Great playing and demo. Roland introduced the nice concept best part is about this is on board speakers. I am keen to buy this but some how I felt piano sound has very less resonance compared to many other products. As I play lot classical music it’s more suitable for pop style that’s what I feel. On specifications they have mentioned that it has 3000 sound which is really a plus about this piano but there no demo of other necessary sounds. Hope you guys will make one more video with other sounds. Thank you so much !
It's sounds synthetic on the hands of horrible players that doesn't have a artistic and professional articulation or touch. It's not a simple sample recording like a CD. It reacts badly to bad playing. Practice with a good teacher for some years and try Roland again.
If you can't play with expression, buy a MOTIF and use that mechanical piano recording. Roland piano sound is only comparable to a few top notch software with a lot of gigabytes and powerful resonance and other effects processing.
I played them both over headphone in the store (classical music) and went with the MP7SE. However, connected to Pianoteq, the MP7SE really is a great solution.
@@strongchord4384 *Juno's are a joke. RD's are Roland's flagship stage brands. No professional piano player is thinking about Juno's when they're thinking of getting a Roland stage board 😆. But with that being said, I've never liked Roland's piano sounds, they're all shit. Besides the V-Piano.*
@@Dadee3 Yeah, they’re all xxxx. So much so that Elton John, to this day, uses an ancient MKS 20 module (previously RD1000) and countless other acts such as GaGa, Dua Lipa and Harry Styles have their keyboard players use Roland RD’s. I’m not defending Roland, I use Nords but we’re all entitled to our opinion aren’t we?
@@ferdearmas8732 hi dude, my preferred action is Kawai's GF3 because it feels like the GF2 but with improved mechanism. My second choice would be PHA50, I don't specially like Yamaha digital actions although NXW could be an exception. I wouldn't consider anything below those actions.
@@DavidIzquierdoAzzouz Thanks for your very helpful answer my friend, are you a trained classical or jazz pianist?, and please tell me, what negatives do you find to PHA-50 and NWX?...
@@ferdearmas8732 mate I'm basically classical trained although I play several music styles too (check my RU-vid channel). There're no negatives, it's just GF3 is made by a real piano manufacturer and they intended to make it feel like as close to a Kawai grand as possible, while the PHA50 mimics a Steinway action and the NXW a Yamaha.. It's just up to your taste which one you like more. And again, from those 3 actions only 2 are made by real piano manufacturers (they've been making acoustics for decades).. Also to consider, GF3 is Kawai latest technology and found in some affordable price ranges, while NXW isn't Yamaha's flagship action (not a bad action though).
@@DavidIzquierdoAzzouz Thanks mate for your skilled answer and congratulations for your piano experience..., i´m looking for the best key action possible in a slab format, but i can´t try for myself, my last choices are, Kawai RHIII, Yamaha NWX and Roland PHA-50, which is faster or more responsive, more confortable for long sessions and playing near the fulcrum, more realistic and more reliable, i need the best connection finger to sound and better or more complex sound engine..., is really the PHA-50 worth money difference with PHA-4 Standard in FP10?. Are you tried FP10/30/60 or Kawai ES110, Korg D1 and Casio PXS3000?. Please, give me your help. Which key actions are your favorite and why?. Thanks a lot!...
