Rom 1:3-4 with Matthew Bates - Nazareth to Nicaea (Episode 18)

Early Christian History with Michael Bird

Подписаться 12 тыс.

Просмотров 1,4 тыс.

50% 1

The Nazareth to Nicaea vodcast discusses the historical Jesus, the Christ of Faith, and everything in between.
This episode is part of a series covering Paul's use of traditional materials, in this instance, Rom 1:3-4, which is discussed with Dr. Matthew Bates who is a celebrated New Testament scholar.
This episode covers
• The pre-Pauline nature of Rom 1.3-4.
• Does Rom 1.3-4 have an adoptionist Christology?
• What does Rom 1.3-4 say about Jesus Christ?
• What does Rom 1.3-4 tell us about the early church?
• How does Rom 1.3-4 fit into Pauline Christology?
• What is the faithful allegiance to Jesus?
Please like, subscribe, and share!
Otherwise keep up with me on:
@mbird12
michaelfbird.substack.com
Recommend reading:
Matthew W. Bates, "A Christology of Incarnation and Enthronement: Romans 1:3-4 as a Unified, Nonadoptionist, and Nonconciliatory," Catholic Biblical Quarterly 77 (2015): 107-27.
Matthew Bates, Gospel Allegiance: What Faith in Jesus Misses for Salvation in Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2019).
Check out Matthew Bates' home page: matthewwbates.c...
All images are from either Wikimedia common or Unsplash
#Jesus #Christology #Christianity

Опубликовано:

16 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 7

@elliotwalton6159 Год назад

Liking, subscribing and buying your books 😁😁

@earlychristianhistorywithm8684 Год назад

Glad you liked it!

@calebjore3295 2 года назад

For more reasons to take ἐν δυνάμει with υἱοῦ θεοῦ rather than ὁρισθέντος, I would recommend the following paper: P.-E. Langevin, "Une Confession prepaulinienne de la 'Seigneurie' du Christ. Exegese de Romains 1,3-4," in Le Christ hier, aujourd'hui, et demain (ed. R. Laflamme and M. Gervais; Quebec: Universite Laval, 1976), 277-327 (esp. 301-303)

@earlychristianhistorywithm8684 2 года назад

Might need to brush up on my French.

@calebjore3295 2 года назад

Haha! I copied word by word the parts I needed into Google Translate. Painstaking, but insightful.

@leonardobarbieri1292 2 года назад

Wouldn't the hymn of Rom 1:3-4 put the resurrection as the act of enthronement of the long awaited son of David, through which the royal descendant - during the monarchical period - would become "the son of God"? I mean, the use of Psalm 2 in Acts 13:32-33 seems to indicate that. 1. The enthronement was considered to be the proclamation of the Davidic king as the son of God. 2. The resurrection was considered be the enthronement of Christ. I think that's what Paul is saying.

@earlychristianhistorywithm8684 2 года назад

Perhaps, my point is that sonship doesn't begin with the enthronement because as the earthly Son of David he is already a Son of God.