RoboCop 2 (4/11) Movie CLIP - One of Us Must Die (1990) HD 

I think the director once said that it was showing the demonizing of corporations to workers.

@@SignOfTheTimes008 very interesting, I never knew that

@@brenscott5416 Yeah, it had to do with privatization of companies, I think. The dangers of it. That's why in the end, it was important for them to bring him back and we see his face and he responds to the head guy "Murphey" makes the scene more powerful once you see the meaning behind it. He's gained back a sense of who he is. For all the flaws of part 2, they sort of try to take this back out of him when he's being rebuilt and reprogram him to think as they want him to, not as an individual.

@@SignOfTheTimes008 it's certainly an interesting commentary on the world, especially for it's time

@@fe.vascco if cyborg can be a hero and Cyborg Superman can be a villain then RoboCop can be a hero

He went by himself.

@@SonateSonate Forgot that was a deleted scene, thanks

The whole scene spells out "trap". He obviously didn't learn from his past mistake in Robocop 1. Though I remember he did ask for backup and it wasn't available.

@@SonateSonate It's as if he didn't learn the first time when he got killed by Clarence.

Robocop is a Tank player but even tank players suffer massive damage at +environment damage situations, and worse yet if it's an Ambush.

@@johnblon1536 no they just chopped Peter Weller up and reattached him when they finished filming the scene.

Poor Peter Weller 😔

@@scallywag3486 Peter's body was in a hole in the ground, they just had the metal torso on top covering that up.

The one of Bishop in Alien 3 was awesome!

They overused the puppet in the movie. There should have used Weller in the closeups of it.

Haha... and they made Robocop cartoons! We've been conditioned for this our whole lives :p

That was the intention (plus the world in the 80s and 90s wasn't PC-crazy as it is nowadays). They went forward a few decades to show how urban violence could increase (and it is the case now).

Facts.

His hand getting blown off left him in shock as it was what Botticker did to him in the first movie. Getting completely dismembered was an added hell, whether he could feel it or not.

Exactly!!!

This one felt more like a bad comedy though.

it really should have been a horror film

I was 11 when I saw this and it was very disturbing

@@Haddley333 same

More like a dark comedy/ satire with some heavy duty action. Atleast the first one anyway.

Just one more scene of body horror in this movie, like the other scenes.

pity that they will not be shown more details of how robocop is destroyed to pieces !, I always wanted to see more detail of that !, according to the original script, that was one of the most violent parts

I don't think robocop can be repaired in that level of damage... that's probably why they changed it.

@@phj9894 the face skin was synthetic anyway so they could just make him a new one . and the criminals would leave his brain intact so he'd suffer longer

Another fun fact the metal skull was suppose to be a T-800 Skull From Terminator.

I thought the same thing. He was ridiculously unaware of his environment (he should've detected the kid with the heavy duty machine gun aimed at him) and it's unclear why he couldn't get himself off the makeshift table they disassembled him on. This scene felt like violence for the sake of violence. Not much logic, given what we know about the character.

Cain isn't just a hippie druggie. He is a mob boss. A smart one too.

You need to pay more attention

@clint45 yeah, I forgot about the sniper shot. Basically, whoever wrote the script just wanted an over-the-top (nonsensical) scene where Robocop is disabled for a portion of the movie. It was kinda funny when Robocop comes back to the factory with the cops and is doing all these trick shots (facing away when shooting one of the bad guys)...like he (and the audience) forgot that he was as helpless as a turtle on his back not too long ago lol.

@clint45 I imagine him and the Asian henchman got away. I guess the writers didn't see them as important enough to the story (like Hob and Angie) to give them a definitive ending. And I didn't care for Robocop 3, either. It was like the "Batman and Robin" of the Robocop franchise.

Like me.. 😭😭😭

X3

He gets reassembled

@@matterwhat250 are you muslim

@@KuruMemis no

ADHeroD The difference adding the human element back in makes.

I know what you mean you would have thought he would have known there were other people plus hob with the machine gun and Angie with the harpoon . plus a highly dangerous drug kingpin standing there unarmed should have sent alarm bells ringing.

this scene killed the mouvie without it it could have been beter but robocop 2 wasnt near as good for me only the 1st where good

Yh. Agree. Made him look to weak. He could of gotten away with heavy damage. But his tracking system should of picked up everyone. Didn't make sense for him to be strapped down by chains. He has the strength to break them!!!!

He was programed to protect the innocent so I guess he automatically thought a kid was innocent when he seen one no matter what, duh use ur head and think a little bit u gotta think outside the box sometimes and use ur imagination.

thats why they were good

They are

Weird to say "old Robocop movies" as if there were any newer ones worth considering

@@ekathe85 fair point for the remake released in 2014

That's why the remake absolutely sucked. Hardly any violence whatsoever. At the time when Paul Verhoeven made the original, it was meant to be one of the most violent and goriest films ever made.

Never realized that until now.

It’s not a reference if it’s in the same universe dumbass -.-

@@red_reaper1729 yes it is

He didn't actually die in the first movie. His heart and brain never ceased functioning.

@@johndoe-ek1qs he doesn’t have a heart

I think it was intended as a message to scare the crap out of the Detroit PD

@@jdfields711 yes. "Look at what did to Robocop. Imagine what we'll do to you."

Murphy was destroyed to the point where rebuilding him wouldn't have been possible (atleast they thought)

@@jdfields711 Yeah I get that, but why would they just give them a small part like his head or a hand?

@@justadude5217 ...Then it would've been a short 40 min movie. Also remember after the scene, it wasn't exactly guaranteed that OCP would have rebuilt Robocop, they were perfectly fine with just junking him and moving on to different projects. Except it probably would've been a huge PR nightmare as like it or not, he was pretty good at his job.

exactly

Well yes but nor that much I know u said "in some ways" wich I kinda agree with u but this time he was getting hammered jack-hammerd, now not saying ur wrong but the only part that was probably a reference to his first death was the hand getting blown off as the first thing they did and in robocop 1 the first thing clarnice boddiker shot off was his hand then he just let his crew go to town

Yes, for instance shooting his arm off.

Yeah, that was brutal!

I was thinking it was the inverse of him being assembled.

That's what makes this movie so kool!!!

Murphy best comment ever😂😂😂

Until today I still have nightmares

pity that they will not be shown more details of how robocop is destroyed to pieces !, I always wanted to see more detail of that !, according to the original script, that was one of the most violent parts

steg140 I agree 100%

+Urza26 Windows Vista

Windows ME

windows 8

well after these OCP does something very close to that XD

"Fucking window 98"

Lynchez Wheeler well obviously, he's the good guy and the protagonist.

In a deleted scene the police commissioner and Lois warned Robocop not confront Cain in the sludge plant since they are in strike and unable to give him back up... Well all the painful dissection could have been avoided if he listened

+Troll Master No dedication to duty in you! People of dedication do not STRIKE! They forge ahead!

I always do. And it still very disturbing.

Who wouldn’t?

@omarfaw computer generated imagery

Amen

yeah yeah

That wasn't blood. Robocop's "blood" is white. That was some king of oil he has for his moving parts. Just like a car.

Some guy told me it was liquid shit. No joke. That's disturbing.

cool

+Rose Supreme I never even thought of that until now. Goddamnit, that's fucked up.

Aivottaja Me neither. I suppose it could be food, or shit. Nasty either way.

Well keep in mind this was filmed in 1990 when the 'World Wide Web' had only existed a year; connectivity like we have now was literally unheard of. Mobile phones used analogue signals (which fade when there are instructions) because 2G didn't exist yet; even a decent long range radio would have been pretty big and dubiously effective. Yes it's a miss but not surprising given culture of the time.

Plot hole. The directors of this movie were just cashing in on the success of the first movie, in general this movie sucked. The third one managed to be even worse than this.

And the third, the bright kid removed it after he was rescued by the underground

@@gggfx4144 Yeah but this is a movie that takes place in a futuristic version of today's world I think we can suspend our disbelief a little.

@@gggfx4144 Distress beacons were absolutely widespread by the 1980s and something of Robocops tech would and should have absolutely had a tracker on him at the very least.

where are you from?

Your stupid parents allowed you to watch this when you were 4?

Nor is the movie itself near as memorable as the first movie.

Can you fly, Bobby?

All I can remember from this movie is some cyborg killing himself by revealing his skull, and Cain's surgery.

Clarence and his gang would wipe out Cain and his entire gang! That is a fact!

but he has been sampled in Frontline Assembly' "Mindphaser", exactly that phrase about 'jesus had days like this'. And lots of other quotes from this movie. I recommend.

@Rykiel Toh no, its exactly like that.

@Rykiel Toh yes, didnt you learn this in school dummy?

@Rykiel Toh they didnt even teach humor at your school?

@Rykiel Toh that shows since you couldnt even take the joke of the original comment

Jesus, these guys cant take some jokes. Great joke btw

😂😂

2:11 when Bae says "go faster".

+Chris Jordan Titanium is para-magnetic. However, titanium is expensive to fabricate and if you are looking to mass produce an item then creating a titanium alloy that nests the metal among others. In practice, titanium in contact with common alloy elements like gold or steel can give it the hybrid metal significnat, even rare, magnetic properties.

But it isn't magnetic.

Try it !!!

This titanium you speak of that has alloy elements like silver and gold elements is only an assumption that Robocop's suit has hybrid metal blah blah.... I have a diagram and diagnostics of his suit in a book from the 80's and the properties the book says he is made up of is definitely not magnetic. Another movie production mistake but its a great movie !! :-)

+Chris Jordan Perhaps there are other components in him that are magnetic. Like the supports for his spine, hydraulics and/or servos... not just the armor.

Because it's horrific and mean spirited. This movie was made by a completely different Director and Writing Team than Robocop 1.

@@TheBigExclusiveWhich also featured a horrifying mutilation by gunfire in the opening scene. It’s just linked with the character, probably to show how depraved the world had become, to make him incredibly sympathetic, more than just a tough guy with a gun. You get very excited when Robocop goes after Kane again after that.

@@olliethepizzaguy - The first movie was about a heroes death and resurrection. A very clear theme. Murphy's death served a purpose and was justified. . The 2nd movie was unfocused and mean spirited in many scenes. The new writers and Director rewrote the script many times. And The studio was rushing production because they wanted to make a Robocop sequel fast....to make quick money because the Studio was in financial trouble. It doesn't make sense for Robocop to get taken down like this either. He took down a factory of much more heavily armed goons (by himself)in Robocop 1. But In this movie, Robocop gets taken down by a guy doing an Elvis impersonation and a little kid. The tone is all over the place. It's almost a parody of the first movie.

You would think that RoboCop's body would have _some_ kind of a built-in distress signal for times like this, at least. "Oh, look. It's Officer Lewis and a whole squad of OCP officers, breaking down our door to rescue RoboCop. Well, I guess we can't pick _them_ up with a giant magnet. Shit."

FapFreeFebruary The cops already made a strike in this movie. Only the chief, Lewis and Murphy were the only left doing their jobs.

Funny how Robocop actually has a tracking system. That's how Clarence Boddicker finds him in the first movie. I know it was the 90s, but I have no idea why at least Lewis didn't show up at the hideout. It would have made a better scene, her and some cops finding him stripped down.

Midvalley Payback he did call for backup when he chase after bodicker. They're just way too slow.

he could only get a few cops, considering they were on strike, most of them. And, remember even when they weren't in the first movie it was unavailable before Clarence and his gang killed him before he was Robocop

Haha! Yeah, he looked super pissed off.

Well if he took to long the cops would’ve gotten out of shock and probably pulled him out which is why his expression is so funny 😂

I know! 😝😂

Agreed

Also the Terminator

Captain Planet is weak against pollution.

Even though titanium is not magnetic at all

I never thought that it was pain he felt (at least not like us because we would be f*cking screaming), but rather the sense of wanting to 'live'

It wasnt pain at all.

He wasn't feeling actual pain but the memory of pain

@@Alen725 Era só decapitá-lo queo matariam de vez

@@oexterminadordemanginas8067 Hajdvao si djaizb akaosh xiakhhalau omaeuo pid zakd

😂😂😂

And when they drilled him with the drill he came a little bit

@@fidan2fast They drilled him and he came

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

​@@fidan2fastlmao

scene kiled the mouvie who ever thought to put it was stupid they did the same thing in new star wars but more times

ye

@@johnyguitar258 the scene only killed the movie if you were a snow flake kid. the scene gives robo cop full a new birth and a reason and to show that he is in fact vulnerable . also to show how evil even little kids can be . robo 1 and 2 were the best of the series because they were dark and not bs like 3 and 4

Yeeeeah. This movie had this scene and then Duffy getting cut up. My mom actually stopped the VHS and said that was enough.

Yeah, nearly as bad as the intolerable spoiled brat in Terminator 2.

Jeff O I really hope that's sarcasm. If it is, lol, if not...

I was so happy when Cain lit that shithead up.

Zatharos the kid was annoying af

Can't shoot a kid, can you?

This movie was made by a completely different Director and Writing Team than Robocop 1. This movie is too mean spirited and horrific. No wonder audiences didn't like it, and Peter Weller refused to do another Robocop.

If you add in his absurd durability in the TV series you’d die from a heart attack

Jo O Titanium has a very high melting point of 1668 degrees, I doubt they had anything to hand that could reach those temperatures to melt him.

OMG .😕😔😕🙏 Peace.

Also, there's no holes in his chest plate from the electro gun's hooks...

Have you even seen Terminator?

chappie

@@Spider_Rng Robocop is more violent than Terminator

@@lukerichardson2404 no he isn’t. Only a child would say that

@@Spider_Rng In Robocop a guy gets melted with toxic waste and then obliterated when he's run over. What in Terminator is more violent than that?

Yeah I know, awful writing and script for the most part.

Kane forced the kid to watch despite the kid being unable to handle it at the time in order to desensitize the kid to such things later.

@@johndoe-ek1qs which would make sense for him to want to see robocops brain later on. It's character progression and people are usually to dim to see that.

The scene is violently disturbing

That's because RoboCop is a robot to him.

Cain is a cop slayer

@@7Tomb7Keeper7 Nah Kain sucked Clarence Boddicker was Robocop best enemy.

You didn't think it was metal?

That's what I always wondered

He has a tracker in the first and third film.

Useless. The cop are on a strike and the rest were simply overwhelmed.

I hope to see a pitch meeting video for Robocop 2 someday. Movie Producer: Why doesn’t RoboCop have a built in distress beacon for times like this? Script writer: So the movie can happen. Movie producer: Wow, it must have taken OCP technicians months to rebuild RoboCop, and having to fix him during a police strike must have been almost impossible to accomplish. Screen writer: Actually it was super easy, barely an inconvenience.

Cops were on strike.

True but even in the comic Cain say's something like You sent your toughest machine Robocop and we sent it back in pieces. Supposedly it was him sending a message but than why didn't they cut him up, kill him and then send his parts to the PD? Good point

It's one of those silly plot devices to make the movie seem more dramatic.

You can say the same thing about bane imprisoning Batman in dkr

It's just a movie...

Razlo5000 I feel an excruciating pain whilst cringing during this scene.

He's not allowed to fire unless shot at, it's in his code.

and he can't shoot kids

Primary directive 3 violation: Uphold The Law

@Litshttam no but he was wielding a knife and putting a civilian's live in danger

@Litshttam if someone is in immediate danger, yes

When I first saw her appear in an episode of SG-1, it took me forever to connect her to this movie.

what they did to HIM was actually pretty merciful compared to what the film makers REALLY had in mind! "The story involving corrupt Officer Duffy was much more protracted in the film's initial cut, which included a much longer sequence where Duffy is tortured and killed onscreen as well as a running bit where other officers kept finding his severed body parts. The filmmakers knew these segments would have given the film an X rating and quickly rounded off the story to end with relatively little gore and no follow-up material." - IMDB

Doesn't he look scared?

This is most disturbing scene I've ever watched

i think he was ok as a bad guy to be honest i like Hob more and Mcdaggart from Robocop 3 but nobody beats the villens from the first one

Yet in part 3 he survived a shot from a missle ...sequels are always inconsistent

+swagger 601 the titanium plate in his chest seems thicker and tougher than his cut arm. wondering if the kid shoots 50 BMG to robocop's chest

+swagger 601 in robo 3, it wasnt a missle, it was a 50cal grenade launcher from a m40

Thomas Kim but yet a claw pierced it in the scene! This scene makes absolutely no sense what so ever.

@@HellBrYnger 20mm grenade from an M203 wasn't it?

Goreball studios oooo smosh should make a video on that lol

That's because they had that backup plan with that giant crane hook and that industrial giant magnet. This was a planned out ambush.

They we're sendin' a message cartel style. "Keep sending us your robotic cop , you will get it in pieces again AND again"

It's never a good thing to see the good guys hurt like that...☹️

I feel you, believe me, there are equally vile schoolgirls who basically love to see other girls anguish and suffering, I was a victim of some of them... I remember as a kid I always dreamed of getting killed and transformed into a female Robocop so I could go in the school and make those bullies feel true terror by punching their boyfriends to near death and then slap them around for a little fun

Regina Reece Oh I learnt ALL about how sadistic the girls can be. The bullying that destroyed my childhood, teen years... Even my formative years as a young man - was instigated by the abusive teachers. And many of those teachers were women - including those at infant school, that originally instigated it. My 'crime' for it... Being very slow to learn at school. I was slow anyway. But having a full grown adult woman scream abuse at you & slap you around would have sabotaged a kid's learning process. Let's not even talk about what it was going to do to mine, when I was all of 3 years old & having never been left alone by my parents with anybody like this... And from the very start, what caused the most distress was the sadistic kick they got from the distress they inflicted - that I was far too young to understand - was obvious. Far more than it ever was in any male teacher. Women are far more 'socially aware' than guys. So them manipulating the other kids by humiliating me (daily) for not learning something, with tactics of 'parading' you to all other kids at the head of the class, was clearly what passed as 'job satisfaction' for them. This is what led to the bullying that took my childhood & destroyed my life before it even started. Kids can be vicious to one another anyway, once they start getting competitive. That, on its own, I could have dealt with - eventually. That's all part of 'Natural Selection'. But these women (& later the male teachers in later schools) took that fact to turn every other kid in a class against me, to, eventually, turn every kid school against me. In no uncertain terms, they used other children, who were too young to know better, as 'weapons' to destroy my life before it even started. 'Serves me right for that 50% of DNA that came from my Mother, that makes me learn too slow' (that I had no control over) - obviously! What is now known as 'Victim Shaming' - abounds! In no uncertain terms, they 'weaponised' those other kids to carry out their vile campaign of abuse & that is how real bullying starts & leads to the kind of torture & humiliation that this scene in Robocop 2, caused. What would have to have been, a PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) 'flashback'. Those abusive teachers - including, maybe even, especially, the women - were the true school bullies... They 'created' the playground bullies. I can even remember them 'turning a blind eye' to what I was put through... My own parents were no protection. Mother wasn't the 'sharpest tool in the garden shed' & was easily fooled into thinking 'they couldn't be bullies because they are teachers. So they aren't being bad to you, their just trying to help you to learn'. Manipulating a parent that wasn't smart enough to recognise their own child was being abused by those in a position of trust, wasn't a problem. Especially considering my Mother wasn't that smart (which would explain why I was so slow to learn to start with) & my Father probably thought it was 'character building'. So 'Parental Instinct' to protect the child, wasn't even in the equation. "Oh but surely it would have ended once you left that school when you were old enough" ...... WRONG! Those abusive teachers, if confronted, would deny everything & vouch for each other to keep their abuse covered up & the targeted child - totally isolated (then makes things worse for the child as 'punishment' for 'telling tales'). A concerned parent's word against their's. And once you did leave that school when old enough & go to the next school in the school system, those abusive teachers would let the *other* abusive teachers in the new school (that was part of the same school system) know how 'bad' (euphemism for being slow to learn, in my case) you were ,so the teachers at the new school would set you up for more of the same. There probably aren't any historical (this was the 70's & 80's) to evidence this, if any ever existed. Because how that info was conveyed between abusive teachers in that same circle was done in a far more 'under the radar' way than phone calls, letters etc. Behind closed doors or even over a few drinks down the pub or bar after work. So - no concrete evidence for any cop investigating it. There was no widely recognised term for it, when I was growing up. But today, all of this would probably be identified as being symptomatic of what is now known as a 'Culture of Abuse'. And the original abusive teachers that targeted me & instigated all this - were woman. So trust me, I'm *all too familiar* with how dangerous girls can be as bullies - all the more so, because we all live in a society that, traditionally, doesn't acknowledge that a woman can be, pound for pound, just as dangerous as an abuser, as any man. Maybe even more so because of that traditional societal belief... What I'm now waiting for is some troll to show up & tell me I wasn't abused because it 'wasn't sexual abuse'. So if it wasn't abused - because the word 'sexually' isn't put in front of it - why do I feel just as violated, talking about it?! And people today wonder why I lost faith in people at an early age, never met a girl (I spent a lot of my youth not trusting them) & why my relationships fail...

I understand exactly what happened to you.

So they split you in pieces? That must have hurt!