Hi Bro hope you will reply 🙏 Bro highness vs hunter comparison video il paranjille highlignes gear shift tall gearing aanenn. So city use il most of the time 3rd & 4th gear use cheythal mileage ne affect cheyyuo? Top gear epolum maintain cheyan patilalo.
I just test rode both rs and hunter. Oru doubtumila. The engine refinment. The power. Ellamkondum rs is better. I dont even know how hunter is compared. Yea hunter is a good bike. Compred to previous classics its really good. Pakshe its too compact. Youll miss the riding feel too. Id suggest honda. Undoubtedly. Pakshe ellarum just try both bikes. Its just 35k Save some more money
Milage+ Riding Quality+ Engine Refinement+ Smooth Gear shifting+ Vibration Free even over 110 kmph + Premium quality parts+ Angane കുറേ കാര്യങ്ങൾ = One and Only ❤❤❤HONDA HINESS 350❤❤❤
4 varshamayi RE use cheyithath kond oru kaariyam njn urapichu eeni royal enfield ileekk oru thirich pokkillaa ...maduthu athrakkum worst experience 😪 ...
I think for Kerala’s road and traffic condition requires a low end torque bike, which is Hunter. To ride through hilly roads, filter through traffic, and generally to go slow as there are twists and turns, I prefer low end torque bikes. On other hand, CB350 demands to push harder which is not the case on Kerala roads. 🙏🏻
I have a cb350rs and I’m 5’7 tall guy which means I can only half foot , still enk Munnar il polum traffic block varumbolum ilaathapolum preshnangal undayitila .
@@rc729-n2x May be you are correct. Have you used Hunter on the same situation though? I’m not a fanboy of hunter and I have no plan to buy it in near future. Just saying that low and mid torque bikes will be more suitable for Kerala than a high speed bikes.
Definitely highness..so much refinement...smooth clutch ,superior suspension,riding comfort,most refined engine and no vibration at all..goes easy on on the hands and back.. Limited service options frequent brake pads changing,low visibility led lights, low profile tyres are one of the minor negative
Thank you.. ഒരുപാട് video കണ്ടൂ എങ്കിലും doubt ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നു. ഏതു എടുക്കണം എന്ന്..ഇത്ര കറക്റ്റ് ആയി പറഞ്ഞതിന് thanks.. I'm ഫൈനൽ hunter, gear ഇടയ്ക്ക് മാറ്റുന്നത് City ride risk ആണ്. Bangalore Full trafic. പിന്നെ കയറ്റം ട്രിപ്പ് ഇടയ്ക്കുണ്ടാകും. അതും ഈ വീഡിയോ കണ്ടപ്പോ തീരുമാനിക്കാൻ പറ്റി. hunter350 എനിക്ക് ഇവിടെ പറ്റുന്നത്.Very thanks.
ഒരു സംശയവും വേണ്ട Highness... Enfield Customersne pizhuthedukkum, it's not money worth, maintanencinte കാര്യത്തിലും Partsnte കാര്യത്തിലും അന്യമായ വിലയാണിവരിടുന്നത്, very bad for സാധാരണക്കാരന്
Tried RE Hunter, satisfied with engine and performance. But severely disappointed with handling, at corners and curves the weight of the whole bike ends up in your arms. Severe hand pain after frequent driving in curvy roads.
Bro ,thank q . Iam deciding on Hunter 350 . First ,because of dual character or flexibility of engine .It gives a feeling of take me anywhere , I come with you. Second for the compactness of the body and precise handling. Third serviceability. Added Features never entice a real rider , so I don't consider it more . Thank you so much bro for your frank & sharp evaluation .
Definitely serviceability is a big factor for RE bikes. Because almost after one year usage RE bikes will be mostly in service centre's for frequent engine issues, which you will never face in case of cb350.
Wonderful comp review. Hunter is really going to catch up and give nightmares for Honda. More than 20 cm lower seat height is one thing that you missed to mention. A real good thing for normal hight person..
actually on paper both have same seat height of 800mm . even on RE official brouchure it says so. but hunter definitely feels low beacuse of its compactness.
Sumn about the Hunter. well evident as a speed lover hpw much more refined honda bikes are, but being broke yet wanting a good bike Hunter is built for a short guy like me. Also KL Rider, the instrument cluster can be upgrade with a tripper navigation, not that big of an upgrade but maps + cleaner
As correctly said in Kerala roads its always important to keep shifting gears and being able to ride the bike slower in higher gear in an absolute must. Hunter 350 makes sense.
Super comparison bro 👍🏻 Can you suggest if there is any other options for someone looking for good riding comfort and good low and mid end perfomance..top end vishayam alla , classic/retro models allathe under 2.5L onroad
irony is that mainly classic/ retros can provide both. budget undel adv consider cheyam. yezdi or re or ronin which is more of a neo,less retro motorcycle
I think Ronin. Njn vandi oodichitilla but mikka videosum kandu hunter and Ronin comparison okke. Kooduthal positive ayi parayunnathu Ronin anu. Ake hunter positive ayi eniku thooniyathu top end undu. But top end arum eppozhum use cheyyilla. So Ronin thanne anu mikachathu ennu thoonunu. And yes slipper clutch nalla oru feedback anu tharunnathu
മൈലേജ് വച്ചു നോക്കിയാൽ എതാണ് നല്ലത്... ഉപയോഗിക്കുന്നവർ ഒന്നു കറക്റ്റ് ആയി പറഞ്ഞു തരാമോ... ഞാൻ കുറച്ചു നാളായി കൺഫ്യൂഷൻ ആണ്... ഒരെണ്ണം എടുക്കാൻ ആണ്.. ഡെയിലി യൂസ് ആണ്.. പ്ലീസ് ഹെല്പ്
@@KLRider thanks bro for your detailed review on classic 350 and cb 350 ithu randintem base lanu njn oru final decision edutha Honda enikku test ride cheythapo ishtayilla uphill okke higher gearsil nalla budhimuttitundu especially when there is a pillion
