Тёмный

ROLEX SUBMARINER DATE 16610 REVIEW 

Marshall Time
Подписаться 16 тыс.
Просмотров 17 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

26 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 33   
@HarryStoneDotCom
@HarryStoneDotCom 3 года назад
Pre-ceramic all the way. They've never improved on perfection. Sorry that the Sea-Dweller has gone, but I can see how this is the better everyday wear. Beautiful watch!
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
Thank you 👍🏻
@patmustardlive
@patmustardlive 3 года назад
I have this 16610 date sub. 2006
@CabanaD
@CabanaD 3 года назад
Bought mine new in 1994. They were a hot item at the time and dramatically more popular than the no-date variant. I would get calls from the dealer yearly asking if I felt like selling it back to them. Best purchase I’ve ever made. Worn daily. When I bought the watch they said never to sleep with these on because it will cause undue stress on the band.
@kma86
@kma86 2 года назад
Of all the comments and reviews I've read & watched about this particular model number and Rolex Sub in general, this is the first time I come across with someone saying that the AD calls from time to time to ask whether the owner wants to sell it back. Goes to show how hot and scarce the 16610 is/was!
@4no1timewaits
@4no1timewaits 3 года назад
The Invicta Pro Diver was designed based on this exact watch. While watching this video I am comparing the two while holding the Invicta. There is an "X-factor" in which there is no comparison. The Rolex is perfectly beautiful.
@bobone6554
@bobone6554 3 года назад
Pre-ceramic subs look so much better, great watch my friend
@nicholasurfe9568
@nicholasurfe9568 17 дней назад
mine was $3650 new in 99. worn daily, serviced only once 15 years after new
@mohnnadmercedes8246
@mohnnadmercedes8246 3 года назад
I was thinking about it but the prices just exploded everywhere cheapest one is little bit under 10k
@michaelriera6277
@michaelriera6277 3 года назад
Looks so much nicer than current gen
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
I agree! Thanks
@derekflannagan9102
@derekflannagan9102 2 года назад
Gorgeous watch I have one in my small collection I bought it 24 years ago
@gaygambler
@gaygambler 3 года назад
Absolutely right. The fat boy case just looks wrong with the strap.
@ahmedelgamassy4567
@ahmedelgamassy4567 3 года назад
That watch is really beautiful. The only thing that I don’t like about it is the clasp design. Thanks for the video
@andychun4320
@andychun4320 3 года назад
Do you think the Luminova will ever patina?
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
I don’t believe it will
@lead-dog
@lead-dog Год назад
realize this is from a couple of years ago. but why not measure the diameter precisely. i have seen other you tube videos that say this is a 40.2 mm and that the new subs are only 40.5 mm although rolex calls it a 41mm watch. would appreciate your comment. thanks.
@Baztation
@Baztation 3 года назад
I love to have one!
@Tonysoprano497
@Tonysoprano497 3 года назад
I’m over Rolex and have sold two of my modern pieces and will sell my other two in time . Don’t like the modern image of Rolex I think most people are driven by the name on the dial and brand recognition than the actual watch . However I really wish that I had invested in perhaps a pre ceramic sub and gmt around 20 years ago , there’s a purity that modern pieces just don’t have ..i
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
I can understand that . I just think they do it better than most brands
@FrankCampbell-rq6di
@FrankCampbell-rq6di 3 месяца назад
Love lug holes on my submariner.
@Baztation
@Baztation 3 года назад
What year is this sir?
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
03 believe
@Baztation
@Baztation 3 года назад
@@ChrisMarshall1978007 thank you
@TheKingModz
@TheKingModz Год назад
@@ChrisMarshall1978007 perhaps even before the little holes on the side were gone by 2003. It may be 200,2001, 2002 as well. I have the same one
@zillsburyy1
@zillsburyy1 3 года назад
i came here for mr. marshalls voice
@Billeh556
@Billeh556 3 года назад
This is the best sub ever. For me, I’d prefer 14060m but I’d get 16610 because: 1) SEL if it’s a newer version 2) you can purchase the bracelet for the Ginault ocean rover and it’s completely compatible with the 16610 with SEL and a copy of the 6 digit sub glide lock clasp, while keeping the OEM bracelet in good condition and unworn
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
Where do you get the ginault bracelet?
@Billeh556
@Billeh556 3 года назад
Marshall Time I think you’d have to contact them on their website or via social media. I’m not sure if they sell them separately but I don’t see why they wouldn’t. At worse you would have to buy one of the watches I guess...but contact them and see! Good luck and keep us updated if you’re able to purchase one! Would love to see a video about it
@ChrisMarshall1978007
@ChrisMarshall1978007 3 года назад
@@Billeh556 thanks
@cwuzii
@cwuzii 3 года назад
I like the look of these I just do not like the pressed clasps, very cheap for such a watch!
@surg1000
@surg1000 2 года назад
Too small for your wrist
@derekflannagan9102
@derekflannagan9102 2 года назад
Gorgeous watch I have one in my small collection bought it 24 years ago
Далее
СМАЗАЛ ДВЕРЬ
00:31
Просмотров 160 тыс.
Wife habit 😂 #shorts
00:16
Просмотров 54 млн
The only Rolex Tierlist you need.
13:32
Просмотров 227 тыс.
I bought a Rolex Submariner off eBay!
14:35
Просмотров 769 тыс.
Is The Rolex Submariner the Greatest Watch of All Time?
10:30