Paedophile entertainer Rolf Harris loses stone behind bars because he 'can't stand prison food The 84-year-old entertainer, who Harris, who is serving five years and nine months
I am so sick of people defending Rolf Harris, Jimmy Saville, Gary Glitter, Weinstein etc. It is disgusting. What would you do if it happened to your daughter?
Absolutely. And Rolf Harris plays so innocent, He has a lot of aliases writing for him here. I am pretty much sure it is himself. Have a look on this site.
What’s most disturbing is how he practically condones his disgusting behaviour with words like “how was I to know” and “why didn’t you tell me” these are not the words of a man burdened by guilt, I wonder if he was under 30 whether his sentence would have been longer.......and most disturbing of all, Jill Dando was assassinated when she was about to uncover him and all his high ranking cohorts
All of you want to read this book, Rolf Harris: The Defence Team’s Special Investigator reveals the Truth behind the Trials... And then apologise. Rolf Harris is not guilty and never was, Saville opened a can of worms that all the compensation hunters went after, read it and learn.
Trevor Random He was stripped of all his Australian Honors by the Governor General of Australia. The Queen also stripped him of all his awards. I remember watching the program when he painted the Queen for her 80th Birthday. Never in my wildest dreams would I have thought he was this horrible man, capable of these horrific crimes. They are just everywhere it seems.
Debbie Judd Prince Andrew is innocent until proven guilty. Virginia Roberts has been known to lie on several occasions. Both She and Courtney Wild brought young girls to Jeffrey Epstein, they have both admitted this. In fact Courtney said at least 75, probably over 100. They would get 200.00USD for every girl they brought. They knew what they were doing, they know what would happen to these girls and yet the 200.00 was too much for them to give up. They too need to be prosecuted for their horrific part in this. I am sick of them all.
A Sick, Mentally ill individual. No remorse ? Says it all really. I hope someone dishes out what he deserves one day and that they get away with it. A Disgusting Horrible Man.
You call him mentally ill, yet say he should get what he deserves someday? In other words, you believe he should be castrated or even viciously beaten? Would you do that do people with dementia or schizophrenia or other mental illnesses?
Jimmy Savile and Gary Glitter were totally different to Rolf Harris. For a start there was actual evidence against them. Rolf Harris (if you actually bother to look into the details of the trial and the unprofessional way the police "investigated" his case) was convicted mainly after trial by media before his case came to court and his whole trial was clouded by the first case dealt with by the court, that he was accused of having molested an 8 year old. The other charges against him at his first trial were tainted by the accusations made by the woman who claimed to be 8 years old at the time. However, when the details of her accusations were investigated thoroughly by investigators acting for Rolf Harris at his subsequent trials, it was shown that the whole thing had been made up and consequently he was found not guilty of that charge. However, as he had already been convicted, it was too late to prevent the jury from perceiving him as being a paedophile. The other accusations for which he was convicted were also provably false or at the very least based on accounts that when looked at or scrutinised, could not have happened the way it was claimed. He was found not guilty of all other charges brought at his second and third trial after "victims" had brought stories to operation yew tree after responding to requests for "victims" to come forward having been told "you will be believed" with newspapers of a certain type boasting of potential compensation for victims being in the tens of thousands if not more. None of the cases on their own would have been enough to convict anyone. However, the fact that Operation Yewtree presented their "evidence" as if there had been a pattern was enough for the jury to decide, against real evidence, that he was guilty. There is a book out now by this investigation team (Rolf Harris. The Defence Team's Special investigator Reveals The Truth Behind The Trials by William Merritt) which quite clearly illustrates the shocking stitch up Rolf Harris was subject to. Anyone who genuinely thinks Rolf Harris was treated fairly should read this account and it will shock you to the core that someone could be convicted on the flimsiest of evidence. I think there is a suggestion that Rolf Harris may have been a bit tactile at times with people (not those who made accusations as most of them provably did not come in to contact with him or others whose account would have been witnessed by people if they had been true) as was the behaviour of people in the 70s and 80s, which doesn't condone that sort of thing but it was almost certainly not as sexually aggressive as was portrayed in court and certainly not paedophilia. As the book points out, the Metropolitan Police investigating these crimes were, at the time, involved with their own questionable practice of stamping new female recruits as an initiation ceremony where young police woman had their bare bottoms stamped with the station stamp while everyone else looked on! I know there will be people who take issue with what I have said, but I suggest you do a bit of research first and not just rely on what you are told by the tabloid media. As I said, Jimmy Savile and Gary Glitter were totally different cases, but unfortunately Rolf Harris was tarred with the same brush, as was nearly Cliff Richard, Paul Gambaccini, Jim Davidson, Freddie Starr etc. all of whose cases were dismissed or fund not guilty through a lack of evidence and believability of the complainants.
Kissing his ring, saville was the master supplier of unfortunate individuals! Evil evil people that do a little good sometimes for charities as a cover!
Seville? Something tells me this is run right through the crown itself - they aren't naive, just look how many of their close friends, both celebrities and private individuals have been exposed. J Epstein was very close to Bill Clinton and "prince" Andrew and hundreds of other very powerful and connected people. Don't think for a minute this isn't a little secret they all share and indulge in - look what little time these people serve when in the few circumstances they actually get caught and go to trial.
Bless you for speaking some sense. The hysteria and hatred surrounding "paedophiles" just shows what an evil, hateful society we live in, where bigoted people thrive on hating and tearing down other human beings. I 100% disassociate with the UK, it is a sick, hateful nation which calls good bad, and bad good.
Hopefully no one publishes his so called book, how can this monster say the victims only wanted money, wtf one was only 7yrs old disgusting bastard, his wife & family are just as bad sticking by him send the creep back to australia when he's released from his far too lenient sentence he should've got life for the lives he ruined.
How can his family stick beside him is baffling to me fame and money bought him immunity five years and he's boasting how easy it it inside something seriously wrong and corrupt about the court system
To protect our children hold this photo in front of them and Monsters do not always look like like Monsters , sometimes they look like Father Christmas,, your Granddad, or a beloved relative !
Ella Taylor there was a photo I came across on FB about a year ago of an old priest or vicar(not sure exactly which he was)and a really tough looking guy covered in tattoos with his chest showing all punked up.i asked my 7year old who out of the two pics she would trust.she straight away said the priest.i asked her why,and she said the other man looked really scary.it turned out that the priest had been convicted on multiple charges of child rape and the punk looking hard man had intervened and saved 2 woman from being killed by a bloke with a knife.the point I'm making is that the point you make is very true.cant judge a book by its cover
yeah scare the crap out of your kids untill they think everyone is out to get them then you can keep them locked up safe in your house like bad boy bubby
I hear you Not easy to trust Probably better to get your own thing going to gather evidence especially if other children are in harm's way then they have to do something or someone else will If it's a big name or links to then it won't be easy but more reason to do Hopefully this person is no longer with us which is always the best scenario
@@Debate-or-Hate-Gate , thanks, for your reply, pal, ! Here in northern Ireland UK, am scared too say, back when I was abused, 1 time it was from a paramilitary, in 1975, 1976, ! But he was not a paramilitary at that time , ,UDA,,! But there was other times I was abused as well,,! Sorry,,😢😢
Many famous weirdos visited Northern Ireland to abuse boys . God I am so sorry for you. But , at least you have that beautiful wee girl . To love . I know you will take care of her.
My grandfather was awarded a CBE and he was one sick paedo. Pretty sure he murdered at least one of them too. They work hard to be recognised as powerful, trusted members of society.
@@hArtyTruffle it's terrifying I know. We had two priests at our local church turn out to be prolific se* offenders. One serving back to back sentences. Other died in prison. Horrible evil dirty b*starts! They proper pulled the wool over our eyes got so close to us as a family. Vile, no excuse cab be made.
One did; the conviction was quashed and should never have come to court. The woman's own stepfather gave evidence at the appeal. Thank God that Alison Saunders is no longer DPP. Two other of Rolf's convictions are decidedly iffy.
Rolf asked a young girl to put her hand in his trouser pocket she fumbled around a little then Rolf asked Do you know what it is Yet ...😂 dirty fucker .
I grew up with Rolf on TV all the time. In a way he was a much admired TV 'surrogate uncle' to thousands. My reaction was disbelief.. ' Oh no not Rolf!!' There seemed to be nothing creepy about him, unlike the others (Saville, Glitter etc) I don't know the details of what he did or if he's admitted his guilt. The whole thing is tragic.
I was not only horrified but hugely disappointed by him. I always thought that he was a lovely man, I loved watching him paint on t v and felt he was a true animal lover with his "Animal Hospital " programmes. I felt we had all had been so deceived. I had a genuine fondness for him but what he has done to those girls is unforgivable.
I love Rolf and that has not changed. This "paedophilia" thing is nothing but hysteria - just like "homophobia" and other PC nonsense. It's just some made-up buzzword used to demonize people - especially men, by a bunch of vicious liberal lesbians. Rolf hasn't assaulted anyone. He seems like a lovely man who probably overstepped the mark, but being attracted to teenage girls isn't immoral - it's the bedrock of all human society across all history (normal marriage age has always been 12 in most culture). The only thing "sick" is locking up a man of his age. People are hateful hypocrites, and "paedophilia" is an excuse for mob mentality.
Really? Sent to prison on dodgy evidence given by psychotic and stupid women of something that they claim, and mind you claim, happned 35/45 years ago? What price justice when a fucking female ca make allegations like that stick.
I have come across enough victims through my voluntary work to totally understand the lynch -mob mentality. He should have 15 years. The victim's have lives and the lives of others are ruined. Too many are getting away with this evil . I hope the private prosecution ruins him and some of the money go to victim charities.
That's cod Psychology 101, suggesting that people project their unacknowledged desires onto convenient scapegoats; Freud was a mountebank; while his theories are an occasionally useful shorthand for thinking about cognitive processes, repression etc has no existence whatsoever in neurology; I believe understandable outrage by ordinary folk is simply this; generalising from your own experience doesn't help you to understand the motivation of someone with a warped personality - this is the province of the professional - whether it be social worker, clinical psychologist or psychiatrist. So people are outraged because they don't understand how someone can be sexually excited by a minor and commit such a breach of trust.....it is lack of understanding or insight on their part not half-understood repressed desires. You need to delve more deeply into things.....
Graham Grimmett Man you're full of it. My op was a question not a statement of fact, but it seems to have triggered you into doing a piece to deflect. You got something lurking deep down?
What the hell does he mean by..."WE"... in his self-serving, patronising letter. Got of lightly, then gives everyone the finger. Well, even if he kids himself...he ain't kidding.."WE"
Sorry but I'm not comfortable with this one. Not because he was a particular favourite i mean I liked him but I liked others more and others less than him. I just think when uk law states *beyond all reasonable doubt* I think the jury deliberating for six days is enough to create doubt in itself
Law is so f*** stupid. They say the sentence but you are actually getting out automatically in half that time. Is the establishment putting one over on the public. Just say how long someone is going to be locked up! Nothing off for good behaviour, if any of these people were into good behaviour they wouldn't be in the position of going to prison.
Rolf Harris is also a murderer too ! ........He murdered stairway to heaven !.... and I was hoping the judge would have taken that into account during his character assessment :)
2.5 years of an old mans life that may not have 2.5 years left to live. conviction on testimony alone, and from women who have actively profitted from the accusations.
There were originally 4 alleged victims, a conviction for Victim 1 one was quashed. Victim 3 (friend of the family), had an affair with Harris when she was 19 to 29 years old (1984-94). They broke up in 1994, and around the same time that Harris claimed she blackmailed him for £25,000, he said she wanted money for her boyfriend's failing bird sanctuary (Harris had started appearing on Animal hospital that year). She denied it was blackmail but admitted asking him for £30,000. About 1 month after asking for money and after they had broke up, she told Binti (Harris' daughter) about their affair. In the early 2000s she began to allege that Harris had started sexually abused her from the age of 15 to 19. Tonya Lee (victim 4) got paid £33,000 for her story of Harris sexually assaulting her when she was 15 in 1984, when her dance troupe visited the UK from Australia. The deal was arranged by her boyfriend and publicity agent. However, at the 2nd trial, an answer machine recording was played of her now ex-boyfriend accusing her of making the whole story up for money. She claimed Harris assaulted her in font of witnesses, when she was sat on his lap in a pub, and again outside the pub toilets. Her chaperone said she did not notice anything and remained friends with Harris after the visit, she however stated that she believed Tonya (but this was before her boyfriend accusing her of making the claims up for money). His conviction involving Witness 1, the visit to the town hall in Devon, was quashed. There was no evidence he visited the town at all. She was a member of a sexual assault support group and only made her allegations after Harris was named in the media. At the 2nd trial, police officers who worked at a police station across the road from the town hall testified that they had their lunch break in the town hall every day, and none of them remembered Harris visiting the town. Harris was convicted at the previous trial despite no evidence that he visited the town, the prosecution had sent letters to every household asking for witnesses, trawled council record and local newspapers to see if Harris visited the town, they found nothing. The conviction for touching the bottom of Victim 2 in 1978 was not quashed in the 2nd trial. However, the jury did not believe this time that he assaulted her in a taxi a 2nd time the same day in 1978. After the first trial she said she was glad to have helped the other victims, and also said that Harris had touched her breast (which contradicted her testimony at the 1st trial).
Absolutely disgusting that that base of his conviction was that he forget a place he was at decades ago. All the Women that went public have earned big money from this. It's a witch hunt.
Him or someone else,it's a job for anyone after all.What you mean is it's a shame capital punishment was abolished.Have you seen the film on Pierrepont,it stars Timothy someone,sorry forgot his surname.Hum out of Aufweidersein pet
wow, just found out about this. i used to love his songs and still did up until now. well, you can't do anything about it. i guess rolf harris liked his extra leg a bit too much.
SADLY EACH VICTIM IS SERIOSLY HARMED, YET THEY ARE TREATED WITH LITTLE CONSIDERATION BY THE COURTS!!! PERHAPS THEIR OWN FAMILIES ARE NOT THAT IMPORTANT!!!
He should remain in prison for ever, because we all know he will do it again, either that or they should find an island and put all the paedophiles on it together and left to rot .
I tell you what I notice - nothing more I enjoy than looking at the sordid side of life... but the longest programme on this man is 11.08 minutes... so is he not protected...? he was caught and someone had to be slaughtered and it was Rolfy boy!!!! But please if ever you do care about children and those who molest and murder in the most sadistic of ways... please show unity and ask for those who sexually abuse and murder children to be put to sleep when all doubt can pe proven ? Maybe he can come to terms with him being used as a scapegoat he is only ever their excuse for their bad paedophillic behaviour... The Judge was probably fucking children and he told Roly Boy that his time in prison would be cushty... Deviants of the Crown!!!
Is this a case related to the Jimmy Saville thing? After watching BBC's Sherlock on Netflix and learning of Saville recently...I am starting to learn why ppl believed the "Clinton-Pizza Store-Paedo Ring" story...disgusting!
OoooDear the 70's has a lot to answer4... and the 60's and the 50's & so on and on. 2019 you pi ched my bum 30 years ago. Your going down. Especially if you have Celebrity status at that time.
if he is out of jail then why number 1 has he not had all his medals and all the sir/mbe's why have they not been ripped of him and why is he not at Garrick airport to go fly were ever and have his English permit took of him so he can no longer stay here,
I loved him....and felt awfully betrayed by the bastard. When a family friend or somebody in power abuses younger people then they feel unable to say no, unable to admit that they have been made to feel guilty and dirty because they allowed it to happen. Dirty bastard.
