It’s incredibly interesting to me that 10 to 15 years ago the world was generally so very skeptical, whereas today the general consensus is much more swayed to a consciousness existing independently to the physical body.
There is a need to bring remote viewing to the general public in order not only to help people to develop their psychic ability but also to become acquainted with it in order to then start understand several projects that we have that speaks about our origins who are we and what we are doing here in this planet.
What would be a more convincing experiment is have the same lady at the same time view that fountain. Have four remote viewers and four non remote viewers in separate buildings with different hosts and see what each of their answers are.
Remote viewing, for most people, *is* vague impressions. The remote viewer's job is not to interpret or name things (for example, numbers are almost impossible to remote view) but to explain the experience. You may even "see" things associated with the object and the experience of the object as well. To give you an example: there was a remote viewing exercise to identify an object the presenter had hidden. My impressions were something that was both very smooth and very jagged. At one point I drew a star-like/flower-like shape. And I kept getting the color red for some reason. My conscious mind kept wanting to interpret something that was both smooth and round as a rock. This is why you try not to interpret, only describe the impressions. The object the presenter had was not red at all. It was completely silver. What was it? An apple core-er. A circle and inside the blades that wedge apples ray out like the rays of a sun from the circle in the middle. I can only assume I saw red as a signal of apples (although apples of course come in green, pink, yellow, and the inside is usually beige/cream). Was I being a "charlatan" for seeing these things in the privacy of my house trying to remote view and not being able to correctly interpret what the impressions were? No. That's what low-skilled remote viewing looks like. This test was definitely not rigged in his favor. There was stuff EVERYWHERE: red telephone booths, the maze-like streets and cobblestones, etc. By the way, Derren put "Gurgle" on the "failed words" list, but fountains do gurgle so... The viewer said "church-like" perhaps because he kept getting the impression of "statue" and his conscious mind associated statues with a church. If you keep seeing a bowl-like shape and water, your conscious mind will try to make sense of that. Both fountain and boat make sense in that regard. So everyone saying that remote viewing is fake because he was vague: no, he definitely remote viewed. He may not be the most skilled, but he obviously got some accurate impressions. And his target was fantastically overwhelming with hustle and bustle and zillions of things that he was obviously picking up impressions on. Maybe next time, don't pick such a busy area, and perhaps someone with a bit more skill and training. I saw another video where a woman accurately described a concealed image of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field as "circles of spinning energy" and "a spinning cylinder", but because she didn't come out and say "galaxies photographed by the NASA'S Hubble Space Telescope" the guy cackled that he had debunked remote viewing. The other guy drew a rectangle with wheels and mentioned death. He should have just explained his impressions: rectangles (the solar panels on the telescope), wheels (the galaxies), and dying (in this case, dying stars in novae)...instead he tried to sound smart by interpreting the experience and his brain said hearse, which made him look stupid unfortunately. Remote viewing isn't about naming things or interpreting them for many people. It's a sensory experience, not a dot-matrix print-out.
Remote viewing is fake for all people. No person claiming to have the ability has been able to prove it. Unless they are talking about being able to see the remote control for the tv. I bet a 'remote viewer' looses their tv remote like the rest of us and gets annoyed about not being able to find it.
So from what you are saying Bleda, it would be more like the viewer gets an impression of what he sees and his conscious mind will try to translate the feeling into words. Is that correct? It is a little bit like dreams for example if I am scared from something happening in my life I dream with lions surrounding me. So my mind tries to translate the feelings into symbols that carry that feeling to me. So that is why you mentioned the viewer shouldn't name the thing itself but mostly describe how it feels.
Remote viewing is nothing more than a parlour trick, used to extract money from the vulnerable. It can't be demonstrated under controled experimentation, It is Pseudo-science.
"I can see something round-ish, or possibly square-like. It may be a square or a roundabout. Something that has a shape. And there are people. There's a church-like structure within 10 miles of this place. And I can sense a river. Definitely a river somewhere near the centre of the city. I can see shops. And there are taxis. And buses. I see pigeons. There is some kind of building or statue or tree. There's a tower of some kind, or a tall construction. Am I close?" "Yes! I was looking at a statue on a roundabout! OMG!"
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information: "Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
Everybody can learn that because of one thing - we all have energetic body/soul. Scientists, journalists tries to portray this ability like something you can only be BORN WITH . They portray this as extraordinary thing that only a small percentage of human population can use - but thats bull_hit. Everybody can do this thru meditation
Real Bull_hit is that this "remote viewing is real", 😂😂😂😂 This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information: "Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
Would Darren accept proof of remote viewing based on a single experiment? If not why does he dismiss it on the basis of such, even though actual scientific experiments point to a statistically significant effect?
If we can basically die every night and go off travelling to other worlds and dream hop etc… then more than likely with the right abilities, the right environment and the right training it is highly probable that remote viewing is totally legit.
@@thedevilhimself8521 No because on rare occasions my consciousness, I floated outside my body and saw this light appeared. And I got sucked into it I was in the dream world.
Derren Brown tried his best to debunk this but he couldn't. Remote Viewing is well documented and well respected Statistician Jessica Utts came to the same conclusion when she was hired by the Government to look over these studies. Also, the Government had a remote viewing program that was funded for 23 years and Jimmy Carter even talked about a Medium that helped find a downed plane. His picture of the fountain and horse sculpture was close. The woman was very impressed but looked like she was a Derren shill that was supposed to debunk it but couldn't.
All of the government funded esp and remote viewing projects took place during the Cold War. It was typical for the USA and the soviets to lie about what kind of things they had accomplished in order to mislead each other. The fact that this stuff is so “well documented” is evidence of its falsehood. The real black projects were all kept very secret. Just think about if your enemy could send psychic soldiers to check out all of your secret bases... it’d be terrifying. That was the whole point. If it was legit, it wouldn’t have been in the papers at the time and you probably still wouldn’t know about it now.
But he said like every word you could possibly think of during the hour and a half so he could have made anything fit no matter where she actually was. That's the main point that shows that its BS.
I understand the skepticism around remote viewing, so it took some time to get to this point. The "uncomfortable truth" in the research into the field is where the meta-analysis of all controlled experiments carried out at the Stanford Research Institute showed an effect higher than chance for successfully identifying characteristics in a remote viewing session. Or to put it more directly; in order for the "hits" to be purely lucky guesswork, you're looking at a one time probability of around 10 billion to one. So the point is, here you have a single example, and in this example it admittedly appears quite unremarkable. But when you take all controlled experiments, there is a significant effect measured. What that effect is exactly no one can say for sure, however the fact that there is an effect is grounds for further research. Also, the Stanford studies didn't follow this model of filling out hundreds of pages for a single target. Each target you were judged independently based on 4 possible targets, meaning there was a clear 1/4 chance of the judge matching your picture to the target with a lucky guess, and most submissions were on a single sheet of paper so no "cherry picking" was possible. The important thing to remember is that this effect wasn't a large effect, but it was a statistically significant effect nonetheless.The lady who did the meta analysis did an interview about her work as a statistician for SRI. Her name is Dr. Jessica Utts, shes a professor of statistics at University of California Urvine and you can find the video by searching her name. I'll still listen to anyone who can change my mind :)
Derren is an asset... his job is to discredit real phenomena to keep the masses stupid. You are quite correct.. plus I would add that many of us are starting to have these abilities 'switch on'... I am one of those people... I am not an expert but I have begun to have these remote viewing experiences occur, as well as other experiences that could be considered 'psychic' and precognition which is the phenomena I experience most prolifically... sometimes with data coming in very very fast... and way too many for them all to be merely coincidence. In fact, I have repeatedly predicted the future based on information that has come to me... many many many times and have stored all of the evidence of that because at the end of the day it proves God and that is the very thing they do not want to occur.
I learned to do remote viewing from a book. I could repeat conversations people did in private and believe I was about 80% accurate. I did not abuse people but used RV to assist in tneir lives and I worked on unsolved murder cases.
He also said he saw a hundred other things. Those 99 others were all completely wrong. But you think the one guess that happens to be similar is magic. PT Barnum was right; there’s a sucker born every minute
@@flawlesswill1987 No, not true, because there really isn't much else in a forest. However, in a city, it can be all kinds of things. "I see books everywhere . . . I am on a lot full of cars . . . Ect."
By the way the whole thing is staged and its revealed at the end, just so you know. to be honest remote viewing requires you to not have any doubts or basically to remove your "analytical overlay" which he clearly does not since shows plenty of self-doubt therefore self-sabotage.
Exactly. More than this, there is a ton of front loading. There is no target number or other "anchor". He almost collects TOO much data, which could just be cold reading. Stuff like this is just disinformation trash.
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information: "Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
@@koolkukumbur388 Nope, they researched on it and after they completely eliminated every single strand of this thing, they left it in 1995 because it's practically useless!
It is real. Skeptics included. Still real even if you decide to exploit your disbelief in it. Still real. It is a tool in a tool belt, another sense for your senses, you are free to use or never use.
He is not doing Remote Viewing. He is not an expert. Derren Brown does a great diservice to the art of true remote viewing. He should have done his research. To the critics .. do your research.
any proof that isnt say so? like a remote viewer on here since there is apparently so many of them, id be happy to have one remote view me as proof but apprently none can
I had a very adept spiritual teacher and if I did something he didn't like when he wasn't around, he would pull me up about it and admonish me over it. He knew exactly what I had done and he was nowhere near there physically.
I can confirm this is real and that everyone can do it. I just did my first blind remote viewing like 10 minutes ago and I can assure you my mind was blown like an effing supernova. I'm still trying to calm myself down 😃😃
I also do it. Describing the photo that a friend choose without telling me nothing. Was the first time that i do it...and everything that i write was correct......imagine what you mind can do. In my process...she choose a photo and then in another paper she write a radom number. She give me the random number, and me in another paper start to write de code number...when i was writting it...i recibe information...like a description ( green plants in front, a big brick color in the center like a big montain...street signs and electricity pole, cement) and the picture was about a bigg restaurant with brick color, with green plants in front, and The street sign and a lamp electricity pole. ( And this was my first try)
As a kid, in France, we had a Sunday tv show where the host would interview kids. There was always one who said he/she was coming from a very remote village, completely unknown. The host would then go “oh yes! I know the place very well! There is a big road, right? With houses around it? Yes! And trees! Cars park along that road.That is near the cafe at the corner! Not very far from the church!” Basically describing every little town in France. But the kids were always surprised and amazed. 😂😂😂
Yes.. he is a showman.. he is paid to discredit real phenomena and make it look retarded... thats how he makes his buck.. dirty money. He is really a harlot...
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information: "Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
@@jaco9286 hmm. Interesting that it says there's 3 comments here and here we have just one from the comment. If you listen to Darren he mentions a controlled environment so basically it's not legit one way or another: Basically for creating an environment conducive to whatever narrative is required to portray.
Actually we have several soldiers with documented awards for remote viewing. Our CIA natural science division operated for 20 years. It was funded year by year based on mission success for all 20 years. It finally came to an end due to dogma vs. Science. The natural science division was ran by a pretty decent physicist. Ya, it's real and it's cool. Younger physicists believe, so should you.
@@MikiMannikin yeah maybe it “works” to entertain some people, indulge their imaginations or alternatively delusions, but it’s good they know better now than to let it suck funding just for people who are too gullible or sick to know any better.
All atoms in our universe are connected. Some have the gift, some do not. It's NOT a perfect science for the current state of human conciousnous/awareness. However, once you witness it, it is hard to discredit the capabilities of the human mind.
I can predict whether a coin toss is heads or tails. Throw the coin. Don't let me see. I feel like it is kind of like a tail. But with some sensation of a head. Yes, definitely I feel like it is head-like. Also I am getting a clear image of a tail. So it could be that I am receiving a message that it is a tail. But I could be wrong. I am not always right you know. What was it? "It was a head." Do you think I pretty well described what it was? "Yes, you did say it was head-like. That you felt the sensation of a head." How well would you say I predicted the result of the coin toss. 50%? "Better than 50%. More like 60% or 70%." Thank you.
Remote viewing is real, it might not be as practical as we want it to be at the moment, but anybody who really does his research will find plenty of evidence for remote viewing and not only...
Us psychics know what is real and what isn't. I must say, I am slightly offended at some of the comments here that argue that remote viewing isn't real, when in fact it is. But what can we do? These kind of 'magic' stuff, as people would call it, can't exactly be explained by science yet. But those who are fimiliar with it would know these stuff exist.
What you can do is prove it. Have a remote viewer publicly demonstrate how they can ‘see’ things more frequently than a non-viewer. It would be so easy ie. have them answer multiple choice questions about what object is being seen. If they get a higher success rate than chance, it works. Nobody has done that though.
@@calvin3005 yes they HAVE done that. Your comment shows how little you know about the topic. It doesn't take much searching to find the proof. The Rhine Institute has researched it and shown it's a true ability. In fact I've "remote viewed" my entire life but my ability wasn't something I learned from anyone. I do it spontaneously. How, I don't know. I wish I could explain it. I've always given credit to God since He made me.
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information: "Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
A lot of people can do this, but it's not done by the individual, there is a supernatural force needed to carry this out, Dr Carr clearly displays this when he raises his hands to summon this force.
rather than calling it a tool, you'd be better off calling it like any other skill.... and i dont necessarily mean like being able to play AN instrument. more like being to play MANY with very little practice. or being able to create in a variety of mediums. being bilingual (or multi??) being able to play chess and win.... the key is your willingness to pursue and learn something. if you pick up a violin and make a terrible sound you're probably going to laugh and say NOPE! not for me! but what if you laugh and say What other sounds can this thing make?! i don't think you'll ever get far if you doubt yourself, regardless of whatever task you have set before. i say if you have doubts give it a try anyway. it's not like you have anything to lose. we're all made of electricity, sending out our own little frequencies. some people are easy to read by default. like, you know your kid is going to steal a cookie when you're not looking. but then you take it further and consider the bond that twins have. even some animals can predict when their owner is coming home - and not because they are conditioned to their routine or the sound of the car engine. my favorite thing to do is guess the next song. and i dont mean on the radio. if i think of a particular song it WILL play (i listen to some pretty random and obscure music. nothing mainstream where you'd say "they play that all the time!" i also have the ability to think of someone and they will contact me within the next 48 hours or i will get some kind of news about them. and it's only strange because they're people i rarely interact with. unfortunately that's not always fun. I was thinking about Kirtie Alley they day before she died. and Right before Meatloaf died I had just bought the Bat out of Hell CD on a whim. I was enjoying it immensely... until i got the news that evening that he too had passed away. and i don't believe that is unique to me. i am 100% certain everyone has these experiences only to write them off as coincidences. i guess some people have a LOT of coincidences lol but if you are determined to poke holes in things then don't even bother. just don't accuse bing crosby of lip-syncing because you can't carry a tune in a bucket.
You think he exposed somebody here? The word the guy said the most was WET and flowing water... She was staring at a fountain... He also said boat, which clearly has to do with water but the host listed that as a "miss" 😂... I'm not saying it's real or not, but I am saying it'd be pretty ignorant to just dismiss the fact the things he said the most, were dead on.
@@jhenealika2255 what's to elaborate, I can connect with a person, see them their house and locations, objects etc through an esp ability called remote viewing, I actually had to google it because I found out I could do it.. Outside of that I'm currently working on checking out the planet from the outside
I wouldn't say its about "entering a person's body" to see what theyre seeing. Ive done this several times and even for a new friend in another country, explaining in great detail items they had in their room, specifically their closet. It totally freaked them out. Do not confuse new age occultic with true gifts. It would be easy to debunk and debate on though, thats for sure
Eddie Lives "David Goslin, of the American Institute for Research said, "There's no documented evidence it had any value to the intelligence community." Read this:" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing#Decline_and_termination
And David Goslin is the end all on the subject case closed..... What if I told you that once upon a time I used to meditate a lot, like 2 to 4 hours a day and one day I was asleep, I got a phone call from a friend, the phone rang and woke me up. When I awoke I had this vivid flash in my head of a location I've never been to. When I answered the phone my buddy said he needed a ride. before he could tell me where he was I said ok and hung up. I drove to a place about 10 miles away and there he was. 20 years latter he still talks about that, He was tripped out about it. I didn't consciously do that, it just happened. If that could happen to me it's not a stretch to think that people could actually deliberately do it. I do however have reservations about my tax dollars going into such a project.
Eddie Lives I would say you were either lying or you had convinced yourself of a story that is only half true. Like all these supernatural powers or paranormal sightings, there is absolutely no evidence for any of it except anecdotal.
What I've been noticing about remote viewing is that vision is always sketchy, evidence is weak, and interpretations are vague. Not a true science. Human intuition is an extremely rare phenomenon. Proponents always brag about the rare incident where it "worked," ignoring all the times it didn't.
My remote viewing abilities are kicking. I’m intrigued but also anxious. The things I see are disheartening. It just happens as soon as I get in a meditative state. I am also telepathic.
@@Seekingtruth-mx3ur well many things actually too many to list. But last night I saw horses with men on them a group on them with a Canadian flag 🇨🇦 I couldn’t see much as my visions are 2 toned but I did see the flag waving in the air. Another vision I received was of that at a place called Skinwalker Ranch. And in that vision I saw an inter-dimensional being and they were letting me know that they are there doing a great work. They revealed how they looked to me. And then I also have received some images of children that were being hurt those by far the hardest images for me to experience.
@@Nicolesrecoverycorner Hi friend, A Canadian here. Do you have any control within your dreams. Can you fly around at will? Is there always the same theme or concept surrounding the dream? Are you seeing things in Color or Black and White? Are any people recognizable? Or total strangers?? I myself have Lucid dreaming whereby I am in remote unknown places and fly around at will but Never know what to do so get bored and wake myself up. Sometimes with a slight headache. I suppose if I were to train myself or something ? I would be able to "remote view" what ever eventually I want?? I am NOT astro projecting and can pull myself out of anywhere by Will, I wonder how I can master this?? Oh and I also can pass through objects and or people if I want. It's very strange...
On a purely physics-based level, technically we're all connected by the same electro-magnetic bonds of molecules, so technically we're all connected on that level.
it's somewhere IN LONDON, there is a stone building nearby. perhaps also something that the public are able to go inside... If that's all you have to do to become a remote viewer, I think I'll start referring to myself as one.
im sorry but in central london - arches/ old buildings/ cathedrals are very common. most of this is barnam statements nothing specific. why not tell her something specific like if she asks somebody for them time get him to describe the person who she asked, and what their response was - what the person looked like/ accent etc - ie something VERY SPECIFIC,
I just woke up to my phone buzzing. But didn’t open my eyes but I was looking at my phone buzzing. Clear as day. So I think to do this you must by totally unaware or unconscious of where you currently are. I slowly opened my eyes but shut them quickly to see if my vision matched what I seen with eyes closed, and it seemed like it did. But then I fully opened my eyes and I was the opposite way the phone was behind my back. I’ve done this many times while half asleep.
We where all born with God like powers in his image etc. . . You just need to tap into them from an early age and practise . . Telepathy. Telekinesis. Remote viewing . The brain is a powerful tool.
When you have faith and belief in yourself and truly no yourself , God is within us , the God gene has proven that , every element of the universe is us . . Our planet and us all contain the same stuffs. . All from the universe. Tap into that and accept that . . Feel it . . See it. . Smell it . . Enjoy it . . Be the best you can be.
It's Fake! This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information: "Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
@@newhope5729 no evidence? Have you actually looked? Or did you just take one wiki paragraph and decide the case was closed. Jeez! Have you heard of Scientism?
@@andycochrane4131 Bruh, something which is as effective with 1 in a million probability is practical useless for me..... Though, maybe You find it useful, 🤭 Go ahead with your superstitions, 🤭
@@newhope5729 The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence. Nikola Tesla Just thought I’d add that.
50 /60 % ay . From a genuine doctor/specialist teacher of the art of RV , MY CONCLUSION impressed , NOT REALLY. Now waiting for Derrens entertainment, i mean experiment 😅
Sorry but Rving works....but the process here isn't really remote viewing. It should be done in extremely clean conditions....IE there is a target, here are the coordinates- 8 digit. no other clues.....view the target. results should be analysed thoroughly, should get viewer to view multiple times….multiple viewers. this is not RVing This is preloaded viewing at its worst.
I am online finding videos of this because I am Astro traveller. I am not sure where I am from but I am also a remote viewer who is really trying to expand his view & knowledge on this subject
to be honest remote viewing requires you to not have any doubts or basically to remove your "analytical overlay" which he clearly does not since shows plenty of self-doubt therefore self-sabotage
I think if your trying to make money or be famous your probably a fake...that being said their are most certainly not fakes have you heard of Ingo Swann?
Or Lyn Buchanan or Paul Smith, all of these highly respected remote viewers to get on the show and instead, Darren got this random guy that doesn't even seem to know the fundamentals.
It's pretty much the same concept of cold reading. Put out a lot of words that could be interpreted however the person wants then the "viewer" leads them to the conclusion he/she want's.
@CrisisofConsciousness Take a look at the Farsight institutes remote viewings of planets in our solar system, 9 11, the Kennedy assassination etc, etc. Ive learned the basics of remote viewing and know that it works,
A remote viewer will try to interpret what are photo negatives to fit his session. Pre-programming and time work against him because we assume time works properly from Lauren's POV and Dr. Carr's. Carr launches himself into a trance but also uses space inside the room. He seems to have no feel how space works in his linear movements because what a RV master uses is a 360 eye as if operating from within a orb. It would have been easier for Dr. Carr to simply guess what Lauren was wearing on her trip. Abstracts are as big as whatever it was that he eventually rendered. A lot of time, RV masters will see other people looking at them throughout the day. Mostly, a RV master will have to clear his mind of heavy visuals, colorful art, shapes or things that move oddly like lava flow. Personally, I try to not sketch because it limits the detail of what I actually see. The discerning mind works to read other persons on many levels, not just what they think or convey through speech. Any language spoken is contextual but to do a real time read of another person a color coded keyboard would have to be used to group syntax. A Synesthete for example would be able to assign spoken words to his color coded palate for quick documentation.
I just tried own remote viewing for the first time... I got into the head of someone looking at a Derren Brown video on RU-vid... amazing, perhaps it was you Easy peasy this remote viewing stuff..!
Guys Darren is completely aware that remote viewing is 100% real but he doesn’t want to admit it if you don’t believe me then go on the internet and type targeted remote viewing and then I can guarantee you will believe it’s real because I was just like you but then I got every answer right
Not a good example of remote viewing and remote viewing is used in the military. The main issue is to quieten the mind. The best remote viewing is not 100% hence why they use at least 5 remote viewers. Also blind targets are best to stop our conscious mind butting in and adding false information.
Spiritual and metaphysical arts practitioner here... Born with gifts and abilities, never lost connection... There is a whole lot more, with high accuracy, yet this one thing seems to be the only topic of what they think is useful... Is it possible they don't really know who and or what is roaming around the continental US, and what We can do? Do they really not know? They don't... They don't really see...
