@@bipl8989 Under Trump administration, there is no war at all. Only Obama and Biden did start the war. I am Vietnamese and I think you are so stupid to think Trump is a threaten
Here in Ukraine we're just making jokes about it. Well, some are really afraid, me - if Ukraine is going to die, if Kiev is going to be nuked - I want to die with it.
@@FireOccator that was needless civilian casualties. Its already proven that Japan is losing and the war was about to end. US is a cancer of humanity. They have no principle.
Article five doesn't really apply here though, being that Ukraine isn't a NATO member. I don't disagree that they would forced into a position of expected response up to and including nuclear weapons, but not necessarily by article five.
@@Lemosa3414 You're not wrong. Sadly, much as has been seen in other countries, the elites tend to pass the costs and 'externalities' of a sanctions regime down to the poorest in the nation, then use it as an excuse to stoke nationalist sympathy against foreign actors. North Korea is a good example of this.
The USA isn’t really one to talk the launched multiple nukes in japan and after seeing the damage still kept going. For the u.s to condemn them is hypocritical
If I am to die in a nuclear war, all the matters to me at the end of my life is that I am right with God, forgiven of all sin....and that my name is written in His book of life....Then a whole new chapter begins...at home for all eternity with the One who has always loved me
There will be war if the jerks in the west keep poking the bear to make Profit. Find God and Prep. There was 70% survival in Japan nukes. will be less cause the yields are larger, but some of us will survive. You can tell our govt. thinks shit of us, cause there has been no training or stocking of shelter for the people. Now Russia has drills every year and actually evacuates over a million from the city. They have shelters. Why, they feel threaten with ours and Nato missiles on their borders. That is why Ukraine, but no one listened or cared. We will get to learn the hard way.
Why would he? They’re for long range strategic options and he doesn’t want them shot down. You’ll not use such when tactical are available. Study the difference.
There seems to be some confusion delineating the difference between "tactical weapons" and "strategic weapons". I'll try to clarify it as best as I understand it myself. "Tactical" is akin to "mobile" or "smaller" while "strategic" is akin to "stationary" or "large scale". Strategic nuclear weapons are those usually found in silos and in the bomb bays of planes and typically have a much higher yield in comparison. Tactical nuclear weapons are typically what you see on cruise missiles or the occasional artillery with the capability of firing specially modified rounds with nuclear tips. These tend to be of much smaller yields. Hope that clears it up a little.
In a sense there is no difference between tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. On detonation they both leave their signatory radioactive fallout with attendant 100-year lasting adverse effects.
A tactical nuclear weapon has more to do with the yield of the weapon, not the distance it travels to target. A ballistic missile could also carry a tactical nuclear warhead. And a 'strategic' nuclear weapon could be fired a short range or dropped from a plane after a short flight.
It also has very short half life which strategic nuclear missile systems do not. Strategic nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles are to inflict mass casualties and destroy infrastructure and make it uninhabitable long periods of time. It would work using a long half life nuclear component in a tactical nuclear weapon. If you plan to send your soldiers to play in your neighbors' playground you just nuked! They should not have to worry about sucking up nuclear radiation from their own government.
@@noneyadamnbiznezz Never heard of the shorter half life theory. There'd be less fissile material in a small bomb, so of course a smaller area. But a tactical nuclear weapon will still destroy everything in it's blast zone as in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A dirty bomb is one dropped at ground zero altitude.
Putin will probably use poison gas on a population before using nukes. Putin used chemical weapons on civilians in Syria and I think in Chechnya as well
@@haruruben Stupid mor*on, everybody knows US was behind white helmets CW false flags, /children from Mariupol tell how Azov militants shot them in the legs, Russian troops are moping up neighborhoods in Mariupol and other events of the special operation on March 27.
Nuclear war will happens soon because of USA/Nato, look Russia attack Ukraine suppose to end in shorter time but it become harder because westen is backup Ukraine and turn up more people is going to suffer. not to mention hate between Russia and west increase.
@@sleepybear5069 what? So nuclear war is going to happen because NATO has helped Ukraine? NATO and the world should have done nothing? Your equation starts off with the ignorance of the key fact. Russia invaded Ukraine. Had Russia not invaded Ukraine, NATO would not of help Ukraine.
@@toddleva Yes, the world should do nothing and let Russia do the job. Do you know who is arming Ukrainian long time ago, this people are mostly neo nazi/white supremacist/far right azov/whatever. Do you even know who you're support. I mean we all feel sad for innocent people, we need this case end as soon as posible so people can go home, but what happpened now is US don't want to end, I believe US is the key to end this war just negotiate with Russia but they keep sending weapon. I guest western want to use this opportunity to destroy Russia economy so at the end Nuclear war can't be avoid.
most religions used fear like this to make people follow and to control them. fear is the key for power and victory. that's why many russians Soliders died Cuz the did not made ukrainian fear by dropping thousands of strikes in kyiv the night of 24 of February and they still have electricity. imagine winning a war this way. pure Stupidness and sympathy from putin.
The purpose of Russian nuclear weapons are all Anglo-Saxon countries without exception, they will be the first to be destroyed in the event of a war, there is no sense for Russia to launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine, the Anglo-Saxons will destroy Russia's main enemy
I dont think Putin would nuke Ukraine. I do however think he would nuke NATO countries or the US if they intervene. If he did by chance nuke Ukraine we would see Russian troops pulling back or moving away from an area they intend to nuke.
I don’t understand why people say this ^^ Why exactly do you think this? If Putin does this he would get nuked back! Do you think he could just nuke NATO and get off freely? 😂
The doctrine of Russian tactical n strategic missiles r indeed interesting. So do with their anti-aircraft n anti-missile system. Nato n US have good in defense, their weapons r good in defending, not brutal offensive system. Whereas Russians having brut offensive doctrines that r unstoppable. Or Russia could b suicidal, blasting a Tsar bomb at a specific crate in artic or in Pacific will rip this planet apart, whether anybody know it or not! So ppl in the west n that Ukrainian clown should drop ego n stop escalating the situation. These fools r playing with fire n laughing with an emoji. Stop nato expansion eastward as promised, implement Minsk agreement, stop killing ppl in donbass n Luhansk.
No he will nuke Ukraine ,the chances is he knows many have left n attacking NATO first with nukes risk getting one back or both country would be finish.Ukraine by now is almost flatten n most population has left except army n soldiers imo.Good bet
A ludo player playing chess with professional grandmaster. Every one knows ludo player has only pawns left and checkmate is immanent but ludo player still want to play till end and keep sacrificing his pawns.
Ego, not egos - Putin's ego. He ordered this war, he can order a tactical nuke, or he can order the military to cease operations. I've worked 17 years with a Russian who came to the USA in 1989 and he says"Never trust a Russian".
Watching this.. I couldn't help but think of the chain reaction if a nuclear weapon was used near Chernobyl... What a hell of a mushroom cloud of radiation.. and it would blow back on Russia.. like burning a brush pile with the window open 👍
Beautiful analysis and presentation ; just one correction, Ukrane is yet to become a NATO member, hence it is not a war on NATO and its allies, therefore, NATO cannot go on a nuclear war with Russia but continue to extend indirect suport to Ukraine. If not anything this conflict has helped a few Nato leaders 1 Boris Johnson whose chair was shaky, can now be sure of retaining it, hence he is making the loudest noise 2 Macron is sure to be re-elected 3 Nato secretary generals term extended by one year 4 Canadian PM will be in power full term 5 Rest of the members can be sure of their seats for some time
@@fishnug3405 In what world is Boris Johnson sure of retaining his seat? The British economy is a disaster, he broke his own covid rules multiple times and the Conservative Party are behind in the polls. It's also irrelevant, the opposition have said very similar things about Ukraine as Johnson.
@@goodearth5584 you know what , this is what will happen : the aggressor will get the most humiliating loss in all of his history and will have decades of grey times ahead . You can't beat karma .
About a week before the first Space Shuttle disaster occurred, I had a dream that it crashed on landing. My dream was wrong, it crashed during takeoff. Last night I had a dream that Russia was using strange weapons against the U.S. including nukes. But what scared me the most is that the nukes were detonated up high with thousands of dart-like penitrators in them. I pray I'm wrong and dreams are just unconscious fears of our daily lives. I'm a child of the Cuban Missile Crisis, so I'm re-living the dream.
Let me clear this up. A "tactical" nuclear monkey thrown at a bunch of birds would reduce the bunch of birds to smouldering ashes, leaving nearby monkey forces unharmed. A "strategic" nuclear monkey thrown at a bunch of birds would reduce the bunch of birds, the monkeys, and the forest to smouldering ashes leaving only irradiated cockroaches to celebrate their new place in the forest/wasteland hierarchy. You're welcome.
With the annoying side-effect being that even a single tactical nuclear monkey wildly increases the risk that all other monkey-capable nations let loose their entire barrel of monkeys at once. Which would be unfortunate for monkeys and birds everywhere.
@@montlejohnbojangles8937 yeah if Russia does that then everything is going to hit the fan and currently if Russia has over 5,977 warheads then they could use those powerful weapons against the U.S. or the UK or any other countries that have supported Ukraine
One pundit said we will see a game change in about 10 days. That was last week. They have their existential threat.. a standing NATO army on their doorstep.
No one wants or has wanted to attack Russia. This is a land grab. Let’s all be real here. An attack on Russia is just outrageous, see what’s happening to Russians in Ukraine? That’s what would happen to anyone invading Russia. It’s just not worth it. Putin is taking land because he can. Putin is more likely to kill a Russian than any Ukrainian.
Putin is threatening to use low yield nuclear weapons like nuclear artillery shells or nukes on cruise missiles. Some of the first North Korean nukes fit into the tactical nuke category. The USA also has tactical nuclear weapons too. As one who grew up with the Bomb - I would say the nastier element of nukes is the radioactive fallout. The cleanest nuke is the neutron bomb and EMP weapons. Radioactive fallout has the same problem as chemical weapons... depending on the way the wind blows ... one could risk being hoisted by one's own petard. Any use of nuclear weapons would leave a radioactive signature. EMP weapons would wipe out civilians but most mil std stuff will survive to live another day ... if Putin is seriously thinking of deploying such weapons then you'll also see the Russian generals who are worth half a lick sending out Russian NBC monitoring vehicles into the battlefield. Most nuclear weapon ready military forces have these Nuclear Biological Chemical monitor vehicle to detect radiation fallout, chemical or biological weapons usage on the battle field ... they are used to tell central command and field commanders about the NBC risks in the battlefield. The military NBC soldiers wear PAPR w NBC filters and PPE bunny suits....you can't miss'em. NATO has tactical nukes too so there is a risk of a tit for tat tactical nuke exchange. I would say the biggest risk of a nuclear exchange is not the nuclear explosions themselves but a famine when radioactive fallout poisons the regional food and water supply. Btw: iodine tablets might not be all that useful in preventing radiation poisoning of the thyroid. .
Nice information. Thanks. İ will add US used this nuc so Russia can anytime... NATO cant stop him otherwise world totally destroyed... İ think best way this comedian president must go his bosses home and putin will go home...very clear comedian trying to mix nato into war...
EVAPORATION OR BURNT TO DEATH AND SLOW AND AGONISING DEATH BY THE RADIATION WERE STRONTIUM (SR) ARE O N E OF THE MOST LEATHAL COMPONENTS OF KILLING RADIATION! IT ATTACS THE WHITE BODY AND ESPECIALLY THE BONEMARROW WHERE THE BLOOD IS BUILT AND DISTRIBUTÖR TO THE BODY! WATCH HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI EFFECTS OF THERMONUCLEAR BOMBS!
@Daredevil you think the war will stop if NATO stops supplies? ukraine would keep fighting and maybe win, and if russia succeeds putin would invade moldova next.
@Daredevil what? putin wont stop until he conquers ukraine and possibly moldova, maybe even the baltics,.. or until russia is defeated in ukraine. Stopping supplies to ukraine wouldnt stop the war, it would actually escalate it since putin would smell weakness in the west and exploit that.
@Daredevil russia isnt invincible you know? im not saying ukeaine can conquer russia, but they can probably kick them out of ukraine with increased western support
@Daredevil he wont go for NATO because he knows his army would get destroyed easily, given the performance in ukraine, the danger is that he will then escalate to nukes to save face. this is why a direct russia NATO confrontation has to be avoided by keeping putin busy in ukraine. you seem to think that putin only wants ukraine, that is false he wants the old soviet borders back. sooner or later he has to be stopped, better now then in a NATO conflict.
@@nueroendoctrinecarcinomaaf2272 Grace and peace to you. To whom do you address your message? I think this video help us alot to understand this topic.
You made a fallacy in your analogy. He said that they would be a response from NATO if Russia uses tactical nuclear weapons. This is false. Ukraine is not a NATO country and they don’t fall under article 5. If Russia launched a nuclear attack on Ukraine NATO would do absolutely nothing.
@@gbjanuary Unlikely. First of all, the only city near enough to the polish border is Lviv. People way overestimate how far fallout spreads or how it spreads. Fallout depends entirely upon wind direction. Also, fallout is only spread out to a decent amount if a ground strike occurs, which in the event of a city being bombed is unlikely. And at the end of the day, a nuclear response by NATO over some radiation crossing the border wouldn’t make sense and be an overreaction. Risking the collapse of the entire western world over an uptick in cancer rates in Eastern Poland makes no sense. It would just be a tragedy we’d have to accept.
@@gbjanuary Chernobyl was a completely different type of event than a nuclear blast. Nuclear reactor meltdowns release far more radiation than nukes do. They also release it for days rather than a short moment. That’s why Chernobyl still is mostly uninhabitable to this day while places like Hiroshima quickly rebuilt and were home to millions of people not long after the atomic bombing. If nukes carried the similar effects as nuclear reactor meltdowns, all of those tests back in the day would’ve resulted in radiation spreading throughout large regions rather than small controlled areas designated for testing.
The use of tactical nuke in 1945 ended the war but if it was used now the war would be escalated. Or would it? Not too sure anymore, NATO might pretend that it's just another volcano eruption.
Partially agree but Hiroshima nuke killed 100000 civilians in few minutes and affected generations after??? So did US was ewer punished for that? Remind me please
@@beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 Why the fuck should US be punished in 1945? Japan had an evil regime which killed 30 million people in Asia, so 150 000 civilians killed compared to 30 million is a drop in the sea. And Japan hasn't apologised to China or Korea for millions of civilians killed. Even when the most liberal president Barack Obama visited Hiroshima, he reefused to apologise for the dropped nukes because in 1945 there were no legal treaties that protected civilians in conflicts. Therefore stop judging actions taken in ww2 by today's standards ok?
@@beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 Why would US be punished for acting in self defense and bringing about the end of WW2 and creating relative world peace for the next 70 years?! They dropped the bomb because the Japanese would not stop attacking US and to show the world that the war was no longer worth fighting with such weapons in possession
@M. DJ Strategic or tactical in the circumstances they're all practical. It's all fair in love and WAR. Nukes might not come into play straight away but they cannot be ruled out totally either. If Ukraine takes advantage of the present momentum and tries to chase the Russians out of Donbas and Crimea, Putin will be forced to display shock and awe as a game-changer.
Ukraine is also not part of NATO. And NATO has stated that they will not fight Russia unless attacked on NATO territories. Since Ukraine is not part of NATO, Russia could probably use nuclear weapons without worrying about a nuclear retaliation since NATO isn't obliged to defend Ukraine militarily. This actually makes nuclear weapons a valid option for Russia. In fact the heavy sanctions and support for Ukraine might make the nuclear option even more tempting. NATO could be indirectly provoking a nuclear strike without realizing it. It just depends how far Putin is willing to go.
There is nothing to be gained for Russia by employing nukes. There is no singular military target in the Ukraine to bomb. It’s not much more than house to house fighting. Any use of nuclear weapons by them would have them cut off from the rest of the world like Nth Korea is. NATO would not enter into a nuclear exchange as they would not be prepared to escalate the situation beyond Ukraine. They don’t need to. Russia will be crippled if they went the nuke option.
@@matthewtighe7401 If you’re cornered with no escape, then you might as well take the rest of the world down with you. It’s important for the peace negotiations to offer Putin a way out of the situation.
The problem with threats to strike fear ,might scare the adversary into doing something stupid ,like striking first, when least expected like those days of infamy we remember each year..We never know what dictators might do..😱😳😱
A tactical nuke in Europe would provoke a full launch response because it would validate that NATO is the intended target. There is already no faith that it be the last use or the aggression will stop.
The fear of a nuclear fall out once Putin uses nuclear weapons be it tactical or not would surely affect surrounding NATO countries around Ukraine. And, it is enough reason for NATO to move according to Article 5, which is an attack on one member nation is an attack on all. This will definitely blur the lines between defensive and offensive use of nuclear weapon. And, mind you if and when Putin decide to use nuclear weapons, God forbids it, he know that strategically time is of the essence, before NATO can react it is advantageous to use nuclear arms to its full potential. May God save us all from this mad man.
It would be the end of the world as we know it, all NATO nukes targeted at every Russian city, as the Russians and their allies would also target ours, billions of people & animals would die in that type of war.
Nah. It would provoke a war most likely, but the west wouldn't go to a full nuclear launch in response. The first to use nukes in modern combat (especially as the aggressor) would become worldwide pariahs and would die a slow economically strangled death while methods to knock their nukes out would be developed and deployed. As poor as maintenance has been on conventional Russian military equipment, I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of Russia's strategic nukes were duds by now and tactical nukes aren't actually tactical to begin with. So they have no legitimate military use.
Your logic is litlle bit confuse. Russia on january already saying, warning to america and Nato about ukraine and give them security proposal!!! Russia attack ukraine because nato eastward expansion. Even with bla..blaa.blaa sanctions the biden, europe,nato bark . putin have balls to attack ukraine for russia interest. And now russia telling west do not intervene on ukraine or nuclear go into your ass. Lets see are NAto gangs have balls?? Because russia already saying many times there is no place to retreat. Russia like a man if diplomacy fail choose the hard way or nuclear . 😎
The number of people killed depends as much upon the population density of the target as the strength of the bomb. Obviously a small nuke detonated in a city will kill more people than a large nuke detonated in the countryside. Therefore measuring a nuke by the death count is, of course, a tad misleading.
I am truly shocked how people can laugh and joke about this situation. People need to be very clear. We could all be blown to pieces & those are the lucky ones. The unlucky ones survive!
article five cant be invoked if Russia uses a nuclear weapon against Ukraine, unless any fallout that spread across NATO territory would be declared an attack, which is a stretch considering all the nuclear tests conducted by the u.s and the soviet union in the past, but allright.
What I think is tactical nukes or low yield nukes will be used for targeting enemy concentration or mass formation to win a particular battlefield location. The real question is whether Putin will use them in Ukraine and what will be the NATO response.
In this case NATO has no other option but to respond with equal magnitude,I doubt NATO will retaliate with nukes bcos Rusiia has shown they will fire back.
@@jeffrey4181 The question is which society will be more control by their govt ??Do you think Europeans are will to die to fire a nuke back ?or they will be stunned by Russia action n think maybe it would be best to stop it from escalating!?
Nato will definitely respond to Russia with much more of severe Nuclear attack if Putin was stupid enough to even use one Tacticle nuclear weapon. Why because Ukraine 🇺🇦 is surround by NATO countries and that radiation will hit at least one nation which activates article 5! And if USA attacks I think they will have there 20 plus ballistic Subs with 194 475 kiloton warheads each fire all at once at Putin’s Milatary and nuclear weapon weapons! And yes America will be devestatated aswell but they do have defense against ballistic missles and unknown weapons in space. The world will probally end.
Wait, if Russia uses nukes in Ukraine why would nato respond with a nuke. Ukraine is not a nato country, responding with a nuke will just escalate tensions
West being salty for not voting against our best friend. India ain't the country who stabbed from behind. A friend in need a friend indeed. 😂😂😂 Time forDOWNFALL OF DOLLAR HEGEMONY TO MUCH ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE DOLLAR AS A MAIN BACKBONE OF WEST AND MATO SO WETHER WEST COUNTRY WILL BE DOING OR NOT BUT YEAH EMTIRE ASIA EXPECT JAPAN & AUSTRALIA & SOUTH KOREAN OTHER REST OF THE COUNTRY IS READY TO TRADE BETWEEN COUNTRY OF ASIA WITH THEIR OWN LOCAL CURRENCY JUST TO DITCH ZIONIST DOLLAR. THE RISE OF EAST ERA AS WE CAN SEE FUTURE OF ASIA IS BRIGHT. ✌️🤘 LONG LIVE RUSSIA AND INDIA AS LONG TIME FRIENDS. 🤘🙏👍 ALSO ITS THE BRANDON & HIS PUPPET BORIS THEY BOTH BEING SHAKY AS THEIR PLAN IS NOT ON THE RIGHT TRACK. So they pulled india onto this WAR as of since day one when war started #INDIA DID STEP BACK FOR VOTING IN UNSC AGAINST OUR FRIEND RUSSIA. DOWNFALL OF WEST NATO & E.U
Swear this is like having Admiral General Aladdin explain nuclear weapons. A tactical nuclear weapon is defined by its payload or nuclear yield it has nothing to do with distance.
False, the US have used small, low yield nuclear weapons in Afghanistan and Iraq. One just only needs to Google the use. The public globally is being manipulated by being mislead to think that Russia would be the first to use tactical nukes. Many people aren't aware that the use of them have already occured.
@@BearFruit90 it's a starting point for your research. Many people want others to do the work for them, then deny the results of what they may find. Not saying you, but yes the US has already used the low yield nukes that can take out about a city block.
Another difference in tac-nukes is, they are dial-a-yield, meaning you can control the chain reaction of the neutron flow by letting some escape before splitting further atom cores. Also there are tac-nukes in the form of Howitzer projectiles, 155mm and 8 inch(203mm).
DISLIKE. Putin May say that Ukraine belongs to Russia and ocupants are in Ukraine and that is threat to Russia and they can shoot. Nuclear missile but that has to approve 5 people and Putin thinks that there is one person from 5 that is not willing to do that but Putins. Fingers are itching for pressing nuclear button.
Mark my words Putin will use a tactical nuke. The reason is simple he cannot afford to lose this war, the same was when USA couldn't afford to lose to Japan and used a nuclear bomb and USA is still going strong. So whats impeding Putin to use a nuke?
If the glow comes it will come over Moscow. There is no tactical nukes war only total nuclear war . The use of so called tactical nukes over ucraine means the simultaneously use of the 80 strategic nukes from the 4 b52 bombers which are always pointing towards the main 6 Russian cities
✍🤍💙❤ואוו איזה סרטון ✍💘🧏♀️😅😘אדון היקסר ✍🌻🌻🇸🇮"זכור תמיד כי ההחלטה שלך להצליח היא חשובה יותר מכל דבר שתעשה על מנת להגשים אותה" ( ✍😘😘😘🤍💙❤😘😘😘😘🤍💙❤🤍💙❤🤍פוטין זה פוטין 😘😘😘הנשיא הקיסר
If we don't mind our own damn business. This is bound to happen if don't leave these people alone. That fight has nothing to do with us. Biden has made this out problem and it's not
Article 5 can only be activated if the attack is on a NATO POWER, Ukraine isn't member of NATO so NUKES can't be used even if RUSSIA uses TACTICAL NUKES in Ukraine.
Putin is losing the war in Ukraine. His army has been proven to be much weaker than previously thought. To even be discussing Russia using nuclear weapons proves how weak Putin really is. Don't think for a second Putins use of a nuke wouldn't result in the end of him.
Thank you for your opinion, but if the U.S. and N.A.T.O. kept their nose out of ukraine, there WAR would've been over a long time ago. Since the U.S. and N.A.T.O. don't listen and just keep coming in with MISSILES, well the U.S., N.A.T.O., and ukraine will pay a high price.
@@dirtshredder8737 Thank you for your opinion and yes you are right. That being said, President Putin WILL resort to NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Just like the U.S. would if in the same situation.
Russia doesn't want to conquer Ukraine,what they want is to force Ukraine to recognise the territory from the south as part of Russia. Like they did in Finland.
So it is better for Putin to withdraw its force from Ukrain by respecting the soverginity of a nation and by seeing the dangerous consequeces that should arise from the use of nuclear wepon.
@@soumranjanpatro1262 It's not simple to handover parts of their territory to Russia n also how can it be simple when one dictator try to dictate how one independent sovereign nation can live n tell them whom they can make friendship with n whom they can't......Will u still able to say it's simple if ur neighbour try to involve in your family issues n tell you who can be your friends n who can't....I'm not siding anyone but from a neutral point of view Russia is totally wrong starting this war n commit war crimes I hope Putin will pay a heavy price for all the brutal crimes he commited, future generations will always remember as a ruthless dictator who invaded smaller n weaker country n started war killing thousands of innocent civilians just like Hitler , He will be study in schools just like Hitler n will always be remember as the only ruthless dictator who started war in the 21'st Century...
I think it's time to get rid of Russia for good this time.And the Chinese isn't any better than russians.But the Japanese will deal with them lol.Be safe India and be smart.
