RTX 4090 VS BeamNG Drive 

First

No 2

@@-_-Framed 1 min ago vs 10 sec ago stop lying and also i dont want to argue but this man is enjoyable to watch thats why i label myself as first so please Stop lying on the damn internet

*bizness yies*

si

Pure and utter satisfaction

nah your computer screen can't handle that

@@MuYe Truly

@@MuYe best content upload in a while

@@MuYe please have fast ah cpu

The first self-cooking gpu

@@greecevstheworld hello Playstation 4

And cook every thing (even the cable)

@@EpicgamerRehanPOG2000 hello epic gamer rehan

I see that as a feature

fr maybe becouse the botle neck is CRAZY

Congratulations 🎊 ur first!!!

Yes

@@MuYeneed that video in 4k, I will never sleep well again if I don’t see this masterpiece

I scrolled about 1800 comments and yeah you're first

Italy is the worst for mod range pcs.

Foliage always has a massive impact in every game. It takes a ton of computational power to render out thousands of foliage decals across the map.

Yeah I was thinking this, the number of CPU calls required for rendering all the details makes it more CPU limited. However, in that case it seems strange that maps like jungle rock island were double the fps

@@Incommensurabilities jungle rock is well optimized because it was recently remastered.

The first thing I do is lower grass density :D

With the new updates it's also GPU heavy but yeah, a better CPU, especially the threadripper which is very unlikely to happen

@@pleaseenteraname4252 threadripper wont improve much with beam ng performance since single core performance is more important than number of cores because beam ng doesnt nearly utilize all the cores of a threadripper. And the single core performance of a threadripper is average compared to a 7950x or 7950x3d

Nah bro my accountant gonna kill me hahahaha I think it would perform 15/20% better than the 7950X, but not when it comes to traffic, since it heavily depends on the number of cores, but who knows

@@MuYe $12000 96 core epyc cpu time, just to be able to run realistic city traffic at 20fps

@@MuYe you can always write off your expenses 😉

Sorry, but I need to use it as a fork

@@MuYe "Am i too poor to understand this joke?"

@@MuYe LMAO

@@MuYe I'll use my gts 450 as a spoon

@@MuYe i use the 4090 as a room heater

Fellow smart person I see

SEE THIS! Also very RAM dependent too! If you have a i5-4690k ( my CPU ) and then a RX 570 4GB VRAM ( again, my GPU ), you can't run more than 4 cars in normal graphics settings. I can't even play that well because my PC has 8GB RAM, which is not even the minimum required. I want a new PC so bad.

Anyone know what music is at 5:44?

@@jet100a Mariokart

that happens when any of the parts on your computer are in some kind of way "incompatible", mostly being the motherboard or the processo- ... yeah okay the processor is the problem

hi

To compensate for my small co- cocoa tree... it's been 3 years of scheduled watering and maintaining the perfect humidity, but it still won't grow

Crispy and Spicy

My storage drive after I switch to 4K: 👁️👄👁️

yes

his cpu is about 6-12% slower than the 13900k

@@fpswhore9973 the speed of the cpu is irrelevant to how the game runs. Each car you spawn corresponds to a core. The new i9 processors have a ridiculous amount of cores i think like 12 or something

@@sta255_ his is a ryzen9 as well. By your logic you should buy xenon server cpus to run most number of ai cars but it wont work like that

@@sta255_ r9 7950x is a 16c/32t cpu and the i3900k is 24c/32t cpu

Makes sense. That's why I'm wanting a ryzen 7 without GPU to run it with as much vehicles as I can at 30fps.

ʜɪᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ɪ ɢᴏᴛ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ sᴜʀᴘʀɪsᴇ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜ🎄🎄🎁🎁💐💐☝️☝️☝️☝️

oh no....

Now I can zoom in even further

@@MuYe No, now you can “‘Zoom’ By Tim Allen” in even further.

If you pair it with a 4K high refresh monitor, it is peak gaming experience

same

I think my GTX 1060 6GB got about 250 FPS on the lowest I believe

ʜɪᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ɪ ɢᴏᴛ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ sᴜʀᴘʀɪsᴇ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜ🎄🎄🎁🎁💐💐☝️☝️☝️☝️...

ʜɪᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ɪ ɢᴏᴛ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ sᴜʀᴘʀɪsᴇ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜ🎄🎄🎁🎁💐💐☝️☝️☝️☝️..

Oh I didn’t see you talked about the traffic in the video, oops

And the ets2 music is also very good

Dm let's talk 👆👆 I got something special for you And thanks for watching ......

It's an ets2 (euro truck simulator 2) soundtrack

nah fam

And pay for it $3500, not worth it

@@windowstips1430 it’s just the facts

Nope. It's not WAY more. It's a -1 -> 5 %, depending on the workload. And AMD does do better at Recording+Gaming at the same time, because of the full cores instead of the 8B+16L architecture that intel uses. So no, he wouldn't have gained more FPS from a 13900k. And honestly, this way he will have a better upgrade path, because Intel, in their infinite wisdom, can't keep mobo compatibility for more then 2-3 generations, while AMD... On a x370 board you can run 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000G and 5000 series CPU's, so if you bought a first gen Ryzen, you could upgrade now to a 5000 series CPU, or even to the crazy 5800x3D that is still one of the fastest CPUs for games. And him, with the 7000 series board, can upgrade next month to a 7900x3D, which will improve gaming performance by about 20-25%, if AMD is to be believed. For the reference, I aint a shill. If Intel had the clear performance advantage, like in the 9900k era, then I wouldn't have said that you were wrong. But they don't. Their advantage is small, and will be beaten. Which is only for the better for consumers, as that means they will lower prices, so more people will be able to afford the new gen CPUs... Only wish it was the same in the GPU market.

@@PK_King1406 bro it’s 1500 for a good intel setup and the i9 is just better

👶

👶

👶

STOP

@@CoolTurtle2.0 I guess ur not very cool now

ʜɪᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ɪ ɢᴏᴛ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ sᴜʀᴘʀɪsᴇ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜ🎄🎄🎁🎁💐💐☝️☝️☝️☝️..

ʜɪᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ɪ ɢᴏᴛ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ sᴜʀᴘʀɪsᴇ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜ🎄🎄🎁🎁💐💐☝️☝️☝️☝️..

ʜɪᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ɪ ɢᴏᴛ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ sᴜʀᴘʀɪsᴇ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜ🎄🎄🎁🎁💐💐☝️☝️☝️☝️..