‪@RussellBrand‬ 

Good chat

The documentary was more of a mockumentary!!! whenever you have actors or actresses standing in to give deliberately dramatised statements on behalf of / instead of the actual accusers that already puts the accused at a huge disadvantage, a bit like the Michael jackson ‘mock-u-mentary made by Oprah. Furthermore none of these women should be called victims either. this instantly creates a supposition of harm done. Until he is given a fair trial (if that’s at all possible now) and found guilty, then and only then should these women be called victims. Right now we simply have accusers and the accused. Emotional language should be obliterated from all media and certainly actors and actresses should not be used to dramatise statements of the accusers. They should be written and held up to the screen for us to read and for the visually impaired perhaps it could be read by AI. Even with this deliberate manipulation from the media then as far as i know this man has still not been interviewed by the police never mind charged or convicted! There has been much talk of others saying they were asked if they have any sex related beans to spill on Russel. It seems ‘they’ve’ been trying to gather enough of a story against him for a good few years!!! I have every sympathy for anyone who’s suffered abuse of any form including those that have been mis-accused. I can’t help but wonder if Mr Brand was not so vocal about his politics and views on possible ‘global agendas’ if they would have been so interested. The government themselves have sadly promoted this idea by getting involved in the news story by strongly suggesting to RU-vid & Rumble that they withdraw his ability to monetise his platform with them. Since when have we had parliamentary directives to suspend the earnings of uncharged non convicted individuals! Weirdly for them this action has many of us feeling defensive for Russel rather than being open and impartially awaiting the facts