Recreating Dinosaurs; Photographing Wildlife; Up Close With Lions | 60 Minutes Full Episodes 

I think they got that line from the Last Samarui, just inserted dino's. lol

I think what he cares most about is being a celebrity paleontologist hack and being wealthy and powerful as a result

Yea... that's what he said.

Geld the hunters.

Hunt the hunters.

Write your Congressman and Senators, your Governors and the White House to ban hunting.The killing of wildlife is a money maker for the N.R.A. they are at the root of all this horror. And mentally unbalanced people are brainwashed to believe hunting is ok. When in all truth, IT IS NOT.👿👿

Why? This is natural selection and how organic life evolves.

Keep in mind that roughly 95% of all species that have lived on earth are extinct and had nothing to do with man's existence. Some extinctions are merely a matter of nature.

Yes and no to the dino chicken :c Some students did in fact try the gene flipping method, and the chick embryos developed teeth and their tails stayed long, however they were forced to terminate the fetuses due some kind of ethical issue. I personally would like to of seen the chicks come to full term.

@@sexy0rthrus That would've been amazing!

It's the hunter who should be forced to lay down HIS life in exchange for the one he took. Humans are NOT going extinct, animals ARE. 😈😈😈👿👿👿

& go directly to the Whitehouse.👍 I agree 💯°

@@abstraddic0442 Well, I'm not American but this is a too politically correct world now. It's such a mess, they need to come back and fix it.

In this case, Kevin had the nickname lion whisperer given to him by a news tabloid ages ago, it wasn't something he came up with. Kevin does genuinely have a good relationship with these lions. He has been working with them for over 25 years and knows their behavior. They greet him happily and he is even able to be around them safely when they hunt prey.

The rapid-fire camera isn't as much of an advantage as it seems. It gives only the type of advantage a basic camera gives over a human eye -- the camera just *_slightly_* extends our eye's abilities. And rapid fire cameras miss more photos than you realise. They can take at most a photo every few milliseconds (at most 20 a second). For his photo of the bear eating a fish in water, that instantaneous moment would've been gone in a few nanoseconds (he said this). The fastest camera would not have gotten that photo without immense luck or persistence -- or likely both. One second has 1,000,000,000 nanoseconds (a billion!) in it. His camera only captures 20 "moments" out of every second. That's 1 out of every 50,000,000 possible photos -- so that fast camera misses 49,999,999 out of every 50,000,000 moments. It takes a tiny tiny fraction, only 20 photos out of a billion possible photos -- in every second. That's why such a camera doesn't give such a magical photo to other photographers who own one. Much more is needed than a special camera -- luck & persistence. He didn't say this, but he probably tried 1000s of times to take similar bears feeding, and most of those photos he deleted because they didn't capture this type of magic. And due to luck, only one of those 1000s of times (after probably months/years of trying, over & over, taking maybe 200,000?? rapid-fire photos of feeding bears) did he capture that one magical instant in time -- that nanosecond. He truly is gifted -- but his persistence & patience enable his gift more than a $15000 camera.