Reviewing 1900’s SHOCKING German Book On Aisha 

Nah this got me😭😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣

Ayesha siddiqa razi Allah anha is the mother of believers, whose evidence of purity and dignity is given in Qur'an, how can you believe a non believer and not Allah s.w.t

lol

I want to read this book since so long. Please do share it. I’ll be extremely thankful to you🙏

Sunni are too brainwashed and love Dubai 😂

This is iralavant shi go against the sunna ....the desputes between these charicters and thier personalities ...shi are not devout u know this i have seen enough of you ...were is the shi hafiz go find one ...stop being sherp

Is everything that suits our previous notions and teachings would always be easily considered a FACT without assessing others' perspectives? If that so, we would be lost to any misinformation that suits our whims.

@@maxmaxmaxgoon5602 lmao u go find one we have more than you ajeeb jahil

@@maxmaxmaxgoon5602 bro take a english course first then come here and write an essay

Hopefully we can help by sharing and recommending some good videos to people 💚

I want to read this book since so long. Please do share it. I’ll be extremely thankful to you🙏

Brilliant analysis

Available on Amazon

They want to present her as a virgin I’ve heard someone say. While the other wives were previously married when he was married with Aisha in Madina.

Aisha was a divorcee and was about 24 or 26 when she got married to rasool e Pak saaw

@@gudduthakur1249 yes she was already divorced, thank you

@@gudduthakur1249 that absolutely correct 💯, thanks 🙏

@@gudduthakur1249 I heard she was 16 or 18 or 19, I never heard 24 or 26 and I never heard before the divorcee part. Where did you get that information.

he kind has to make a lot of disclaimers so sunnis don’t get mad in the comments to be fair🤷🏻‍♀️

Yeah I need the link

@@EpicRevelations i dont have it .. i was asking where to buy😀

@@ekremgj he was jus sayin that he agrees and wants to know where he/she can also buy the book

I want to buy this book and have been looking for the book called The other face of Aiasha by Sheikh Habib Yasser

@@lailakurji1350 You can call or message fadak tv on WhatsApp They will send you the book as pdf insha'Allah

I think these are good videos to share and recommend to people :)

This guy is on a mission to tarnish the Rafida by pretending to be one of them and saying the Quran is corrupted. Screenshot captured ✅

Salam. I guess you mean intercessors?

@@dominancepreserved8749 yeah lol, thanks

@@fatemeh9664 Most welcome. Let me know if you're interested in reading hadith/sermons by the Holy Imams (a) regarding various topics. i got way many. See some for instance, (I'll post some regarding tawheed) _(The book) ‘Al Ihtijaj’ - From Hisham Bin Al Hakam who said,_ ‘The atheist asked Abi Abdillah Master Al Saadiq (a), He said, ‘From which thing did Allah Create the things?’ He (a) said: ‘From nothing!’ He said, ‘So how did a thing come from nothing?’ He (a) said: ‘The things are not vacant from either having been created from a thing or from without a thing. If these were created from a thing, it would have been with Him. So that thing would be ancient, and the ancient cannot happen to be an occurrence, nor can it perish, nor change. And that thing cannot be vacant from being one essence, and one colour. So, from where did these difference colours and the many existing essences come to be in this world, from various types? And where did the death come from, if the thing from which the things had been created, was alive? And from where did the life come from if that thing was dead? And it is not allowed that a living and dead both be ancient, nor ceasing to be, because the living is such that dead cannot come from it and He does not cease to be alive, nor is it allowed as well that the dead be ancient, not ceasing to be with what is attributed with the dead, because the dead, there is not power for it, therefore it cannot last’. He said, ‘From where are they saying that the things are eternal?’ He (a) said, ‘These are words of a people who are rejecting management of the things, so they are belying the Messengers and their words, and the Prophets (a) and what they have informed on His behalf and named their books as ‘stories of the former ones’, and they placed a religion for themselves with their own opinions. And their approbation is that the things point upon their occurrences from rotations of the spheres with whatever is in it, and these are seven spheres, and the earth and the ones upon it are moving, and the turning of the times, and interchanging of the time, and the newly occurring events which occur in the world, from the increase and the decrease, and death, and afflictions, and the restlessness of the soul to the calmness, (point) that there is a Maker for it and a manager. Can’t you see the sweet becoming sour, and the sweet (becoming) bitter, and the new (becoming) decayed, and all are to change and perishing? And he (the narrator) continued the Hadeeth until he said, ‘The atheist said, ‘And the one who claims that Allah did not cease to be and with Him was harmful clay. So He could not Separate from it except by mixing it with it and inserting it into it. So, from that clay, He Created the things’ He (a) said, ‘Glory be to Allah! How frustrated is a god who is described as being with the power not being able to separate from the clay! If the clay was alive, eternal, there would be two gods, both ancient. So, they mixed and managed the word from themselves. It that was like that, then from where did the death come, and the annihilation? And if the clay was dead, so there is no lasting for the dead along with the eternal, the ancient, and the dead is such, the living cannot come from it. These are the words of Al-Daysaniya, the staunchest of the atheists in words’. Then he (a) said in a place from this Hadeeth, ‘If it was ancient, eternal, it would not change from a state to a state, and the eternal cannot be changed by the days, nor can the annihilation come upon it’’. *[Bihar Al Anwaar - V 54 The book of creation - Ch 2 H 53]* _(The books) ‘Nahj Al-Balagah’, and ‘Al-Ihtijaj’ - In a sermon of Amir Al-Momineen Ali (a),_ ‘The One (Allah) His ancientness is evidenced upon by the newly occurrence of His creation, and by the newly-occurrence of His creation upon His existence’ - up to his (a) words, ‘The newly occurrence of the things testify upon His eternality.' And in another famous sermon (186) ‘The times do not accompany Him nor do the devices behind Him. His existence precedes the times and the non-existence and the beginning of His eternality.' Up to his (a) words, ‘The stillness and the movement does not flow upon Him. How can it flow upon Him what He has Flowed and Returns in Him what He had Begun, and how can it occur in Him what He is it’s Occurer? Then His Self would be diverse, and His existence would be in parts, and it would not prevent eternity of its meaning’. Up to his (a) words, ‘He Says when He Wants its existence: “Be!” So it comes into being. Not by a voice reverberating nor a call being heard, and rather His Speech, Glorious is He, is a deed from Him He Grew it and Represented it. It did not happen to exist from before that, and had it existed anciently, it would have been a second god. He cannot be said to have existed after having been non-existent, so the descriptions of the newly occurring events would flow upon Him, nor does there happen to be any gap between it and Him, nor would there be any merit for Him upon it, so the Maker and made would be the same, the Initiator and the initiated would be a match. He Created the creature not based upon any prior example from others, and He was not assisted upon their creation by anyone from His creatures, and He Grew the world and Withheld it from without any occupation and Spread it unsettled, and Made it stand without any legs, and Raised it without any pillars, and Fortified it from the bends and the crookedness, Prevented it from the crumbling and splitting. He Spread its pegs and Struck its barriers, and Swept its springs, and Dug out its valleys. It did not weaken Him what He had Built nor did what He had Strengthened, weaken’. Up to his (a) words, ‘He will be the Annihilator of it after its existence, until its existence becomes like lost, and the annihilation of the world after its beginning is not stranger that its growth and its invention’. Up to his (a) words, ‘And surely, He the Glorious, after the annihilation of the world, would return to be Alone, there not being anything with Him. Just as He used to be before its beginning, like that He would be after its annihilation, without there being any time, nor place, nor moment, nor era. The terms and the timings would be non-existence during that, and the years and the hours would cease. So there will be nothing except the One, the Subduer Who, to Him is the destination of entirety of the matters. Without any power from it was the beginning of its creation, and without prevention from it would be its annihilation, and had it any power upon the prevention, its lasting would be permanent. The Making of something had not obstacle for Him when He Made it, and it did not fatigue Him what He had Formed and Created, and He did not Bring it into being in order to strengthen Authority, nor out of fear from a decline and loss, nor to be assisted by it over an overwhelming adversary, nor to be protected by from an avenging opponent, nor to increase in His Kingdom by it, nor to propagate (boast) to an associate in His association, nor for loneliness which was from Him so He Wanted to be comforted to it. Then he shall Annihilate it after bringing it into being, not due to any tedium having come upon Him in its upkeep and its administration, nor for any rest to come to Him, nor for a burden of anything from it upon Him. The length of its lasting does not tire Him so He would leave it to the quickness of its annihilation, but He, the Glorious, Manages it with His subtlety, and Withholds it by His Command, and Makes it precise by His Power. Then He will Repeat it after the annihilation from without there being any need from Him to it, nor will anything from it assist Him upon it, nor to exchange from a state of loneliness to a state of comfort, nor from a state of ignorance and blindness to (state of) knowledge and search, nor from poverty and need to richness and abundance, nor from humiliation and weakness to honour and power.' *[Bihar Al Anwaar - V 54 The book of creation - Ch 2 H 6]*

@@dominancepreserved8749 tysm for this reference. i was actually looking for a similar hadith about an athiest.

@@fatemeh9664 I've got more similar reading material. Let me know if i should send it out here.

بأمكانك استخدام ترجمة يوتيوب اعلى الشاشة على جهة اليسار ايقونة ضبط ادخل عليها واختار ترجمة الى العربية بأمكانك استخدام هذه الخاصية مع اي فديو يوتيوب

العراقي موجود عندي هذا الاختيار على جهاز اندرويد بس ما تطلع ترجمة ربما هذه الترجمة متوفرة في بعض الأجهزة الحديثة فقط أو تعتمد حسب إعدادات اللغة في الجهاز أو سبب آخر

@Fatima Maykh تمت إضافة ترجمة عربية لهذه الحلقة وبعض الحلقات الأخرى

Prove cover ups with your own hadith books.

@@nihatkarazade07If we did you would say we made it up 😂 The reason we use your books to prove our points is because you can use your own book along with logic and reasoning to come to the truth

Maybe the person in your profile picture will try to imitate brother Abdul Malik too like he tried to imitate Sheikh al-Habib

Hasan Ali you really want to spread this pollution everywhere, don’t you?

What up, it’s John Agha from discord

@@johnahmad2116 Azizam

Good read different side of aisha

@@Timeone123. I mean it really has a painting of her on its cover!!!...

I remember there was a copy of the book for sale on Amazon, might be sold by now.

@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 there isn't, unless you got the author and the title wrong Google doesn't even find this book.

@@toobalkain That was like 6 months ago or more and if it is sold then the page was probably removed. Ps: The title was in German.

@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 maybe, but it would have stayed on Google even if Amazon removed it. I tried in German too. I'm not saying the book doesn't exist, it's just weird no search engine knows about it.

@@toobalkain I just googled “aischa mohammeds leibling frau by kurt freischler” and clicked “repeat the search with the omitted results included” and it showed four websites offering the German edition of the book for sale.

What about that surah? Specify it. Make it clear, what your question?

@@nejateshetu7826 ayah 11 onwards, what is the context of the revelation of these verses according to the general Islamic understanding?

@@Veiled_Ventures Surah Noor is about Aisha accusing Mariah the Coptic of committing zina when she said Ibrahim (as) wasn't the son of RasoolAllah (sawws). The only person narrating that Aisha was the accused and not the accuser, is Aisha herself. I'm sorry your sunni/bakri/umari scholars lied to you.

@@red.anon.313 what is the tafseer you are quoting?

@@Veiled_Ventures Tafseer from AhlulBayt (as). Not hypocrite companions.

They are foolish books that appeal to the illiterate and irrational

@@ZaydDepaor like you exactly foolish n illitrare

Well he quoted from Hadith too so 💁🏻‍♀️

He’s Quoting their Hadiths to comply with the book

If so, she should never create chaos if she was a pious woman

The only thing they say is tht aisha is wife of mohammed saws and poor those who dare to talk against her or bad about her....such person is a kafir in their eyes like she is a goddess or something....They know NOTHING about aisha other that she is Mohammed saws wife and mother of believer .....and they treat her as she is best woman ever lived .....They don't read or hear facts about aisha......They only repeat what they have heard from others......

Aisha never carried the children off the prophet pbuh for this reason

Allah sets forth an example for the disbelievers: the wife of Noah and the wife of Lot. Each was married to one of Our righteous servants, yet betrayed them.1 So their husbands were of no benefit to them against Allah whatsoever. Both were told, “Enter the Fire, along with the others!”

And Allah sets forth an example for the believers: the wife of Pharaoh, who prayed, “My Lord! Build me a house in Paradise near You, deliver me from Pharaoh and his ˹evil˺ doing, and save me from the wrongdoing people.”

Khaled Amalki. Aisha was married to Jubayr ibn Mutim ibn Adi, and was divorced when her father Abu Bakr ibn Abi Qahafa decided to convert to Islam. She was divorced aged in her twenties and brought to the Prophet as a woman who had suffered due to her father's conversion. [She was not 6 or 9 years old as according to ibn Katheer, for no child was born aged minus 13 years]. To be fair to the Prophet of Islam, he did warn the ummah when he pointed to Aisha's hut as the source of the Devil's horn, but fell short of divorcing her. Her second marriage was not consummated and planned to marry Talha ibn Ubaydullah after the Prophet had died. But her plan was demolished with the Quran prohibiting wives of the Prophet to re-marry. Academics do concede that history of Islam would have been terror-free if she had been divorced and allowed to marry Talha ibn Ubaydullah, and her sexual frustrations would have made her far less promiscuous. She never gave up on Talha, and after inciting the ummah to "Kill Na'thal (Uthman ibn Affan ) for he has become a kaafir", after the latter refused to restore her allowance, and was angry when she learned that Uthman had been killed but the people of Madina had not opted for Talha. She then waged war against Ali bn Abi Talib.

I see where you are coming from but marriage in medieval Arabia, it was a common practise among tribes as a means of cementing bonds. For 1 man to found a religion that went on to become one of the largest in the world (where he actually governed over followers) in a short period was inconceivable. In the early days in particular it was miraculous that the religion survived because it was unsettling to the other established religious communities, the Pagans, Jews & Gnostic Christians. Islam was under threat from the beginning, it was therefore necessary to make firm alliances with tribal stalwarts. Many of the companions coveted the marriage of Fatima and had come forth with proposals but they were rejected, a* suitable consolation was to take their daughters*. In addition, it’s not about a poor judge of character but rather a refusal to intervene in free will. When you take an objective look into the faith, these “mistakes” in history have been necessary to see the truth of what transpired.

This is a test from Allah swt to see where the umma will stand with truth or falsehood

If he did kill her, others would’ve killed him and every other kind of Muslim. So many people (men) liked her so if he tried to kill her he and islam would’ve died. The prophet also told him to remain patient or the worse might happen. There’s a lot going on at that time and killing wasn’t easy and done like it sounds

And he didn’t have any power, if he had he wouldn’t be 4th in caliphate and would’ve been able to end her.

@@Missionhearts That makes no sense because Imam Ali could have easily killed her after the war with Muawiya. The fact that he won the war shows how much power he had at the time. He actually forgave her after the war for joining.

@@SELFMOTIVATION007 so killing is always the best solution? What I said came from a Hadith a brother gave me almost two years ago

@@Missionhearts You said that Imam Ali had no power, if he did he wouldnt have been the 4th caliph and he would have been able to end Aisha, implying he couldnt when he was fourth caliph. He clearly could have since he won the war showing his side was more powerful. Just because you read something in a Hadith doesn't make it true. There are a ton of bias/fabricated hadiths.

@may2001 I agree, some of the content was very explicit and shocking. However, I feel that the aim of this video was actually to shock people severely and in tern stimulate them to go and research these matters for themselves. Of course this can be dangerous and it often worsens sectarian tensions, but I do believe there were cases of people converting from Sunni to Shia Islam after hearing such shocking things and attempting to refute them through historical research but instead finding that they were undeniably true. I converted from Sunni to Twelver Shia Islam in 2015 through independent research sparked by curiosity. However, in my case it was listening to respectful discussions and lectures bye Shia speakers that by the mercy of Allah lead me to convert. I think in most cases, respectful and academic criticism is much better than insults and shaming when putting across our narrative to our fellow Muslims.

Alhamdulillah for your conversion to Shia Islam. That is great you had an open mind to research and go further and find the answers you needed. This video had some great academic discussion about the character of Aisha, although I just felt some content was unnecessary. I certainly don’t think this video will be accepted by people who have been raised to hold Aisha in high esteem their whole life. But I guess if some people felt shocked at the content it may get them to Further investigate InshaAllah.

She married the Prophet at the age of 19.

@@RafidaPlus is that what Shia's believe?

Yam Jam yes and maybe even some non-Shia Muslims too, although Omar Suleiman questions the objectivity of this opinion at the end of his lecture on Aisha’s age 😒

Shias believe Aisha lied about her marriage age, this because she tried to defame the Prophet every chance she got.

In the light of Ayat e Tatheer is it possible even that The Prophet ever consummated his marriage with Ayesha LA. Don't think it is possible. Nevertheless it is a question which needs an answer.

I will try to explain it in English as best as I can. This marriage had a special purpose: to neutralize the role of Aisha and her father as direct enemies of Islam, and also a woman who received the teachings directly from the Prophet will have no excuses on the Day of Judgment.

You really think the peak of creation who is trying to spread Islam is going to set an example of divorcing ? Common think a little

Basically giving a terrible punishment without saying so

@@skendergjergji4262 The hypocrites deserve the worst punishment according to the Qur'an, is there anything that is not clear about that?

What have the Sunnis done? They spread the Religion of Allah (SWT) by the sword, forcing others to either pay them money, fight with them, or convert to their religion. That's the only reason they have so many people following their beliefs. The Prophet (SAWA) and his Ahlulbayt (AS) would have never spread the Religion of Allah (SWT) by the sword because if a religion is correct, you don't need to force others to convert. And now, there are Muslims that are leaving Islam because of how the people you look up to (Ayesha, Omar, Abu Bakr, and other tyrants) spread the religion by the sword. If you look at the life of the Imams (peace be upon them), they convinced others to follow them not through the sword but through wisdom. And your Caliphs have no wisdom whatsoever.

@@thatshiairaqi allah blesss them in paradise ?

@@oladabdiyussuf6694 What do you mean? Why would Allah (SWT) bless a tyrant who forces someone to convert to their religion or they'll die?

@@thatshiairaqi Islam is never force to convert

@Olad Abdi Yussuf Well, that's what Abbasid, Ummayid, and other Caliphates did. It's even on history channels.

Even Germans know about the wickedness of Aisha the adulteress

No brother this book written by the references of Sunni books

Are they authentic ahadiths???? Because the Quran defends the wives of the prophet So idk what those books are but yeah they’re probably fabricated

@@Abu-Yazid22 33:33 of the Holy Quran was for Ayesha but she ended up disobeying Allah (swt) and the Holy Prophet (sawa) at the battle of Jamal.

@@thatshiairaqi no Aisha r.a never disobeyed Allah!! You are wrong

1:18:08

It's written in Sunni hadiths that Allah (Swt) ordered the Prophet (sawa) to marry Aisha in order to test the people to see whom they would pick. Him (Allah) or her (Aisha). This is specifically for times like the battle of Jamal to see whom the people will support.

@@thatshiairaqi it's such a stupid test and illogical

@@mahdih2141 Calling Allah (SWT) decision stupid and illogical is an insult to Allah (SWT). Allah (SWT) may do things we do not understand but they are infinitely wiser and more intelligent than any decision we could make.

@@iceycones654 this is all rubbish