Тёмный

Rolex Explorer 36mm - is the 114270 still relevant after 124270 came out? 

Watch Geek
Подписаться 138 тыс.
Просмотров 22 тыс.
50% 1

A special thank you to all the channel members!!
To join the membership program, click here: / @watchgeek
The equipment I use to make these videos:
The camera I use: amzn.to/2N0TKu3
The MACRO lens I use: amzn.to/2YVDtcF
The MAIN lens I use: amzn.to/3jss2Tm
The MICROPHONE I use: amzn.to/3aDAnj2
The LIGHTING system I use: amzn.to/3q3FHCQ
The TRIPOD I use: amzn.to/3tzHzoU
The LAPTOP I use: amzn.to/3pXV6o2
Using the links above and below and purchasing ANYTHING on Amazon thru this link gets the channel a commission, so THANK YOU!!
Visit my Amazon Storefront to check out the watches I recommend:
www.amazon.com/shop/watchgeek
Sign up for a free Amazon Audible trial and the channel gets a comission too: amzn.to/2ppuwdC
Today we are reviewing the first ever Rolex I bought, the 2000. Rolex Explorer 36, reference number 114270.
It was the first Rolex that I fell in love with because of its simplicity and at the time of purchase, almost no hype compared to more popular models.
Since Rolex released a new 36mm 124270 this one seems irrelevant at first glance, since the new one is objectively a better watch in every way, BUT, the proportions and shape of the case are slightly different, so this one still looks better, at least to me.
The only downside is the lack of lume on the 3,6,9 numerals, but other than that, it is better.
I even prefer the older bracelet as it hits the sweet spot between being comfortable and just sturdy enough.
The movement used, 3130, has been pefect. This is a 20 year old watch that has never been serviced and it is still within 2 seconds a day, which is incredibly impressive.
#rolex #explorer36 #watchgeek #rolexexplorer
I hope you enjoy the video :)
To help the channel:
PayPal donations: www.paypal.me/watchgeek
Become a Patron: / watchgeek
Patrons get to see videos before they premiere on RU-vid as a reward for keeping the channel going :)

Хобби

Опубликовано:

 

17 дек 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 89   
@lettuce1305
@lettuce1305 Год назад
can't go wrong with either references but as a wearer of the ceramic GMT I actually opted for the older 114270, I like how the watch "disappears" on the wrist and actually don't mind the bracelet at all for everyday wear.
@timetowatch_francois
@timetowatch_francois Год назад
@Watch Geek - Truly appreciate you sharing this one. You are a much more patient man that I will ever be ... the issues with setting the hands and that sub-par clasp would "irk" me senselessly and I would have immediately sent the watch back for repair and/or replacement. Mostly at the price they sell them! From what I hear from this review, your Rolex "journey" was a good one and that's what counts 🙂👍🏼
@nicholasanderson9019
@nicholasanderson9019 Год назад
Great stuff thanks. I happen to prefer the 3, 6, 9 not being luminous and like the versatility for straps on this model as versatility is a key strength for this watch. Also the taper on the new bracelet is a bit weird and dainty for me. So I think I'll go for this modern classic
@yellownine
@yellownine Год назад
I don’t like rolex very much but i credit the 36 explorer for teaching a whole new generation of watch owners that 36mm is a perfectly normal and good size 😂 Thankfully 36 and 38 are coming back.
@JMNTN
@JMNTN Год назад
My daily watch is just under 34mm but with a 42mm lug to lug, it wears perfect for me
@StruanRobertson29
@StruanRobertson29 Год назад
@@JMNTN your right....my week day wear is about 35mm and I think its great. Very comfortable..I mean you dont want something getting stuck on your cuff and banging into things because of the size....
@FSVR54
@FSVR54 Год назад
For us smaller dudes, 36-38 is where it's at. Anything bigger is way too bulky on the wrist.
@VincentAmari
@VincentAmari Год назад
Unbelievable that Rolex has missunderstood why the Rolex Explorer 36mm was so popular - 'the look' and balance of the dimensions, 36mm diameter with 20mm lug width, very little tapering, ideally none. All they needed to do was update the movement, add lume to the 3-6-9 and a solid bracelet with it's glidelock clasp. That would have been the perfect update.
@epvtrinidad
@epvtrinidad 7 месяцев назад
Exactly. I will say- the AR coating on the new 36 is better and the dial has a lacquer finish which I prefer so in terms of that the dial is better on the new ones but other than that, everything you said is spot on. Hoping we get that “perfect” 36mm soon!!
@divertiti
@divertiti 6 месяцев назад
Bracelet with no taper? Nope
@StruanRobertson29
@StruanRobertson29 Год назад
It really is a classic...ive always been in love with the exp 1
@iamnew7545
@iamnew7545 Год назад
Nice review. I've owned both the 114270 and the 124270 and agree with your comments. I prefer the 114270 due to it being more comfortable on the wrist and I also prefer the dial proportions. I love the 114270 and it is the watch that finally stopped a cycle of flipping for me! Mine doesn't have the issue that yours has with the hands moving when you're setting the time. Perhaps that's something that could be fixed with a service? Also, I know what you mean when you describe the movement as being the most basic that Rolex offered at the time but that could sound as a negative to someone who doesn't know their history. They movement isn't any inferior to any other Rolex movement at the time, it just has fewer complications as they aren't needed (I know you know this, I'm just leaving this comment for anyone who is unsure what you meant).
@Milofchg
@Milofchg Год назад
I will say I wish the new Explorer had 20mm lug width. The only other negative about the new reference is the lug hole location. 19mm straps are easy to find more now than before. But, you need a thin strap because the lug holes are close to the case, and the case has a lip on it for the end-link. You can wear out the strap a little bit. You also need a thin NATO strap if you're into NATO's. Everything else makes up for that. The movement is spot on and a great power reserve time. The new reference has a more refined case/bracelet taper/better clasp, but the old 36mm looks more neo-vintage. I have no issues with the design proportions of the new reference. I will say depending on the shape of the forearm/hand, or wrist size over 7 inches, this could look small. On my 7 inch wrist with my forearm to hand proportions, it's spot on. Not everyone will like how it looks on wrist. It also takes a few days to get use to the size. After wearing 40/42/44 mm watches since the mid 2000's. The classic smaller size takes time to get use to again. After a while you'll start to think. Are watches over 40/42mm necessary? I'm a 70's & 80's kid so small classic size watches are nothing new. Less is more
@invictus_They-Them_Nazi_Hunter
You may be confusing the 124270 with the 214270 39mm watch in terms of your comment about dial proportions, as i dont believe these have changed on the new 36mm 124270.
@iamnew7545
@iamnew7545 Год назад
@@invictus_They-Them_Nazi_Hunter no, the text is bolder and the numerals and hour markers are larger on the 124270 compared to the 114270. It’s clearer when they’re side by side. YoureTerrific does a great video comparing them.
@invictus_They-Them_Nazi_Hunter
@@iamnew7545 oh ok, thanks
@Bignewshound60
@Bignewshound60 Год назад
This is one of the best computer generated voice overs I’ve heard. Almost sounds human. But not quite. Good video
@floridasoldat
@floridasoldat Год назад
Am I missing something lol?…
@johnrb9397
@johnrb9397 Год назад
That’s a real voice. Not generated!
@biladitanya
@biladitanya Год назад
What??? Computer generated voice??? Dude, whatever you’re having… share it too. This is next level.
@tamdam
@tamdam Год назад
The AI voice chuffs my bits
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek Год назад
😂😂😂😂 In some videos they tell me I sound like Christopher Walken, some tell me I'm from Minnesota, but this is a first one where I'm told I'm a computer
@drwindsurf
@drwindsurf Год назад
This is the smallest watch I own and I love it. Thank you for an excellent review
@bobbywatchaddict523
@bobbywatchaddict523 Год назад
Wonderful review.
@loducawarrior
@loducawarrior Год назад
I just got one of these and your video says it all. Small but classic and unobtrusive. Just a beautiful do it all watch. Thanks for the video.
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek Год назад
Enjoy it
@davidryan4454
@davidryan4454 28 дней назад
Great review. I love my 114270. Inconspicuous. It is clear from the comments that critics are either jealous they cannot afford a watch more expensive than a G-Shock or who want their watch to be noticed. Loud, brash & juvenile people.
@_sr
@_sr Год назад
I love the 36mm explorer. Understated and Classy..
@tsibren
@tsibren Год назад
Beautiful video that really honours this watch. It's definitely one of my favourites and hope to be able to afford a real one one day. The Steinhart 39 version is also great, maybe they will make a 36 mm version as well.
@tsibren
@tsibren Год назад
Also want to add that with this Rolex, the simplicity is its beauty. Every detail to the smallest one has been done exactly right, which is just perfection.
@Pedronimo5
@Pedronimo5 Год назад
gorgeous movie. very nice shot
@Zeeraha
@Zeeraha Год назад
Nice review of a legacy piece. I tried on the new 36mm version at the AD and the watch is fully solid. A premium Oyster bracelet with a solid milled clasp. The new movement has no jumping minute hand issue. In my opinion, the new Rolex models are the ones which anyone should go for.
@yusufbest4475
@yusufbest4475 Год назад
Actually the unlumed 3, 6 , 9 makes sense for such a versatile watch that can be both dress and field watch.. 🤔
@user-yy9lg6gs4h
@user-yy9lg6gs4h Год назад
Disgree. Lume is not required at the 3,6,9. Why? Obviously one knows they are 3,6,9. Secondly numerals are difficult to relume, batons are not. Polished bezel is great as it makes this watch universal. If you want a tool watch buy a Marathon GPQ.
@andreleverettejr3747
@andreleverettejr3747 Год назад
I only buy one watch per brand, this will be my choice when I'm going for a Rolex
@MrBTDhimself
@MrBTDhimself 8 месяцев назад
I think the Rolex explorer is the best everyday day watch , looks nice , works well and has a classic look , I have a white gold date just as well but that i use for office meetings, since it’s white gold and fluted bezel looks great with a suit .
@nottooherbal
@nottooherbal Год назад
Appealing watch . Great size.
@aussieexpatwatches
@aussieexpatwatches Год назад
Thank you for stating actual dimensions! The new one is faithful, 35.4mm.
@Milofchg
@Milofchg Год назад
Measure the bezel edge 8-2 o'clock with digital calipers. You will get the 36mm spot on. Why does Rolex market watches at ___ size when it's really ___ size? Even the "41" OP is smaller than they say. Yet the old super case Sub is really close to 41. Yet the new reference is 40.5mm. Or the 39mm Explorer more like a true 41mm size.
@zach4216
@zach4216 Год назад
The Explorer is the King.
@leeonr
@leeonr Год назад
its hard to justify the cost of rolex these days as op36 4 years ago only cost 5.2k tax included. the new 'improved' movement and price retention is the only reason i would even consider buying the new one.
@Milofchg
@Milofchg Год назад
It's still the cheapest Rolex at $6k plus tax. The only problem is getting one at an AD with less than a few months or years wait time.
@J0hnny8ravo
@J0hnny8ravo Год назад
Any other watch than Rolex would have been bashed for that stamped clasp and the minute hand issue. Somehow, when it comes to Rolex, anything that we don’t like in other brands just adds character. Disappointing…
@timetowatch_francois
@timetowatch_francois Год назад
Totally agree! I'm floored (and baffled) by this one 🤔 However, the heart wants what the heart wants, right? 💚🤷🏼‍♂💚
@HazukiKyouko
@HazukiKyouko Год назад
When you love something so dearly you forget all mistakes and things that arnt quite right , but paying retail or grey for a basic watch seems silly I have a over engineering g shock but wont touch a luxery brand as it seem like burning a hole in ur wallet.
@HazukiKyouko
@HazukiKyouko Год назад
That said I do appreciate rolex seem like a over hyped great watch. People paying thousands just to feel like they ,ve made it just funny.
@triniboy05
@triniboy05 Год назад
When the Explorer 114270 first came out, all watches had stamped clasps.
@nikouai
@nikouai Год назад
My one doesn’t have that minute issue
@Milofchg
@Milofchg Год назад
Great review as a owner of the new 36mm I agree it's small but I love it. I prefer small low key watches. Even though I have a 7 inch wrist and I own a Speedy and use to own a Panerai. I keep coming back to the small classic size. I wear my Explorer more than I wear my ceramic Sub. It's less noticeable and it doesn't get negative attention. It doesn't give a douchebag vibe either (not that all Rolex owners are douchebags, a good number are though). Unlike the Submariner or other professional models it goes unnoticed even up close. I will say the measurements are all over the place on RU-vid and on forums. However, if you have access to the 124270 36mm, and have digital calipers. On the new Explorer, the bezel overhangs slightly over the sides of the Oyster case. Measure at the edges of the bezel (8-2 o'clock) a digital caliper will give you 36mm measurement right on the money.
@explorerjlc1743
@explorerjlc1743 Год назад
0:54 how is it more robust? its basically the same watch with the same movement lol
@howardjones725
@howardjones725 Год назад
error
@hughming
@hughming Год назад
The lume is the deal breaker. I prefer the new one more.
@MateoBakija
@MateoBakija Год назад
$$ is the real deal breaker, let's be honest here..
@turvyjj9232
@turvyjj9232 8 месяцев назад
The way to go is the 11370 (don't remember exactly the code), no metal numbers, only lumix, no brand name around the face, with an artesanal touch yet.
@richplant2205
@richplant2205 Год назад
This is the only rolex I'd be even slightly interested in.
@friskjidjidoglu7415
@friskjidjidoglu7415 3 месяца назад
What book is that?
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek 3 месяца назад
This one: amzn.to/4aCfnqr
@kuharivica4403
@kuharivica4403 Год назад
Kao stvoren za moju ljevicu.
@roderickos3980
@roderickos3980 Год назад
That's WG's bronze voice
@Xoan-Diaz
@Xoan-Diaz Год назад
Not being able to set the time properly seems a major flaw to me especially for a COSC watch that costs a kidney. Please bring back the usual channel sound track 🙂
@avtex108
@avtex108 10 месяцев назад
its not a problem with mine. what you have to do is bring the minute hand ten mins forward then slowly bring it back to the desired minute. this will ensure the gear slip is minimised
@Xoan-Diaz
@Xoan-Diaz 10 месяцев назад
@@avtex108 good for you --- i must say, it's amazing the power of a brand like rolex: flawed product (the one reviewed by the video, not yours), astronomic price and yet happy customer :-)
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek 10 месяцев назад
Well it's almost 20 years old, hasn't been serviced and keeps time within 2 seconds a day. I'd say it is a pretty good product 😂
@Xoan-Diaz
@Xoan-Diaz 10 месяцев назад
@@WatchGeek It’s fantastic that “keeps time within 2 seconds a day”, congratulations, man! Now the question is, what time does it keep? 04:53 “… it’s very hard to set the minute hand exactly where you want it, as it always moves ever so slightly when you let go off the crown, so you have to aim close to the marker you want to set and hope the hand lands on the marker when you release it…” If it was a Christopher Ward that showed that Vostok-like behaviour, you would have sent it back in a blink, but being a Rolex… you obediently adapt “aiming close” and “hoping it lands where you want it” 🤣 The power of a brand - Q.E.D.
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek 10 месяцев назад
You're stuck to your theory that you simply ignore anything I write. The minute hand not being easily settable is down to the fact it HASN'T BEEN SERVICED IN 20 YEARS! IT IS 20 YEARS OLD, and you compare it to a brand new watch. It's like I drove a 20 year old BMW that works great but has a clunking sound in the gearbox so you have to aim for second gear, and you come and comment BRAND LOYALIST!!! IF IT WAS A BRAND NEW HYUNDAI WITH A STICKING GEAR YOU WOULD RETURN IT AND SAY IT'S GARBAGE
@CHAD-RYAN
@CHAD-RYAN Год назад
The Rolex is cool and all, but im not attracted to it like i am a G-shock Square.
@J0hnny8ravo
@J0hnny8ravo Год назад
Tough solar is the way to go! 💪🏻
@CHAD-RYAN
@CHAD-RYAN Год назад
@@J0hnny8ravo thats what i got!
@williamhill7312
@williamhill7312 Год назад
Nice video, I would never buy a Rolex
@HazukiKyouko
@HazukiKyouko Год назад
Most divers just look like a Rolex I just roll with g shock reliable and gets the job done wont get you eyed by thieves and can run along with time 10+ years and let you know your wearing a watch when you need the time so you can carry on with life.
@yusufbest4475
@yusufbest4475 Год назад
Technically, gshock is over build.. the f91w is more affordable, simpler and more comfortable than the gshock..
@gazz501
@gazz501 Год назад
Why do you even bother to look at videos like this? If you are so into Gshock then stick with the Gshock crowd. Do you really think you are going to inflence people here?
@_den_
@_den_ Год назад
Haha.
@favoritethings3065
@favoritethings3065 5 месяцев назад
Great video. I agree with all your points 100%….(ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gu14heboj84.htmlsi=cLTx8OVGLxCY8FQI). Thanks for confirming the issue or “quirk” of the rebounding mi Ute hand when setting the time. Nice to know it’s not just me!
@HazukiKyouko
@HazukiKyouko Год назад
Just saying bro , if you dont like g shock dont bother reviewing them, you've clearly like swiss timepieces like rolex eg if you truly liked the watch no need to show the purchase not saying not good to show your achievements , you seem exhausted with g shock yet you seem to still review, dont force to wear what you like , why does every watch reviewer need to do a vedio on "my first rolex/luxery watch unboxing " do you need to spend thousands on a watch maybe if you like it brand history but by buying something so expensive you feel the need to justify the price.
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek Год назад
If you watch my state of the collection videos, you would see me repeating one thing, I am a WATCH lover, not a BRAND lover. In my collection there will always be room for both a basic Casio, a high end JLC Reverso, and everything between them, including Rolex. You are whay I call a brand lover, meaning you love G-Shock and exclude everything else. What I am trying to send out as a message, is that liking or buying one watch doesn't exclude you or ban you from liking another. My DW5000SL is still the most worn watch in my collection, and if I was not obsessed with watches and was a "normal" person, that would be enough, I wouldn't buy anything else after it, but I am not. I am a watch lover and that means I'll always be on the hunt for the next timepiece 😅. Also, there are 4 Casios in my permanent collection, so no, I don't like them, I LOVE THEM!!
@daddykool9507
@daddykool9507 Год назад
Because he is a fake RU-vid reviewer! Plain and Simple
@yusufbest4475
@yusufbest4475 Год назад
@@WatchGeek bro, dont have to explain yourself to others who dont share the same hobby.. they wont understand no matter how you tell it..
@emreisiklar
@emreisiklar Год назад
39 is the right size
@Milofchg
@Milofchg Год назад
I wish the Explorer 39 was a true 39mm. In reality it's almost as big as a Speedy at 42mm.
Далее
Explorer Long Term Review
18:31
Просмотров 26 тыс.
🛑 до конца!
00:12
Просмотров 35 тыс.
Как пронести Конфеты В ТЮРЬМУ
19:16
Missing the MARK!  (Rolex Explorer 36mm 124270)
9:17
Просмотров 48 тыс.
BALTANY RETRO DIVER UNBOXING
9:05
Просмотров 917
How to know if a watch is Real or Fake?
0:56
Просмотров 528 тыс.
This $25,000 Rolex Explorer Was Exposed to Seawater!
52:06
Rolex Explorer 114270 Impressions & Discussion
26:01
Просмотров 26 тыс.
Самый ДОБРЫЙ мальчик!😎
1:00
Просмотров 6 млн
Заварушка на пляже!
1:00
Просмотров 5 млн
Головоломка от дедушки🔥
0:31
Modern Wood Rifle / Woox Furiosa Ultra
0:30
Просмотров 10 млн