Тёмный

Review of the Amazing Diesel Outboard Waterjet Engine by OXE Marine (OXE300 Jet-Tech) 

Salt Water Fishing University
Подписаться 72 тыс.
Просмотров 42 тыс.
50% 1

Waterjet technology has now been introduced to the diesel outboard marketing with the new release of the OXE300 Jet-Tech. Environmentally friendly and incredibly efficient, this waterjet technology is a marvel to see. Check out this video for features, pricing, and more.
Visit us at www.speechlesssportfishing.com

Опубликовано:

 

18 мар 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 49   
@icydrink97
@icydrink97 Год назад
Wow, this blew me away.
@chrisschoendorf6691
@chrisschoendorf6691 Год назад
Awesome😊
@DENNISTunaKiller
@DENNISTunaKiller Год назад
Marcus, when u get a chance, can u let me know about prop wash with the jet compared to props outboard motors. Thanks
@cgem8426
@cgem8426 Год назад
Cool cool. But this is not a review. It's a preview.
@DENNISTunaKiller
@DENNISTunaKiller Год назад
Awsome video , i have a question. I have a twin outboard, and prop wash is an issue trolling. Is there less prop wash with a jet? Number 1 fan of SPEECHLESS,, as soon as the weather warmes up, im gonna contact you.
@sharonbraselton4302
@sharonbraselton4302 Год назад
yes it diße
@josemariomerced9219
@josemariomerced9219 11 месяцев назад
Could you provide us service manual & parts catalog manual or download CD .I been servicing lately phillipine navy OXE 150 hp . Screw propulsion
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665
The shielded nature of the impeller in waterjets makes them so much safer than props for marine life and swimmer's... Though more efficient than an open prop it would be interesting to see the comparison with a toroidal/sharrow prop and the deep speed electric rim driven electrojet.. the advantage tends to open up in favour of jets as speed increases.. and with jets however the rim driven blades of the electrojet mean it continues to cause less cavitation and has lower operating costs in terms of servicing .. oil and filter changes. That give the Rim driven E jet a speed and efficiency advantage over internal ICE driven interior waterjets. The bio diesel option makes sense but even more logical is the development and substitution of the rotary liquid piston diesel and multi fuel motors.. mainly for simplicity size and lightness 80%. and also another 20 -30% efficiency . They produce less noise vibration and with only about 60 parts in a whole motor. They are also inherently quieter and physically small. To anyone interested in wake turbulence/noise reduction rim driven electric drive adds total rpm control from 1rpm up to max. to the options whilst full motor torque is available from the first few RPM. Up to near max. This is an interesting and valuable transitional development but it can quickly be overtaken if the combustion of the fuel is optimised through an advanced generator .. as in comercial diesel electric systems..🤔
@user-kh3gy4gr7t
@user-kh3gy4gr7t 3 месяца назад
Такой привод КПД сильно занижин, чем у простого винта.
@Blanchy10
@Blanchy10 Год назад
I'd like some better pics. Looks like the intake is attached to the transom? How do they turn?
@tamaralee4108
@tamaralee4108 Год назад
The engine doesn't turn. The waterjet has a steering nozzle on the discharge. You can see the stainless nozzle gimble shaft in some of the views that show the bottom of the jet.
@shaynelhta
@shaynelhta 4 месяца назад
1-1power on the jet???? Really? I would like to see it in person.
@variator7466
@variator7466 Год назад
So efficiency is higher with jet than prop, is that what this man is claiming?
@Twelvestonestacking
@Twelvestonestacking Год назад
Weeks Marine has the conventional Oxe outboards and tear them up "weekly"! I personally am building a pleasure boat (32' x 9'6")will the engines hold up? So far we are Not impressed!
@xavierrivadeneira4129
@xavierrivadeneira4129 12 дней назад
Hola Precio porfa
@Joelontugs
@Joelontugs 4 месяца назад
I was down until the end lmao
@kellymchenry1944
@kellymchenry1944 Год назад
That’s a lot of money for 300hp. The price has to come way down.
@brianpeele9156
@brianpeele9156 Год назад
Wel I mean it’s not for basic recreation….
@dreed7312
@dreed7312 Год назад
Carbon pollutes water? I'd like to hear more about that.
@Charles53412
@Charles53412 Год назад
I'd put the Cox 300hp V8 diesel up against it any day.
@JRotten
@JRotten Месяц назад
I hope the best for this company. But 90k is out of my price range. My two Suzuki's rigged, costed less.
@sharonbraselton4302
@sharonbraselton4302 Год назад
oxe 200 hp disel jet outvard
@1STGeneral
@1STGeneral 4 месяца назад
Eva Gabor relative ? Oliver you need an outvard for the tractor
@swine_tech8014
@swine_tech8014 Год назад
Nananana, not so faaasst. So did OXE just solve the diesel soot problem, or is it just unregulated in the maritime applications? That's true, if the guy says, that diesels are 50% cleaner in terms of CO2 compared to gasolines, buuut what about the typical diesel problems: NOx and soot? Solved or not regulated? P.S. I was triggered by him mentioning, that this engine was much cleaner than others in that room..
@gregoryhunt1142
@gregoryhunt1142 9 месяцев назад
It would depend on how you set it up .
@chippyjohn1
@chippyjohn1 4 месяца назад
If the exhaust is discharged into the water like most marine engines you will not have an issue with airborne soot particles. Also for the most part boats do not operate in highly populated areas.
@Rico11b
@Rico11b 3 месяца назад
Awesome technology. However, the cost is STILL way to high. It's not going anywhere for now.
@chippyjohn1
@chippyjohn1 4 месяца назад
BMW B57 twin turbo outboard, hmm.
@polska905
@polska905 4 месяца назад
Unreliable overpriced junk
@redman2751
@redman2751 Год назад
Um am I just dumb but a 300hp outboard is between $28k-$38k. He compares an outboard to inboard. Why? He says it’s $100k versus a $160k inboard. Also isn’t the Yamaha jet engines way less than that. I mean the Yamaha 25fsh with twin jet engines isn’t even $100k. Granted you can’t get just the Yamaha engines as far as I know but seems like it’s a ridiculous price.
@edwardbowles8613
@edwardbowles8613 Год назад
Guessing he is comparing it to a diesel inboard so comparing diesel to diesel. Not outboard to outboard.
@redman2751
@redman2751 Год назад
@@edwardbowles8613 ah yeah that makes sense. When he said it, it seemed off though. That does make sense though. I don’t know what diesel inboards cost but I’d imagine it’s right around there.
@saltwaterfishinguniversity
@saltwaterfishinguniversity Год назад
Yep, as Edward said 👍
@gabbermaikel
@gabbermaikel Год назад
300 hp diesel is way more then 300 gas hp as the torque wil be much higher so you can run a bigger prop on the diesel meaning a 300hp diesel wil be faster then a 300hp gas engine
@brettweltz8135
@brettweltz8135 Месяц назад
@@gabbermaikel but what about the gearbox? Diesel engines are Torque Monsters, can the gearbox survive for enough time to make it financially make sense?
@jot2287
@jot2287 2 месяца назад
Lol 160 000 for comparable outboard. Ok I'm an idiot Doug 🤣
@fredchase3068
@fredchase3068 Год назад
Who ever heard sucking in water - ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT? I guess the water suddenly has to bob up into the intake. How can that be efficient at more than a few MPH?
@cordellej
@cordellej 7 месяцев назад
if you look properly you will see a tube on the back of the boat. when the engine is lowered into position the front of the jet seals onto that tube. and that tube leads to the intake thats under the bracket ( similar to an armstrong bracket )
@duncandmcgrath6290
@duncandmcgrath6290 8 дней назад
Every jet on every boat is above the hull line , try and educate yourself on jet pumps
@Ras-wisdom
@Ras-wisdom 7 месяцев назад
Prices for those diesel-powered outboards is way toooooo ridiculous & soon another intelligent engine manufacturer will make some less than half their price & see prices drop fast!
@fredchase3068
@fredchase3068 Год назад
Stop bragging about instantaneous thrust at take off. Water jets totally suck against a prop from a start. Very weak.
@saltwaterfishinguniversity
@saltwaterfishinguniversity Год назад
Why so frustrated Fred? It’s OK to not like the tech, but no need to get angry about it man. Life’s too short.
@2200pathfinder
@2200pathfinder Год назад
Agreed, prop performance way better and more efficient than a jet. Not sure how they are coming up with that.
@polska905
@polska905 4 месяца назад
Sorry, but jets are not more efficient.
@miketee2444
@miketee2444 10 месяцев назад
The President should retire. I half way pay attention to these motors but now he satisfied my suspicion. For me, a salesman that is trying way too hard and willing to say things that aren't true isn't looking out for your interests. There is a rule in the Marine Industry. If Merc. Engineers haven't done it, it doesn't need doing. Yes I know they've built a diesel.
@JacobRozaly
@JacobRozaly Год назад
ONLY $90K.. HAHA.. I'LL STICK TO HONDA, YAMAHA, SUZUKI, AND ANYTHING JAPANESE MADE
@treashurehunter800
@treashurehunter800 7 месяцев назад
Meh cat 32b ...is the bone.$150 k worth the extra $25,000 bones ..🥹
Далее
CLANCY 🦞 Operation Squid Ink (New Animation)
00:58
Yamaha 80hp Jet Outboard in Action!!!  (my fishing jet)
10:14
Mesin OXE Diesel Outboard   300 HP by OXE Diesel
4:23
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Direct Thrust Waterjet
2:23
Просмотров 22 тыс.
OXE300 JET-TECH - The Breakdown
2:03
Просмотров 15 тыс.
OXE - the assembly process and the people behind it
2:52