Richard Dawkins on the Creationists

Подписаться 847

Просмотров 112 тыс.

50% 1

Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion, The Greatest Show on Earth, The Selfish Gene and other books talks to Irish Broadcaster and journalist, Karen Coleman about the Creationists who believe the world began less than 10,000 years ago.

Опубликовано:

4 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,3 тыс.

@Chaosdude341 11 лет назад

He's so patient and intelligent. I love listening to him talk about biology. He's so passionate about it.

@2fast2block 2 года назад

He's a loser, is all. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@kantraxoikol6914 2 года назад

more passionate about people being intelligent enough to drop their ignorance and superstition....far more passionate that you think for yourself and not your group of fanatics that would rather bomb us than actually be a fellow human ....and i mean christains too, because they believe since the world is ending tomorrow we have no obligation to live well today.

@seanjones2456 5 лет назад

Richard Dawkins delivered more useful and interesting information in 9 minutes than an apologist will all year..

@idontknow9862 4 года назад

A year? A lifetime maybe.

@2fast2block 2 года назад

@@idontknow9862 You losers are so funny. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

Here is some interesting information that you may not want to hear! Dr E M Spieker. Professor of Geology at Ohio state university quote from “The Genesis Flood” page 209. Does our time scale [referring to the invented geologic column] then partake of natural law? [In other words is it proven science?] No, I wonder how many of us realise that the time scale was frozen in essentially its present form by 1840. How much geology was known in 1840? A bit of Western Europe none too well and a lesser fringe of eastern Northern America. All of Asia, Africa, South America and most of Northern America, were virtually unknown. How dared the pioneers assume that the Ideal Geologic Column would fit the rocks in these vast areas by far the major part of the world? Only in dogmatic assumption and in many parts of the world, notably in India and South America, it does not fit. But even there it is applied! So flexible and accommodating are the facts of geology! [My comment- I would say myself, so flexible and accommodating are the so-called facts of evolution and so evolution is built upon a frame work of lies].

@EVHfan5001 12 лет назад

greatest goal in my life: give dawkins a high five!!! lol

@snoordman04 4 года назад

And now 7 years along.. Did you do it?

@allebasaiadartse3951 2 года назад

9 years have passed... did you do it?

@2fast2block 2 года назад

@@allebasaiadartse3951 yeah, did you love being a loser and do it? We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@glenliesegang8935 2 года назад

it is unscientific to discover nanoscale machines capable of precise catalysis, communication and signalling functions, adaptive responses to novel environmental cues, all requiring a base 4 encoded information as software. this software can only operate with a unique and arbitrary operating system to translate code into function which performs self-referential operations, edits itself, and specifies other nanoscale machines which work cooperatively to copy that same software, and call it zero proof of an intelligence behind it. this software can evolve, but demonstrates periodic updates and patches to produce novel new structures and functions, like caterpillar to butterfly, each using different biomolecules for energy and raw materials. were the same found on a planet where large wooden warehouses were run by wooden robots running on software of notches on long lines, capable of harnessing fire as energy source, there would be zero doubt of its "un-natural" origin. Any intelligence capable of what the nano machines found in cells can do and back-coding it into DNA base sequences, with sequences which operate and regulate the rest as a cooperative distributed instruction net is certainly "god-like." I must reject any primitive, unscientific belief system which say, "Life just happened."

@timwatts9371 Год назад

@@glenliesegang8935 That tedious waffling just said that you think life was brought into existence with magic by a Supernatural Being

@GT-hy2wm 9 лет назад

These (Creationists) are the people who, if nothing is done to hinder them, have the capacity to devolve humanity to the ancient times of sticks & stones.

@thepassionate3335 9 месяцев назад

100%

@pillsareyummy 15 лет назад

I love Dawkins!! Keep 'fighting the good fight', sir, we need more like you...

@rezagandomi7828 Год назад

has man went to the moon?

@333222777888 12 лет назад

Prof Dawkins looks almost bored with the creationist questions, but then lights up when he starts talking about the plants and insects... it shows that he really is interested in the science and is not a troll (which is more than can be said about some of the people who watch his speeches without listening!). I think he's amazing!

@michaelprozonic 2 года назад

“that’s just dopey” This man peaks for me

@walrtbstudios5430 2 года назад

Frank Zappa once remarked that the most common element in the universe was not hydrogen, but stupidity. Creationism/ ID is the absolute apex of that stupidity.

@gnuochtapir 15 лет назад

The voice of reason. thanks for posting!

@HazelTheHare 10 лет назад

Why is he blinking so much. I cant stop noticing it now. Also, his expression in the first 30 seconds or so was just classic!

@bobbart4198 4 года назад

@@mandarkumthekar8565 Notice that when he begins discuss Pollination and " Bees copulating with flowers " he gets particularly blinky and start to grin !

@InshushaGroupie 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon The myth of the Flood has been so well explored! It didn't even exist in Jewish myth until the return of exiles from Babylon, it was brought back by them and adapted from the Epic of Gilgamesh. There is absolutely no evidence in the geological record of a world-wide flood, the physics of it is impossible, the concept of literally putting every species of animal onto a wooden boat is hysterical and utterly impossible and the process of re-releasing them all equally ludicrous.

@2fast2block 2 года назад

You losers are great about "no evidence." We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@InshushaGroupie 2 года назад

@@2fast2block If you can only get life from life, your God requires a creator of his own. Your conclusion contradicts your entire argument. And even then, the argument you're making is deistic. You need another further, enormous leap to your theistic conception of God. And that God, who cares who you sleep with, is something you haven't even begun to justify. Do you think these sloppy arguments are something new....?

@taxusbaccata9200 Год назад

@@InshushaGroupieNot quite true. If there is a God, it existed eternally, so it has no beginning or creator. It existed outside of time. There is no infinite regression. Events themselves (such as the birth of the universe) created the time/space continuum.

@InshushaGroupie Год назад

@@taxusbaccata9200 The question is one of regression. If something exists, it requires a creator. Whether that creator is eternal is irrelevant, it requires a creator because it exists. Also, if spacetime begins with the universe, concepts like "eternal" have no meaning. Eternal is a measure of time, which you're applying to something 'before' time. If spacetime begins with the universe, we can't even talk about a 'before' time.

@taxusbaccata9200 Год назад

@@InshushaGroupie The whole argument of my concept of eternity is counterintuitive, I know. I understand it. We exist in time and can conceive of time because we are temporal beings. Because we are temporal beings we have a beginning and an end and are constantly in flux. If an all powerful God existed that needed a creator, it would be proof that this God was not all powerful, but perhaps that which created it was and then so forth down the regressive chain of creators. This idea is absurd. The idea that infinity has a beginning and end is absurd. Think of it as a donut shape. No beginning and no end, but just is.

@TomUK7 12 лет назад

Creationism is just a short cut to feeling wonderful about yourself..."What?!!!? God created ME!???!! And he also gave me a soul! And you say all other life on Earth is excluded from having one? Well I never!!! Aren't we SPECIAL!!!! That's amazing! I feel much better about myself now!!!! I like this creationism!" Its nothing but a crutch for the psyche. You can understand why its so popular

@rongarner4273 11 лет назад

Well done Anthony, you validate everything that Dawkins says of the Blind Believers in the Bible. Keep up the good work of spreading his word.

@2fast2block 2 года назад

Loser, you jokes are the blind ones. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@quantumrobin4627 6 лет назад

It doesn’t make financial sense to learn about things that could debunk their beliefs, especially if you’re taking donations from hordes of others that believe the same

@maxwellsequation4887 4 года назад

DUMBO creationist

@2fast2block 2 года назад

@@maxwellsequation4887 ok, show me your knowledge, loser. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@MrGuitardude92 12 лет назад

7:55 - 8:15 The look... of love... is in... their eyes... That explanation of bees and orchid pollination is my new chat up line lmao.

@nshafiee5780 4 года назад

"Flowers are sex organs". OMG, I love that

@tinaanderson2851 12 лет назад

I love you, Richard Dawkins!

@hwd71 4 года назад

Prove that love exists, or are you just dancing to your D.N.A?

@hwd71 4 года назад

@@kevinOneil6742 Explain the origin of the first prokaryotic cell.

@hwd71 4 года назад

@UC66Kj5AI6rIycjblfdRdtXA TOE =GOD. In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. The Kalaam Cosmological Argument proves that. That's why Dawkins won't debate William Lane Craig, because Dawkins will get savaged and he doesn't want to risk having another stroke. Richard Dawkins Called "Coward" by Oxford Atheist for not Debating William Lane Craig 1-on-1 m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rI5I10CAGIg.html#

@hwd71 4 года назад

@@kevinOneil6742 I will let Professor of Mathematics, John Lennox answer the equation for you. Is There Evidence of Something Beyond Nature? m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-F6rd4HEdffw.html

@bourbonbird8067 4 года назад

@@hwd71 let's take this step by step. the first step involves looking at the primordial earth four point seven billion years ago there it is mostly wet very warm and with an atmosphere composed of all sorts of gases hydrogen, hydrogen cyanide, methane, and ammonia. among them DNA is a long chain molecule made from just four different types of nucleotide so the first question is where did the nucleotides come from. in 1961 hydrogen cyanide and ammonia were left to stew in an aqueous solution in a laboratory under conditions very similar to the primordial earth. left alone, the solution produced adenine one of the four nucleotides that make up DNA. once nucleotides formed the next step was to join together to make chains called poly nucleotides. in the 1980's researchers found that a clay called Montmorillonite which was abundant on the primordial sea floor and in hot pools of water on land is the perfect catalyst for this process some of these long poly nucleotide chains like ribonucleic acid or RNA are able to make copies of themselves. the copies aren't always perfect mistakes creep in but some imperfectly copied molecules would have been better adapted to the environment than others. these successful molecules continued to replicate and pass on their traits while weaker or less well adapted molecules would have broken apart over hundreds of millions of years. RNA grew more complex the single strand became a double strand and the better adapted DNA molecule evolved. one of the differences between RNA and DNA is that DNA needs proteins to replicate itself. proteins are made of amino acids which are often called the building blocks of life so where did the first ones come from? The same experiment that produced nucleotides from a primordial broth of ammonia and hydrogen cyanide also produced a lot of amino acids and long chains of amino acids called polypeptide montmorillonite. it turns out is a natural breeding ground for all kinds of complex organic chemicals. as DNA molecules replicated themselves they shared their environment with other chemicals that thrive in montmorillonite clay. one group called lipids have a natural tendency to clump together to form spherical structures called micelles. RNA or DNA molecules that attracted these lipids would therefore find themselves protected inside and my cell membrane because they were better protected they better survived and replicated more successfully. there you have the first primitive cells they look nothing like the complex cells we have today for a very good reason. over 3.7 billion years they've evolved. the theory of evolution which has been around for 150 years and has overwhelming evidence to support it. You see? no imaginary god. Dont use the god of the gaps fallacy because it makes you look like a fool.

@DahPianoNut 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon From what you have said in your earlier comments, it is under my understanding that it is the way hydrogen and other atoms react with each other within our bodies that have created life as we know it. And these atoms act after the laws of nature, thereby meaning that it is the laws of nature that have made mankind, according to your theory.

@williamwilson6499 11 лет назад

Many years too late, but I wish that lady would refrain from using 'theory' when talking about Creationism. Creationism is not a theory...it's barely even a hypothesis.

@UniqueCopy0 12 лет назад

not making of richard dawkins but I havent seen him not blinking for a second.

@TheAnubisDrake 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon You are right. BECAUSE NATURAL PROCESSES DID THAT! as I already told you, they are not the same thing.

@neilmcintosh5150 12 лет назад

The world is actually only 4,000 years old, the universe is only 6,000 years old. These are very accurate figures and should not be questioned..

@JosephNordenbrockartistraction 10 лет назад

The camera angle makes R Dawkins look small. How strange :)

@seanjones2456 5 лет назад

I was under the assumption that she is a giant.

@Mnch-tn9rh 4 года назад

He's sitting on a smaller chair.

@Longtack55 5 лет назад

At 5:55 Dawkins says "Flowers are sex organs...." The conversation goes on for a few minutes and there's talk of "copulation" and the interviewer begins to change her calm demeanor. Do you like flowers? Oh dear - so many lost opportunities in our lives...

@vincentpol 11 лет назад

That's a nice quote you looked up. As far as life emerging from non-life. Just google "thin line between life and non-life", it's a TED talk. Life is the inevitable result of chemicals reacting to each other. If god is the truth, how come you guys have such hard time providing any kind of proof at all. Sigh, the audacity of calling us duped.

@DahPianoNut 12 лет назад

You are correct objects did not make us what we are. The forces of nature made us what we are.

@bermudaguy1 11 лет назад

I don't know, therefore it must be god!

@ryandunn8333 11 лет назад

I'm curious, how do you believe the earth was created 10,000 years ago when the rest of the solar system outdates it by billions of years?

@normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

I think some people's consciences are fast eroding concerning right and wrong!

@Pipsqwak 12 лет назад

Is it just me, or does Dawkins look like he's thinking, "Shit - not again! What the hell am I doing here answering these same old questions for the millionth time?" right at the beginning of the video?

@cjcjcjiamcj 11 лет назад

holy shit!! think that's the first time I've seen that written on the internet haha good on ya!

@oldpossum57 Год назад

At 7:42 Dawkins says that, so to speak, the flowers provide nectar to bribe the insects to act as ferries to carry the pollen. Clever! But at first I thought he said the flowers bribed them to act as “fairies” carrying pollen. Also clever, but delightful.

@taxusbaccata9200 Год назад

Someone once asked me why flowers were so pretty. I said it's because they're in competition for pollinators. It works on humans, too in that it induces them to propagate these plants.

@NathanielK1234 12 лет назад

My field is biology. There are things in the world that science cannot explain, regardless of the assumption that it can. There are things in the world that go far beyond our ability to measure them and its likely we never will be able to. As humans, we like to think we know everything. Science is just an avenue to attempt to fulfill those desires. There are just some things we will never know.

@FahadAyaz Год назад

Can you give examples of what you believe can never be explained? I think there are very few things that we can never know, if anything at all. I do realise your comment was from 10 years ago and you may have changed your mind 😄

@InshushaGroupie 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon No, the Epic of Gilgamesh is a description of a local flood. The Biblical Flood story is a derivation of this Epic. We know this because we have earlier examples of the Epic of Gilgamesh, and typically Babylonian imagery in the Flood story. We also have evidence of a series of localised but devastating floods in the region. The world is full of local flood myths, because floods are common events. But there is absolutely no evidence of worldwide flooding.

@MrCostiZz 12 лет назад

I accept your premise, so how you know that what created the cosmos is a) Person b) revealed him self to us c) he cares about us d) he is good e) he cares only about humans ......All those things reminds me human contradictions, so the most logical thing to assume is that you believe what you want to believe, because it feels good.

@hungryman211 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon "No law of nature is able to order any functions." What about the law of electromagnetism? It orders the building of atoms by causing (or ordering if you like) the attraction of electrons to the nucleus. This is the basic building blocks for all the matter you can see in the universe.

@kristopherloviska9042 3 года назад

Had to quit when she asked about the "different" gods of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism. They are all the same god. She was clearly just reading pre prepared questions. I admire Richard for playing along.

@2fast2block 2 года назад

No, they are not the same. No, I don't admire Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@wowamonn 13 лет назад

@Aubbin Carbon is not the only element that is used for dating. There are a dozen or other Elements that are used in Radiometric dating.

@WolfSeife 12 лет назад

If you ever do, don't wash your hand and call me so I can high five you. It will be an indirect high five, but still a high five.

@Jay-xw9ll 2 года назад

A 10 yr olds understanding of geology tells you you need alot more than a poxy 10000 yrs to do anything.

@InshushaGroupie 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon Evidence against the Census as described: Galilee was not a province, no Census was held in a province. We have hundreds of examples of this fact. Luke's dates contradict Matthew's. One has to be wrong. No census ever required people to return to place of birth. No census was ever throughout the Empire. No census was ever held by a client kingdom. Luke was not intending to write literal history, he was writing for a specific audience who wanted specific things.

@oldpiq 14 лет назад

@gooser1981 If being "full of oneself" means being confident and rejecting submission to BS, then you are absolutely right.

@anthonywalker6276 Год назад

I think one of the principal reasons creationists cling to their mythology is Human exceptionalism. Some may be "animal-lovers", but they don't want to be related to other animals. "Animal" is used daily in this culture as a term of abuse, and the uneducated don't want to believe that we are animals, even. Another is what is encapsulated by the old Jesuit saying: "Give me a child to the age of seven, and he is mine for life." The story their parents told them is more precious to them than reality, and they feel under threat. As for those converted to creationism, they are like the adolescents who follow cults.

@alexrulz911 11 лет назад

"Please supply one transitional fossil, Darwin and today's evolutionist will tell you there is not one been found in the millions that have been found." the word species, in evolution, is not quite so black and white. all creatures are transitional, they all are continuously evolving. therefore, all fossils are transitional. we group fossils together by similar traits.

@bloodfaythe13 11 лет назад

i am female. Just very attracted to his voice.... and intelligence.... and straight-forwardness....

@kansaimagic 14 лет назад

Hope you guys enjoy the ' 1 GOD MORE TUNE ' ( please type that in the search ) because it sings about Dawkins and Hitchens.

@Pipsqwak 12 лет назад

What is up with the weird seating arrangement/camera angle in this video? It looks like Dawkins is sitting in a kid's chair at school, while Coleman is sitting in the grown-up's chair talking down to him.

@questianna 13 лет назад

How? How on earth do flowers create their own appearance to mimic a specific female insect in order to attract the male insect?

@alexrulz911 11 лет назад

my point is that the argument "god did it" explains nothing. it explains our universe to an extent, but if the universe WAS created by god, we couldn't understand the universe without understanding the god-iverse. "god did it" is NOT a simple answer at all, it asserts the existence of the most complex being imaginable.

@bloodfaythe13 12 лет назад

is it weird that i'm in love with his voice?

@bloodfaythe13 4 года назад

@@Remembering-rq6si listen here you little shit

@alexrulz911 11 лет назад

so, because energy and matter change, there must be a god? "stability?" E=mc^2 means that the energy in the universe is constant. what is your god, anyway?

@funkyflowerful 12 лет назад

yus! i have no doubt that is really top shelf i cant wait to see more

@boc1953 12 лет назад

I am an atheist and I certainly wouldn't say science can explain everything. Science has only been working on these problems in any real sense for a couple of hundred years and look at what light it has shed on the nature of things! 100 years ago, science said the milky way was everything in the known universe and the sun was at it's centre. Now science has learned so much more. Unlike religious belief, science is always searching for real truth and ready to abandon ideas shown to be false.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@TheAnubisDrake It was a typo of 1,000 years that I forgot to correct. It is corrected now and it doesn't make that much difference anyway. How can you feel threatened by mere words that happen to be true and you cannot prove otherwise? You cannot ever disprove what actually happened and we have accounts from people that were there at the time so they know a lot more about what happened than you know.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@zed1207 Quirinius was in the area at the time. They are matter of fact statements that would have never held up at the time if they were not true. Miriam and Yoseph were both of the house of David so they had to go to Beitlechem.

@TrevoltIV Год назад

I'd love to see this "ample evidence" that she speaks of. Years of studying and I've yet to find any at all really.

@-cosmicrogue- 12 лет назад

I love you MORE, Richard Dawkins!

@2fast2block 2 года назад

Losers loving losers. How sweet. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@DahPianoNut 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon Why do they have to be ordered for them to work?

@harmonyvegan 4 года назад

It looks like he's with his mum at a parent-teacher meeting

@IndigenousUndergroundPrimate Год назад

Why are their chairs set up so that she has to look back at him? She`s turning her neck enough to probably start hurting pretty soon. Now my neck is starting to hurt. Now it`s really hurting bye

@bobbart4198 4 года назад

The Christian Agenda is hardly new. The interviewer mentions the Bush years, but it goes back MUCH farther. The Scopes Trial of 1925 is a good example ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_Trial ... www.history.com/topics/roaring-twenties/scopes-trial ... and then, there is always the Original version of ID, known as Natural Theology ... plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-theology/ ... The more things change, the more they stay the same ...

@OpenMawProductions 12 лет назад

Actually science can explain everything - in time. Just because right now at this moment we don't know everything does not mean that the method does not work. Every day, week, month, year, decade, century, millennium, and epoch that go by we learn more and more about the way the world works, out bodies, minds, the cosmos. Everything. Just a hundred years ago there were so many things that people didn't know that we now know and take often for granted in knowing them.

@WalnutCreekBagger 13 лет назад

His sweater, the hair... I'm thinking Noam Chomsky here. Brilliant

@zytigon 13 лет назад

Great thoughts from Dawkins.Also E.A.Wallis Budge, 'The Papyrus of Ani' (1500BCE comp O.T.800-300BCE ish), other great writings are by Donald A. Mackenzie,' Egyptian myth and legend', James G Frazer, 'The Golden Bough', Thomas Paine, Mark Twain, Joseph Wheless, Robert Ingersoll, C.Dennis Mckinsey, Victor J Stenger, John W. Loftus, Robert M Price, Dan Barker, Bart Ehrman, Gary Greenberg, Richard Carrier, David Mills, Valerie Tarico, Ken Humphreys

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@victorsossa The fact that we have a Maker is observable because the mechanisms inside of us have a Maker.

@ZzX42 13 лет назад

@DrZenith whatever you don't have to convince me, im on ur side

@Kyocus 14 лет назад

I don't like to give corporate shills my attention for too long. To answer your question, no I am not in servitude. I do not bow my head to any other Man, no matter his position. There is a difference between cooperation and servitude btw. Assuming that I don't take part in society is quite a leap to make. Its interesting that you see no problem with judging others, yet judgment of others goes directly against the teachings of Christianity.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@zed1207 The census had to do with the house of David and both Yoseph and Miriam were of the house of David so they had to go to the City of David so they could be taxed. They were taxed, Matthew was a tax collector. The Romans did tax the people. Neither Yoseph nor Miriam were born in Beitlechem, they were of the hous of David. It all depends on how you count the census which took more than a year. You don't know about it because you were not there.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@DahPianoNut The forces of nature are the forces that objects have, PianoNut. LOL, you don't know how long I was waiting for this question to come up!

@oneirishpoet 13 лет назад

@bary1234 well said, I had no idea how 'catholic' Germany was til I started working with a German doctor who is Catholic...it's pretty much an institution there. or at least was for man years

@vincentpol 11 лет назад

What's more likely? The universe has always existed or an invisible entity outside of time and space created the universe, who has always existed?

@2fast2block 2 года назад

The latter. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JiMqzN_YSXU.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. The odds are NOT there. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-W1_KEVaCyaA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yW9gawzZLsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ddaqSutt5aw.html

@bluemoonrising26 13 лет назад

@trixapete I'm joining. I've not really encountered many Creationists, and I live in a town where most of the inhabitants are 50+. What does irk me though is the emphasis that is put on our Christian roots, etc.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@zed1207 The record says the did return to the city of David to be taxed. The record says there was a census, how do you think they taxed the people? They were taxed so they did have a census, it is that simple. Quirinius was in some capacity of authority at the time whether officially or unofficially, whether a helper or the one in charge. It is a non-issue. They were taxed so they had a census. Someone went over to Judea and took the census to tax the people.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@DahPianoNut I can see mechanisms that have a maker , I cannot see any mechanisms that do not have a maker. The function of hydrogen in life forms do work in mechanisms. Since all working parts have a maker, hydrogen has a Maker too and the Maker of hydrogen is the Maker of the entire universe consisting primarily and initally of hydrogen. The stretching out of the fabrication of time space determines the laws of nature, constants that determine the functionality of hydrogen.

@bigowl9408 11 лет назад

It is interesting how mankind has gone backwards, over this subject because even Elisabeth the first, said that metaphysical belief should not be tangled up with politics or invested interests. It would suggest that women are more intelligent than men.

@albertdepeal9658 Год назад

He sure loves to assign intelligence to random processes, yet refuses to admit intelligence in design. Perhaps someday he'll wise up.

@shervman 14 лет назад

Evolution really doesn't oppose the idea of a god or "deism", it mainly threatens organized religions especially Ibrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). For example, I think you can believe in a pantheistic god or Spinoza's god and believe in Evolution and scientific discovery.

@OpenMawProductions 12 лет назад

Now there's a mind blowing thought. :)

@Forlo12345 13 лет назад

@darkstar8043 Or the lady is closer to the camera. That kind of perspective would make Richard Dawkins appear smaller.

@alexrulz911 11 лет назад

we are both trying to understand the same thing: the nature of the universe. the difference between you and i is that you choose to personify the unknown by calling it god and worshiping it. im content just to say "i dont know," and try my best to understand what i can. tell me why you must assert the existence of such a being.

@JungleJargon 13 лет назад

@theELUSIV It is not about "interaction" or "design", it is about function that is ordered which requires a Maker. Everything is in accordance with relative laws of physics. The Maker of the fabrication of time space made most of the most common elements to be working parts in life forms when ordered to work. Obviously, the Maker of the relative laws of physics is able to alter or manipulate them. We should expect that from the Maker of all matter. He made laws for us to know Him.

@trixapete 13 лет назад

If you are sick of religious privilege/nonsense in the UK, consider joining the National Secular Society and/or the British Humanist Association. Isnt it time you took some action?

@Skyswinger 12 лет назад

I think I fancy the interviewer.

@cnmmedic218 11 лет назад

"You need to look at your morality.... Lying is wrong." I would object if religion was taught in a science class. I would also much prefer if no religious indoctrination took place in my daughter's school. I'm not sure if "lying" is the right word for what a person with a religious belief is doing when they express their belief. A lie is a known untruth (i.e. the person saying knows it isn't true). I think my morality is more complex than deontological statements like "lying is always wrong".

@DahPianoNut 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon At the same time you have said that it is not objects that have made us what we are. So when you in this new statement say that the forces of nature is a part of objects, that is self-contradictory.

@JungleJargon 13 лет назад

@theELUSIV It is Hydrogen ions that are used to make ATP molecules so we can live and DNA is held together with Hydrogen bonds. What question could you possibly have about the function of hydrogen working as ordered in life forms?

@truvelocity 11 лет назад

I'm just scientifically literate. So, I tend to see what's more real than what seems to fit.

@cnmmedic218 11 лет назад

I think there might be a difference between telling a child that they had made a horrible cake and telling an adult that they needed medical help. My point was that there are utilitarian arguments that would justify lying in some contexts. In a more general sense there are virtues more important than truth such as kindness. The scientific explanation is more factual from an empirical point of view but there is also intuitive or esoteric knowledge which has value.

@InshushaGroupie 12 лет назад

@JungleJargon Share this evidence. If it is so widespread it should be all over academic journals, so it'll be easy to find on the internet.

@hungryman211 13 лет назад

@JungleJargon "The functions of hydrogen and essential elements working inside of us as ordered prove that we have a very great Maker. That is physical observable evidence that we have a Maker." No, that is explained by Darwinian evolution. The only 'order' being carried out by elements anywhere in the universe, are a result of the laws of nature. If you have a specific example where the laws of nature do not explain biology, as opposed to a general opinion, please provide it so we can clarify

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@MultiLolgasm I learned that objects did not make or refine what I am. That is more than what you learned.

@GeneralToxicus 12 лет назад

We are tought about religion here in sweden, which i think is great, statistics show that over 80% of population in sweden admits that a god doesn't exist. It's good to learn about religion i think espescially how many there actually are. Because we develop a higher sense of respecting people of different faiths. Ignorance causes fear which causes harm and destruction. "there is only one good: Knowledge and one evil: ignorance

@DahPianoNut 12 лет назад

Actually, there is proof of human remains that is a lot older than 4400 years. Carbon-datings have shown the age of some remains to be tens of thousands year old.

@JungleJargon 12 лет назад

@AddR0ck If the cave paintings are on sediments deposited by the flood, they were made after the flood. If the paintings were buried by the flood, they were made before the flood. Do you have geneolgies or historical records to support your date?

@Jivvi 12 лет назад

Saying that Earth is 10,000 years old is as accurate as saying that it orbits 300 km from the Sun.

@jeffhart9916 5 лет назад

Jivan Scarano yep. Agree. But there are so many dumbasses who believe it is less than 10000 years old. It really is quite disturbing.

@futurehistory2110 13 лет назад

@JungleJargon first please note this statement wasn't targeted at theists it was posed to atheists within the assumption of atheism as truth, but in general society and in the more truthful debates I wouldn't assume, I didn't expect any theists to be here but anyway's are you saying that civilization can only progress through the acts of your creator? or do you mean something else.

@bary1234 13 лет назад

@talons2112 : Jewish hatred did not spring from Hitler, it came from the preaching of Catholic priests and Protestant ministers throughout Germany for hundreds of years. Future generations should remember that Adolph Hitler could not have come into power without the support of the Protestant and Catholic churches and the German Christian populace.

@MRbombonel 14 лет назад

@bary1234 oh and by the way when choosing to come to earth, spirits don't gamble, they choose the circumstances, they choose where to incarnate, they choose their parents, they choose their wealth and situation. Some of them choose to be born blind or handicaped because this way they will learn limitation and grow spiritually faster. And also incarnate at a surtain vibrational frequency that corresponds to their current level of spiritual evolution and understanding if that makes any sense

@cnmmedic218 11 лет назад

"Im a Creationist and a Christian and I believe that the world is 4.5 billion years old" Can I check what do you mean by "creationist"? Are you what is called an "old earth creationist"? Do you believe that each species was created fully formed or had a common ancestor?

@evilyig 13 лет назад

@Aubbin Why would you say this? Carbon dating is only used for objects that are tens of thousands of years old in dating. Radiometric dating also uses dozens of other elements which much more accurate than carbon that you are unable to refute outside of ignorance or lying. Things like Argon and potassium are used for dating things millions of ears old. The funny thing is, over dozens of different elements all point to the same time periods. It's irrefutable.