Тёмный

Roger Stritmatter - Discovering Shakespeare’s Bible: Rebel Grad Student to Marginalized Professor 

Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship
Подписаться 4,8 тыс.
Просмотров 13 тыс.
50% 1

How has J. Thomas Looney’s Oxfordian theory, propounded in his revolutionary 1920 book, “Shakespeare Identified,” influenced Shakespeare studies over the past century? Professor Roger Stritmatter offers a unique perspective on the subject, surveying various connections between “Shakespeare” and Oxford’s life that build on Looney’s insights, including markings in Oxford’s personal Geneva Bible.
Stritmatter is Professor of Humanities and Literature at Coppin State University in Baltimore. He has been deeply engaged in Shakespeare studies for three decades, publishing dozens of scholarly articles in leading journals including “Review of English Studies,” “Shakespeare Yearbook,” “Notes and Queries,” and “Critical Survey.” He is co-author (with Lynne Kositsky) of “On the Date, Sources, and Design of Shakespeare’s The Tempest” (2013), and (with Alexander Waugh) the forthcoming “New Shakespeare Allusion Book.” His 2001 Ph.D. thesis, “The Marginalia of Edward de Vere’s Geneva Bible,” explores numerous parallels to biblical references in the works of Shakespeare.
This talk was presented on March 4, 2020, at the “Shakespeare Identified” Centennial Symposium at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
Bob Meyers, who moderated the symposium and introduced the speakers, is an award-winning journalist and author who formerly served as president of the National Press Foundation and director of the Harvard Journalism Fellowship for Advanced Studies in Public Health.
For more on the Shakespeare authorship question see ShakespeareOxfordFellowship.org.

Опубликовано:

 

1 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 42   
@alexanderwaugh7036
@alexanderwaugh7036 3 года назад
Dr Stritmatter is a terrific speaker with a brilliant, stimulating mind that effortlessly exposes orthodox assumptions as a mess of broken crockery. Poor Teapot!
@johnwarner3968
@johnwarner3968 4 года назад
Thank you, Professor Stritmatter for your great investigative and scholarly work. I believe Edward de Vere was the real and true Shakespeare! 👋👍🙏
@kenkaplan3654
@kenkaplan3654 2 года назад
I was personally present at Strimatter's dissertation defense and know him well, I have a copy of the published dissertation Shapiro is a despicable person and flatly intellectually dishonest as are unfortunately many Statfordians regarding authorship issues. Roger and Lynne Kositsky published a remarkable paper on sources of the Tempest proving it was written far earlier than traditional dating. I presented at a conference on the hypocrisy of Greenblatt's Will in the World, so filled with unfounded speculation after accusing Oxfordians of the same. nelson was there. He liked my talk and congratulated me.
@bryan.h.wildenthal
@bryan.h.wildenthal 4 года назад
Some fact-checks on comments I've seen on this and other SOF videos: A favorite tired old chestnut is: “If Shakespeare was the highly educated Earl of Oxford, how come he didn’t know Bohemia was landlocked?” etc. Well ... Bohemia DID have a coastal border during some historical periods, as even orthodox Stratfordian scholars have occasionally conceded. Borders of European nation-states and empires often changed over time. And who was more likely to be educated about such historical details? The businessman from Stratford who could barely sign his own name and may or may not have attended a rudimentary grammar school (no records exist)? Or Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, who it’s well-documented had a superb education? The seacoast was already noted in Greene's Pandosto (a source for The Winter's Tale), so Shakespeare (whoever that was) did not originate that detail anyway. One Stratfordian scholar, John Pitcher, in his 2010 Arden edition of Winter's Tale, says we shouldn’t even take the issue seriously as saying anything about the author's knowledge or lack thereof (pp. 99-102): "This clearly wasn't Shakespeare's mistake, but a joke." More recently, scholars exploring the Thomas North theory of Shakespeare authorship have pointed out evidence that published and performed versions of "The Winter's Tale," post-1604, may have switched the identities of the Kings of Sicily and Bohemia (and thus the locations of their kingdoms), meaning that references to "Bohemia" having a seacoast may actually have referred (very logically) to Sicily having a seacoast in the original version. One need not adhere to the North theory to accept this interesting explanation. Some have also criticized the author "Shakespeare" (whoever it was) for suggesting Verona was on the coast. But the author never actually said that. Did suggest you could travel from Verona to Milan (and between other Italian cities) by boat. Which it’s been documented you COULD during that time. Northern Italy had an extensive system of canals connecting to various rivers. I recently asked a friend of mine about this, with no stake in the authorship issue whose mother was born and grew up in northern Italy. He laughed in puzzlement that anyone would question the canals, said it's common knowledge among Italians they existed. Some still do! They interconnect (and used to even more extensively) various river systems. As for NOT mentioning canals in Merchant of Venice, the author never suggested Venice did not have canals. They may not have been overtly discussed because it wasn’t relevant to the plot. By contrast, travel by boat to and from Verona and Milan WAS relevant to the plot of Two Gentlemen of Verona, The Tempest, etc. Keep in mind ... the author was writing plays with storylines, not travelogues. What’s most compelling is not particular details about Italy the author did NOT mention, but the plethora of details about art, geography, customs, culture, and language he DID mention -- in a very natural offhand way, clearly showing intimate firsthand experience as a traveler. Stratfordians have no way to deal with all that, hence their typical diversionary bluster on irrelevant points. As for the suggestion that the author "Shakespeare" must have known the loss of a child (trying to connect that to Shakspere of Stratford's son Hamnet dying at age 11 in 1596): Well ... hmm ... why is such a grievous loss never dwelled upon in 154 deeply personal Sonnets? There's an implied reference in one sonnet to a newborn son possibly dying within days of birth, but that clearly does not fit with Hamnet's death (does with the deaths of an infant son, and daughter, of the Earl of Oxford during the 1580s). As for all the frantic pearls-clutching moral condemnation of Oxford (e.g. for allegedly "abandoning" his first wife and eldest child for some years -- one could argue he was driven away by a meddling father-in-law) ... what exactly is the claim here? All great artists must have been morally upstanding people? Therefore, since Oxford was allegedly a bad person, he could not have been “Shakespeare”? That is an obviously silly line of argument. Many great artists have had famously messy personal lives. Also a very awkward argument for Stratfordians to pursue, given their guy's petty money-lending, lawsuits, hoarding grain in famine, dodging taxes, etc. No particular biographical detail can clinch the argument for any authorship candidate. What people need to focus on is a rational big-picture comparison between Oxford and Shakspere of Stratford.
@Short-Cipher
@Short-Cipher 3 года назад
Brings to mind the moot court case between Oxford & Stratford in which the Stratfordian Counsel was going on about Oxford's messy personal life & one of the SCOTUS Justices (forget which at the moment but possibly Stephens) quipped, "Sounds like a playwright to me." It deservedly got a rise from the audience.😆
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 3 года назад
@@Short-Cipher A brilliant moment.
@stephenjablonsky1941
@stephenjablonsky1941 Год назад
For the most part, great composers are prime examples of geniuses who had very messy personal lives. For example, the music of Chopin is perfect yet his life was pathetic and as far from perfect as you can get. Just ask George Sand. Let's not even talk about Mozart who was an insatiable sex addict and gave "piano lessons" to more women than you can shake a stick at.
@rhstpchld
@rhstpchld 3 года назад
Bravo & thanks. A moment that resonated: when around 35:00-35:40 about that verse, De Vere and then Tyndale.
@munishanti3021
@munishanti3021 2 года назад
Applause...well done!
@peckerwood6078
@peckerwood6078 4 года назад
Wonderful! A revisitation of the deVere Geneva Bible dissertation and contextualized with the Mathew 1-4 reference gives very meaty fodder to the cannon of Shapiro shot! Roger is fully growing into his skin and begins to wax eloquent in his prose & knows enough to not say all, while some is more than enough. Certainly the heat of the fires kindled by establishment Torquemada's would cause the most sangfroid of academics to wince; Talbots pay heed indeed. Heretical acts are best kept to ones self or a coterie of associates such a Gervais and company as mentioned. Of whom it might be said were not of momentous significance, only to the blind and those who will not see. As to the authors personal circumstances relative to faith the assertion by the questioner that the author was not a crypto catholic but rather an adherent to the Protestant faith is refreshing to at last hear acceded to by someone who might know. Further research into the matter of faith would be well instructed to investigate the concepts within the works, of a supreme father as opposed to a redeemer focused theological perspective. The choice of the Geneva Bible, the bible of a heretic who was forced into exile for his troubles seem's again a signal pyre which would be difficult to ignore let alone deny. Bede, Alcuin, Chaucer were contemporaneous with the longest line of nobility in history, the deVere's whose lineage is said to be derived from the likes of Melanger & Melusine in the ethereal and Lucius Verus in the temporal, of whom it is said was the better of the two when contrasted with his co-council the immortal Marcus Aurelius. There is a reason that the Boar is Blue. What possible reason could Oxford have had to have kept his identity anonymous, is posited frequently by English dept academics. Those who think that the forces which would keep humanity in perpetual ignorance have long been vanquished and none need ever again fear their wrath should consider the case of Galileo Galilei who in 1992 after 350 yrs and fully 23 yrs after man had walked on the moon, was given a Papal pardon excusing him from his heretical conviction due to his having espoused the Copernican heliocentric system in opposition to the Terracentric teaching of the Roman Church. Don't forget Giordano! Exceeding fine ~ Sextus
@FilmFloozy
@FilmFloozy 3 года назад
We believe what we want to believe and from whence our paychecks come.
@annarboriter
@annarboriter 3 года назад
Clever paraphrase of Upton Sinclair
@VasaVasorum2
@VasaVasorum2 Месяц назад
Brilliant
@SeaWarriorSon
@SeaWarriorSon 4 года назад
I do wish post modernist constructs like “social justice” would be left at the door in such discussions...
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 4 года назад
This is a topic of study and debate that goes back to the Bible and is extensively discussed in the ancient world and very much on the minds of renaissance reformers: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
@MrMartibobs
@MrMartibobs 4 года назад
@@rstritmatter The idea that de Vere believed in 'social justice' is RISIBLE. He murdered an under-cook and got away with it. He spent his life writing begging letters so he could live the aristocratic life with no effort. He deserted his pregnant mistress and tried to leg it out of the country. What an utter piece of excrement he was.
@bryan.h.wildenthal
@bryan.h.wildenthal 4 года назад
@@MrMartibobs What's "risible" (laughable) is that you think this is a serious argument against Oxford as "Shakespeare" (or against any great artist). Stratfordians have to deal with the fact that their guy was a usurious moneylender, dodged taxes, hoarded grain in times of famine, probably committed fraud or bribery or both to get a coat-of-arms, etc. We're not debating whether Shakspere of Stratford or the Earl of Oxford qualify for the Nobel Peace Prize, but which of them is more likely to have written certain specific works of literature. Instead of dealing with the Grand Canyon of mismatch between the works and the moneylender from Stratford, you focus on Oxford's alleged personal moral failings. If you've done any reading on great artists, composers, writers, etc, historically, you should know that many were pretty screwed-up people with very problematical morals.
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 4 года назад
@@bryan.h.wildenthal Thanks you Bryan. "Marty" is indeed a laughable example of the pseudo-intellectual and even fraudulent character of today's Shakespeare establishment.
@Short-Cipher
@Short-Cipher 3 года назад
@@bryan.h.wildenthal What a refreshing and sober response to a risible comment. Thanks.
@myersred8
@myersred8 9 месяцев назад
I want to know more about that Fender Vintera II ad! Is that Wend Melvoin and Leland Sklar???!!! Beautiful song! I think Oxford was an influence on Shakspere, or provided the inspiration and some source material, but Shakspere was great at putting together productions of the plays--he was MORE than just the screenplay writer or "author"--he managed costume, choreography, delivery, etc., overseeing the entire production and hiring and firing to tailor the best team who would make the best production. "Shakespeare" is like Woody Allen or Steven Spielberg or Stanley Kubrick. If Shakespeare were a total fabrication in association with the plays there would have been a public uproar at the time of the 1st publications.
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 3 месяца назад
That sounds lovely but is 100% made up from your imagination.
@markhughes7927
@markhughes7927 10 месяцев назад
Was Hal Rosey his own father perchance?
@Fuzzylove-wn1cd
@Fuzzylove-wn1cd 6 месяцев назад
Looney as in Clooney or Rooney
@MrMartibobs
@MrMartibobs 4 года назад
One important note. The word 'author' had a broader meaning in early modern English. If you use an online Shakespeare concordance you will find that the man from Stratford uses the word 15 times. Sometimes its meaning is the modern sense of 'writer' , but just as often it merely means 'a person who did a thing'. The rapist in 'Lucrece' is described as the 'author' of the deed. Here's another example from 'Much Ado': "Don John is the author of all, who is /fled and gone. Will you come presently?" For anyone unfamiliar with the play, Don John is a pantomime villain who has hatched a dastardly plot. NOT a writer. Another point is that both Francis and Horace Vere were involved in conflict in the Netherlands, under Maurice of Nassau, Prince of Orange. This seems to relate directly to the end of the paragraph: "...famous exploits fortunately performed, deliuers you peraduenture but the name of Nassau, or the Dutch, and such like..." This honestly suggests to me that this entire paragraph is concerned ONLY with the exploits of Francis and Horace Vere, and the 'secret' is perhaps a refusal to take credit for some military victory. But please, if you have another interpretation, let's have it. You just have to prove that the opening and closing of the paragraph (both clearly about Francis and Horace) are in some way divorced from the middle.
@williamberven-ph5ig
@williamberven-ph5ig Год назад
As with the "theory" continental drift, the truth will eventually win out but as with the unfortunate misguided souls denying covid as they are being placed on a ventilator, Stratfordians (especially those which have decades invested in the traditional narrative or a financial motive ), will go to their grave defiant to, no pun intended, their last breath.
@MrMartibobs
@MrMartibobs 4 года назад
I've been lying awake, thinking, 'what was Looney talking about?' Dr Stritmatter enthusiastically quotes his remark that Shakespeare teaches an improvidence "that would soon involve any man's affairs in complete chaos". He comes to this conclusion because Shakespeare's references to money and purses are 'of the loosest description'. I genuinely don't think this makes any sense whatsoever. Looney expected ... more description of purses? More financial discussion? Do we think that would have made great theatre? Anyway, the professor interprets this as suggesting that Shakespeare taught financial imprudence. And I went through the plays in my head, one by one. And the poems. And SERIOUSLY the only plays I can think of that deal with the issue of fiscal imprudence are King Lear and Timon of Athens. King Lear gives all to his daughters ... and ends up ruined. What is the message of King Lear? Don't give everything away. (Especially to your daughters!) Timon gives everything away to sycophants. The message of Timon? Don't give everything away (especially to sycophants) Hamlet plans to marry below his station, but ... marrying the daughter of a statesman seems pretty sensible. And generally, when people in the plays marry, it always turns out that both parties will do well out of the deal. Even love-blinded Olivia ends up marrying someone who's her equal in estate, degreee and fortune. So Shakespeare's message is definitely NOT one of unbridled disregard for money. And it makes me wonder .... was Looney actually FAMILIAR with the plays of William Shakespeare? Because it sounds to me as if he hadn't got a scooby-doo. And it also makes me wonder ... did you actually consider the implications of quoting that remark without providing a shred of evidence to back up its veracity? Anyone. Please? Tell me which play, which poem, advocates ruinous generosity. Just name one.
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 4 года назад
May one suggest that instead of "lying awake" trying to unriddle this problem, reading Looney would be a good next step. He tells you what he was thinking about. Now, specifically with reference to the question of financial affairs, in my opinion, after thirty years of reading and writing about Shakespeare, he hit the nail on the head. It is Iago who says "put money in your purse." Is he your role model? "was Looney actually FAMILIAR with the plays of William Shakespeare? " Again, reading Looney's book will help you to answer this elementary question.
@commonberus1
@commonberus1 3 года назад
I suppose the reason why the Bibles annotations was not accepted as proof of DeVere being Shakespeare was because Scholars did not find many Shakespeare Bible allusions from the annotated part of the bible unless they concentrated in that part of the bible that was annotated. But if you concentrate in any part of the Bible you are sure to find more parts that are like Shakespeare. For instance in 1993 (the year this story broke) Professor Shaheen published the 3rd & last part of his Biblical quotations work which contained about 2000 biblical quotations and allusions in Shakespeare (in the 1st edition) but only 80 of them were marked. This is a hit rate you would expect by chance.
@kenkaplan3654
@kenkaplan3654 2 года назад
You haven't read the thesis so how can you comment on its contents? It was not just annotasted portions but underlined ones and their patterns. Stritmatter found an extremely important correlation Shaheen had missed. Shaheen used it but never gave Stritmatter credit. BTW, where are Shakespeare' of Stratford's books? Where is evidence he had access to them? there were no libraries in his day. They weren't being sold in shops. Where is evidence he actually READ any of them?
@rstritmatter
@rstritmatter 2 года назад
Commonberus, if you would consult the document under discussion, you'd know that I included all of Shaheen's data in my study and am quite familiar with his work. I reviewed the book on the Comedies in 1993 and noted some discrepancies in Shaheen's data collection methods, since he borrowed critical data from me without acknowledgement. As for your notion about "hit rates" that "you would expect by chance," well -- like Ken said, you should do some reading before further commenting.
@craigtimmons6907
@craigtimmons6907 7 дней назад
Stratfordian Academics - Shameful, Scandalous, Dishonest, Tribal, Intellectually Dishonest A lot to answer for, it would appear
Далее
Paul Cantor on the "Shakespeare Authorship Question"
1:20:24
Katherine Chiljan - The First Folio Fraud
45:08
Просмотров 19 тыс.
Is this the face of Shakespeare?
52:40
Просмотров 19 тыс.
A Revolution in Thought?  - Dr Iain McGilchrist
1:04:12
Просмотров 125 тыс.
Was Henry Wriothesley the son of Elizabeth 1st?  Part 1
1:14:34