Remote viewing is beautiful explained in Ancient Hindu scriptures Mahabharat (3100 BCE) where Sanjaya, the charioteer of King Dhritarashtra, was granted divine vision by the sage Vyasa, enabling him to watch and narrate the events of the Kurukshetra war from a distance.
I was meditating on my father once i was living in canada and he was living in egypt. He felt profound feelings and knew it was me. I saw a text from him once i came out of meditation. It was wild
@305steel I was thinking of my father deeply, think about his presence, his smell, the feeling of hugging him. I was trying to connect with him overseas and it seemed to work
is this the banned Ted Talk "Is ESP Real?" cause that's what i searched RU-vid for. Thanks for reuploading it. it's good to have proof of ESP. My father had an incident with ESP when i had skipped a Math class one summer when i was in elementary school. i was hiding in the closet under the stairs. and i remember the phone ringing. i thought "should i answer it? Mom's not here. She left already." i didn't answer it. i just let the phone ring. i also remember dad asking me that weekend, "Do you believe in ESP?" i responded, "What's ESP?" Dad said "Extra Sensory Perception." dad went on to say how he had called earlier in the week cause he "felt" that i was in trouble. After mom came home from work, i was in trouble. So i suspect he felt my fear. He didn't remote view. but was it empathy? in Robert Sapolsky's book Behave: Human Biology At Our Best And Worst, he defines empathy as "feeling someone else's pain" and he explains the neurology of empathy. the same neurons that evolved into Mirror Neurons evolved along side as the same Neurons that are responsible for empathy. so empathy isn't from Mirror Neurons. but empathy shares the same Neuron Ancestry as Mirror Neurons. ☮️🖖🎶
🤔 I remember seeing this video on Tedx but then it was taken down... Thanks for bringing this back to RU-vid! This is so amazing I wasn't sure if I dreamed it or not, haha.
@@danundacuva3703 I know this stuff sounds crazy. But, if you use yourself as a test subject and try some of these things, you will be suprised. I think the biggest hurdle is that believing makes it easier to use these extra abilities... But, it is hard to believe in something that isn't studied in popular academia. I know a good way to break the ice though! Have a supernatural experience that cannnot be explained away by science. That is how I ended up on this path... Maybe stay a night or two in a haunted hotel? An actually haunted one, not just one for advertisement. Visit a battle ground at night with a guide. Meditate on being open and receptive to the unseen world, but that one might be difficult for someone who doesn't believe in this kind of stuff. Anyway, we are here learning about this for a reason. We like to know why the world is the way it is, including supernatural experiences. And, not everything can be explained by science. I wish you a good life.
With the Silva Mind Control (the Silva Method), you learn a kind of remote viewing when in Alpha during which you are given a name, age and location (anywhere in the world) and are able not only to detect what is physically wrong with a person, but even help them get better. The Silva Method also allows you to "diagnose" what is wrong with your car's engine if it is not working, etc.
My dad had this book on his shelf for years and I just picked it up a few days before reading this! I love the amount of coincidences that keep coming up recently
@@shoulderoforion115 There is no such thing as coincidence, as you're alluding to. I learned the Silva Method when it was called Silva Mind Control as a very young child as my mother was very into it and was a friend of Bob Johnson, who was very involved in the early days of Jose Silva's work.
There is plenty of scientific data extending well back for more than a century. That evidence simply keeps getting buried and suppressed. Many skeptics are fond of saying "I wouldn't believe it even if it WAS true!" When a well-respected social psychologist Daryl Bem published nine meticulously designed experiments in the early 2000's, there was a huge outcry in the community of professional (immovable) skeptics, who panicked upon finding PSI experiments they found it hard to refute. Bem wrote a great meta-analysis in 2015 on the topic of PSI research showing abundant data supporting the existence of PSI (and discussing the history of attack by skeptics). Google "Daryl Bem" and you'll get his website; the title of the meta-analysis is "Feeling the Future...."
He's greatly exaggerating what was really accomplished. The government gave up funding on the whole sham. Do an actual controlled experiment like this, and you find out that it's either plants or the power of suggestion: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-40QVp8_P0LY.html (2 parts)
Watching this reminded me of so many real life accounts of people that I read in a book called Miracle of Love by former Harvard professor Ram Dass!! The author’s guru did possess such psychic abilities which intrigued people. Then there was the famed epidemiologist by the name of Dr.Larry Brilliant who named the same man as his guru in his TED 2006 prize acceptance speech on the topic of stopping pandemics and wrote a detailed account of his experiences with the guru in his biography Sometimes Brilliant. Thank you for making this talk available to the public despite TED’s decision.🙏
It's so heartwarming, Mr. Google, that the 7 million views it got on the other site was without any promo. Amazing that it's a long talk and not just a soundbite, and still there was so much interest.
This is one of only a few things that prove our third eye. And don't make me feel delusional. I was told by staff at an out patient facility that believing in ESP was delusional.
Carl Sagan on bias of fundamentalist materialists happily ignoring evidence for the reality of psychic phenomena.He said "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs."But this is irrational&unscientific suggesting "Hell with evidence,we insist on disbelieving!" Odd how scientists accept non-locality at sub-atomic levels while denying non-locality of human consciousness as superstition,&impossible.Btw,Carl, psychic experience/claims R widespread&traditional,more ordinary than extraordinary.
There's never strong enough evidence to PROVE these claims, though. The people who believe in RV are loaded with confirmation bias, so you're just taking THEIR word for it. Long article on RV failures, with details Targ and others skip over: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing
Very interesting. I'm following Courtney Brown and all the other excellent remote viewers in the Farsight Institute. They always have a lot of interesting projects, and they practically remote viewed all the important events in history and found out, hat they were never caused by humans alone (hint hint, ET's).
Pat Price was killed by the Russians for tracking their submarines but may have known his hit was coming and Ingo on the other hand had encounters with aliens.
I’m convinced that consciousness exists in (or maybe even comprises) what would be known as the 5th dimension! (AKA the dimension outside of “time” as we know it)
@@pynkie553 It's the current thinking at the edge of knowledge, where consciousness isn't a product of the brain but it came first. Here's a good book: marjoriewoollacott.com/books/is-consciousness-primary/
@@SuzanneTaylorSUESpeaks the reality is that there is no consensus, there’s a meeting happening each year to discuss the hard problem of consciousness between heterogeneous fields scientists, let me find you the link. They also present there the main models that are explored in the scientific communities.
Totally believe in ESP and remote viewing. Now the making money part is what im focused on and i do believe i have that skill as i pick stocks that make thousands of percentages in a few weeks at times. Very high percentage of winning trades too as im close to 90% winning positions
I believe that human beings possess a very limited amount of ESP ability. It's hard to explain, but I believe this hypothesis is supported by the myriad of stories of mothers having an "innate" ability to know their children were in danger or possibly dead.
I haven't watched the full thing yet but I've had psychic experiences before where I can talk to people almost (its mostly just an idea i can share never really full sentences) and they tell me about it, whats this called? Can anyone let me know more about these things this is all really new to me
Can anyone point us in the direction of a response by TEDx as to why they banned Russell Targ's Ted Talk? Or just type out specifically why TEDx said they banned it? I'm not interested in speculation as to why they banned it. I think we all can agree that materialists hate anything that says the universe is not purely a material universe
Not quite right they "banned it." Shortly before the TEDx program was to go on TED canceled my license so I lost all my sponsorship and had to pay myself to put the wonderful program on. It was a terrible time when TED changed its parameters to not allow "pseudoscience." Look at the text under the video.
It's said that most people only use or can process about 10 -15 per cent of our brain's associative power or properties. Imagine being able to use even 50 per cent ? It is in my humble opinion the next evolutionary step in our progress is the ability to use more and more of our own brain's functions such as esp properties and potential.
# %@@AndyMcGeever Actually it's said that most people , however those people named AndyMcGruber only use about 2-3% of their overall available brain functions. LOL!
Actually, TED never allowed it to go up. They cancelled my TED license and I produced the daylong program myself. Here's all the drama: suespeaks.org/ex-tedx-west-hollywood/
Get a book by Ingo Swann, and some candles. Practice on quieting your mind. When you are no longer listening to yourself thinking you can see and hear things outside of yourself. It is possible to see anything anywhere in space or time. It does not even need to be in this universe, it can be outside of space and time. You want to visit your relatives that have passed you can do that and more. The only things that limit people are themselves, as they are afraid of what they might see. Also there are people that tell themselves they can't do things that they have never tried.
Go here on RU-vid to Jeffrey Mishlove NEW THINKING ALLOWED - CONVERSATION ON THE LEADING EDGE. There you find all the specialists as Russel Targ, Joe McMoneagle, Lyn Buchanan. Paul H. Smith, Charly Tart and others. There you find also their books presented. In the meantime a lot of vids have been taken down. Here is a LINK ... ru-vid.com/show-UCFk448YbGITLnzplK7jwNcw ... -Very solid stuff and very recommendable. Have fun ...
You can even hear in Targ’s curated and exaggerated examples how remote viewers bend results to make RV look effective. That’s the only game here; playing with statistics (and even time!) to vindicate RV, not to generate any useful information. It has no predictive power, which is why the government no longer uses it, and nobody has actually gotten rich using it to play the market.
What interests me about remote viewing is not "using it," but the fact that it works when it does, which indicates there is something more than the material world that's real. Understanding we are swimming in a sea of consciousness would be what humanity needs to get out of the materialistic perspective in which we are so harmful to one another.
@@SuzanneTaylorSUESpeaks That’s the problem, though. It doesn’t work. At all. It’s just an exercise in working vaguely enough to get apparent hits, and then bending over backwards later to spin a narrative that you saw something in the first place.
Yes! Confirmed by me. I had no luck finding the video by typing just his name "Russell Targ"...and I scrolled for a long time in the results. I had to type specifically "Russell Targ banned Ted talk"
First result on Google is PARE-a-dime. Languages evolve.
3 года назад
Sorry, I think I am quite liberal in my views (not only as theoretical physic but also as person who from very young age study and practice) and I see the universe as very intrinsic and interconnected place, where can be done quite a lot. But this guy sound for me as someone who just endlessly brags without any actual wisdom or humility. Maybe it is just me, but I do not see anything appealing or attractive here - just big words and using others to make himself better by association without any real respect or understanding to others or processes... So I am glad TED administrative decided to do not let him use their brand.
This is a strange comment. Russell is a physicist who ran a lab funded by the CIA, where the results he got kept them funding it for many years. Are you sure your comment belongs on this talk or maybe you got it mixed up with another one? You may not Ike things about it, perhaps not being attracted to Russell as a personality, but the work doesn’t deserve the critique you made. And, TED’s flack was about that successful work, which they call pseudoscience, for it not fitting in with the materialist scientific paradigm that they are shockingly beholden to considering their motto is “Ideas Worth Sharing.”
Yeah most of the claims sound ridiculous, only supported by certain physecists hypothesis' but with no actual proof in practice. Almost all "psychics" and "magicians" are proven hacks. James Randi has plenty of videos where he debunks magicians that go on his show to prove themselves and they are never legit.
@@AMeanDude what do you mean no proof in practise you obviously didn’t watch it and Randi has also got himself dirty with fraud himself with his friend he helped a lot was put in prison for having a fake passport
