Ac1 and ac2 had this tone and little bit in brotherhood and it was out when revelations came out and justified as well i think, the tone of revelations suit ezio age at that game, later they left it all but we will see what will they do with hexe.
Yeah they completely fucked everything up after Revelations. The whole those who came before thing is just a total mess from what I've seen in the newer games.
I like this version. This shows that the game was originally going to be longer. And Ezio defeated Rodrigo Borgia and finding the vault take place in 1503 instead of 1499. Making his revenge quest almost 30 years. In the final scene this shows that stopping the Sun disaster was going to be different than what Assassin's Creed 3 showed. Desmond was destined to prepared humanity for the upcoming disaster and his stop to it was going to be different meaning they never planned to kill him off. And he was originally going to be a ultimate assassin leading the modern assassins to victory against the Templars. Without Desmond, the modern storylines no longer has meaning.
Because ac 3 was supposed to be the last game, the original director who worked in ac1, 2 and brotherhood said that and desmond would have survived and lucy they would emigrate to mars and start a humanity there a new like adam and eve
Yeah, they completely trivialized the story of AC. The point was to explore genetic memories in order to save the world and give the Assassins an upper hand. The Isu stuff is just completely pointless.
@@dogestranding5047 I know. Assassin's Creed was always about having the 21st century have a approached knowledge from the past from their lineage. The franchise is about revisiting the memories of our ancestors in order to better understand and affect the present. But ever since Desmond's death, all of that was changed in ac4 to now, they have the Animus uses people DNA to put in the Animus and look in the individual's memories and their ancestors. That's not how it actually works. With proof of this. Clay back when we know him as subject 16 was unstable by being in the Animus long took his own life and there was never a mention that they use his body for strategic values because that's not how using DNA to look into the past works. You need to find the descendants of the most important people whose actions change and improve the world. Not going in their graves for their DNA.
Edward wouldn't even have cared about what Minerva said,my guy would have tried to use the Papal Staff and Piece of Eden to get rich💀 Minerva: And once more,the fire shall ignite upon the earth- Edward: Aye aye,now tell me,how much ya think this trinket here can get me?(*lifts the Apple) Minerva: ....Damn must be a wrong era(goes back to 1499) Edward: HEY!Where the hell do you think you are going lash?
@@newhybrid101This is kinda hilarious ngl, I could see this happening after Edward somehow switched places with Ezio while he was drunk, he went to the past while Ezio went to the future in Edward place
Yes, I believe Rodrigo was meant to die at the end of AC2, with the ending taking place in 1503. When Brotherhood entered development, they quickly altered the ending to adjust for it.
Theres more evidence to that. In a developer video, released months before, Corey May, one of AC2 writers, said something like that "Our game begins in 1476 and ends in *1503* ".
He should have died by Ezios hand in 1503 and simply face Cesare from 1503 till 1507. I always thought Ezio sparing Rodrigo was garbage,like BRO you have killing people the entire game,NOW you figured out murder doesn't bring the dead back?
Oh, i forgot that there's a cut dialogue where Ezio reveals about temples, and Mario said "maybe Altair know it, we should check the codex pages again to be sure". In fact the codex show the position of them...
Yeah it does. It also showed that the existence of The Ones Who Came Before has been mentioned since after the third crusades. Meaning Ubisoft didn't research that no one before Altair's time were aware of their existence. But know of pieces of eden.
@@gabrielandjavierpinales3689 thatis still true. Many didnt knew of themm. Only the Order knew. The Hidden ones had no idea and thought ther wher just storys
according to the novel - ezio was never supposed to kill rodrigo but rather after ezio would come out of the vault to find that rodrigo would have taken the poison rodrigo then asks that who was in the vault as his last wish to which ezio will reply no one also this mission was to be set in 1503 in the year the Spaniard dies
It could been used for the level you play during the end credit Since ac was supposed to be a trilogy, maybe it was our goodbye Ezio, before thinking to make more Ezio. Back in 2009, I've thought it was a bit weird having Ezio got a huge reveletion and then was supposed to live with the dread of having the world be destroyed and he could do nothing to stop it Thank you Sliver2
Why would he live in dread? It wouldn't happen in his lifetime. And even if it did we are all gonna die anyways,i would prefer to live to see the end Most people believe the world will be destroyed eventually somehow and they arent worried about it,heck many believe it will happen in THEIR life time
Yeah that's why Assassin's Creed 3 original demo showed that the animation and fighting combat looks similar to Assassin's Creed 2 meaning the third part was already planned before they have to delayed it because of making the development of Assassin's Creed Brotherhood, they were going to bring back Ezio again.
It's strange how the AI starts out sounding like Ezio, but then sounds more like Roger's actual voice as it goes on while everyone else sounds like they should. Still some cool dialogue that really should've been in Brotherhood to tie it to 2 better.
Man it's always sad to reminisce about the things that could have been. This ending seems so much better than Ezio sparing Rodrigo for no fuckin reason
Can you dig into game files and solve the mystery of the "keys" you can loot from mannequin during hidden gun training mission and the decoy mannequin during the "bounty hunter" assassination contract?
literally is just a little joke. it is an easter egg. why would anyone loot a dummy. same goes for the puppets you shoot at after getting the gun from altair's codex@@Scared_Yoda
I always thought the lines said in the beginning were an exchange between Ezio and Rodrigo, Rodrigo kills himself in the book since he failed to open the vault. Very interesting interpretation of events. It would also explain how Rodrigo turns up dead. It’s not like he suddenly dies off screen. This can be backed up somewhat because the novel also goes through the Cristina memories which never appears till brotherhood but remains cut from the game with content present inside the game files. condensed everything to one reply to make this easier to read lol, but that's my take EDIT: As a commentor pointed out in one of the dev diaries for the game, Corey May (AC2 scriptwriter) indeed says that the game starts at 1476 and ends at 1503... which correlates with the book as the game ends at 1499. Fascinating to think that the book is an early version of the game to some extent. Adds up with everything in the comment too
Uncovering all the behind-the-scenes of the classic AC's, story and gameplay alike, all on your own. Tremendous work, simply tremendous. You're an absolute GOAT, just keep at it.🔥🔥🔥
The game ending was supposed to take place in 1503 and Rodrigo was going to off himself by drinking poison, it was so far into development that the novel actually has this original ending, when they decided to make Brotherhood they quickly changed it but the novel writer couldn't change in time. This made Brotherhood's novel have a weird recon and take place fully in 1503 instead of 1499-1503
Fantastic work on covering the cut content of these games with forms of visual representation. Brotherhood being the true expansion of AC2 (if development wasn't rushed) would've made sense instead of sequences already part of the main game being rushed and delivered as DLC later on. (And those DLCs were still rushed 💀)
This version makes better sense. No way Ezio would travel all the way to Rome and suddenly feel like to spare Rodrigo. I mean he has killed many for revenge anyway why would he spare the last one 😑
The dialogue show Rodrigo take poison and die for self hand; Ezio didn't kill him. After the bonfire of vanities dlc, Ezio envelops a new porpouse: protect people and show them how to follow their phat. During Rodrigo confrontation looses himself for a bit, but he focus again for what is important for him
On one hand, it's a good kind of closure for the game, but on the other, with this mission the game wouldn't have ended on the iconic cliffhanger (I mean, we dostill have the modern day section but the animus plot ends in the vault). But I really like the dialogue and wish it had been icluded in the beginning of BH.
The perfect explaination for why we had to go through SO much of Ezio's life should have been that in that moment Ezio suffered extreme induced amnesia after entering the vault. So upon revisiting, the memory was more corrupted than anything they'd ever seen. Because it had been deliberately deleted from Ezio's living memory. So we HAD to live his whole life, because that's what it took to synchronise the memory to a playable state.
I belive this is more like in the books. At the beginning of Brotherhood, Ezio actually comes out of the cript, he sees Eodrigo on the ground. Then he leaves. If I remember corectly, he then comes back to get the pieces of Eden but Rodrigo was no more.
@@Lighthouse29501 ... jesus i totally missed that, i can't believe AI is this convincing. Now that i know it's AI it clearly sounds like AI, but i totally missed it in the first listening.
It's like at first Ezio was supposed to have a american accent just as Altair did in the first game. The first game explains the reason he has one and everyone were speaking so modern was so Desmond can understand what they're saying.
Can anyone talk about the dialogue of the gods and the people that came before? This is seen in a lot (if not all) major cultures in the world. A depiction of an ancient race with extraordinary technologies that once governed, but their time came to pass (for yet unknown reasons), and now the truth that has been dealt upon us is but a mere mirage of the true grand scheme of things. If this does not interest you, then I don’t know if you played the games properly, since to me it always seemed fascinating.
This is the epilogue of the Law. To become one with uncle Mario and aunt Minerva is truly an exceptional experience. Nothing is true. Everything is permitted. ❤
I’m glad that’s not Ezio’s actual voice because that voice doesn’t fit his character and I think the original voice belongs in a more modern video game
The first paragraph of lines is actually between Rodrigo and Ezio after he exits the vault, not Ezio and Minerva. Rodrigo commits suicide in front of Ezio then Mario comes right after.
It would have been great to hear that resolution at the end of the game, alas I still played every other Ezio game so nothing was lost and character was indeed intact in sequels.
This ai is pretty good I mean the voice of Roger Craig Smith sounds more like himself than Ezio but if you're not paying too much attention it's pretty accurate
Also Desmond wasn't planned to be killed off. He was destined to be the ultimate master assassin. Meaning his act of stopping the sun disaster was going to be different.
I can't deny the quality of piecing together these scraps left in the game files, but it is undeniably a bit rough around the edges. The voice acting especially reminds me a lot of voice acting from a Slav-Jank game - a bit flat, straightforward and little in the way of expressions. AI can read the lines, but it can't really bring the finesse and soul that the original voice actors could.
"Slav-Jank game" because new Anglo-Saxon games are so finished and well-made. I would rather play a "Slav-Jank game" like the Witcher 3 than some random "Anglo-Saxon" woke trash that doesn't even run without crashing.
These really seem like placeholders. Like they where told to read these out once without much thought and then thrown into the game. Still very interesting to what we couldve got here tho
![Removed Epilogue from Assassin's Creed 2 [Cut Content]](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
