Aurangzeb had relatives who were Hindu since his grandmother was a Hindu Rajput who reverted to Islam. he never asked his relatives to convert to Islam but asked you to convert? Strange.
@@MAli-hh1mg They were his allies and you don't piss off your own allies. The main reason for the fall of Mughal empire is Aurangzeb pissed off people of every other religion resulting in rebillions from every part of his empire. I don't really think Mughal rulers were that keen in conversions I mean if you want to rule that large part of land you have to live in harmony with locals. But Afghan rulers were different unlike Mughals they were savages. Wherever they went they forcefully tried to convert and Kashmir is the best example of it. Even during the partition their tales of butchery were horrifying.
@@zodiacsama7693 About Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir, Aurangzeb was a fierce warrior saint and an able administrator. He is the second longest-reigning monarch ever to rule the Indian sub-continent, just a couple of months less than that of Akbar's reign. Aurangzeb’s empire was the largest empire ever ruled by any Indian ruler. His empire was the second richest empire in the entire world second to the Chinese empire. His army was considered one of the strongest armies of his time. He was the first Indian ruler to crush the British rebellion. As far as Aurangzeb is concerned he was a successful ruler but his successors were not as capable as him. Moreover, foreign forces had already started meddling in Indian politics., and this is why the Mughals declined. However, the Mughals continued their rule for another 150 years after Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir.
Conversations haha. There's no angle of religion here. That guy Aurangzeb was a serious mad killer. He doesn't even have anything to do with religion. All he wanted to rule!
I studied in a sikh school, and I studied elementary level sikh religion during my time there. There were immeasureable amount of atrocities inflicted on Indians during Aurangzeb's time. Murder, rape, pillage, and other unspeakable crimes were common sights. In fact, these horrors were so common, that our sikh brothers took up arms and picked up weapons just to protect common people-- and unfortunately, many of them died horrible deaths while fighting or after capture. I wholeheartedly agree that muslims today shouldn't be asked to pay for atrocities that these invaders inflicted. This invader mentality belongs to only a few in extremes. We also must ensure that we do not underplay the horrors that our ancestors had to live through under the Mughal empire.
Aurangzeb hated Hinduism because he believed it is a religion which teaches caste discrimination . Hinduism is a religion which teaches God created Brahmins from his head and Shudras from his feet. Even Br Ambedkar hated Hinduism.
@@kishorarya1562Hinduism is a religion which has caste system in it. Ambedkar while converting to Buddhism he burnt hindu holy scriptures infront of every one. In his book, Pakistan or The Partition of India, Ambedkar wrote, “If Hindu Raj does become a fact, it will, no doubt, be the greatest calamity for this country. No matter what the Hindus say. Hinduism is a menace to liberty, equality and fraternity. On that account it is incompatible with democracy. Hindu Raj must be prevented at any cost.”
@@shahid1991july well nobody follows the law of manusmriti... During Muslim Raj many of the Hindu religious books were edited... Current manusmriti is definitely not good for any human or other living beings but we have proofs that in other yugas manusmriti didn't used to follow... And about the quote you took from Ambedkar's book😂 I would like to draw your attention toward the situation when he wrote this... During partition of India.. Muslim wanted a Muslim country and hence wanted to cut India into two... In response Hindus of India too demanded a hindu Raj where hindu can live freely.... source of my statement, "The Muslims are howling against the Hindu Maha Sabha and its slogan of Hindudom and Hindu Raj. But who is responsible for this ? Hindu Maha Sabha and Hindu Raj are the inescapable nemesis which the Musalmans have brought upon themselves by having a Muslim League. It is action and counter-action." (Pakistan or partition of India by B R AMBEDKAR) just in next pages of your quote
15:04 🤦 bro Aurangazeb was a Muslim, read what Jizya is about. It's for the protection of people against outside forces. And in Islam the people who cannot pay jizya are exempt from paying it.
I am Hindu And i will never Forget what Happened with our ancestors. And I will never forget that what Aurangzeb did with our Sikh gurus and our beloved Sahibzaade Jo bole so nihal sat shree akal जय श्री राम🙏🙏🙏
@@PANDITDADDY-kq9ufOf course Aurangjeb was an evil. But same applies to Ashoka who murdered over a lakh people in Kalinga. Also King Shashanka who beheaded Buddhists.
As a Muslim I will never forget how hindu killed Sikhs after Indra Gandhi assesination As a Muslim I will never forget Khalistan As a Muslim I will never forget how Sikhs are portrayed in Bollywood movies.
Aurangjeb may have many good quality but I will always hates him to my guts because demolishing worship places to show power is the lowest anyone can ever fall. Babri masjid demolition is not a destruction but a reclamation of old heritage.
🤣🤣🤣 Veere ek din zaroor aayega Hamare 4 religions (Sikh,Budh,Jain,Hindu) milke sanatan kaa naam lenge and apni saare difference bhoolke ek honge aur us din us din Duniya ki aur in Abrahamic religions ki G maarenge 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻 Waheguru ji ka Khalsa waheguru ji ki Fateh 🚩 Jai Shree Ram 🚩
As a Maharashtrian growing up knowing what he did to Sambhaji Maharaj or even a fellow human is inhuman and cruel in general. I can never overlook the atrocities caused by Aurangzeb and his regime to the whole Maharashtra during his reign.
Aurangzeb was cruel, he did not care for even his family. When Shivaji Maharaj's son was captured by him due to betrayal, he cruelly tortured Sambhaji Raje, offering him to convert to Islam. But when Sambhaji Raje refused, he cruelly tortured him and his poet friend. I can't even say how cruelly he killed our Raje. He was evil and no one should doubt it.
Bro you never knew of grandson of Chatrapati shivaji mahataj aurangazeb took care of him after his father got killed. When aurangazeb died shivaji grandson went tk his memorial and respected him
पाखण्डी धर्मगुरुओं ने अफवाह फैला रखी थी कि जो काशी में मरेगा वह स्वर्ग जायेगा तथा जो मगहर में मरेगा वह गधा बनेगा। परमेश्वर कबीर जी कहते थे कि जैसी काशी है वैसा ही मगहर है, केवल हृदय में सच्चा राम होना चाहिए, यदि आप सतभक्ति करते हो तो आप कहीं भी प्राण त्यागो, आप मोक्ष के अधिकारी हो। माघ महीना, शुक्ल पक्ष तिथि एकादशी, विक्रम संवत 1575, सन् 1518 को कबीर परमेश्वर मगहर से सशरीर सतलोक गए।
@@asentertain352 inhone bas bkwas hi karni hai Jo log aa tank wad ko justify kar skte hai do you think wo aise ghatiya Mughal emperor ki galtiyo ko accept krenge inke liye toh wo ek proud mus lim tha aur abhi jannat me hooro ke sath ayyiyashi kar rha hoga
Being a Kashmiri hindu ( KP ) i want to say that even today in each and every kashmiri hindu family we are introduced to the story that how guru teg bahadur has helped us to not convert to islam.
Did you know what chor shivaji does with of hindus of surat Did you know seth veerji vora?? At that time seth veerji vora was the worlds most richest man But chor marathas looted him so bad then he became fakeer veerji vora Shivaji got what he deserved
@@Kk-rc5dlJust because thousands or millions of people strive to clear Aurangzeb's and other people's history and name and do not support the cruel regime of BJP you call them propagandists?.
@@harshalyerpude8751don't listen him Burhanpur was Aurangzeb's most loved place He lived his earlier part of there. He made Burhanpur a big market like Surat. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj looted treasures of Surat 2 times. So after Shivaji Maharaj, Sambhaji Maharaj decided to loot Burhanpur. He loot Burhanpur like his father without taking lives of innocent public or businessmen. I don't feel anything wrong in that.
At first, muslim historians said, auranjeb was not interested in politics and was interested in islam But then after becoming badshah , Muslim historians were defining that all his action against sikhs and hindus were political and not for his religious interest.... 😶😶It is as it is ,nothing to explain in it ...😶😶 Also i am targeting muslim historians not mohak bhai , please don't disinterpret this comment in wrong way ..
As a Sikh i would like to say that the reason behind Guru Gobind Singh Ji developing the brotherhood of Khalsa wasn't to 'take revenge's but to protect the community and other minority communities of the time. Revenge is not something the Guru seeks. Edit: y'all let's not fight about who's contribution it was and wasn't, that ruins the whole point.
@@RC-wy4tf ya the hindu rulers were just sitting and doing nothing that time no doubt guru Gobind singh did a lot but that does not mean we say that they protected us from converting to Islam it was the cumulative efforts of both Sikhs and hindus
@@AnkitKumar-sn8hqAurangzeb was a conservative Mslm and Izlm orders to dmolish idols and prophet of izlm himself did that so any Mslm d6molishing idols and temples can only be religious not political. Leftists distorians expert in distorting the history as per convenience and this political demolition is part of that referring to western historians while talking about Indian history makes no sense( not talking about European travellers but European historians) and referring to extreme left biased historians like Irfan Habib just questions your credibility. And it's a proven fact that guru teg bahadur was beheaded because he refused to accept islam. Kashmiri pandits approached him because Aurangzeb was trying to force them to convert. Guru teg bahadur put a pact in front of Aurangzeb that if Aurangzeb succeeds converting him then kashmiri Hindus will accept islam but Aurangzeb won't force kashmiri to convert if Aurangzeb fails to convert teg bahadur. At the same time, Aurangzeb also tortured 3 other Sikhs in front of guru teg bahadur ji to convert them.
You did mentioned that he destroyed Kashi Vishwanath Temple and something similar was also done by his father. They did so to crush the Maratha Revolt. But unlike his father why did he built a Mosque there ? Many temples have been destroyed in history like Somnath temple was looted and destroyed many times but Mosque was never built upon it and that is why people were able to rebuild it. Aurangzeb was cruel. Politics or revolt are just the excuses.
@@nischalsantooshsinghsairam2278 muslims? I thought india was mostly Islamised during his era? And so I order to gain support from the muslims you just have to distroy the most holy temples of the natives and if that is the case doesn't that reveal his Islamist mentality
arungzeb did to Jain's who were in great population of that time... He literally got a cow butchered inside a great jain temple. He was a bad person who followed a bad book Qur'an for justifying violence on other dharmas.
@@aarshjain3004 well no need to call qoran bad bhai..yes it does have some bad elements. Mostly be cuz abrahamoc religions like Jews and Christians don't believe in other gods and call them false.
11:43 A little bit of correction. Aurangjeb didn't captured Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. He invited him for negotiations but he house arrested him in Agra.
Re correction, Aurangzeb Invited him to his court to improve relations, however Shivajis Ego was hurt at the court since he was placed amongst the lower ranks in the assembly. due to this Shivaji stormed off the assembly and this was considered blasphemy and hence put under house arrest. If Aurangzeb wanted he could have hanged or beheaded but he didn't. However instead of asking for negotiation he devised to ran off hiding in fruit baskets.
@@ofeebape4232 If you can't even equally respect the other side how are you even supposed to negotiate? And what do you think ? Aurangzeb was just gonna let Shivaji Maharaj go if he pleaded? Of course escaping was a smarter move.
@@Vardhan789 The fact that even after defying the Emperor in Public, and after illegal escape from house arrest Between 1666 same year after escape and 1668, Aurangzeb conferred the title of raja on Shivaji. Sambhaji was also restored as a Mughal mansabdar with 5,000 horses. Shivaji at that time sent Sambhaji, with general Prataprao Gujar, to serve with the Mughal viceroy in Aurangabad, Prince Mu'azzam. Sambhaji was also granted territory in Berar for revenue collection.Aurangzeb also permitted Shivaji to attack Bijapur, ruled by the decaying Adil Shahi dynasty. So yeah peace was an option...but No...Shivaji chose to rebel Again broke the peace treaty, which led to Marathas breaking up the Indian subcontinent and paved the way to the British empire to take over. There is no other way to put it. As long as Aurangzeb was alive the British were on their knees.
Excuse me Guru Gobind Singh ji ne mohmed ki reality expose Ki hai Shri Dasam Granth me…..jo zafarmama bheja tha kuttey aurangzeb ko usme use….jhulam krne wala bola gya hai
@@joshimukul6467 if guru Gobind singh ji wanted to kill Aurangzeb, it would have been cakewalk for Sikhs. There were thousands of Sikhs ready to do anything but it was not the objective and Guru Gobind singh ji made it very clear in their writings.
Bcuz he was the Most power Muslim Emperor of his time and century his era is said to be the golden era of Islam and its 1 of the most power Islamic Era where his empire stretched from Iran and Arabia to Borders of Indonesia and Malaysia and his forces are responsible for Islamization of Indonesia and Malaysia from his capital Delhi and he was a strong Muslim nationalist and a very close friend to the Ottoman Sultans and Safavid Shahs a very very close friend to them to the extent that he killed 2 Sikh Gurus and 3 of the most powerful Hindu Rajas in Indian Subcontinent in his time the full scale Islamic Hanafi Sharia was Enforced in Indian subcontinent and all the Muslims of Indian subcontinent revered him from Punjab and Bengal and Malabar and Karnatic and much much more he was Called Ameer E Momeneen E Hind and Khalifa E Muslimeen E Hind Sultan Of Mughal Empire Aurangzeb Alamgir. in his time the nationalism was almost dead due to his reign being a fully power Islamic regime which made Islam in every breath of Indian subcontinent to the extent that people forgot nationalistic concepts. he was fluent in Arabic and Turkish and Persian and Urdu and all other major Islamic languages. king of Indonesia accepted Islam in his palace in Gujrat resulting in Islamization of Indonesia and King of Malaysia too. he was the soul reason of Islamization of Indonesia and Malaysia. a mighty powerful Muslim emperor. thats why Hindus and Sikhs hate him. he was the reason why many Sikhs and Hindus were converted via force to Islam and he converted Millions of South Indian Hindus to Islam via military force and resulted in creation of Islamic Sultanates in South India and 1 example is Sultan Tepu.
Do u know that many eminent historians professor like DN Jha, S irfan Habib etc wrote mercy petition of Afzal guru and u expect them to write true history
@@rajashashankgutta4334yeah man nothing is wrong when a mercy petition is written for a TERRORIST who attacked the parliament, killed multiple security personnels and caused a fear among among entire nation, exactly these type of people need the mercy...very good logic
Upper caste Hindus are such a peaceful society that they do not even know the meaning of the word "discrimination". The love shown towards lower caste hindus was epic and BR.Ambedkar fell in love with upper caste Hindus and decided to left Hinduism because he believed he does not deserve to be in this peaceful non discrminatary religion.🤣🤣😋
@@shahid1991july if you think his views are so sarcastic on hinduism then go and watch his views on islam too😅 Lol you'll find more entertainment there!!
@@ayushisinha7151 Oh ya true, 😄😄 Br. Ambedkar has done phd in Islamic studies and his views on Islam should be 1000% accurate. Br. Ambedkar is a hafize Quran and has done phd in Islamic Sciences. 🤣😅😅 and we should follow him.😆 Oye, Listen, Islam is the truth . The Religion of Abraham (peace be upon him ) . i.e., ONE GOD , the one and only,,,, is the Message of Islam. The God of prophet Jesus, Moses and Mohammad ( peace be upon them all) is the only one God. ONE GOD IN THIS CREATION. ONE AND ONLY. RABBUL ALAMEEN.THIS IS THE MESSAGE OF ISLAM.
@@shahid1991july me khud ek lower caste Hindu hu.. jab Bangladesh me tere bhaiyo hamla kiya tha...tab unhone kon upper caste kon lower caste kuch nhi dekha...sirf hindu dekha aur Marne Lage...kuch faida nhi tum logo ka ye sab bolna...babri masjid ko torne Wale Brahmins nhi...maximum lower caste Wale log he🕉️🕉️🤣🤣🤣.
@@shahid1991july his book Pakistan or partition of India it is written all about Islam do you know more than dr br Ambedkar or you know about him more than himself here are some lines from that book compendium of Ambedkar’s thoughts on Islam and Muslims in India could be found in the seminal book ‘Pakistan Or The Partition Of India‘, first published in 1940, with subsequent editions in 1945 and 1946. The book, a collection of his writings and speeches, lays bare a staggering account of what Ambedkar thought about Islam. Those thoughts have the potential of earning him the tag of “Islamophobic” by radical Islamists today. In crude and lucid language, Ambedkar expounded that Islam was a divisive religion, a faith that segregated people into rigid groups of Muslims and non-Muslims, where the benefits of brotherhood and fraternity were limited only to the former, i.e Muslims, while the latter was treated with contempt and enmity. “Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity,” BR Ambedkar wrote in ‘Pakistan or Partition of India’. Ambedkar also elucidated the incompatibility of Islam with local self-government. Underscoring the Islamic ideology of Muslim Ummah, Ambedkar said loyalty of a Muslim is not based on his domicile in the country but on the faith to which he belongs. Islam, according to BR Ambedkar, could have never allowed a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland. For that to happen, the establishment of Islamic rule was imperative. This was a bleak possibility given that India was a Hindu majority nation. Therefore, he concluded that for a Musalman, India could never be his motherland. This, of course, was the cornerstone of the two-nation theory propounded by the Muslim League, which inevitably led to the partition of the country.
some people are saying to forget the past but i say remember it well either for learning from it or for knowing what communities did what in what era.... Because people take land, name, pride of their forefathers then why not carry the mistakes and make it right... If we keep saying to forget the past than nothing good can come out of it.... It's not only about muslims, even some high class community did wrong things to their own people which is inhuman.... Such as to not abolish caste system in hinduism or make it to what it rightfully was.
@@gin42069 go search the meaning of weeb, kid... Or ask your dad but oh wait he wouldn't know that either because if he was good enough he would have taught you not to say about something you don't know the meaning of
guys let abolish the sati pooja! as we shouldn't forget how our religion does to our women! ... soo stop saying non sense shit which u can't do ! doing same thing as they did is same as we wrong as they were! ... as he compared ashoka as same as aurangzeb! stop just spreading hatered based on religion nd all!
@@benudharmadhi4154 hnn tu toh present tha vha. Tbhi itne confidence se bolra... or bol b ese raha jese tere pe aankh bnd krr k vishwaas krr lengey.. tu b toh nhi tha tb.. kyu.. ab b defend krega kya aurangzeb ko???....
King Ashok spread Buddhism. But there is no evidence that he destroyed Hindu temples and punished hindu civilians. Hence his action cannot be compared with that of Aurangzeb.
In history You don't give proof for negative claim. You only give proof for positive claim. Eg If I say Ashoka was not Christian , I don't have to give proof. But If you want to deny this claim and say that Ashoka was Christian, then you will have to give proof. Similarly if you want to claim that Ashoka destroyed temples, then you will have to give proof.
@@pragyankh7377 well actually you'll have to prove that because ashoka was ruthless we didn't know what he did back then. It's was way back on history that all the written records were destroyed. Most of the archaeological excavation is done in the modern times which makes us aware of maurya empire and others. That means even until the time of end of mughal empire people had no idea of who Ashoka was. Maybe they had heard some oral folktales which had survived. One should not glorify Ashoka just because he wasn't a Muslim. He could have been cruel too.
Royal farmaans still exist in archives. Not only that, he even constructed a Balaji mandir at Varanasi, a series of Jain Temples at Rajasthan, gave land for Umananda Temple at Assam and a few others. All by Aurangzeb's farmaans.
@rohand04 I think he said there's gonna be one more video over the policies implemented by cruel Aurangzeb. So I would request instead of jumping to conclusions why not wait patiently for his next video
Always keep in mind the supreme sacrifices of Guru Tegh Bahadur ji, Guru Gobind Singh Ji, the 4 Sahibzaades, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Chatrapati sambhaji maharaj, Kavi Kalash and many more warriors who have sacrificed themselves just to protect us and our country from the evil Aurangzeb.
Hey Mohak, I have been your subscriber for a long time. I wanted to know what were your sources for Sikh History part. It seems to be highly or overly simplified. Also I want to point out that ' revenge ' was never the purpose of formation of Khalsa. Guru Gobind Singh created and initiated the Khalsa as a warrior with a duty to protect the innocent from religious persecution or other inhumane practices( Khalsa is against the enemies of humanity not just Aurangzeb). Our ' non-revenge' policy is evident with the famous verse:ਇਨ ਪੁਤਰਨ ਕੇ ਸੀਸ ਪਰ ਵਾਰ ਦੀਏ ਸੁਤ ਚਾਰ, ਚਾਰ ਮੂਏ ਤੋ ਕਿਆ ਹੂਆ ਜੀਵਤ ਕਈ ਹਜਾਰ(in Gurmukhi) इन पुत्रन के शीश पर वार दिए सुत चार, चार मरे तो क्या हुआ, जीवित कई हजार(in Devnagri),In Putran Ke Sees Par Vaar Diye Sut Chaar, Chaar Muye To Kya Hua Jeevat Kayi Hazaar(in Latin script) which translates as: " I have sacrificed my four sons. So what if my four sons died, when thousands of Sikhs(sons like) are alive" . He never never discriminated between his own sons and his other Sikhs, so revenge is totally out of question. And, you also highly over simplified the Guru Teg Bahadur ji's history. In 1672, Guru Teg Bahadur traveled through Kashmir and the North-West Frontier, to meet the masses, as the persecution of non-Muslims reached new heights. It was in that time when non-muslims came for help to Guru Teg Bahadur. He challenged the authority that if they are able to convert the Guru to Islam the everyoone else will also happily convert to Islam. Guru Teg Bahadur left from his base at Makhowal to confront the persecution of Kashmiri Brahmins by Mughal officials but was arrested at Ropar and put to jail in Sirhind. Four months later, in November 1675, he was transferred to Delhi and asked to perform a miracle to prove his nearness to God or convert to Islam. The Guru declined and three of his colleagues, who had been arrested with him, were tortured to death in front of him: Bhai Mati Das was sawn into pieces, Bhai Dayal Das was thrown into a cauldron of boiling water, and Bhai Sati Das was burned alive. Thereafter, Tegh Bahadur was publicly beheaded in Chandni Chowk, a market square close to the Red Fort.
WE all have been a regular viewers of this channel but this time Mohak was biased and the way he delivered certain part of history is very disrespectful for Hindus and Sikhs. Hence I am reporting this video because i feel like the video could have been better and I think everyone should report it, which is the least we can do. Bcoz he should realize that these much subscribers and people following him he should do a better study before representing his views.
Aurangzeb ne saare temple ko todne ko order diya tha, or wo political quest par nhi balki apne religion se rediclized tha or iss ne sirf ek hi ideology wale writers k reference liye h ,dusre POV ko include nhi Kiya ,
As a Marathi I can't forget what he did to our sambhaji Maharaj son of shivaji Maharaj he put a condition to him to choose between conversion or death . That Aurangzeb put red hot iron in his eyes and cruelly killed Sambhaji maharaj. I can't forget what he did to 4 Sahibjade's what was the crime of them.Mangal should have to mention that also .😑😑😑😑
Mohak didn't mention how Aurangzeb killed cows in Chintamani temple and converted the temple into a mosque, he did that when he wasn't even a King. There was no political reason there was only hate. Mohak didn't mention how he crushed a Hindu crowd with elephants when they were protesting his policies by not allowing him to offer namaz at Jama Masjid, he killed all these people and then offered namaz at Jama Masjid.
@@ariyanxd1585 so according to u forceful conversion is right? Then we can also put you on gunpoint to convert you and don't try to compare Shivaji Maharaj with that Aurangzeb
Our PURI JAGANNATH TEMPLE has been attacked 17 times by invaders...The Iconoclast Conservative ruthless Cruel Aurangzeb had ordered too 😪... There were times when local priests used to bury even the "Brahma" of the deities to prevent from attack 🫥... My Grandfather being a History scholar.... When I used to hear these things I literally used to get goosebumps, Angry, Sad at the same time 😅...And PURI KINGS called "GAJAPATIS" used to also have grt role in these. The GAJAPATIS were so religious n Devotees of Lord Jagannath that after winning wars too they used to give all the WEALTH earned to the Temple ✨️ But the GREATEST DEVOTEE OF LORD JAGANNATH WAS:"BHAKTA SALABEGA: A MUSLIM BY BIRTH" Every yr the chariot of Lord stops for a while near his Mazar to mark the Universal Deity-Devotee Relationship on 9th Day of Rath Yatra. JAY JAGANNATH ✨️🙏🏽
Mohak didn't mention how Aurangzeb killed cows in Chintamani temple and converted the temple into a mosque, he did that when he wasn't even a King. There was no political reason there was only hate. Mohak didn't mention how he crushed a Hindu crowd with elephants when they were protesting his policies by not allowing him to offer namaz at Jama Masjid, he killed all these people and then offered namaz at Jama Masjid.
@@NewInt7 Very Few muslims (Liberals) live in Puri district r devotees too...How can U see many muslims near Hindu temple? 😆 Have a logic?... Are we worshiping Allah? But still very very few Muslims reside near Puri who even take part in Rath Yatra Moreover There is no reason to hate all Muslims... Their religion is conservative no doubt but all r not bad as Aurangzeb... Be against only the RADICALS and ABUSERS
@@arnavpandey5386 If a Ruthless emperor like AURANGZEB can be so dreadful towards his own Father and brother... It's not a big deal... He can go to any extent 😅🤢
Lachit Borphukan (24th November 1622 - 25th April 1672) was the famous General of the Royal Army of the Ahom Kingdom of Assam who defeated the Mughals and successfully halted the ever-expanding ambitions of the Mughals under Aurangzeb. 🚩🚩
16:55 Guru Gobind Singh never made Khalsa for revenge. Dasam Guru Sahib is Sarbansdani he sacrifised his father, mother and four sons for the rights every person should have. He made Khalsa Panth to deal with cruel people and for safety of poor and women from both langar and kirpan (Degh Tegh fateh). Raj karega Khalsa. Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh
But facts doesn't agree with u Many historians have agreed that guru Gobind made khalsa for revenge He was even planning a war against Aurangzeb,that's why he killed him before guru Gobind make any move
@@sakibmir5360 those communist historians are mughal appeasers and they’ve continuously lied and framed history according to their own Nehruvian Agenda
@@sakibmir5360 what historians? Khalsa was established for protection against mughals. Shri Guru gobind singh ji himself said to Shri Guru Tegh Bahadur ji that he should sacrifice himself to protect kashmiri pandits. Why are you making things up. Revenge was not primary concern for Shri Guru Gobind Singh ji, Protection of people was.
Sikh genocide? 👇 It should be noted that Sriram Sharma followed the path of British historians and wrote his famous aforementioned book in 1940 AD in subjugated India on the eve of independence. Till then there was not a single researched and informative book on this important subject. It is for good reason that Shri Shama's work has been particularly popular in particular fields over the years. Muhammad Atahar Ali, a renowned researcher of medieval history, has reviewed the book and said, like other parts of the book, there are major errors and inconsistencies in the notes added at the end of the discussion about Aurangzeb. We are informed that towards the end of Aurangzeb's rule, Dhala was ordered to massacre the Sikhs and this context is mentioned in Maser-i-Alamgiri. However, there is no mention of Sikh genocide in Masir-e-Alamgiri. Ram Sharma may have got it from some other source, but that too is not mentioned. There are many other misconceptions that need to be corrected. Narrating an incident in Agra, a Sikh pelting the emperor with stones, which Sri Sharma also mentions later and cites unreliable sources such as news letters of 1693.
Amazing video but a few corrections...... Guru Gobind Singh did not militarize the sikhs because he wanted to avenge his father. On the contrary, when Kashmiri Pandits came to the 9th guru it was the 8 year old Gobind Rai who encouraged his father to give his life for the hindus.. The formation of the khalsa and the militarization of the sikhs was only to save helpless people from the cruelties of mughals as well as anyone who used their power to terrorize the weak.
And Aurangzeb order not to demolish the well settled temples because this might give rise to protest,,,,but he slowly started to demolish the small temples and issued order not to built any new temple,,,,he want to get the public support but later on showed his real face
🌟Funfact : Indian Muslims saying "we muslims" built all the Mughal Historical Monuments☪️ is like A Kerela Ricebag Convert saying that "we Christians" built Vatican City✝️ My Brothers you built nothing you all are converts😂 only Syeds can say they built it💯
@@dev-rehanAhmadhahah go and check most of thing muhhamad copy from turat and bible 😂😂 read hadith and you come to know that he was as cruel like aurangzeb
@@sajadmehmood7051 Vai Tum log ho Muslim lekin iska matlab ye Nahi ki Aise bando ko zinda bad bolo 💀 Tum Indian ho ya Pakistani? India KO barbad kardia usne
@@PakistaniPunjabi Vai Tum log ho Muslim lekin iska matlab ye Nahi ki Aise bando ko zinda bad bolo 💀 Tum Indian ho ya Pakistani? India KO barbad kardia usne
@user-tu7dm5bl2jthe Jijya Tax is something which a non-muslim have to pay if he or she resides in a Islamic country. This tax is taken to protect the worshipping places of non-muslim and also because of it the muslim armies are obligated to protect the non-muslim and the non-muslim are also Won't be get drafted into the army. This tax is not oppressive. Muslim pays Zakat which in many cases are more than the Jijya Tax which gets imposed upon the non-muslim so being a muslim actually is a disadvantage.
Poore comment section mein sab negativity fail rahe hain so sad 😔😔 . . . बुरा देखन में जो चला बुरा न मिलिए कोय मन खोजा जो अपना मुझसे बुरा न कोय -संत कबीर
@@Sw-rz4fg धर्म कोई भी हो उसकी विचारधारा जब कट्टरता की सीमा पार कर देती है तो वो मानवता के लिये हानिकारक हो जाती है फिर वो चाहे हिंदू हो मुसलमान हो या किसी ओर धर्म का हो.
@@waseemahamad5209 kyuki aatankwadi ek samay tak ki raaj kar sakta hai Hum jinda hai kyuki chatrapati shivaji maharaj ki durdrushti, unke vichar vo aatankwadi mita nahi paya 🚩 यदा यदा हि धर्मस्य ग्लानिर्भवति भारत। अभ्युत्थानमधर्मस्य तदात्मानं सृजाम्यहम्।। Gita ka ye shlok hi kafi hai aise aakranta, aatankwadi, krur vyakti ke liye..
@@ybiitbhu jaise Aurangzeb ne saare Hindus ko maar diya ho. Tum kaise paida ho gaye jab saare Hindus ko aurangzeb ne mar diya ? Bhai logic hai koi is baat ka ?
Bhai paise ke liye kya kya bol dega Jis tarah se aap Aurangzeb ko justify kar rahe ho so sad bro...... Kya mil jata hai ye sab karke One more time fir se jaakar aurangzeb ke baare me padho
Ofcourse today's Muslims can't be blamed for what Aurangzeb did, but they themselves take pride in his actions, hails him as a hero, names their kids "Aurangzeb" while lecturing others on secularism and so called Ganga-jamni tehzib . Such crooks and hypocrites deserves to pe publically called out.
Taught in Clergy . Pride is what led to hate for Israel creation as a Jewish in a land occupied by Islamic win prior Allied forces overthrow Ottomans. Political war is still on. Through information propoganda. History taught in Clergy is just made to feel good to present PPL. People running to middle East , Islamic revolution was to userp all intellectual rights British had which lead to US sanctioning Iran everytime through lobbying.
Aurangzeb hated Hinduism because he believed it is a religion which teaches caste discrimination . Hinduism is a religion which teaches God created Brahmins from his head and Shudras from his feet. Even Br Ambedkar hated Hinduism.
@@shahid1991july Usually it's a visualization that Brahmin came frm "Mouth" n not head, coz they chant mantras, Kshatriyas frm Hands coz we use our hand during fight and Shudras frm feet of Lord Vishnu coz they move frm one place to another. Even Ganga came frm the feet of Lord Vishnu, and yes Ganga is a Holy River. Similarly Shudras rnt unholy. U guys consider feet as a disgrace but it isn't. No Hindu text said that u must discriminate on the basis of Caste System, even Lord Krishna turned his back towards a brahmin in Udupi who kicked out a Bhakt who happened to b frm low caste. It was people who created that
What ? They said AURANGZEB destroyed temple, he has destroyed that's fact . BJP said they will reclaim all destroyed temple & I support them . RAM mandir was proof which made me trust on them
Dhruv rathee, akash banerjee extreme left wing Mohak pretends to be neutral but even he is left wing And I also request the left wing to produce more videos like this so the Hindus unite
Right , He expressed.. that is Aurangzeb Political step But We know the Truth ..Even He Compared The Great Ashok with Aurangzeb... This describes his Mentality...
Ravan He is described as a devout follower of Shiva, a great scholar, a capable ruler .Ravana was eternally ambitious. After he won Lord Shiva's heart, he wished for his supremacy, heavenly spirits, serpents and rakshas. He wanted to rule the three worlds and always wanted to emerge victorious. But we still don't worship ravana because he was character less . Another side we worship prabhu Ram because of his modesty and calm nature who always stands for dharma [righteousness]. So guys try to choose your idol thoughtful ly. Jai sree Ram 💞🚩
Lord Rama did not fight Ravana for Lanka. He could have annexed Lanka with his kingdom, he was rightfully the ruler of Lanka after killing Ravana. He had no greed.
Even if you bring any best historian in the world from oxford or any so called institutes , you cannot remove 0.001 % hatred for aurangzeb from the hearts of maharashtrians🚩🚩
@@LeviAckerman-by7ym dude relax .... The way he concluded the video it seems like he himself doesn't like aurengeb.... He first showed us the neutral point of view ( which is necessary) then concluded that aurengeb should be judged for his bad deeds ... He also concluded that the title of kings being great is questionable as no one becomes king without killing anyone.... But still aurengeb is an evil king ..... Now if according to you being neutral makes you left wing then it is better ...
@@udaychoudhary6172 400 saal purane logo k bare mei baate krke ladna bandh kro. If aurangzeb was bad,it doesn't give us any kind of promotion in our present life. Focus on present life
@@ManojKumararch If they have the same attitude like their Mughals then why not . They take great pride in calling Mughals there forefathers, so what's wrong in we taking pride of our Indian kings and not the invaders
पूरी दुनिया में सच्चा संत सिर्फ संत रामपाल जी महाराज जी हैं ,जो सभी धर्मों की होली बुक से सिद्ध करके शास्त्र अनुकूल सत्य भक्ति बता रहे हैं और यह भी सिद्ध कर रहे हैं कि सब का भगवान कबीर परमात्मा है जिन्होंने ही सारी सृष्टि की है। कबीर परमात्मा पूरी पृथ्वी को बचा सकते हैं। कोई भी धार्मिक स्थल में जाने से मोक्ष संभव नहीं है । विजिट करें यूट्यूब चैनल पर संत रामपाल जी महाराज साधना टीवी देखें शाम को 7:30 से 8:30 बजे तक, श्रद्धा टीवी देखे दोपहर 2:00 से 3:00 बजे तक, रात 8:30 बजे सी न्यूज़ पर, रात 8:00 बजे सुभारती टीवी पर पवित्र पुस्तक पढ़ें.. ज्ञान गंगा
सच्चे अल्लाह कबीर साहेब जी है धार्मिक स्थल प्रमाण के लिए है कि इस स्थान पर देवी देवताओं ने या संत महात्माओं ने ये लीला किए थे अब उस जगह की पूजा करने से हमें क कोइ लाभ नहीं मिल सकता है।
आज पूरे विश्व में जगतगुरु तत्वदर्शी संत रामपाल जी महाराज विश्व गुरु है जो शास्त्रों के अनुसार भक्ति बताते हैं अधिक जानकारी के लिए साधना टीवी पर संध्या 7:30 से 8:30 बजे तक सत्संग अवश्य सुनिए एवं संत रामपाल जी महाराज यूट्यूब चैनल पर विजिट कीजिए 🙏🙏🙏
Hi Mohak, can you please make a video on Sikh Gurus and the sacrifices which they made as you depicted in the last section of the video. Not to promote any religion but to make everyone aware of our history and the Sacrifices of Gurus and Sahibzaade
MOHAK - We will stop blaming today's M0ozL1Ims for aurangzeb atrocities if they stop protecting the mosque that aurangzeb built on top of temple in Varanasi. Indian M0ozL1Imz do exactly that which proves they r the inheritors of aurangzeb legacy and support aurangzeb The strain of 1zLa@m1c IMPERALISM is present in today's M0ozL1Imz. Read sai depaks book - INDIA BHARAT PAKISTAN which exposes the Indian M0ozL1Im mindset
राजपूत 🤣🤣🤣महाराणा प्रताप और चंद्रशेन के अलावा कौनसे राजपूतो ने मुगलो का विरोध किया था। मै सम्मान करता हूं महाराणा प्रताप का और उनकी वीरता का। क्यौकी वो राजपूत थे इसलिए मे सब राजपूतो का सम्मान करू उनको वीर मान लू ये हो नही सकता
सभी राजपूत महाराणा प्रताप और महाराणा सांगा ( महाराणा संग्राम सिंह) के कारण अपने आपको वीर मानते है। इसलिए हर जगह बोलते रहते है हम राजपूत है हमसे मत उलजो। बोलते तो ऐसे है जैसे वो खुद कही युद्ध लड़ के आये हो और बोलते हो की तुम राजपूतो को नही जानते। मैं सम्मान करता हु महाराणा प्रताप, कुंभा, सांगा, चंद्रसेन, पृथ्वीराज का। इसलिए नही की वो राजपूत थे बल्कि इसलिए की वो वीर थे।
@@manabdas4733in Pakistan and afghanistan maximum muslim also suffering , what you do bad it will come around you, we don't even have to mention about condition of pak now.
@@inordinateseptet885 yes tumhi log ne kiya tha jitne thode bhot Muslims rhete teh unko dabane ki koshish ho rahi thi aur jitni masjide bachi thi unko todne ki baat hone lagi thi , ab yeh mat bolna ki yeh sab jhut h ,wo alag baat h ki tumhe puri kahani nhi batayi jati , kuki godi media aur BJP gurukul University yeh kabhi nhi chayegi,aur Mughalo ne joh Kiya h wo b dekho tah Mahal,red fort,Delhi fort, qutub minar,etc etc aaj in sabhi jagaho ne bahart ki GDP mai bhot zada contribute kar Rahi h 🏴🏴
He didn't mention everything Aurngseb did. Like slotting of cows. Torturing son of shivaji and his friend. Killing gurus. And their little sons. And other things. And he said that Aurngseb demolished temples because of political reasons. Really like it was pure hatred towards hindus and he even billed masjid on them.
@@jennyvarshavski3138 bruh mughals koi hamare baap nahi h jo hum unhe support krenge. Jo sahi h usko support krenge sur jo galat h uski aalochna. Sabhi muslims ko ek jaisa mat smjho.
Hindu Raj came after mughal empire declined. Marathas captured 60% of mughal empire. Did they r@ped muslim women? Did they destroyed any masjids? No they didn't. There is nothing negative to talk about Hindu raj.
The eldest living son of Akbar, Jahangir was declared successor to his father at a very young age. But, he was impatient to be the next in power, so he forcefully tried to gain the right; though he was defeated. Akbar in his will had passed on his power to rule the nation into the hands of his grandson, Prince Khusrau Mirza. Threatened by his own son, Jahangir imprisoned Khusrau Mirza, after he attempted to succeed the throne. And as a punishment, Jahangir blinded him.
Dont spread misinformation. Guru Gobind Singh Ji did not fight for his father's revenge . He did it to protect minorities from persecution. So that people could stand up for themselves. You just completly distorted the truth. Please read more.
Upon searching this up, lists and lists of pro Hindu and India websites pop up. Bias check, yes. The historical evidence is distorted. Why not highlight the cruelty Marathas committed?
The story of Sikhism mentioned here is a very small part of it. though I am not Sikh, I am Punjabi so I know the other part of it. Guru Gobind Singh Ji was far above small thoughts like Revenge. He created Sikhs to create a community of Brave warriors to help the commoners of the country then. He sacrificed his four sons at a very young age. so that he could make a fearless community. Believers in the reality of God as the Supreme power. He was a deep thinker yet with a very innocent mind like a real holy saint. No cruelty against any religion.
