enough, and probably why it's such a 'debate' is because it Beats the facial recognition lock down of 1984;)) so i'm going to start..lol

+30stmFantasy If I want to wear a mask in public I should be able to. If I want to wear a shirt with a swastika on it I should be able to. If I want to walk around naked I should be able to. This authoritarian idea that the government has a right to say what I can wear is horrible. If I want to wear a cradle of filth Jesus is a cunt tshirt I should be able to, if you want those kind of stupid clothing laws move to England were people actually get arrested for wearing cradle of filth tshirts, you would love there anti-freedom policies.

+bucket foot5 No thanks - I like it here where people show their face! I don't give a shit what people wear but when a Muslim covers their face, then that gives everyone the right to cover their face. Not good.

+Emily Asgard even 14"?

??

***** I wouldn't go that far but I feel she's more of the same corporate bs that the other side up holds. However, if she's nominated (I hope not) , I'll still vote for her. The others guys are just loons. I believe Bernie had this. The media is working overtime to make us think she's a done deal which makes me think she's scared.

+Emily Asgard That's probably why hes doing so poorly, when you are siding with feminists you know you are on the wrong side.

Jamie Dimon if you say so.

+James Pazzaglia Bill has the mainstream media's mindset. Because he lost the southern states, ope, let's start talking about Hillary as the inevitable nominee. He DEFINITELY has a chance. Yes, fingers crossed for the next two weeks and beyond.

JD HIs guaranteed states already out of the way? You do know the primary is only just getting into his territory, right? But please tell me how much you know about politics and the importance of super-delegates, sir. HAHA

+Movie Muscle www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-delegate-tracker/

Luv Patel That includes super delegates the real count is less then 100 difference which is one state.

Honestly its people like this that make me mad. I used to be one of them though till I actually looked at the process. Republicans are no better they are going to steal trumps nomination. I dont like him but he is going to have the most delegates. In the end it wont matter because they will do the first vote at the convention he will not have a super majority which lets them do another vote where delegates can change there vote. There is going to be shady shit going down in Ohio. Dems are just kind of open about it with the super delegates. lol

+Nauseum Bob Saget, Pauly Shore, Dane Cook, and countless other comics try much harder, fail much harder, and never get the shit that Silverman gets online (mostly concerned with her looks or ethnicity).

FungusMossGnosis ugly people are objectively funnier than good looking people. Self-deprecation coming from a pretty girl is a pretty tough bill sell. Those guys aren't funny either though, I'll give you that.

Nauseum You definitely have something there, yes, harder for attractive people to be unselfconsciously funny. Although Maria Bamford and Nick Thune are pretty damned funny. There are other exceptions.

+gespilk Well firstly, I agree with whatever she's said here on Real Time. Prima Facie, she seems nothing like a career-obsessed manufactured career politician like Clinton. Secondly, you mind substantiating your claim, bud?

u hy, m8?

sarcasm overflowed

Yeah exactly. I think that's because now bernie has no chance of getting the nomination.

Nile Ab That is what I thought at first...but he is still doing okay. Seems like Bill switched gears REALLY fast, maybe there is more to the story.

+carpo719 It sort of feels that he wants to talk about Bernie though

Ryou kagamine Then he should! After all, he IS the last mainstream show with the kind of clout he has, and now he owns Vice, he should get with it and get more info out.

carpo719 I feel the exact same way. People assume Hillary is going to win due to on going media coverage they've put putting up. though With states like California it's going to a landslide victory for Bernie all the way. I really hate how the media just keeps on pushing him to the side.

+PaulinWoburn Way better choices than Hillary. That's for sure.

+PaulinWoburn Tulsi Gabbard is far better than Donna Edwards. Edwards seems to have the old-school, establishment mindset.

+Mani M -- I love Sarah, too; but in other appearances she hasn't been as on-target as tonight. She nailed it when she explained her support for Hillary and then joining the Bernie camp. That's exactly how it happened with me. Tonight, some of her momentary comments really astounded me, like when Bill was wrapping to go to new rules and she made one last comment, then looked at him and said, "Sorry. Go!" No forethought, it was just perfect for the moment. I want to have her babies.

+Mani M Im not really a fan or follower of her, but i do think shes funny and attractive. I liked seeing Bill and Sarah together, and it was nice to hear that Maher said she would be a great co-host, right before they went into the "New Rules" segment, because thats what i thought too.

+Mani M Sarah......isn't funny at all to me. I know comedy is very subjective; I don't like Jim Carey, Steve Martin, or Will Ferrell's stand up either. OTOH, Carlin almost always cracked me up, as did Hackett, Pryor, and unfortunately, Cosby.

+Bill Malcolm And that is why they are afraid.

+Beorn Borg Thank you for data: really? "Bernie Bros?" Why does Bernie accept support from known opponents of his platform? No worries; i'll check it. :)

+CharlieSheen'sAIDS u high? Larry King, Adam Sandler, Andy Samberg, Jeff Ross, Half the friggin cast of SNL...come on.

+Kotazo Sabe Pretty sure that was sarcasm there bud.

walkinhop Nope. They all support many causes. And backstage is the funding, management, etc. Seriously, I wish Bernie gets to the office so he can do what survivors do. Your economy needs a kickstart. Who better than a fellow tribesman of the smartest people around.

***** Are you ok?

+CharlieSheen'sAIDS they rule the USA and the world already. they control how you live your lives indirectly. you work for them, because they own the private federal reserve, which the US gov borrows from and all currencies are based on the US currency. You work for money, you are an indirect slave to the jews.

Not a critical thinker are you? That is just stupid

Jonathan Cassidy see that is the problem you are under the impression you are thinking.

Jonathan Cassidy So what? No one asked you to give out critiques.

Jonathan Cassidy All you had to do is tell me to vote Trump and that tells me everything I need to know about your thoughts. You want to use the documents of this country to defend yourself but will vote for a man that has no respect for those same documents or of his promises in actions being unconstitutional or even legal in most cases. You are foolish

Sounds like a good argument for National Healthcare then no problems you go to who you want an it is always covered because it is The Healthcare of the Nation and there would be nothing else. Donald is an embarrassment to this nation has no integrity and no experience for the job plain and simple he is not qualified and never was. NEXT.

+Eastbluedrew I came up with the term "temporal proximity high"

In other news, air is breathable.

+Poiison Dota (Español) Except she's not religious. Which is precisely why she's likeable.

+Hashim Kazmi I met her when she was dating Kimmel. She was really hot.

She is a terrible comedian. I think people are just attractive to her thats why she is so famous.

+fourdeck33 Yes, it would and it' would dispel all this Bernie bro nonsense. Actually, in 2008, Hillary accused Obama supporters of the same thing, think it was phrased, Obama boys.

+fourdeck33 Here's an apropos video about this; Why "Bernie Bro" Myth Is Bogus ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FdW5OkizEto.html

Just to be clear however, I would support any Democratic nominee over any Republican, but Bernie is talking about and planing to tackle the most important issue in politics today, getting rid of the legalized corruption in American politics through money in politics, which affects every other important issue today. While some maintain Bernie has already lost, that is a fallacy, he's about to probably win 3 out of 4 states which are being contested in the next 48 hours. Some also say that Hillary is more electable but most polls show that Sanders beats any Republican nominee by a much, much greater margin and most media is being disingenuous in their reporting because most of the money donated to politicians end up paying for political ads and they do not want to kill the golden goose. Surprisingly Bernie isn't as popular with minorities but that's because of the narrative put out there by media which hardly talks about his fighting for, and getting arrested fighting for civil rights for African-Americans. Luckily Trump has the Republican party in complete disarray, if he becomes their nominee, a lot of Republicans won't vote at all, maybe you've seen or heard of the #Never Trump campaign. Some however, would vote for the anti-establishment Sanders but none would vote for Hillary. If they take the nomination away from Trump, and chances are good that they will as this is the likely reason the other three candidates aren't dropping out, so they can stop him from reaching the required number of delegates he needs to automatically secure the nomination, and he miraculously keeps his word and doesn't make an independent run for the presidency, a 'huge' amount of his 40% of supporters would be up in arms and still wouldn't support the 'establishment' nominee. The truth is however, If the nomination is given to someone else, he will likely run as an independent out of spite and take his 40% of Republicans with him, he's been known to flip-flop...a lot. No matter what, a massive amount of Republican voters will be disenfranchised, 'believe me'. This is the perfect opportunity for real change. Sanders is more electable against any Republican, he wants to tackle the most important issue of the day in the legalized corruption of money in politics, not to mention justice reform, financial sector reform and ending the corporate welfare system which sees literally TRILLIONS of dollars going to corporations and taking that money and using it on things like education and healthcare. Healthcare which is a basic human right and education, which only an uneducated person would see as a handout. It's actually an investment in the countries future which would reduce unemployment, drive innovation, give opportunities to minorities and poor people, create jobs and generate extra tax revenues which is currently spent on tax cuts and bail-outs for corporations. Some say Bernie is a socialist, but he is a democratic socialist like FDR who instituted socially democratic policies like the New Deal, the GI Bill and Social Security, programs which brought America out of the great depression, were responsible for the post-war boom and were so successful they were maintained and even expanded under Eisenhower, a Republican. There have been four supreme court decisions since about the mid to late seventies that allowed money in politics, said that corporations are individuals, have political rights like a person, made the amount that could be donated unlimited and finally with Citizens United allowed those donations to be made anonymous and the country has been in decline ever since. Bernie is the only candidate willing to tackle this issue, and there will never be a better time or a better person to bring about this real and positive change to this system which no-one but corporations, traditional media and corrupted politicians likes or trusts.

+Andrei Strenc I agree completely, and Trump is part of that system. He bought politicians all his life and now he's just trying to cut out the middle man and buy the Presidency itself. He's not even self funded, he's taken out loans to do this and will probably use future campaign contributions to pay himself back because while he can get by without donors in a primary, he could never win a general election with his own money.

She wants to be on bills little point.

+Movie Muscle Yes, Donna Edwards is a black woman. Very true. She even said so. But I think maybe you should calm down. I'm a Bernie supporter too, but it's a little ridiculous how so many Bernie supporters are so thin-skinned about any perceived Bernie slight. And Hillary's really not that bad, given the fact that she's a normal politician. Besides, we need a woman president. And I thought Bill was actually a bit better this episode than usual. He managed to go the whole 75 minutes without making a single bigoted statement about anyone. So relax. It'll be okay.

+Movie Muscle What are you talking about? He clearly stated in the main show that it was ridiculous for people to to call Bernie unelectable while Trump was the most hated and Hillary the second-most hated candidate; all while Bernie was the most liked. He also blamed the media for this anti-Bernie nonsense. Get a grip.

Right, because Bill is the only news show talking about Trump right now. No you're right bro... It's not that his show is only once a week and that Donald does and says crazy shot throughout the week that Bill wants to cover. Naw it's not that. You're right, Bill is just obsessed with Trump. Lol how ignorant are you?

That is exactly what I thought. He was just praising Bernie a week or two ago and after South Carolina/Super Tuesday he's praising Hillary and speaking as though she's already the Dem nominee?! I'm tired of him flip-flopping (eh-hem, Hillary-move). He doesn't genuinely understand this movement behind Bernie and against Hillary. Bill is well-off, and isn't affected by the lack of healthcare access and offshoring of jobs. This is a movement by the people, of the people, and for the people. #Bernie2016

***** What don't you agree with in my second paragraph?

+hmmm Yeah yeah yeah, but when Hillary gets the nomination, you'll be voting for Trump, and everybody knows it.

jbrisby Good.

+hmmm Socialism boils down to equal misery for everyone! Its beyond belief that anybody would buy into this marxist fucking stupidity!!!!!!!!

+delta8264 it is beyond belief that anyone buys into fox news arguments like bernie wants to turn this into a socialist country. we are not purely capitalists. have you heard of social security? monetary policy? he is suggesting a hybrid simpleton.

mkrulic517439 And no one looks at Canada as a threat, and yet it is more of a socialist country. People are stupid man, as much as you try and explain they don't understand.

She sounds like a boy going through puberty whose voice is cracking to me. Kind of annoying.

+Blood Angel A pubescent boy with a cigarette addiction.

+Blood Angel that's _interesting_ to me. different strokes...

+Blood Angel - she has laryngitis.

Atheism is a religion too you know. There's no proof for Gods nonexistence, so be careful what you wish for.

+Harry Huckleberry Please tell me you are joking, because only an extremely stupid person would believe that somehow Atheism - which by definition is the LACK OF RELIGION - to be a religion.

+Verum omnibus supereminet to be an atheist you must have faith as well. Atheism claims there is no God without any evidence. Agnosticism is a more honest position cuz it does not require faith.

+Harry Huckleberry That's a misunderstanding of atheism. We live as if there's no 'god,' because we just don't care if there is one or not. Show me one, and I'll say, "okay," but my life won't change one iota. Maybe some rabid atheists like to scream "no god!" with certainty. Most atheists I know don't say that. We just ignore the whole idea of gods, because, frankly, it's a terribly uninteresting idea to begin with.

+Harry Huckleberry It isn't that we believe there is no God. We don't believe there is a God. If we find unshakeable empirical proof for God, whichever God, like we have for evolution or the age of the earth, then sure, we'll believe it. Till then, we don't believe in one. Also, importantly, we don't say there isn't a God, but if you say there is one, then we'll say no there isn't and ask you to substantiate your claims. Simple as that.

+Eric Bacon Sounds like a True Scotsman argument there bud.

Archie Andrews Not exactly. The No True Scotsman fallacy is an attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion. When the No True Scotsman fallacy is called in error, that is a logical fallacy in and of itself - something like Denial of Definition. It assumes that the subject being discussed (in this case Christianity/Islam) has no real, hard-and-fast definitions, which is not the case. Regardless of "interpretation", these faiths are still based on Scripture (Bible/Quran) as well as other documented sources. If I call myself a Muslim but I go to a Christian church, worship Jesus Christ as savior, and think Muhammad was a false prophet . . . I'm not a Muslim. While I agree that not everything in the Quran/Bible is so black-and-white and can be open to interpretation to a certain degree, this is not to say that people can just impose meanings into the text which do blatantly and outright contradict a plain reading of the Quran/Bible and what it does actually say. Two contradictory opinions can not both be true: this is basic logic. In this context, those who bring up "alternative interpretations" are essentially just making something up based on their own feelings and what they want it to say rather than just accepting what it says. To me it seems that they are not genuine believers, because they are rejecting and going against what is plainly written in the Quran/Bible. This is what Eric meant when he wrote "it is a degree of disbelieving". For example: The Quran defines ITSELF as the perfect book and literal word of Allah for all of eternity, so if a Muslim blatantly rejects certain verses, then he/she is already admitting (indirectly) that Allah is flawed which by definition would falsify the religion. But religious people have no integrity i've come to realize, so instead of facing this truth they instead choose to REDEFINE what it means to be Muslim/Christian. I guess that's cool, you can just make it up as you go along, like a 'Choose your own Adventure' book LOL. BTW, Eric couldn't have worded his comment more perfectly. He carefully included "(in the original sense)" which saved him from committing the fallacy you accused him of committing :)

I probably wrote that comment like shit but whatever i'm tired and not going to proofread it. Hope it makes sense.

+Question Everything so kind of like how Christians use the bible as justification for their homophobia but dont adhere to any of the other 500 rules in leviticus

John Adams Exactly. Muslims and Jews and Hindus and whatever-else all do this, this behavior is not particularly unique to Christians. All too often the concept of "differing interpretation" is used as a mask for picking and choosing. But i'm not unsympathetic, I truly understand. I try not to sound too preachy for I was also VERY religious at one point. Whenever I became educated of a Scientific theory or fact that contradicted the Quran, or if I questioned the morality of a certain verse, I too altered my "interpretation". Ironically I also misused the "NTS" fallacy, as well as many other fallacies, to refute those that questioned the validity of my belief. So I would be a hypocrite if I were to pretentiously judge others for their willingness to cling on to the faiths they were indoctrinated in or their understandable defense mechanisms. I know I can sometimes come off as patronizing but I only speak this way because I TRULY know what it's like to be stuck in "the bubble". There are very deep subconscious psychological systems behind identity and to very many leaving the religion their parents molded them by is more than just "accepting the truth", it is literally killing yourself and re-birthing yourself and everything you knew, something that is very intimidating and extremely difficult for most of us - this is something most of my fellow Atheists aren't in tune with. Having that said, keeping titles such as "Muslim" while not believing in the dogma is a completely different thing than what I just wrote about in the previous paragraph. In this context it is more about keeping a "cultural identity" in the face of a perceived opposing force that constitutes of people who merely use religion as a scapegoat to hate or as a tool to manipulate for hidden agendas. It's very similar to how many African Americans united under "The Nation of Islam" in the 60's and 70's, because even if they didn't believe in the dogma itself, they felt empowered by its unity or whatever else. Rastafarianism was rooted on rebelling against the idea that their "creator" was a White man and painting Jesus as a Black man was a way of countering racist Christians. There are also OTHER intentions such as those that don't believe but think they'll be more productive reforming the damage Islam is doing by working on it from within than being shunned an "outsider". Like I said I don't AGREE with any of these reasons but I understand it. But yeah, I just wanted to clarify that the cultural/reforming/etc ideology behind keeping labels like "Muslim" is different than what I was writing on in my last 2 comments, which was more discussing those that still DO believe in the dogma but are not genuine with themselves and the ways they alter the definition of their Faiths by masking it with words like "interpretation" and wrongfully accusing people of fallacies.

+Critical Eats Japan Because the first one is streamed live.

redlightmax Really? Wow, thanks, I never even noticed...

+AlfaPegasii totally agree. I think it is wrong to do but this cry of racism is total bullshit

+AlfaPegasii You don't think the general Republican freeze-out of everything Obama isn't partially about race? Seriously? Racism is bread and butter to those guys.

+AlfaPegasii No it is about race and has been from the first time he won. They just got really angry the second time he won. The old party of white angry men have fought tooth and nail to make him a illegitimate president and disgrace him in some way...the amount of Obama hate they have created is shameful. This is about the old white men not allowing the African Americans their spot in American History. You are blind if you don't understand what President Obama represents to these men and their kind.

+AlfaPegasii There's something wrong with you if you don't think it has anything to do with race. Get yourself checked out.

+AlfaPegasii Annoying liberals like this panel love to cry racism. Both sides can be rather intellectually pathetic.

Not big on context, are you?

+fishhead06 You're going to need us to when your Prime Minister tanks your economy.

SugaryCoyote Oh, do tell, Nostradamus. If there's one thing that the rest of the western industrialized world can say about Americans, generally, with some confidence, it's that they know the price of everything - and the value of nothing.

fishhead06 Excellent bumper sticker slogan. You will sell many. I know the price they could sell for. If you don't know the value of $30 billion Canadian dollars then you shouldn't be running a country. You can't feel your way out of a deficit.

SugaryCoyote If I sell 6 billion at a penny, I'll be filthy rich. And dictator of the United States.

She's not saying Muslims can't were whatever they want in their home but in public citizens shouldn't cover their face.

because if you are brainwashed from birth and forced to wear that than its not a choice. Muslim woman are opressed and we shouldn't allow them to keep that part of their culture when over here men and woman are equal. they re not property. if they are made to hide themselves under a sack their entire life that undoubtedly causes mental health problems.

+Jethro Plebian I agree, why waste time on something so superficial? Besides, it is Canada u need to cover your face anyway just to protect you from the cold.

that's exactly what I was thinking

+Benjamin Ferenz But y should people be obligated to express themselves with their faces? Why do you feel entitled to know other peoples thought and feelings?