you made many weak and false arguments starting with weak argument that you criticise Dr. Joshua Little for overwhelming you with information argument 3 he said there are some contradictions in so called "shahih" hadith you translated it to: "when you apply "sahahih" it clears up" which is not what he said argument 7 "hadith were being mass fabricated" you: "there were lots of fabrications, and muhaditheen (idols of ahlul hadith) where there to combat the fabrications" Allah protects the Quran, and muhaditheen protect the hadith argument 10 you try to deny the exponential growth of hadith. saying "Ibn Abas only heard 10 hadith from the prophet," then from where did the thousands of other hadith come from if he didn't hear them from the prophet. did they fall from heaven? argument 16 you whine and complain about Dr. Joshua Little being suspicious of testimonials, then you again start glorifying the muhaditheen as perfect beings that protect the hadith Argument 21 you dint make any sensible arument you just perched some nice sounding words and ignored what Dr. Joshua Little said about people who lie, but are seen as pious and orthodox. which is a fact of history in every society and every religion, and Quran repeatedly gives examples of previous nations where the clergy and leaders have lied to there people also eating during the video doesn't make you look cool
@@dr_logical_b3a5t63 No, Javad brought Little Kafir to educate the Muslims about their religion. Javad is already a Hadeeth rejector; his perspective is the same.
One of Little's arguments is also that there are so few Hadith from early and major Sahaba like Abu Bakr and Umar r.a and so many from someone like Abu Hurrairah r.a who came in so late during the medinan period. But even non Muslim scholars of Islam point out that this is an argument for the sound preservation of Hadith and not against it. See, if the Muslims really wanted to lie convincingly about the Hadith, they would have attributed so many Hadith to many of the great Sahaba. But the very fact that they don't, and simply that the available Hadith from them is few, shows that the Islamic scholars preserved the accuracy of the Hadith diligently.
@@mylikes5942 if they weren't trustworthy the hadith would be weak as being trustworthy (non commiters of major sins and having ethics and evading taboos also having complet memorization apptitude) is 2 of 5 of the conditions for a hadith to be sahih people back then lived in small communties they knew each other ,people's testimonies of the trustworthiness of said narrators and caracter was compiled in books of science of men by the same witnesses (ahmed ibn hanbal , yahya ibn mu'ayn etc) 1/5 narrators having heard of each other no disconnection in the chain 4/5 no irruglarties as in 5 saying X and 1 saying Y about the same news if such a case Y is deemed weak as in being shath 5/5 no hidden affecting defects (the science to know where trustworthy narrators made mistakes even that is ruled out)
Younger companions during the lifetime of the prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had more students from the tabieen than older companions because they died quite early on into the tabieen period. Therefore it makes more sense that those who spent more time teaching in the tabieen period and thus had more potential students would inevitably have more narrations quoted from them.
The scholars of Ahl Sunnah affirm that the word scholar applies to even deviant people of knowledge of the innovators. The people of innovation have scholars, they are just scholars who lead of misguidance.
@e abu a'mer ibn abdu'lbar the maliki scholar in the 4th century has rellayed that the scholars of all countries agreed (consensus)that the people of kalam are people of innovation and tilting(from the truth) and that all scholars of all countries do not count them in the layer of people of understanding(scholars) as such innovators aren't scholars to begin withonscensus
Anyone following the so-called "Interfaith dialogue", which in reality is a satanic all out war against Islam, would have noticed that many Western universities have been very generous in offering higher degrees to even rats & goats as long as they are devout islamophobes.
and this shows why you dont have a doctoral title even when you claim its "easy" but also shows why all these so called Islamic "scholars" get their title easily
Ever since I started watching you in 2020, I got really interested in learning Islam to the core. Alhamdulillah I have completed memorizing the Quran and other small books like the 40 Hadeeth and Aqeedatul Wasitiyyah and others. That’s all going to your scale of good deeds on the dat of judgement InShaa Allah.
@@ibrahimahm3d most hadith are one on one reports. sometimes its claimed there were more then one. but thats like paul claiming there were 500 witnesses
even the academic one give lame argument without proper research and in-depth understanding......just because you said you are oxford graduate phd or whatever mean nothing if your heart is blind....
I remember once I commented asking you about this very topic - I saw a lot of people on that "oriental" side championing that thesis - I went through it and thought it had some validity but I remember noticing some weird claims. Glad you're making a video on it
I really admire your content. Could you please answer me one thing? Where did you get the islamic knowledge from? Was it your personal research, reading and dedication? Or Did you refer any islamic institution or so? Or both?
This were such weak arguments ngl. For him to even suggest that the righteous people lie all the time without any evidence aside from a claim that other religions do it is utterly pathetic. La’natAllahu ‘ala James Little.
can someone explain how argument #10 is refuted? Im confused that if ibn abbas (RA) said that he "heard the prophet say" to only 10 hadiths wouldnt this still make all of his other hadiths unreliable?
If Ibn Abbas says: The Prophet said. Then he may have heard directly or from another companion. If Ibn Abbas said: I heard the Prophet say. Then we are certain he heard it. We accept both types of reports. Joshua didn't understand what he was quoting and was suggesting that only 10 are authentic.
This is not Refuting, this is Commenting. Refute means you have to provide counter evidence, showing ulama's or scholar works that contradict to what dr. Little just said.
The first argument presented was just hilarious. He first says that the Hadith corpus is full of contradictions, then he backtracks and says “Oh, btw the Sahih Ahadith have only little contradictions between them”😂. It’s like dude, we see how desperate u are to critique us, at least be honest in ur critique and don’t make grandiose claims that u have to backtrack from later on.
Maybe it is your IQ problem... Whole corpus of hadith is including maudhu, dhaif, hassan and shahih While shahih is below 1% of total hadith corpus and has been filtered out So the discrepacies should be minimum compared to other hadith in all hadith corpus... IT IS BASIC LOGIC if you take IQ test
03:00 why did you clip it short, he gives the same explanation you gave about direct listening. I was actually interested to hear your thoughts as a response, not re-iterate.
Assalamualaikum brother, I am from Malaysia ☪️🇲🇾 may Allah bless you Bro, I want to ask, in surah 17:78 and surah 2:187 that it says the time of prayer and breaking the fast, but the polar region has long days and nights, can you explain all this? Happy Ramadhan😁 0:47
@@FaridResponds bro what he meant its he wanted explanation of People that live at antartica and other Cold Region that have like longest Night or Short Daylight, how to do Fasting there? just because short Daylight they fasting for Short Period of time? and the opposite because Night its have long time there they have to do more than 12 hours fasting?
@@irpanfauzi1160They fast by the longer of the day like when we asked the Prophet how will the persons fast near the judgment (because day time will be different) he said fast by the longer of time of the day I hope I answered your questions ❤❤❤
Salam brother Farid. I am not sure if you will read this. I came across the page of Hassan Radwan. He is an ex-Muslim and I think he has some well-thought out responses against certain aspects of Islam. Can you do a video reacting to his claims, particularly the unjustness of Hellfire being for eternity and also, the scientific miracles video? Jazakallah!
Jazakallah! I did have a question regarding the bee miracle in Surah Nahl. It is suggested that because the verbs are feminine that it is referring to female bees in verse 16:68-69. However, in 105:3-4: "And He sent against them Flights of Birds, striking them with stones of baked clay." striking is also feminine. So does that mean it is referring to female birds? Also, in 16:66 the pronoun for cattle is male so is it only referring to male cattle? I'm just trying to understand if the verbs being feminine in the verse about bees is truly unique. Thank you!@@FaridResponds
Assalamualaikum brother. Can you make another series on Christian princes lies because he has come up with more of them. Please make a video refuting them.
بارك الله فيكم... اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين.. اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم.. رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين... لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين..... .''''''' ................ . .
The bottom line seems that in the end, people believe what they want. The Shiite say Sunni Hadith are inaccurate, and vice versa. The primary complaint that Muslims have about the birth of Christianity (being assembled after Jesus was gone) is the EXACT complaint that non Muslims have about the Prophet after HE was gone. It is only fair to use the same scrutiny and not be bias. It is naive to say that the followers of Jesus wrote everything wrong, but the followers of Muhammad wrote everything right. If a Muslim looks at ALL the hadiths and says "I believe most of it." then its fair to say that the Christian writings might be mostly right as well. Right? Fair is fair. The best thing to do is throw out inconsistencies. If hadith isn't popular, then its probably not true. The same can be said for early Christianity. there are close to over 25,000 translations and variations and they were written in different regions by different people of the time, but the one constant of all those variations of the gospels is that each of those variations still say that Jesus was crucified, died, and rose again, and was seen by hundreds (and 11 of his 12 disciples) for weeks after his death. There certainly isn't a variation or translation that does not hammer that point home to the reader almost every other page in the Bible. So, keeping with that "trend" you could assume that Hadiths that are agreed upon the most are probably the most correct.
Dear Farid, following extensive research, listening to you (you were a great help), prayers, and effort, I have become a devoted adherent of Ahadith. However, I still have some minor inquiries. How can I reach out to you? Please.
@@FaridResponds I apologize, I'm not sure why my comment keeps getting deleted repeatedly. This is the third time. Actually, I'm unable to DM you on Twt, for that I think you need to follow me too.
JaFed the murtad with his Little Schalar. After watching the whole video, i was like "where was the arguments against hadith?!". One principle in usul al fiqh is enough to settle their doubts/ignorance, that any possibility based on speculation or without evidence is not the evidence and hence, must be rejected. Poor academic wannabes
Please do a rebuttal of his PhD thesis where he labels the Hadith of Aisha r.a's age a forgery by Hisham ibn Urwah. Absent a proper rebuttal, many would be inclined to believe it because he's convincing.
The fact that the author thought the sun set in a muddy spring, stars were missiles to firstly genies, and humans made from clay proves Islam is false bro..
@ah6757 just go back to any arabian history book and i don't see what this proves as at best it proves people didn't write which is plausible because arabs were more of memorizers than writers (demonstrated in how they memorized their history and lineages) and the foundations of the ka'aba are ancient old
Excuse me? The only people who need guidance are fitnah mongers like you who accuse people who're part of Ahlul Sunnah of being deviated which is almost always Salafis themselves.
@@FaridResponds Well there's more to it then that. He carries out an ICMA + form criticism + geographic analysis on all the different Aisha age hadiths and based on this he argues that Hisham created this hadith after he moved to Iraq. He also derives from these analyses that the hadith cannot actually be traced back to their supposed Medinan sources. From there he explains the possible motive for Hisham to do so, which is to present Aisha favourably against the Shia. But regardless of whether he is correct about the motives for doing so, I think that the method of analysis he used to reconstruct the ur-hadith is interesting. There was actually a conference held earlier this year, organised by Jonathan Brown and Ramon Harvey to discuss ICMA as a method in contemporary hadith studies. Shame there was no recording for the public though
@@generalOpenMindedThe problem is that his paper is essentially a chain of inferences rather than solid evidence to any of his ideas. Joseph Schacht, an older Orientalist researcher and arguably the first to seriously assess hadith from an orientalist viewpoint, did the exact same thing. They construct a narrative and pick out features that support it without conclusively proving anything to be true on it's own merits. Hence why the argument that Hisham fabricated the hadith to rival the Shia is just a substantiated assumption and far from conclusive.
Watch the original video first. When scholars contradict popular consensus and tradition the people ALWAYS react with hate and disbelief and then they eventually accept that the Earth is not the center of the universe. Dont be so bullheaded that you refuse the possibility that you may be wrong.
Here because a Christian mentioned to me that Joshua Little is a 'Muslim scholars' that said Hadith is unreliable. 🤣 Because of him, I know the existence of this 'Muslim scholar'.
Give up dude. He just obliterated the hadith corpus. As so much of Islam depends on hadith (like knowing how to pray, the biography of Mo's life, etc), you're left with no religion without the man-made nonsense that is "islamic tradition"
Farid what does the hadith mean by Ali ibn AbuTalib: The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: The eyes are the leather strap of the anus, so one who sleeps should perform ablution.
Farid bro mashallah u have a very nice hairstyle and face but bro pls workout do pushups ull look amazing bro. Then watching ur videoes will be 10× more enjoyable
You leave the fold of Islam with your argument number 16. You admitted yourself that sources of history, including hadith, can contain contamination. The Qur'an makes it explicitly clear that God's revelations have no doubt in it. It's literally the beginning of the second chapter. If God is emphasizing knowledge that has no doubts in it whatsoever, you seriously cannot argue that God is authorizing another source where there is plenty of room for doubt, or in other words, contamination. And it is without a doubt that the hadith literature is rife with doubts and contradictions. Game over.
Why do you call them “so called scholars?” What’s interesting is even a Hadith expert like Uthman has pushed Little’s dissertation (without giving him credit) that Aisha was not 6.
@@infinitebeast5517 Dr. Little isn’t a “so called scholar” he actually is a scholar. To say that he is “miseducated” also misses the mark. Difference of opinions doesn’t mean he’s miseducated. Two people can review the same facts and evidence and come to different conclusions - its all theorizing. For evidence that maybe he isnt “miseducated” as you accused, I stated that Hadith experts like Uthman (who has a masters in Hadith studies) have also adopted Little’s dissertation on the age of Aisha not being 6.
@@SomeofThisSomeofThat farid clearly shows how "the professor" doesn't know what he's talking about. Its par for the course with these professors who are pseudo experts. Refute what farid showed if your so right. I bet you didn't even watch the video
@@infinitebeast5517 i watched the original videos first then watched this. Farid cut a 3 hour interview in 6 minutes and thats the evidence you used to belittle someone with a PhD? If you’re biased with no original thought and have to be told what to think just say that 🤷🏽♂️
Ultimately Farid, there are sahih narrations that contradict each other. This is yet to be answered and presents a serious problem for the reliability of hadith.
Dude Farid, you seem confused and full of arrogance, no disrespect..just remove the ego and be like the Prophet. He followed the Quran alone, not Bukhari 🤣🤣
If you read the Quran which you didn’t, you would see it says to follow the acts of the prophet. Which is predominantly in hadiths. You don’t seem so smart with such basic arguments.
Hadiths will forever be a point of contention. Hadiths forever will not never be Quran. More and more highly intellectual scholars view that if the hadiths are not in harmony with the Quran, even Shahih ones, they should be rejected. But Farid isn't such a scholar, yet.
Go study some principals of fiqh and then you will realise the lies of modern western academia and such scholars regarding the hadith. Or you can simply just read the authority of sunnah by mufti taqi usmani
I dont think the issue is Hadith. The issue is the weight behind Hadith that yall place. Every sunni constantly makes the weight of hadith the same as the Qur'an. Allah never promises the preservation of hadith.
False...no Muslim has ever equalled Hadiths with the Quran. We know the Quran are the revelations from Allah and Hadiths are the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). So you're obviously are not Sunni..so what are you to say such crap ???
