Тёмный

Review of the Canon 15x50 Image Stabilized Binoculars for astronomy and more 

Mike Likes
Подписаться 1,3 тыс.
Просмотров 16 тыс.
50% 1

Welcome everyone, here's my quick review of my Canon 15x50 binoculars. These are especially fantastic binoculars for astronomy, or any application where you don't want any jitters in your viewing experience. There is nothing worse than your stars turning into squiggly lines due to the natural movements of your hands being magnified 15x, so these solve that issue completely! No need for costly parallelogram tripod mounts, use these handheld with zero troubles.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

15 мар 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 42   
@denniswebb7473
@denniswebb7473 Год назад
I've owned a pair of these for many years and they are truly my go-to piece of equipment for sky gazing. I can't imagine using binocs without image stabilization after using these. All four of Jupiter's largest moons are clear and bright. The Pleiades are brilliant. The moon is stunning. You won't be disappointed.
@sexiestargirl
@sexiestargirl 8 месяцев назад
I got these as a gift! My brother got these for free! Thank you universe, I am so excited
@kena9595
@kena9595 2 года назад
Are the rubber eye cups soft and flexible. I have the the 12x36 and they have really nice eye cups. Thanks
@stevejohnson4069
@stevejohnson4069 3 года назад
Very informative like the other comment where did you buy the case from
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel 3 года назад
Hey there, found it on eBay :)
@Tech_Advisor_to_CXOs
@Tech_Advisor_to_CXOs 6 месяцев назад
How would you compare these binoculars with stabilisation on to a 7x50 Nikon OceanPro that doesn't have stabilisation? Would the former be as good as the latter? I'm asking because I have shaky hands and I find the Nikon Trailblazer 8x25mm too shaky.
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel 5 месяцев назад
I couldn’t say since I’ve not owned the Nikons, but I can say the Canons will be very helpful if you have shaky hands.
@robkcra
@robkcra Год назад
How long do the batteries last? Thanks much!
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel Год назад
Hi Rob, I've heard up to 8-10 hours for the lithium ones. I have yet to replace mine and they've been in it for ~3 years now (I check them periodically, even though lithium batteries aren't typically ones that leak).
@robkcra
@robkcra Год назад
@@MikeLikesChannel Thanks much Mike!
@SleepingGaint
@SleepingGaint 2 года назад
Hey there, I’m looking for that case. The only one I can find like yours on eBay is from a company called (Surf to summit) and for the 18x50 cannons. Is that the same case you bought? Thanks
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel 2 года назад
Hi John, that should be the one yep! Brand name is the same.
@timing_solution
@timing_solution 3 года назад
Thank you for review. Can you give some hint for your case, where to buy it. Thank you. Serg.
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel 2 года назад
Check eBay, brand name is "Surf to summit"
@demetriusboyle5165
@demetriusboyle5165 Год назад
What strap are you using are there are they magnetic.
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel Год назад
They’re Peak Design anchors :)
@DouglasLippert
@DouglasLippert 9 месяцев назад
They look cool, but they are not magnetic. They slide down and click into the housing where you attach the strap. They are useful if you have a case that doesn't have room for the strap in it like inthis gentleman's case.
@dogberto42
@dogberto42 2 года назад
How much magnification would be needed to see the rings of Saturn? Would the 18x50s resolve them? I'm debating the purchase of some binoculars for general use and astronomy and it seems that the 10x30 and 15x50 Canon IS pairing is serving people very well.
@TheRayDog
@TheRayDog 2 года назад
Not sure why he said that. The rings of Saturn are visible with the 8x30s I have. Granted small, but it's obvious to neophytes even.
@rfcdgaf
@rfcdgaf 2 года назад
@@TheRayDog Really? I have 7x50's and they are NOT visible in those ...?
@TheRayDog
@TheRayDog 2 года назад
@@rfcdgaf Depends on what you consider visible to mean. The rings at low magnification are mere protrusions, bumps at the edges of the disc. But yes, discernible.
@ricardoernestosotobarrios9519
To see the rings well, 25 to 30X.. To see Saturn like a fried egg or a flying saucer, less magnification.
@ken-ec9wv
@ken-ec9wv Год назад
I have the 18x50mm canon binoculars, you can see the rings of Saturn with them in two ways, first you will see the rings as two protrusions, when I sit in a reclining chair, I look and wait for the air to stabilize, usually it's only for several seconds, but when steady, what I can see is two little black spots between the planet and rings, very small but seen not glimpsed, but it's very small for sure !! And you can see what angle the rings are tilted, easily, I've had an 8 inch and 7 inch scopes so I know what to look for, I'm a binocular astronomer only now, it's so much easier to see and find dso's.
@barryorbik215
@barryorbik215 3 года назад
Wait till you've had them for about 10 years and the rubber goes tacky, you won't be impressed 😏
@popusikurac1108
@popusikurac1108 3 года назад
Which rubber? And is it replaceable?
@gordonshumway4763
@gordonshumway4763 3 года назад
Sticky soft-touch plastic is all eroding after dozens of years. This is a well-known problem, how many devices I had, from mouse to phone, everything was sticky. The stickiness is wiped off with white spirit or lighter gasoline.
@MikeLikesChannel
@MikeLikesChannel 2 года назад
Yep, I've heard. My 15x50s are ~7 years old and remain ok so far, but on borrowed time I'm sure. Curiously, I have some Pentax bins from 2005 and they remain perfectly fine... wonder why.
@jeffro7p202
@jeffro7p202 2 года назад
Speak for yourself tacky rubber means friends are less likely drop em.
@ricardosoto5770
@ricardosoto5770 2 года назад
Depends on the Rubber, I have Steiners since 1999 and Fujis since 2006 and not have become sticky.
@skhochay
@skhochay 3 года назад
Canon binoculars are not superior with their stabilization as Fujinon TS-X , I have them both and Fujinon is beating Cannon 10 times
@billmakdesi7436
@billmakdesi7436 3 года назад
Hi Sergo, which canon do u have!
@SleepingGaint
@SleepingGaint 2 года назад
Crickets
@skhochay
@skhochay 2 года назад
@@billmakdesi7436 Sorry I did not see your question I have Canon 18x50 IS UD 3,7* all weather I was very satisfied till I got Fujinon 14x40 4* you can't even compare how this Fujinon stabilizer works Cannon is in the dust.
@XShadowAngel
@XShadowAngel 2 года назад
@@skhochay I agree that Fuji's stabilization is better, but I think the Canon glass is better.
@skhochay
@skhochay 2 года назад
@@XShadowAngel glass is glass none of them use Svarlowski anyways
Далее
КРАФТИМ НЕМЛЕС ФРАГМЕНТЫ
1:05:04
Просмотров 253 тыс.
Canon 15x50 IS Binoculars for Astronomy
4:28
Просмотров 30 тыс.
Old Meade conversion to F2.
22:40
Просмотров 10 тыс.
Canon 10x42 L IS WP Binocular Review
15:11
Просмотров 65 тыс.
Swarovski Raises the Bar with the New x52s
2:55
Review of the Astro-Tech AT60ED Refractor Telescope
10:27
10 МИНУСОВ IPHONE 15
18:03
Просмотров 33 тыс.
Новодельный ноутбук Pocket386
1:16:17
iPhone 15 Pro в реальной жизни
24:07
Просмотров 446 тыс.