Roger Federer Destroying Great Players ● No One Can Do It Better HD 

Federer: the Mozart

The real GOAT

You are right. But I always wonder why and how did he lose all those matches with multiple match points. I never rewatch that. I don't have the heart to. He would have minimum 25 grand slam .

@@hijabakhtar agree. Crazy to say, but he underachieving big times. I think he lost confidence after mono

I love Federer and no doubt he has the most beautiful game in tennis, but he cannot be the best player when there is someone that has literally achieved more than him. Not a dig against him, but I think he’s the second of all time.

@@tolendoi123 it depenjds what metrics you're using to establish that. Is Emerson better than Laver because he has more GS titles?

​​@@MrFrescocotoneEmerson was an amateur...

Maradona not Zidane.😉

No Zidane.. maradona was a maniac not relaxed player.. plus he was a coke head for Christ sake 😂😂😂😂

@@peterabnormal327 Zidane? Zidane didn't even have a fingernail of Maradona.😂😂😂 In football you can't be relaxed. Federer was the Maradona of tennis. At most you can compare Zidane to Agassi.

@@peterabnormal327 I'm talking about pure class and not performance

@@lorenzomarchi6635 what you talking about , you can’t be relaxed in football.. have you seen Zidane play ? Go and watch a few videos in RU-vid son.. Maradona lmao you crack me up

Good fun.. Thank you.

Good and bad. Take away one hander you take away that incredible defensive slice reach he had on the backhand corner, take away reach in general bh side, takeaway that perfect slice w pace that only 1H can produce, lose some bh volley, lose the best bh smash the game has seen. All that gone to give more bh power, from a player that can has the feet to run around and hit that FH at will (back then).

Why don't you watch tennis ? Both Tsonga and Monfils are great players .

@@annewalden3795 Tsonga and monfils are respectable players. Not great.

In your mind

He won 40% against Nadal and 46% against Djokovic. That's not exactly regular destruction.

He defeated Nadal 6/7 of the last matches they played. Nadal failed to defeat him on a non clay surface after 2014

The thing about Federer is precisely that he doesn't need to to break records or to win in title numbers to be considered at least as good as Djoko or Nadal. That's what makes him so special and unique.

@@joaodav what is that "thing"your talking about? If it's that in your eyes is the greatest player and that you have enjoyed watching him three most, then that's absolutely fine. It's subjective whom you love to watch and who you think the best is. However, facts are not subjective. His main two Rivals best him more than he best them. Someone else put out losing percentages but still have the mood to Federer as Nadal couldn't beat him in the last whatever number of meetings and on specific surfaces. If we wanna do this, then at one point the record was 25 -10 in favour of Nadal with 7-2 in Grand slam finals. However, let's stick to realistic facts: Nadal best Federer in class, Grass and Hardcourt finals. Federer can't claim the same. I don't want to make a debate here, I was merely commenting on the the title of the video. It says Federer destroying great players, nobody does it better. I think it's very ironic given the facts not opinions.

@@majm1297 the number of titles don't tell you the whole picture, they just tell you wich player is more competitive. That is my point and i'm too lazy to talk about the boring "facts".

Djokovic is a hard worker - Federer was an artist. The greatest to have ever played the game - bar none!

Agree. Federer and nadal are a distant second

Jason you are right Novak is a Billy goat but the greatest tennis player is Roger Federer every time .

@@annewalden3795 I feel like Larry Bird is the goat of basketball. That’s how I FEEL

@@user-fi6tq3mo3q I have never heard of Larry Bird and have no interest in Basketball .