i love how confused gavin gets at his own way of words lol like when they were talking about the planets half way thru his statement he just slows down and starts scratching his head like "what the fuck am i talking about" lol
Burnie: the almost equivalent of my 10th grade Biology teacher "Don't have to fastest just don't be the slowest...yeah you go and punch that shark, i'll find help"
When Burnie compliments 'I'm On a Boat' I realize that he was giving praise to Lonely Island that would come on later. It's kinda interesting to see that...
Burnie, you can not possibly defend yourself from a wild animal. They are faster and stronger than you by a lot, and all of your intelligence means nothing in the face of a large cat ripping your limbs off.
I'm starting to get legitimately worried that I'll read Burnie's obituary one day, and a phrase like "attempted to deter the bear with his fists" is going to show up.
I don't know why people think animals on land can't go in the water. Now some animals yes are not adapted to go in the water but big cats yes they can go in the water to take down prey no problem.
Why is Burnie so adamantly against things when he doesn't understand them well at all? There's a huge difference in how we search for stuff in our solar system and how we look at exo-planets but he assumes that because its difficult to rule out that there could be a 9th planet therefore that means there is no way to know the make-up of a planet light-years away. He has no regard for logic at all
+Matt McLaughlin No, but I do give a decent read of the press releases that NASA et. all put out. From my lawman's understanding, how we search for planets in the solar system is very, very difficult because we basically have to point a telescope at every point in the night sky and see what changes over time. That's how we (even though its not a planet anymore) found Pluto and many of the other outer-solar system objects. This is very time consuming because we are having to basically play spot the difference if the pictures were made up of billions of dots. But with exo-planets, NASA only takes the time to look at stars, which are pretty easy to make out against space. When they look at a star, if there is a planet orbiting it the light the star gives off will be warped, like a much, much smaller version of what you see a black hole does to light behind it. That's how they can tell there is a planet around that star. Depending on how the light is warped they can tell how big the planet is, how dense it is, and what makes it up. And its not like they get a reading and publish it, they usually check the star over years to make triple sure that it is a planet causing the warping effect
