Russell Brand & Neil deGrasse Tyson Breakdown The Physical Realm VS The Spiritual Realm 

I think i love intelligent dialogue..

You want him to submit/admit but he wont/cant.

perhaps Thich Naht Hanh would be a better conversation..

Fantastic back and forth man. Im going to ask you make a get em to the greek 2 or another movie in that world. That movie. Those songs have helped me more then i could ever write in a youtube comment section. Your amazing and fantastic. Cheers Mike

I think Russel Brand is a remarkable human

I think we are safe from Donny listening to this conversation.

I was just about to say. nice to hear people with different viewpoints actually having a civilised conversation from a position of mutual respect

Sleeping sheeples 💤💤

Look up street epistemology f you enjoyed that - I think Anthony Magnabosco is the current best at it, but there are many others already :)

That's because there is no urgency or real motive for either of them to change their beliefs and or trying to change/convince the other person.

Anywhere from ancient Greece - now He's a philosopher

i wonder about his ancestors

@Riina he's direct descendant of Plato

He is clearly from every era, time traveler

He's got long hair and a beard. That's all.

how i wish my essays sounded

Kai greene...

I still haven't figured out if that's just his schtick, or if he does that to sound more intelligent /slash, get people to understand that he actually is more intelligent than the Russel Brand of 1999-2000 they might have first heard of him. There's no denying he's a SMART guy. But he often seems to be biting off more than he can chew, ESPECIALLY in this example. Don't try and hang with NDT, bro... just ask your goofy questions and move along.

Have you heard of women?

He takes other things into context so he doesn't get misunderstood as he conveys his points. People could learn from that example, and Neil is doing the same thing. Can I ask you to write down a question he arrives at with the words preceding it, then your shortened version? I would like to try and break down the differences.

Lol

@Captain Nivia FACTS

The problem is, my friend makes fun of me for believing in god

@@LemonGoofball you need friends that believe in compassion reguardless

I definitely agree there. I can't have a conversation with my friends without them getting red in the face. Some of the stuff I talk about rubs their religious feathers the wrong way.

Banging Katie Perry will humble a man 🤣

like hounding a nice old man to an early grave.........

a confused hippie messiah type figure with a severe attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and delusions of grandeur?

@@purefoldnz3070 Confused isn´t Russell. He´s like Michael Moore, and confused is the ideological reductionist view that you spew. Not quite able to avoid type stereotyping classifications or own your own control-oriented assumptions, so you project like a rookie Freudian analyst. Don´t loosen your tie except to down some hootch, clearly. Better check your 2005 World Bank-UNEP Ecosystem Assessment, since the IPCC reports obviously trigger more denialism in your DSM circuits. Try a little scholarly research about Ralph Nader to fry your martini sucking when you can.

@@robinhoodstfrancis No what I wrote was pretty accurate lol. Hippy messiah figure with delusions of grandeur. Sums up Russell Brand pretty well.

S P No.

😯👍🏼

And the other difference is science actually works.

@@chromaxetian496 Yes, and the other explores the mind. Different functions.

@@chromaxetian496 You heard of the 'scientific' term 'placebo effect'..? Or the atom bomb? Only a sith deals in absolutes

You think so. How else are we gonna communicate thoughts. Also you can have infinite combination with words so you can describe everything

@@enviouslawn1665 I think you're confusing infinite with finite there ;p We don't have infinite amount of words, therefor you won't get an infinite amount of combinations. Also, you cannot use any word next to another. Which also lowers the combination. On top of that, we even lack words. We just don't know it yet. This is why language is an ever evolving thing. Language does limit your thoughts, because you think in them.

If you want to blow your mind listen to Terence Mckenna.

He's right, there are words and phrases that represents emotions that other languages describes that we cant and vice versa. There are emotions i feel and images that I see in my dreams that I couldn't even attempt to explain using the words that I have at my disposal. Search people trying to describe their trips on salvia or dmt.

a lot of people claim that drawing (but likely art in general) helps you see the world in new ways. da vinci is a good example of this for sure

Malik Mclean that's what I love about Russell. He allows equal time to those that think differently. Gives opportunity to those with different views to speak their minds. All without disruptive arguments trying to shove opinions down anyones throat. 🤗

Why did you think it was unusual? Russell is not the antithesis of Tyson.

BUT WHO ARE THEY ON THEIR TEA HALF HOUR, NEVER HEARD OF THEM !!!!.

@@lizardas But Tyson is the antithesis of Russell. He treats science like a religion, while constantly degrading philosophy and thinking religion is the source of tribalism rather than a necessary precursor to science. In other words he "knows" a lot of things, but doesn't really think about a lot of things.

@@Bisquick he's a child of the Matrix. The earth is flat ... Science is a religion ... Medicine is poison

But none of it is unknowable! That's an amazing quote though

you forgot, Unknown knowns

@nutflixx knowception

@@BeauInGrace that doesn't make sense.

no, known unknowns, things you know that you don't know. unknown knowns is a different matter

We might not get it but AI will.

But why only stop at 2%?

But why only stop at 2%?

Everything inside consciousness nothing is outside

Sell your tv You will feel free

Just realize that they are not all that brilliant. There might be a 100K people smarter than these two. They are unique in the way that they can make science understandable to high school graduates. THAT is their redeeming value.

Yaaaaasaaas!

It would be an epic struggle between unbridled thought and motion vs. unwavering power stares and low-talking... I'd pay big money to see that!

I think there is a video on this, I know Russell has great respect for Eckhart Tolle & has quoted him & nods to him as a catalyst for his spiritual metamorphosis

yeah man. they are like chalk and cheese but it would be interesting

Yes

Science studies non physical stuff all the time. We just keep not finding any evidence for anything. As a linguist, I see brains doing brain things. All the time. Including praying, meditating, singing, calculating, etc. and there is no evidence that love has any different effect on the brain. There is evidence for, say, meditation. It works. It a actually effects the active brain, in such a way that we can see grown of the hippocampus, and can see a change in brain wave function. So now, the effects of meditation are beginning to be known, and its moving out of the woo place. We study anything people say they think exists. Ghosts, esp, cpsuperconciousness. Those that are real, we might be able to describe. So Tesla, in his own state to, is being deliberately biased. Science does exactly what he claims science should do.

Tanya Nguyen modern science is a cult nothing is factual or true,it’s all theories which are mostly know debunked yet still get taught in schools,colleges and universities. It’s pretty sad

Ladles of gravy - I don’t believe in blanket, “trust me” statements. Please list some of these theories which have been debunked in moder science, andwho did the debunking. Evolution? Atomic theory? Star formation? Germ theory? Particle theory? Thermodynamics? Fluid dynamics? Gravity? Relativity? Radiation theory?

Tanya Nguyen Here’s just one for the starters. If you wanna read his papers on it,it’s by dr oleg jefimenko ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--Ewv-5zTiZM.html

Tanya Nguyen particles theory ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-umXt2dmR4j4.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pkk8rYhOghQ.html

I was gunna say the same thing. Its incredible.

I think it is because he is in peace. There were little moments in my life were i felt so in peace that my thoughts and my conclusions could come out easily. That is my theory.

I noticed it especially in this one too. I’m getting the feeling that it’s about trust. You just trust that the words falling out will make sense, seems as if from a state of no-mind. Awesome

Smoke some weed

practice

what interview

He was just high there, it's just how it works for him.

Neil is the interviewer here, so it's natural he listens more. The interviewer is interrupted, not the interviewee. After all the interviewee is who we all came to see so he's allowed to talk as much as he wants up to and beyond the point of interruption. Still following me?

Paul Freedman no

@@exister4959 gud :)

Without A Doubt Articulated Genius,I Love Learning From Someone Who Doesn't Profess To Know Everything ⁉️

@david holdsworth aff that buckie bro it's no good fr ye

When two puppets exchange their rotten nails, JUST for the herd

@david holdsworth Praise the sun-Skyrim

david holdsworth yeah man people don’t seem to realise all the information is out there on the internet, ignore all these scientists and well educated people who’ve spent their entire lives studying the universe we live in, just watch a conspiracy video on RU-vid and you’ll see the truth. Yeah gravity is a myth we are held to the earth by the arms of invisible aliens who grab each one of us at birth and keep us on the ground. Australia doesn’t exist, the earth is flat, the royal family are lizard people, 9/11 was done by the illuminati lizards and the space wizard who rules us all is laughing at you fools who believe the earth could possibly be round. Wake up people this is a simulation.

I married my wife listening wholly to my heart with little use of brain.

Shawn Chamberlain 🔥💯🔥

Totally agree. If you have any videos you'd recommend to someone who found this enlightening, please share! One love

Is it possible to say humankind or humanity? Because I want to avoid these bias towards man in language as well?

@@Sjahko_ Y'know the word man is in the word woman, right? You know the world male is in the word female too, right? Stop focusing on the letter and focus on the meaning. Mankind refers to the huMAN race: both sexes.

I Couldn't Of Put It Better Myself 🙏🌟

I agree, I really liked him on this one.

Life as we know it did you even listen to him here? That’s not at all what he’s saying. Tyson is really open-minded. I’ve heard many interviews of Neil entertaining the likes of aliens, time travel, even simulation theory. He just doesn’t jump to conclusions, he’s a cool dude though.

Stephen Colbert interview is good too. This was before SC sold out.

@Life as we know it He is a science educator, NDT never claimed to be a scientist that actively publishes research papers. Most scientists are introverted and don't want to communicate their research publicly, which is why educators like NDT are important.

@@formulaintuition8756 Agreed

Cough Rogan! Cough :)

Chris Hardwick does that as well, even 'more', really amazing podcasts as well

Melvin van Galen Finally you found someone is a more honest statement 🤜

@islanti Joe is about dumb as rocks tho let's be honest lol

Refreshing isn’t it! I think it’s rooted to his 12 step work (getting out of selfish mindsets) and meditation (slowing down reactivity), but maybe he always had a knack for listening! -love RB! Another great interviewer is Lewis Howes - check out the school of greatness podcast.

The body wouldn't know. Cleverly worded statement.

Actually, he´s just showing showing the sweet side of arrogance and denialism in Scientism. Hey, ha, ha, graviity has just 4 books. Not like that woo "consciiousness" stuff. Yeah, "spiritual," it means different things tp everybody. Uh, and what about Psychology and Comparative Religion, or the Philosophy of Religion? The guy knows what he wants to do, but he doesn´t have a clue who knows a lot more than he does.

@@robinhoodstfrancis nahh u reaaching

@@robinhoodstfrancis you misunderstood him, especially on his point about consciousness. They both were talking about consciousness on a scientific level, Russel made the point that SCIENTISTS haven't figured it out yet, and Neil thoroughly backed up that point. Neil wasn't criticising or dismissing the spiritual viewpoint of consciousness at all, he was literally criticizing science's lack of advancement in that particular field. OP was right, Neil was awfully respectful and as someone who loves science as much as spirituality that made me happy

@@tjr6900 Nahh. I´m telling it like it is. You bending down to science like a street kid at a car store window.

@@MrFlameRad Neil was respectful? Because he´s a polished showman and not overtly rabid like Dawkins in this exchange with Brand? . You love spirituality and science? I have loved them for decades, and have been studying the likes of Templeton prize winners so that now I have already developed an understanding worthy of SJ Gould´s "Magesteria" and F Capra´s General System´s Theory. You like Tyson´s likeable style, and want to believe that he wouldn´t say something poorly informed and crassly uninformed? His reducing spirituality to "scientific knowledge" in this exchange is naive, and a quick search turns up confirmation of his deeper Scientism. He has said things like, "If you believe the Christian story of Jesus, you can´t call Scientology crazy" and "When I look at the universe and all the ways the universe wants to kill us, I find it hard to reconcile that with statements of beneficence." So you know, "Crazy" is not an adequate term for Jesus, nor is it discreetly made for careful analysis of much relevant information about anything like shamanic and religious experience. "Wants to kill us" personifies the Universe non-scientifically, and shows Tyson to be functionally illiterate in historical sociology, since Science itself has arisen through elements of that "beneficence" embodied in Jesus´ life, mission, and message. Tyson is a showman and Scientism ideologue who has no appropriate knowledge of even the scientifically measured benefits of meditation. As for you, who "loves science and spirituality," your "love" is not quite that well-informed, you need to know. Here´s a good clue for your path, Science needs to be understood as a form of Philosophy, Religion needs to be understood more widely through Philosophy, General Systems Theory puts all forms of modern Philosophy in perspective, and Religion´s underlying spirituality and basis for modern Philosophy more widely laid out. That´s what I can do. You try to make sense of that instead of sucking up to celebrity gossip opinionators abusing, misusing, and confusing their credentials and involvement with Science as if Astronomy were Divine Love itself.

Thinking the exact same thing while watching this..

Indeed. Perfect fit for both science and love.

also a commie

@@mBobbleHatGaming - Yer a commie.

@@mBobbleHatGaming He's an anarchist

Bobble HatGaming I smell straw men

You mean two spiritual people and one scientist.

@@girlplanetboy i dont know if you mean they are both spiritual and one happens to be a scientist or you are referring to a third person

Jacob Caruana don’t even bother mate, I get what you are saying

@@mpuondak421 worth a try lol

I agree wholeheartedly. Although I definitely think more like Tyson I still think Russell is a great interviewer.

@Tyler Winningham Neil has

Itch nay on the Rogan nay

Let's add Jesse Lee Peterson...

Add alex jones

@@KittyCow he's too dumb sorry

he is , without doubt, a complete shill - spreading misinformation, a traitor to humanity

givorget such empty statements only reveal your ignorance.

DjRenect Overstated.

Chris Dragotta if you don’t agree with an opinion its a common custom to counter a statement with an argument to back yours.

Doesn't he use this ( practically verbatim) pitch in most of his podcast discussions nowadays. (Talking bout Neil)

?

Tyson subliminaly was avoiding Russels question because he is wrong to proclaim that humans have the capacity to know everything that is to know. We are a product of reality and we are bound by rules, limited by senses...

Sofian Daoudi good observation! Got me questioning tyson🤔

That one part especially where NDGT was talking about senses and how if someone were to tell him that they had ESP and he would one up them because he had scientific sensors capable if 12 different senses. How does that even compare? Like if someone were to accurately and demonstrably predicted the immediate future then that would disqualify a lot of scientific work. Then it would be difficult to like NDGT actively circumvent the glaring question of how to explain the unnatural using natural laws.

Sofian Daoudi he didn’t say that. He said he wasn’t convinced humans couldn’t figure everything out. Not the same thing.

Ephraim Kelemu what exactly do you mean by the unnatural? Do you mean it like artificial? As in something humans make? Or do you mean something that is not a part of the natural world? Would a concept be something you would consider unnatural?

Where do u see keanu reeves?

Correct

Hallucinating Keanu can't be a bad thing

John Wick

@@retrospecative2454 You know, the bloke who did this video

Tyson is a paid Shill

L 🌎 L A fan of Neil the ass Tyson? Talk about shooting low.

@@mysticnomad3577 what's wrong with Tyson?

@@michael_leclezio he is an actor that thinks he can prove the theory of gravity by dropping microphones. He also says the earth is an oblate spheroid or is pear shaped contradictory to all the images we've seen showing the earth as a perfect sphere. (It is neither) Frankly anyone that claims they know about space or space travel is just talking out of their ass. Neil just does it the best. I hope this answers your question.

@@mysticnomad3577 I suppose you know better about space that Tyson? And you do a better job at educating the public and dispersing ignorance? Please, share.

Lol. Neil is renowned as one of the most close minded and ideological media personalities

Russel Brand is a whole lot smarter than most of us. He just hides it mostly with his dark humor.

It's the 'jesus' hands

🎯🎯🎯

Dartagnan Magic 💜

Ahhh so profound.....

Not true. Neil's a knobhead

@@CakeAstronach You were the troll Stu that lived in my nan's shed yeah?

@Chris Manzi what about it?

moonchart human beings in general can’t that’s why most ppl are livestock

Hahah true

What else were you going to do, jump into it?

Fucking accurate

he's just one big cutie pie

Eremon1 sometimes it drive society into madness for this that question the physicality of our universe

We call the answers to these questions 'knowledge'. For example the question 'WHY? ' . The answer is some cause that happened in the past i.e the cause and the effect. The answer to the effect is the cause. So our knowledge is based on cause and effect which is of course the product of our perception of time i.e past, present and future. So if there exists something beyond our perception of time, then that cannot be reduced to knowledge coz of the above stated reasoning. So it must be a state with out a question and without an answer.

This is the bacterial biology of your body instigating a control over your mind. Your living ego from lives before lived to guide your spirit.

Well it's common knowledge among scientists now that consciousness is best understood as embodied and that there are literally neurons in your gut. Reason, rationality and judgement are not disembodied and abstract but based in feelings and the body. And to be fair, ancient spiritual traditions via things like meditation, breathing exercises, yoga, appear to have known this for a long time.

The inner Cheshire Cat' singing Lions and Tigers and Bears Oh my to Dorothy. lol

The neurons in your gut. It's a second brain

Culmination of innumerable minute empirical observations that suggest a course of action? Brain making stuff up? Cool thing is - we don't know!!!

But you are not able to recognise that mathematics is the langauge of the universe and not your heart. let your brain engage with the real evidence because as you know physics is everything.

@@ministryofarguments3525 mathematics is the language of the physical universe. What I am trying to convey is beyond physics, a universe which can only be felt.

@@ministryofarguments3525 consciousness cannot be wholly explained by physics, so here comes the immaterial/ non-physical which open to the field of metaphysics.

@@simpleguy38 Well the last time I checked there is no positive evidence for any 'willo the wisp' characterisation so nothing worth bothering about. Can you identify any neural activity with your philosophical metaphysics?

@@wendylady69 So you believe that there is another universe beyond our physical universe that you are totally immersed in? Is that a part of a multiverse? How do you know this?

SADguru, another CONman.

@@PhoenixProdLLC have you met him or been to his place IYC or attended his programs , 😂😂😂or just saying that coz you don't like him😂😂😂or you have figured out a human being without meeting him or knowing his work , you are Sherlock Holmes 🤔😱😱😱😂😂😂

neil disgrace still pretends he lives on a flying spinning waterball - protip: get on Globebusters - the ground you stand on is not moving. water never curves.

@@worldspirit 😂😂😂what ?? Then How do you explain seasons and years then ??and a day ??

@@worldspirit I seriously hope you aren't that stupid. The ancients knew Earth wasn't flat thousands of years ago. An Indian sage even said Mars had water 1500 years ago. You flat Earth people are a sad joke. Lmao. Shit is hilarious.

Not really, its kind of like how an animal can understand the world around it ,but if it looks into a mirror it has no idea that its looking at itself

Wow you really think we understand the universe?? 90% of your "accepted model" of the universe is based on theoretical physics. And when observations don't match the theory they simply change the formula. Smh

Know thyself That's why prophets and guru's instruct us to know ourselves.. Find yourself #selfrealisation This is life's only true goal IMO

@@elementop6847 exactly

Isn’t it amazing how a forklift can lift things, but can’t lift itself. Wow!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-l1vBXFhseMk.html 👈🏻👈🏻✌✌😊😊

In 'this' reality, we are constantly plagued by the questions of why and how... why does the universe exist? Why and how did it come to be? What is consciousness and why and how does it arise? Those are real questions that we all have, each of us, within our very real, tangible lives as humans. And so it's at the very basis of 'this' reality if, if you'd like to call it that... it's a gnawing question (perhaps present in anything that is self conscious) that in many ways defines us. And traditional 'science' can be very dismissive of this question...

I liked that interview. Katy Perry was willing to listen and learn. Even if you're tremendously stupid, curiosity and wonder gets you places.

Joshua Sweetvale She asked if math is related to science. Lol , either she was playing dumb or... 😐

tranceone11 Way

Nope No way yes yes way

@@nopenoway9875 She mentioned Christian school in that very interview. She was groomed, not ever educated.

Yes. You people are slow lol

*arenK Childs* "Gravity" is like any other word, it's descriptive and as such works, and works well. What actually makes gravity work is another question.

Douglas that has to be the most ridiculous answer! But then what else can you possibly say!

arenK Childs gravity (theory) There is actually 0 gravity in some places in Canada. You won’t believe it but unfortunately they don’t fly away like a helium ballon

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-l1vBXFhseMk.html 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻😊😊

Im sure if he could interview Elon Musk, he would

why him? Nothing interesting about him

leighleigh not sure how you could think that... does nothing include building multiple organizations that are revolutionizing clean energy, space exploration, future computing interfaces and other technologies to support the longevity of human civilization?

@@Elolelo320 I wonder where your politics lie. OH NO he was an advisor to Trump at some point. We must cast Musk aside as irrelevant.