Resurrection: Evidence from Outside the Bible 

I think you have evidence confused with proof.

@@stueve Oxford English Dictionary: Evidence: the available body of FACTS or INFORMATION indicating whether a belief or proposition is TRUE or NOT. OED: Proof: the EVIDENCE or ARGUMENT establishing a FACT or the TRUTH of a statement. I would add that since there are NO FACTS (at all; none, zilch, nada, niente, zed, zero, null, not a bit, not any) regarding the resurrection of Jesus (or anyone else, for that matter) that my original statement,ent stands, namely, "This should be a really "Quick Look" since there is NO EVIDENCE of a resurrection by anyone, anywhere, at anytime."

@@acircharo So you're thinking that eyewitness testimony doesn't qualify as evidence?

@@stueve I'm sorry, you are obviously a believer. There is NO EYEWITNESS testimony from ANYONE. From whom or where did this "eyewitness testimony" originate? Were there people standing there watching while this as it occurred and writing it down? Who were they? Why did no one identify them as eyewitnesses? As is the case with most of the NT, it does not standup to scrutiny, unless you are willing to accept magical mumbo jumbo as "proof". Any secular scholars (and most clerical scholars) know that the gospels (the ONLY SOURCE of the resurrection nonsense) was NOT written by eyewitnesses or even people alleging to have been eyewitnesses or to even HAVE KNOWN eyewitnesses. Think for yourself.