Richard Reeves: Of Boys and Men | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO) 

Looks like to me that's what's happening now.

It's not that easy, when u f.e. were born in a narcissistic family. It's normal for the child. It takes yrs...to recognize what's going on. And the damage is done. And maybe u not gonna make it alive out of it.

I'm sure that sounds great to liberals who fear Republicans while it was liberal governors and mayors who sent police out to beeches to chase people off during Covid and buried skateparks in sand but the reality is this started long ago. The suffrage activists were in lockstep with the birth control activists who didn't want Italian and Irish immigrants from aiv g too many kids. They both wanted to massively disrupt the family system overall and emancipate women. They'd also go on to get prohibition passed. The results of all their actions are obvious.

We need more responsible men to come out and speak. And we should back them when they get attacked by companies and organizations who like shutting people

No one has a problem with men speaking up for men. I just want to know why Bill Maher and many others aren't showing the same concern for making certain male dominant places being more desirable places for women to join. Does Bill care about getting more women into STEM? Women started to excel over men in one area other than fashion, beauty, and motherhood so only now does he freak out.

I guess hearing about how boys are struggling isn’t something to clap about.

why are you supposed to clap when he's talking about something sad? the right thing to do is keep silent, and that's what they've done. By the way I also found those clapping moments a little annoying tbh

What's disgusting is that Richard Reeves chalks the problem up to a "level playing field", when research shows there's a significant grading bias from teachers. If you give teachers an identical assignment, one with a female name and one with a male name, they will grade the male one 3 percentage points lower. That's the difference between a B- and C+. And I'm supposed to believe that with all the time Richard Reeves spent studying these issues, he never came across this data? The left has just switched from hateful misandry to patronizing misandry.

​@@Dennis-nc3vw Listen, even in tests which are graded with anonymity of identity of the students.. women did better like Pisa.. It is due to the fact that boys are being helped educationally but the it not only because bias... it's also because men are educationally getting behind women...If you still kept going on with the delusion of "ohh pfft wAhMen iS sTupid" and that "it's all because of bias" you'll never be truly able to help men if you don't recognise that men do mature much slower than women..a 11 year old girl has more impulse control than a 25 year old man....And that's a fact.. That just makes girls better at education..

@@Iamhere829 This isn't true, boys do better at standardized tests, ie tests that have be graded impartially because there's an answer key.

Extreme feminists what is doing this shit to put it nice

Exactly Vitaly V,. It starts there and gets worse in life

Had a bitch English teacher like this in HS

Had the same experience

I noticed it from a very young age too. The boys were always getting in trouble and the girls were always being applauded for being so good

which trade?

7 million working age men have dropped out entirely. So much of the system has been rigged against them for 50 years now. One of the things this country absolutely must do is start a robust apprenticeship program for millions of men. Beyond the hopelessness issue we have a major problem with young men not following their father's into jobs that actually make the world go round. Trades, train drivers, farmers etc. Those jobs are enot being filled. And then what?Our service economy is filled with office jobs that could disappear tomorrow and nobody would notice. It's part of the reason Russia survived sanctions. When you subtract the app maker jobs and other worthless shit, Russia's economy is actually larger than Germany's. They make things and pull resources out of the ground and that still powers life whether people like it or not.

Did you need two sentences to say, "I am man"?

And that definitely was the right thing for you - there should always be such a path for boys like you were. Glad for you!

And??

What about humiliation, embarrassment, rejection, alienation, and abject failure? Or do you think every boy excels at PE?

@@stephenryder1995 The only way to get better is by doing. Just because you or someone else didn’t thrive with more PE (being the exception to the rule) doesn’t mean the general rule isn’t true. Studies verify this. Further, not every boy is good at every activity. You can also have masculine-focused poetry classes, where some boys will excel more than others. It’s easier to pretend that all poetry is equal - that also needs to stop. It’s best to allow boys (and girls) to explore and find their talents, not merely learn the “right way” to do things. If security is more important to you than achievement or creativity, then we ought to continue with the soul-crushing garbage.

@@stephenryder1995 It's not about excelling in PE. It is about PE causing kids to excel in history.

@@theBear89451 Oh gee, thank you so much for pointing that out to me - after all, with my obvious cognitive dissonance such assistance is mandatory. Yes, you are entirely correct, and in my 40 years as an Ivy League history professor, my ursaline friend, I am therefore compelled to report the following: What absolute BULLSHIT. 'Fellowships' don't teach the difference between one's gluteus maximus and a hole-in-the wall, but they do paper that wall with lucre. In return they expect some publicizeable product to justify their existence. Hence the mandatory issuance of what is often nothing more than a literary confluence of random speculations puncuated by the occaisional unsupportable neo-factoid. This post-graduate survival technique is also known as Absurditas abundantia, and is never taken seriously by actual scholars.

I agree with Kevin Kent. Further, as a woman who had her (life-defining) ADHD diagnosed at AGE 47, I know that there are women like me who would've benefitted greatly by more physical, hands-on, and trade-related classes. I could take home-economics when I was in school, but they wouldn't let girls in wood shop or auto shop. Wood shop, I yearned for. Now I gather they don't even have those classes for anyone anymore. THAT'S insane.

When I went through Army recruit course, the first thing we did each morning was go for a 30 minute run, then the rest of the day was spent doing the various learning modules; makes sense in retrospect.

I don't know if it's still the case but students also take an active role in keeping their schools clean. More physical activity and it seems like it would build character.

WWJD. What would a Japanese do should be our national motto. Japanese do everything with excellence and common sense.

Combining education of the body and mind was already a principle in Greek philosophy, it was called healthy mind in a healthy body. That's why German high schools to this day are called "gymnasiums". The Chinese do Tai Chi, the Hindus Yoga.

My son in elementary school about 10 years ago had great teachers. After each subject the teacher would put music on and the kids danced their hearts out! The class of 30 was about 2/3 male :)

Congrats to your son! I’ve worked in nurseries and from the very beginning boys are far more likely to be kinaesthetic learners compared to girls, yet we still use a Victorian-style rigid classroom base teaching environment (ironically made for men) which doesn’t help boys at all.

I had the exact same problem. I'm an MD 😁

This is very much my story as well. I'm so glad my parents chose not to medicate me.

To add, my parents only chose not to medicate me because they couldn't afford it - not due to some insightful, better-knowing doctor.

Tried

"The Democrats are playing you for chumps." - Malcolm X Richard Reeves chalks the underperformance of boys to a "level playing field" when studies show there's a grading bias against boys. Teachers will grade identical assignments 3% lower if they have a male name instead of a female one. That's the difference between a B+ and an A-. If find it VERY hard to believe Richard never came across this data studying this issue. 90% of Democrats don't care about boys and men, they want to commandeer these issues for selfish reasons, while doing as little to actually address societal misandry as possible.

YEA!! I HAD 2 WOMEN TEACHERS THAT TAUGHT SCIENCE.tHE 1ST ONE SAID SAND CANT BEW BLOWN HIGHER THAN 3 FT.!! tHE 2ND BITCH AT tr HIGH SCHOOL NORTHERN WHEN I ASKED A QUESTION REFUSED TO ANSWER WHEN i DIDNBT I=UNDERSTAND,& IGNORED ME.

Too bad more men go for the money and not the caring professions.

“Women choose to go into lower paying professions.” I think this is relevant to a conservative here.

@@wildfire9280 higher paying jobs generally have more physical risk

Horse manure.

Unions.

@@walterwhite5674 there are multiple faults from the amount of curriculums to the teachers seeking control. Personally I'm a big fan of big picture learning which has a big focus on personal interest projects.

Well it hasn't changed its material since kids were working in factories...

Women broke it. They break everything because its easier to bring others down than lift everyone up.

It never worked

Yes, and Bill mansplains against his sex. Internalized misandry?

@@willmercury I disagree. I think Bill is tired of the coddling of american youth which I think he believes contributes to what Reeves' book is describing.

@@warsurplus The problem is that it's the _only_ thing he thinks contributes to it. Which is as bad as "systemic racism"/"systemic whatever." Univariate takes aren't any better when it comes men's issues. Richard seems to have better detail which we're not really getting into here, as Bill is fixating on his favorite hobbyhorse.

@@TagSpamCop I appreciate your points but why can't personal accountability ever be part of the solution alongside the "systematic whatever". I know not everyone has the same opportunities, but we're now at a point where the only cause is the "systematic whatever". Thanks the civil reply.

I hope society collapses. Why continue to sacrifice your well-being for a system (and people, women mainly) that hate you? Oh that's right because POOR WAHMEN. Nah, to any young man (or logical man reading this comment), don't be fooled by people like Richard Reeves. No one ACTUALLY cares about out issues, it's all about getting us back on the plantation (labor force/marriage) for the sake of WOMEN & SOCIETY. They need more logs to toss on to the pyre that is western society. Without is, things fall apart. Let them, this is the world that nurtured for so long. Let them reap their benefits lol. Let them figure it out on their own because I'm done being a slave.

I had a Norton Commando 'S' 750 CC in Candy apple red in 1971 - monster bike, but too often kicked back when you kick started it

@@stephenryder1995 Kick starting that son of a bitch was an art. Just getting the choke right took a few tries. Not a bike for a hasty getaway. Mine was a gold 72.

@@norton750commando Ahhh - back in the days when we were crazy, eh?

@@stephenryder1995 Far too long ago now. Haven't owned a bike since 78, when 3 friends in 2 years were seriously hurt riding through no fault of their own. Made me really think.

@@norton750commando My day job was Motor Officer - Big white FLH - A friend of mine in Motorcycle 1 (NYPD) was killed on his - in a sudden rain - I saw too many other guys maimed - gave it up after I dropped mine once, walked on a cane for 6 months - got away lucky....50 years ago now

This is a uniquely MALE thing?? Hardly. I was a female in trouble all the time in school. Arrested by the time I was 18 and doing drugs. Just stop with the victim mentality. What a bunch of whiny bitches. You have no idea what women go through-the sexist, vile shit we get put through growing up.

He has done a ton of good long form interviews on people’s podcasts: Andrew Yang’s podcast, Coleman Hughes’ podcast, breaking points, Reason Tv

His book is a good read too

I hope society collapses. Why continue to sacrifice your well-being for a system (and people, women mainly) that hate you? Oh that's right because POOR WAHMEN. Nah, to any young man (or logical man reading this comment), don't be fooled by people like Richard Reeves. No one ACTUALLY cares about out issues, it's all about getting us back on the plantation (labor force/marriage) for the sake of WOMEN & SOCIETY. They need more logs to toss on to the pyre that is western society. Without is, things fall apart. Let them, this is the world that nurtured for so long. Let them reap their benefits lol. Let them figure it out on their own because I'm done being a slave.

He attributes boys under performance in school to "girls are just better at school", even though studies show a severe grading bias against boys (ie teachers will grade identical assignments higher if they have female names). What are the odds he never came across that data doing all the research he did for this book? "The Democrats are playing you for chumps." - Malcolm X

"bUt WhAt AbOuT wOmEn?!?! pAtRiArChY wInS aGaIn!!!!" Feminists literally insist you must frame the concerns of men and boys through Feminist/Patriarchy Theory, because "fEmInIsM CaReS AbOuT ThIs!!!" They would insist that all of this is due to "pAtRiArChY hUrTs MeN tOo!!!" or that "tHiS Is tOxIc mAsCuLiNiTy rEaCtInG To fEmAlE SuCcEsS" or "bOyS ArE FiNaLlY GeTtInG A TaStE Of cOmInG In sEcOnD". Men are currently accustomed to putting women and their concerns first, and those who don't do that are dismissed as sexist dude-bros. When the whining from women about men really started to take off, men started to opt out and just said, fine, we'll do our own thing. One of the first cases of "your terms are acceptable." That in itself became feminist catnip, that men leaving keeping their distance from women - as feminists had always wanted - was suddenly misogyny too.

We do, and it helps, but its the same arguments that Warren Farrell has been making for years and it always ends up hitting the buffers because its a pro-male policy, and it goes against the prevailing agenda of the day to promote pro-male policies. What we need alongside the male movement is a basic acknowledgement from the feminist movement that its actually in their interest to be implementing the suggestions described by Richard Reeves and Warren Farrell and others, instead of meeting a wall of resistance from the outset because it "doesn't send the right message".

I hope society collapses. Why continue to sacrifice your well-being for a system (and people, women mainly) that hate you? Oh that's right because POOR WAHMEN. Nah, to any young man (or logical man reading this comment), don't be fooled by people like Richard Reeves. No one ACTUALLY cares about out issues, it's all about getting us back on the plantation (labor force/marriage) for the sake of WOMEN & SOCIETY. They need more logs to toss on to the pyre that is western society. Without is, things fall apart. Let them, this is the world that nurtured for so long. Let them reap their benefits lol. Let them figure it out on their own because I'm done being a slave.

Please, I'd rather the left go back to openly hating boys and men than this condescending garbage. Richard Reeves says the problem is a level playing? What a crock of horseshit. Studies show teachers have a grading bias against boys, and will grade an identical assignment 3 points lower if it has a male name than a female name. That's the difference between a B and a B+. And I'm supposed to believe that with all the research Richard Reeves put into this book, he never came across these studies?

I’m sure you “paid attention”.

@@r8chlletters Hey, the education system says it itself, "it doesn't matter how you do it, I just want to see straight A+'s on your report card" :D

6th grade? Dude, Richard Reeves was right, that's early. There's a reason no society on Earth considered a boy a man at that age.

YES. Also if we need to utilize self-directed learning where we can. Things like letting them choose a problem to solve and then providing them the resources as needed. Learning works best when it is actively chosen, and information is WAY better absorbed if the goal comes before the solution. SPeaking mostly about STEM classes here. In the case of a lot of math classes, they'll say "here's how you expand a polynomial" and "here's how you factor a polynomial". But then you don't use these things until way later. If you don't need the tool, there's no reason to keep it. If you start with a need before you get the tool, you know what tools to look for.

Yeah, Dwayne - them ol' evil colleges - full'a commies an' perverts, right?

He mentioned other options...

Not me. College was one of the best things to happen to me. All for success but college can and should be a huge stepping stone to that.

@@svscared College could be a stepping stone for more people if we'd give kids (and their parents) better transparency on the ROI before saddling them with enough student loan debt to pay for a luxury car. Very few people know what they want to be when they're 18 and for its price tag, academia does a poor job of helping kids sort that out.

@@scarpfish I'm all for getting rid of student loan debt which is why I support making college free via taxes like many other first world countries.

because that is the only organization allowed to matter

I agree. This doesn’t get any attention, but it’s a huge factor. I recently tried to find a good male hero movie. I gave up. Star Wars is now a girl’s movie, James Bond is a feminized version of himself, and replaced by a woman. This has been done to every boy’s hero. And the trope is, she’s better at it without even trying. The men used to go through a transformational hero’s journey, the women are born superior, they don’t need to struggle (called the Mary Jane trope, it’s so common it has a name). The men are non sexual support characters at best, or buffoons. No wonder boys are demoralized and give up.

@@interestingtimes6242 I try not to let my kids watch too much of it. A particularly egregious example is the movie Brave. There is just no part of that movie that represents any truth at all. The men are all buffoons and/or genetic rejects and she wants to just ride horses and shoot her bow and arrow.

I agree! How did female teachers in the classroom suddenly become a problem? When Reeves said that, he lost all legitimacy.

You didn't learn this in your mandatory developmental psychology class? Maybe our higher education is the problem?

Listen to folks and observe them. Generalizations help, but inevitably we are individuals. 23 students max. per teacher.

@@rabbit251 I did learn this. It’s seeing it unfold in real time that was hard to cope with.

That's part of it, but don't ignore almost all diseases effect boys more than girls. Learning disability is a disease.

I developed dyslexia in puberty. This was in the mid-60’s. Back then, no one knew what that was and I was just pushed through the system. I went from being an A-B student to a C-D student. I became very depressed and suicidal but managed to pull my self out of that state of mind. However, dyslexia and the lack of knowledge on how we learn differently ruined my life. I was unable to go to college or get a decent paying job. Oh, and I’m a woman.

I'm a male K-12 teacher, and I mostly agree with you, especially on why most men don't want to teach. I can't agree, however, with the concept that male teachers will inherently bring more discipline, which seems to be what you're implying. Perhaps I'm mistaken on what you were inferring there, but there is no REAL and beneficial discipline of any sort in U.S. schools, except for what is brought from home/already existing in the student. Having more male teachers won't change the students who really need discipline. That's akin to believing that your deadbolt is actually meant to keep out criminals/makes you safe.

@@aeristone5941 As a male 7-12 teacher I agree. But the lack of discipline in American schools is due to the administrators - the male teacher has no leeway - as you know. But I'll tell you this - there was iron discipline in my classroom because I didn't give a damn about the system. I was often in trouble with the Dean of Boys, but I told him he could fire me anytime he wanted to, but I will take no shit from any student. By the way, I was the most popular teacher in the school.

More discipline? Nice trolling.

@@stephenryder1995 Hahah yeah, I tried something similar, but it didn't pan out so well for me. It was 50-50 on "good days". More often than not though, it would just culminate in snotty parents coming in to complain that I was meaner to their "precious little angel" than the other kids...which of course would culminate in threats of me losing my job...like teach your precious angel shithead to not kick other kids, and I won't have to be so "mean" lol.

@@Ryan88881 LOL Touche'

Sentence fragments! Why are we shouting?!?!

@@xlDysenterylx I am proverbially shouting for you to get your one way ticket to St. Elsewhere forever! Fake wannabe grammar corrector! Don't be bitter, be better! Good riddance!

@@xlDysenterylx I think it is a poem

He attributes boys under performance in school to "girls are just better at school", even though studies show a severe grading bias against boys (ie teachers will grade identical assignments higher if they have female names). What are the odds he never came across that data doing all the research he did for this book? Democrats have just switched from hateful misandry to patronizing misandry.

@@Dennis-nc3vw Instead of wasting your invaluable time, typing a RU-vid diatribe or essay to me; you should enjoy the Christmas and New Years!

What incentive do young men have when you have te rrorist divorce judges who k idnap children . For profit and then make the fathers slav es to the government and mom while restricting access to their own children. Kids need EqualSharedParentingsite

You can easily still meet women that way. And men who are willing to do that are at a huge advantage bc most guys are scared to

Attractive young women are only interested in competing for about 15% of the men. That leaves 85% of men vulnerable to everything from losing their job to their reputation or freedom if they flirt with a woman face to face. At least with dating apps, women cannot accuse men of harassment simply because they were romantically solicited.

The problem is in United States the social circles are completely living in a bubble and are so tight knit and closed. Also, you have to drink to be a part of any of these things. Overall, their attitude is so closed minded and narrow they don’t accept any people that are different from their mindsets.

@@dmr6390 You gotta ask yourself, why so many younger men are so afraid to meet women face to face, though.

Don't waste your time on western women

I thought that was alarming too. And that’s exactly part of the issue at hand. Women have been benefitting from gentler upbringings and constant pats on the back for the past 2-3 decades. Boys have been getting tough love and no encouragement. Women’s success is applauded even when it’s at the expense of boys. This is an uphill battle.

Aww cry me a river for dummy boys

@@soundandfury6557 And they say the sexism is on the political right? Nope, to many of us it’s clear where it is with comments like yours. Keep hiding behind your computer screen👍🏼

Why are men becoming increasingly right-wing? It's such a mystery.

@@timmyj2366 😂😂😂😂

Ken Robinson. Didn't know he'd died (RIP) but he did come across as a refreshing yet pragmatic voice in his field. No wonder most people haven't heard of him :(

When you are corralling 35+ kids at a time it’s the only thing you can “teach”…be quiet, sit still, et al.

It's more the ability to focus on a task and be organised and disciplined when approaching learning in and after class. Girls seem to have a general advantage over boys in school, but as a girl I never found it easy nor pleasant to be forced through long, boring classes. We all need to be challenged and inspired, to perform well.

Yeah, the Simpsons did it and it worked fine.

Social democracy is dying.

Permanently 'split' in my humble opinion

it is a hard school with the highest suicide rate - the Gorge there is infamous for that

go on...how are they taught to behave? are you talking about adults projecting gender roles and bias or a cultural shift in what counts as manners? or another thought entirely?

The older I get the more I realize how innately different males and females are however point taken and yes in the nature/nurture schema parents can help children learn a host of skills that help them flourish in a structured school environment. This assumes the parents are aware and mindful individuals which they may not be. Preschool also helps.

And feminists will complain.

Same. Rough housing was considered "fighting" and thus "bad". It got me suspended and expelled at 8th grade and suspended and nearly expelled at 11th grade. All while I was the top grade student in my class for multiple years straight.

@@civilengineer3349 Can you flesh out what you just outlined though, and reassure us that you weren't actually just the class bully, who got all the nerds to do his homework for him, or else?

@@GreenMorningDragonProductions I wasn't a bully. The fact that you feminists can't distinguish between rough housing and bullying is the problem

I was the class clown. Got in trouble a few times, but it's because the curriculum was not challenging at all. I got straight A's and went to college completely unprepared for an actual challenge, and got put on academic suspension a couple of years in. Got my act together and graduated, then went on to be relatively successful in the workforce. I watched the full segment (this particular video was cut short), and while I agree that the educational system needs some work, I think the bigger problem with many men nowadays is that thru social engineering, "being a man" is slowly but surely being removed from what the current narrative is accepting. You can call whatever you want, and I'm not getting political about it, but there aren't many "men" who can be a man, but still be a gentleman and a respectable adult. It's either the quintessential alpha male who looks down on women and treats others with less money, credentials, etc like complete shit (narcissism falls into this category), or the incel gamer who refuses to take any responsibility for anything, lives with his parents, won't work a job, and manipulates his parents them to accept that behavior as normal. So basically you have narcissistic assholes who think they're the best thing since sliced bread, or freeloaders who think they're incredibly intelligent and sophisticated because they're good at video games and trolling ppl on Reddit, thus making them the best thing since sliced bread. The middle ground is vanishing, and it's pathetic. It's no wonder women are so frustrated with the current landscape of dating and relationships. Men are as well, but most of them are completely clueless on how to be a man without being a dick, and when you have the two genders that want each other but can't relate or connect, you get a lot of resentment on both sides. I don't know what the solution is. I don't even know where we can start. I certainly think social engineering needs to be modified in a way that promotes a healthy society for everyone, but that's not what benefits the corporate and political agendas, so that may be a pipe dream.

sorry

Yes. But also, a well-designed system of progress would help all parties. So for instance, if girls are struggling on tests compared to boys, they can either make an ill-designed system which makes the tests more suited to girls at the EXPENSE of boys, or what they did by varying the question types, where it improved scores for both girls AND boys, just that girls saw more relative improvement because they were behind. Basically, we need to focus on policies like the latter rather than the former. So in the case of more hands-on learning and more self-directed learning, both girls and boys would benefit. We should just see more relative improvement in boys as things go more towards parity. I think about policies like "man taxes" or "switching to a female focus" or other zero-sum methods and it just makes me cringe. You don't stop a pendulum by pulling it the other way. That speeds up the pendulum. You stop a pendulum by pulling it straight down to the middle.

@@webx135 I agree completely, but as usual the government took the easy way out so they had something to show for it quickly. Making an educational system for boys and girls would have required actual thinking and planning from government.

Maher's constant criticism of younger generations is not only wildly off base, it's intellectually LAZY.

Then it turned into "just get harder" at the end lol

@@UToobin75 He picks strange battles. He hates muslims, trans people, and anybody with a BMI above 25

Long story short. I’m a teacher of 22 years. We were talking about this when I was a student teacher in the late 90s. Then you had to shut up about it. Then I had a son. Knowing what he was about to experience I did the opposite of my progressive instincts and raised him old school. Lots of sports, coaches both male and female, lots of arts music and poetry, hunting, fishing, fires, chopping wood, told him to be strong, helped him over come challenges by making him face fear head on, boxing, jujitsu, play fighting, rough and tumble play, old school movies, cut down the video games, gun safety training. You name it, if it was old school we did it. My friends thought I was red pilled, alt right, and worthy of ridicule. Can you guess the out come?

Here we go, males blaming women for their failures. Why don't you go out and fix the core of the problem and that is a lot of men for many decades have been "gone with the wind" and don't give a rat's ass about the children they spawn. Also, if there were more male teachers, by the same standard are you not concerned that girls would become more masculine?

I recall many years ago hearing Dr Phil say the most important parent to a child is the same sex parent. If he said that today…..he would probably get canceled. Very sad how we have torn down the family….the children are the ones that suffer.

@@magicmarker7047 a predictably emotive response from someone who hasn't read the comment properly. Go back to the beginning and start again.

@@joeyjojojuniorshabadoo8549 Oh, really! A predictable response from an overly sensitive male.

Remember he is not a parent....so his opinion about children is just that an opinion

Nonsense. This is always said by parents who want to feel special in what they do, when what you do has been done since humans have been existing. If you are a logical person, and have ever been a child you can understand parenting. Get this through your Skull. CHILD BARING DOESN'T MAKE YOU SPECIAL!!!!!!!!! You are NOT more educated. You are NOT more understanding. You do NOT have some magical special insight. Get Over Yourself.

It’s true. His “fuck the kids, they’re rude” is WAYYY off

I know quite a few parents that are clueless....

@@MjolnirsPower Nonsense. You are always wrong when you pretend to know about things you have no experience or insight in If you are a logical person -and clearly you are not - you would understand that "once being a child" gives you scant insight into "being a parent". Any parent reading your comment is having a good laugh at your expense. I would ask that you reflect and get a clue, but clearly your arrogance in things you know little to nothing about is down right Trumpian. So instead, I'll just laugh and make fun of any and every time you comment on things you are clueless on. Why don't you explain how to run a restaurant since you've eaten out before. Give me your expert view on the physics of an internal combustion engine since you've driven a car. I know you're not a doctor, but would you look at som X-Rays for me? I heard you had a physical checkup once 🤣