Тёмный

Rethinking Genesis 1: How Translators Changed the First Verse | Genesis Analysis Ep. 1 

Untangle Philosophy
Подписаться 641
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.
50% 1

In this enlightening video, we dive into the intriguing evolution of interpretation surrounding the opening verses of the Bible's Genesis 1. Join me as we explore the shifts in understanding that have shaped our perception of the seven-day creation narrative.
🔍 Key Points Covered:
- Analysis of the revised translation of Genesis 1.1-2 in the NRSVue and its implications
- The intricate poetic structure of Genesis 1 and its significance
- Comparative insights from ancient creation myths and literature
- Reflections on the concept of creatio ex nihilo and its compatibility with biblical narrative
🔬 Sources and Further Reading:
Brettler, M. Z. (2007) How to Read the Jewish Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coogan, M. D. (2018) The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coogan, M. D. & Chapman, C. R. (2018) The Old Testament: A Historical and Literary Introduction to the Hebrew Scriptures. 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dalley, S. (2008) Myths from Mesopotamia. S. Dalley (trans.) Revised edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knight, D. A. & Levine A-J. (2011) The Meaning of the Bible: What the Jewish Scriptures and Christian Old Testament Can Teach Us. New York, NY: HarperOne.
NRSVue Holy Bible with Deuterocanonical/Apocryphal Books of the Old Testament (2022) (New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition) Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
📖 Chapters:
00:00 Traditional Translation of Genesis 1.1-3
00:25 New Translation & Understanding
00:59 The Structure of Genesis 1 Supports the New Translation
02:22 Comparative Mythology Supports the New Translation
02:53 Temporal Clauses in Ancient Near Eastern Literature
03:28 Creatio ex nihilo
04:12 End Screen
🎥 This is the first in a planned series on Biblical Scholarship & Interpretation beginning with the Book of Genesis.
#Genesis #BiblicalStudies #CreationMyths #NRSVue #BibleInterpretation #ScholarlyAnalysis

Опубликовано:

 

4 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 18   
@untanglephilosophy
@untanglephilosophy 3 месяца назад
Thank you for checking out my video. This is the beginning of a new series on biblical scholarship. My aim is to make interesting and enlightening videos on biblical literature, which may have a touch of controversy but are wholly non-exclusionary. They can be enjoyed whether you are religious, come from a religious background, or are as non-religious as they come. We will dive not just into philosophy and theology, but also history, mythology, linguistics, archaeology, and more. I hope you’ll join me on this exciting journey.
@MudhiLi
@MudhiLi 3 месяца назад
It was actually how re-created the world so that human can live. There is a honkong pastor actually described fully.
@ahm3096
@ahm3096 3 месяца назад
The chaos in my opinion was Satan's rebellion. It's a deep study but I absolutely believe there was a flood before Noah's flood.
@untanglephilosophy
@untanglephilosophy 3 месяца назад
Interesting thought!
@ReneeB-mz9cx
@ReneeB-mz9cx Месяц назад
I agree it's a cycle there was a "before" the "in the beginning", but YWHW is Satan and not the Creators of humans
@untanglephilosophy
@untanglephilosophy Месяц назад
@@ReneeB-mz9cx Are you sympathetic to some Gnostic beliefs?
@ReneeB-mz9cx
@ReneeB-mz9cx Месяц назад
@@untanglephilosophy not sure, I came here to learn. I might coincide with some gnostic beliefs but I personally don't think the whole "loosh" and "archons" make sense wholistically.
@pzmoore007
@pzmoore007 3 месяца назад
I am curious about genesis when God created male and female, saw it was good then sent them off to multiply. Yet in the garden of Eden there was only 1 man.
@untanglephilosophy
@untanglephilosophy 3 месяца назад
Absolutely. I'd like to explore this in another video. Genesis 1 and 2 appear to be two originally separate units of text. Genesis 1 suggests that man and woman were made together as the final creation. Genesis 2 has man being created first, then animals (which he names), and then finally the woman. There are other interesting differences between the texts as well. The fact that the compilers of the Bible put these two texts next to each other may suggest they were unconcerned about any potential contradictions in the Bible and wanted to present different traditions from Israelite history.
@pzmoore007
@pzmoore007 3 месяца назад
Or it is possible these are two different events that happened. @@untanglephilosophy
@brunodutra6392
@brunodutra6392 3 месяца назад
Also notice the different time of creation of the plants
@ReneeB-mz9cx
@ReneeB-mz9cx Месяц назад
Man wasn't created first. It was "them" male AND female in 1 body
@pzmoore007
@pzmoore007 Месяц назад
@@ReneeB-mz9cx Interesting the alchemical true form, Rebis, is more powerful than angels. The Rebis is the ideal divine state, the Philosopher's Stone, the combination of opposites.
Далее
Rope climb tutorial !! 😱😱
00:22
Просмотров 4,1 млн
The OLDEST Creation MYTH in World, and its Origins
32:30
Is This The Best Argument For God's Existence?
14:18
Просмотров 375 тыс.
Hedonic Calculus (A-Level Utilitarianism)
9:59
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.
What each book of the Bible is about
17:33
Просмотров 3,3 млн
The Origins of Arabic
21:40
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Eridu Genesis | The Sumerian Epic of Creation
21:39
Просмотров 745 тыс.
Kant's Deontological Ethics
6:58
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.