A lot of people are saying Rollo is better off without Pat. Yes, he might not offer a lot of information on the topic, but I think Pat does a lot of work behind the scenes, working on the topic, the questions preparation etc. And some times Rollo forgets to explain some of the stuff, thinking it might be obvious to the viewers when its actually not. In such cases, Pat asks rollo to explain some of those stuff inn detail, which really helps out. So having an amateur and a master helps keep the thing going. Not to mention the flow is better with Pat.
Broke my heart when you said it probably wasn't the greatest episode.. I was so glued to it and have shared it with a bunch of my close friends, just brilliant as always man, your content is even helping my dad who has been blue pilled for his whole life. Mum has the power to destroy him and often makes it known. Never too late to become aware.
Rollo...another great video. I listened to the live chat and listened to it for the second time taking 3 page notes. When you speak on a topic that you already had written in the RM, you naturally say things and concepts which are not in the book, and it makes these videos a great learning experience. You have changed my life. Thanks always.
I found red pill 101 easier to grasp comparing to articles and books mostly because of the complexity of words he uses in podcast is simpler and easier to understand.
@@The1994Boss Actually the first time I read it the sentences appeared complex. However I later realized that Rollo spends a lot if time to construct each sentence and paragraph to be able to deliver the exact message, which in turn makes the script very powerful. The more I read the more I find new things and be able to slowly internalize the red pill knowledge.
Rollo is better off w/o Pat Campbell IMO. Pat is constantly interrupting Rollo. Pat is aggressive, and doesn't really contribute in terms of informational content. Pat just wants to come off like he's dominant. I like Rollo's calm demeanor. Rollo is all about informational content. He avoids all the unnecessary BS!
@@A.I.- Agreed. Some of the other RP guys (like Donovan Sharpe and Anthony Johnson) just seen like juvenile bullshittters. Rollo is chock full of info whereas the other guys just seem like they're trying to impress their buddies. Richard Cooper is pretty good as well, except he lacks patience with his viewers. The cooking guy (forget his name right now) has some good info.
@@jasong5913 I think of these other RedManGroup guys as the stepping stone to Rollo. lol. I started out with Sandman & Rich Coop, probably due to their early presence on youtube. Rich Coop mentioned how the Rational Male was a life-changing read for him. These other guys are influential amongst their fan groups. Like, these guys are also involved in fitness, cars, black community, and so on. So, they are introducing men from other men-dominant hobbies into RP. So, kudos to all of them.
@@vl5397 Fair comment. Bringing anyone to red pill is commendable. But I think being juvenile and bullshitting all the time does considerable damage to the cause. Otherwise, yeah, kudos.
@@vl5397 Yeah I would have to agree. I, too, started out with Rich Coop, which led me to Rollo. Rollo is the man. He knows this shit better than anyone.
Wow- so many gems here! I’m having a hard time keeping track of all the great points, but the one I’m struck with the most is, “women break rules for alphas and make rules for betas.” Thanks Rollo
Actually the first time I read the RM, the sentences appeared complex. However I later realized that Rollo spends a lot if time to construct each sentence and paragraph to be able to deliver the exact message, which in turn makes the script very powerful. The more I read the more I find new things and be able to slowly internalize the red pill knowledge.
I remember the recent Thor comics with the worthy equation. Mjollnir is a weapon who seeks who is only worthy to be wielded, similar to women who seeks only men who are worthy to be pumped. Thor is a man who is worthy to wield Mjollnir who has high condition, like a man who has she accepted with genuine desire. Yet with recent comics where Thor became unworthy to wield Mjollnir, is similar to how a man has made women their identity, just like how Thor has made Mjollnir his identity while he is the God of Thunder with or without Mjollnir.
Comment of this show "Those who restrain desire do so because theirs is weak enough to be restrained. -William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell" @15:00
Where I come from people say Rollo is wicked smaht. This guy's knowledge is invaluable to former simps like myself. Just bought the Rational Male and am going to read it this weekend. Thank you, sir.
I think this was fucking fantastic. I love Rollo without any distraction. Not how it goes in the red man group sometimes, although I’d be lying if I said overall I didn’t really appreciate the value offered there. But sometimes it’s like: Rollo: well the secret to life is .. Donovan: YEAH BABY! WOOOOH! Rollo: ..nce. Donovan: alright next caller
Another upvote for podcasting solo instead of with Pat. Nothing against Pat, but the flow is way better without him for the reasons others are mentioning.
I was having an affair with this woman that she was engaged in a six year relationship. Her fiancé found out on new years eve through some texts. She dumped me with no closure. I saw her after two months and asked why is she still with him and she replied, he's like my dad. WTF?
Me too! It can be baffling why some women perceived me as more alpha and others more beta! But yes, the sex with a woman who really was into me was much more adventurous and slutty.
1:00:00 true enough, so many foreign betas here, they (local women) make them into cash cow, the 'hold the baby while I shop around'. Sure they are good at first, but reveal themselves after marriage lmao
For me it's 1.5...I will give a girl one date to tell herself she's not a ho. If we're not having sex on the second meeting, it's bullshit. You should be planning to meet at your place or hers, so it's already in the cards on the second date.
For me, historically, I usually have sex on the first date. I’d say it’s like 90% of the time. The problem is I kept ending up in LTRs with these first date women.
@Rollo Tomassi Dropped you a DM on Twitter about how the Roman Catholic Churches veneration of the Virgin Mary is in some way at fault or contributory to how the female prerogative is becoming dominant in western Christianity? In relative terms, the reformation occurred only a short period of time ago, so is the veneration of the feminine still dominant even though the reformationists discount the virgin birth? Happy to discuss it with you if you think it would add value
*Absolutely* . Rollo said in an episode with George Bruno that Christianity in general has been *infiltrated* with the mentality that women are more close to God than Men, therefore going against a woman would be going against the Lord Himself. That means women don't need to necessarily follow Maria as a role model and can still be worshipped like they were good wifes and mothers. As always, they only want the good part of the tradition. From a Roman Catholic.
Hmm, I had my first two children, twins at age 24 and my last, my 6th at age 45, there was no egg freezing, no IVF, purely natural conception not even trying. Women's fertility can vary and a healthy woman can have a baby at even age 56, my midwife delivers these and they are mostly out of USA in countries where women are not eating all this crap like USA. I just wanted to chime in with this. As a woman I agree with a lot of what you say in this and other videos and on your blog.
@Rollo man you gotta see this, it's an interview where a guy asks a bunch of Japanese women what feminism is. This reinforces why the first time I dated a Japanese woman and she was respectful and treated me like a man I could never go back to western women. Most of them don't know what it is or they innocently call it what it is, things like "thats when the women run everything" or "that's when the genders are no longer equal'. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fcqxH6hdOUw.html
So what do you do if the desire just isn't there with the wife? Get a side chick? You're just going to get to the same desireless point with the next wife so divorcing is pointless.
It is true that being sexually desired is a primary need of men and genuine desire cannot be faked. But a women can feel this powerful attraction for a man who doesn't necessarily meet the "fireman calendar" definition of hot. I am speaking of a man and a woman in a LTR who love one another and purposely llose themselves" in this wonderful state of desire and bliss. It's the love and dedication they have for one another (and in this case that the woman has for her husband) that gives her the ability to feel this for her husband despite neither of them being the classical "hottie" Its like "shallow Hal" meets "shallow Val", as they roll around in bed, feeling like the King of the world, and the Queen of Sheba and neither giving a shit what the world thinks. They rule the world! A wonderful glitch in the matrix!
I think the sexual pluralism alpha seed / beta need is not instinctively within their own mind. In other words, she has to figure this out herself. She will date around prolifically in her transition period between sexual peak years to epiphany stage. It is only when they realise that the guys on these dates are all inherently beta that she settles on one of these guys. Alpha seed / beta need in my view is a social adaptation and not a ingrained brain functioning reason. The woman's hypergamy is actually always alpha seed. Always. I think the provisioning side is something that is "figured" out by them as they go through life.
The is an aspect about being alpha I don't understand. Rollo, you say alpha is not an act, it's not something you do but something you are. While it makes sense, what should those of us who aren't alpha do? Does it make sense to "put on the alpha act" to try to recondition your personality, or is it pointless? How else are we to become, if ever, something approximating alpha?
Here's a question know one seems to ask: What if the girl is interested in the guy, however, the guy's not interested in the girl and the Guy says to her, I'm not attracted to you, but let's be friends? Does the the girl spend the next 6 months in therapy for rejection disorder?
