Russia Opens a Second Front in Kharkiv: What Next? 

You'll be expecting the presenter to pronounce Carkey'vv correctly next... ; ) (Report also says nothing about the reason for Russia "just walking in" is that Ukraine had to build the defences several miles back since they were being attacked when they tried to do so on the border.)

Most people have already left before. Vovchansk was already occupied in February 2022, and then liberated in September that year

theres no way it had 18 000 by may 10th , it already seen fighting earlier in the war and has been shelled since liberation in 2022

a lot of them are russians waiting for the liberation.

Shows the incompetence of Ukrainian commanders, the money that were supposed to be spent on the defence line were stolen the very moment they reached ukrainian thieving government

They've been more right than the media - most analysts were more reserved in their hype for Ukraine's 2023 counteroffensive than the media and quicker to say that it wasn't going as planned. But their biggest mistakes happened right at the beginning of the war, when they drastically underestimated how long Ukraine would hold out.

TAIWANESE Lives Matter 🇹🇼💯

@@Talisguythey were also wrong about Ukrainians Kharkiv offensive, no one thought it would come so soon or happy in the Kharkiv region. It seems analysts just don’t know war.

@@BrightWendigoIn my language anal means anal, while "liz(s)" means lick. That gives you a pretty good idea about what analysts do.

Well, maybe it's hard for modern man to acknowledge, but warfare is too much complex to really be analysed and predicted with any meaningful scope. Warfare is something that i shaped every day by milions of decision of hundred thousands of people who engage in it, not only that, it's also shaped by things like weather, germs and other unpredictable stuff. We are building supercomputers in order to create very complex weather models, but even the most advanced tech that we have can only predict with some kind of certainty 40 hours of weather in small area. How we can think that any "expert" that sit behind the table in some office can really predict outcome of things as diverse and multi faceted as military offensive? In Waterloo Napoleon send cavalary to took artilery and destroy it. Soldiers took those positions, but then they couldn't destroy Cannons. Why? Because those of them who had special nails that are used to quickly destroy cannons were those who were killed during cavalry charge. Who could predict that? No one really. But this small nuance changed everything in this battle.

really? that is some news. maybe you can explain why russia retreated before from this area when they where in control in the start of the war with 1000 times the equipment. is there a reason for that? use your brain and think, you can do it.

​@Lavithz What are you saying? That the whole war was orchestrated by the sith, playing both sides against eachother?

Russia has faster access to armaments at the moment so they might have just been keeping the Ukraine front spread thin while waiting for their supplies to run out, until the bulk of available equipment was stuck in logistics. (It takes a long time for those American bucks to reach the front) Can't say for sure, but that's my thought on it at least.

@@Lavithz i'm soo confused by the phrasing of this comment.. When Russia evacuated Kharkiv they still had less than 180k soldiers to guard a 1000km front.. and 30k had were still retreating from Kherson... in the kharkiv area there were apparently less than 2k russian soldiers with no defensive lines at all. Kiev moved in with at least 10k soldiers (by kiev numbers).. of course the russian retreated to better defensive position, and they actually performed an excellent withdrawth saving more than 95% of personnel and equipment.. But the west gotta propagandise

1. Russia didn't open anything. This is a UK 2017 cast. 2. Why Russia retreated from Kharkiv?: well, look at what's left of the Ukrainian army to get the answer you're looking for...

Ukraine and Russia are not the countries that have been spending significant amounts of money on military R&D. Ukraine simply doesn’t have the money to design next gen tanks, fighters, or artillery systems and Russia has too much corruption to make any serious headway as the ARMATA shows. Plus Russian military doctrine actually prefers what is happening since First World War style fronts are simpler and easier to manager when you have a large force of unmotivated conscripts who received light training and minimal equipment. Innovating the way that western countries do with their equipment would actually go against the way that Russia likes to fight wars.

Western countires power in not in m 16 apache f22 bal bla leopard 2 .... western power is in their influence of surrounding and isolate enemy countires and power of world bank (sanction) wich simply destroy enemy economy and cant support their military in battle . You dont understand how war works and dont write crap vietnam war is good example where vietnam economy cant colaps becuse of soviet support and military support and of course usa will lose.

drone tech has given frontline units unmatched visibility of the battlefield supported with accurate artillery and of course more drones. Large formations preparing for an attack would get hit before it entered the battle so trench warfare and small assault units is how this war is being fought. Modern weaponry is very accurate and with a high lethality.

@@CyrilSneer123 surveillance drones are just WWI blimps but modern. bomb/ing drones are a more modern thing but not very far from trench strafers

Modern warfare is kind of insane because never before have both sides been able to have such total visibility of the enemy. It's like playing an RTS game online with fog of war turned off and the enemies all lit up with icons. Oh and the cameras making this possible have fucking bombs attached to them so that's like playing with cheats where you can just click to create an explosion.

Go look at the videos this awful channel put out about Ukraines counter offensive 😂😂They were 100% wrong about EVERYTHING!! Hilarious

​@@RUTHLESSambition5 Bro just discovered war.

Democracy LIKE TRUE

@@RUTHLESSambition5 Wars change, and public opinion changes, early on in the war you'd be called a traitor for even suggesting Ukraine might now win in the long run

@@RUTHLESSambition5 it doesnt matter for the coping nafo bots they are here to hear what helps them cope

These sponsorships require them to talk about it, they're kind enough to put it at the end so you we can just find another video

@@GamerX13X yeah, but I'm talking more about the manner of delivery

Huh I think they are fine. Not the best but far from being terrible...

What about the transition is horrible?

Use SponsorBlock if you're on a computer and RU-vid ReVanced if you're on Android, if it wasn't for either one of these I'd probably not be a RU-vid user right now.

Technical point of order, when talking about positions along rivers, the "proper" nomenclature is not to use directions but rather to use the terms right or left bank, referring to the point of view of the river itself looking in the direction that water is flowing towards. So assuming you're talking about the Vovcha River that runs right through the middle of the town and connects with the Donets River, the Russian position would be on the "right bank" (north side in this specific area) and the Ukranians would hold the "left bank" (south side); since rivers meander, it can make north/south/east/west hard to rely on in, depending on particular geography

Pretty sure even with advancing Ukrainians lose twice as more.

There are many people even in the Ukranian side saying the constructed defenses never happened and corruption may have occured.

@homijbhabha8860 I don't think its corruption, I think its misunderstanding. Borders are rarely fortified and anyone garrisoned near the border would likely be forward of any air defense whatsoever. They'd be a sitting duck. The defensive lines are further back for good reason.

I doubt that the fortifications will work. I came across a post of an Ukranian defensive line,it wasnt even a fence. Worse,even Ukranians said that the fortifications wont do anything and that Kharkov is gone. But that is just my opinion🤷

The Republicans certainly aren't committed to a Ukrainian victory. They've been openly and proudly obstructionist for some time now. And since US aid is so much of western aid for Ukraine...

Do you think America will give more Money 😂😂It's OVER. Black Americans will get trump elected and he will leave Ukraine to the wolves and leave NATO.

​@@RUTHLESSambition5True, the Black Americans dont care about Europeans and probably want more of us to die.

the blame game started

@@RUTHLESSambition5 I mean, most of the support is from Europe atm, and if Trump gets elected, I doubt he will get majority support to leave NATO. Just because he says something, does not means it is so. And if that does happen, then Europe needs to step up their game. To me as a European, I feel we have lost our spine and need to get it back. Personally sick to rely on US.

Yeah but these guys are mostly nato propaganda merchants so they cant tell that truth till a week after it happens

It's only counted when the gains have been consolidated Otherwise greyzone on most maps

God bless Russia and long Live to Putin too

Ouch.

Are you russian ?

Stay strong! 🇨🇦 🍁 Hopefully we get more aid there soon

@@CountryLifestyle2023 um how about no? my bloody tax dollars aint goin to a war thats got nothing to do with us. protection democracy my ahh. speak for yourself mate

@williamt.sherman2573 tax money gets wasted anyways. And if you looked at history, this is how Hitler took Europe, he invaded one by one and no one did anything

Since when is 30k soldiers a small force? That would be equal to 10% of the whole initial invasion force, but concentrated in only one region.

@@alexwitoslawski4557 Ukraine attacked with many more soldiers and heavy armor in last summer's counteroffensive

Isn't that more humiliating then. That such a small probing force was able to capture territory when their plan was only to recon?​@@TSEliot1978

@@alexwitoslawski4557 the inital invasion force was very small, thats why the west was suprised that russia invaded ukraine with so less soldiers ukraine at the start of the war

Well yes but it was not recon of any kind but an intended counter offensive/big operation, you still answered nothing ​@@TSEliot1978

me when I lie :

@@Sinvay you just did

this is exactly what USA does

Yeah, and nothing UA can do about it... We get to the moment where we are about to find out how far is Nato willing to go. Or maybe not. Maybe Nato breaks over this topic. If US says "I wont risk MAD over Ukraine" and EU said "we have to defend UA at all costs"... Interesting times we live in.

@@CroatianUltraNationalist Pozdrav Ujkice...

That isn’t what divide and conquer means

@@TheTfrules Ofcourse its not. It means to divide 2 nations or more to fight eachother and then when they "spend" eachtoher you came afterwards with superior force that would not be the superior if they joined forces and oppose you in the first place. I think it comes from Gaius Iulius Caesar. DIVIDE ET IMPERA.

Stop watching NATO propaganda and you would know its far worse than all that.

its 11 the last time I checked

@@mrpilkington9710 It was 12 but the one guy forgot his wifes birthday so he had to go home.

Nope - the Russians are just conducting reconnaissance at this stage - and are encountering very weak resistance! Ukraine is done. Stick a fork in it. Russia will have won by September take that to the bank.

Avdiivka was 15x more fortified, officially had 25.000 defending troops. Kharkov isn't nearly as fortified and RU don't even need to try to capture it. Merely diverting UA forces into defense of Kharkov is good enough as pressure relief from other parts of frontline. And let's not talk about morale of UA soldiers.

@@vanjamenadzer Morale of every soldiers on the fronts is in the socks lol

@@Sinvay Perhaps but whatever the morale of UA army is, it isn't higher than RU army morale, for sure.

Thing is Adivka was seen by both parties as a way to drain the other. Way more troops were thrown there by both sides than the town should take. If Ukraine keeps going at this rate, maybe 30k soldiers would be enough to capture Kharkiv. Its all about what the other side can do and currently Ukraine is getting weaker every day. Rip to the Ukrainian men.

Its actually the fourth front these guys just read a script provided for them

There's no three day special military operation like a Russian three day special military operation.

@@geofflepper3207 General Milley said that, not the Russians.

​@@alexg2k2I mean, it's pretty obious that the russians and everybody, yourself included, were fully conscious of launching themselves in a (at least) 2.5 years long war when they onvaded, right? Right?

There were 5 at the start of the war, but Kiev and Odessa failed, Charkiv was closed and the Crimian one merged with the Dombas.

And even some grandmamas to help keep the coffee hot at the frontlines !!

Idk what Ukrainian will do now. I don't think russia can capture ukraine all the way to kyiv, but certainly they are looking for way to make ukraine surrender.

How??? Western arms are better than anything orchs can imagine then what went wrong there?

Fake , 🐷 don't have the capability to do so Either way it's a small settlement not even in the top 10 largest city in Ukraine

Accept it americans that this is not your WAR...

Жаль, что Конгресс не сможет выпустить новых украинцев, когда эти закончатся... Конгресс может печатать доллары, выпускать оружие, но не ЛЮДЕЙ! Тебе жаль? Ни хера тебе не жаль.

it's a shame the US thinks a nation like Ukraine could go toe to toe against a regional power with tremendous and I mean tremendous reserves of material with nothing more than western handouts. Ukraine is being bled dry and the US is happy for that to continue. They don't need more support, they need a negotiated end to the war but the US and its puppet in Kiev won't let that happen.

It was a tough call, do we invest 60gn in Ukraine or do we set that money on fire? Either way Russia wins

womp womp. cope lol

[ˈxarʲkəf]

almost sounds like he saying "car-key"

English don't know how to pronounce the "Kh" sound, no matter how you write it. Many languages have this sound, but the Brits just don't know how to say it.

Harkiv rather than Kharkiv yes correct the sound your referring to and represented by Kh doesn’t exist in standard English so we use the K sound in answer to your statement

Who cares how the name sounds in a different language :D tell this stuff to people who live in Munich

Thanks for what?? Lying non stop😂😂😂and bad predictions. The worst was the video of Ukraines counter offensive.

@@RUTHLESSambition5”lying” implies an inherent malice in the intentions of the team. Making inaccurate “predictions” in good faith does not classify as lying to the audience, as they did not intentionally withhold any publicly known information. Criticize the inaccuracy of their predictions, not their intent.

🇷🇺

@@RUTHLESSambition5lying? 🤣 that’s some fantasy world you live in 🤣😂🤣😂

@@RUTHLESSambition5Ukraine liberated more land in the first month of their counter offensive than Russia captured during 9 months at Bakmut

I wonder if he would say the same to Palestinians that they have the right to strike inside Israel "just as Israel is striking inside Palestine"

​@@user-op8fg3ny3jPalestine is not a legitimate country. The. End.

@@SelfProclaimedEmperor that's the point. China and Russia use the same justification to invade Taiwan and Ukraine

@@SelfProclaimedEmperor STFU and read The Ethnical Cleansing of Palestine by Illan Pappe (israeli professor for history)

@@SelfProclaimedEmperor that's what China says about Taiwan, and Russia to justify Ukraine

You think badly, we don’t really notice that someone is fighting there.

Maybe ammunition shortages, but Russia is a country for more than a 100 million. As many as they lose until the Russian people are fed up Russia isn't going to have manpower issues.

How many rubles today Russian troll? What use are they if there is no heat and electricity to pay for again this winter. You couldn't find any work other than spouting propaganda for a barbaric, terrorist imperialist Russian dictatorship? Or you just have no sense of morality?

​@@geofflepper3207why so angry? He just made a point lol

well cry about it then fire worshipper

"Joined Oct 24, 2023" another 7 month old nafo bot account

So Iran produces more arms than 32 nation NATO

@@avex3903 Say the Russian bot joined on 31 May 2024

Russia BOUGHT those drones and patented a similar tech drone itself, which it produced en masse. Thus the difference between having a self sufficient war industry and crowdfunding a war becomes apparent.

From what I heard, the practice was for a long time to just give local military officers. They would than pick some local workers, who build up the trench. But this was seen as way that leaves to much room for corruption. So instead, they made some other entity who was supposed to dig via public procurement, but they didn't dig anything.

It's Ukraine. It allways like this. In Kherson a year ago we hadn't garbage collection services. Government made a grant, hired a company to buy new trucks. They did, even one time removed the garbage. And disappeared with trucks and money. Thsi country roted to the core.

@@iamaim2847and the west still acts like it’s worth saving. Ukraine isn’t a neoliberal bastion of democracy. It’s just as corrupt as Russia. Clown world

the money went into zelensky's personal clash of clans account

I began investing in stocks and Def earlier this year, and it is the best choice l've ever made. My portfolio is rounding up to almost a million, and I have realized that when a stock makes it to the news. Chances are you're quite late to the party, the idea is to get in early on blue chips before it becomes public. There are lots of life changing opportunities in the market, and maximize it.

What opportunities are there in the market, and how do l profit from it?

You can make a lot of money from the market regardless of whether it strengthens or crashes. The key is to be well positioned.

I would really like to know how this actually works.

All you need is a good capital, and the service of a professional broker, with those your investment will most certainly produce high yields.

The copium is real

How's the two week war going?

Zaщекан, твои собутыльники Купянск не могут взять, а ты о Харькове мечтаешь 🤡

@@qantj That's the point Russians did not say that. Yo uare proving the point.

​@@qantj Who on the russian side claimed that? And it really doesn't matter how long the war's gone, people are dying, the ukranian population is never recovering, Ukraine has already lost and is only ensuring there wont be any ukrainian adult males left in Ukraine once the war's over.

Agree. Lots of people pronounce Kharkov wrong.

His pronunciation is still more accurate than so many news presenters who stress the last syllable instead of the first, and pronounce the Cyrillic "X" like a h instead of a kh, which is closer to a "k" sound.

For Anglos, English is all that exists. They just don't bother.

English speaker and English channel. Don't like their pronounciation? Watch some Ukranian news channel instead then

​@@smashwombelYeah, but when Ukrainians speak in broken English, all the Anlgos get offended...

Russia wants all of Ukraine, point blank. They mentioned that this country isn't supposed to exist. After Ukraine it will be belarus joining russia, then moldova, then georgia, then the baltics...

It wants Kharkov but I'm not sure it wants it right now. Russia want to cause headaches for Ukraine by stretching them even thinner with a new front opening. They also want a buffer zone to nullify further attacks on Belgorod. If successful and the Ukrainians are seen to be struggling then that buffer zone could provide the springboard for an encirclement of Khakiv provided considerably more manpower is added to the new front. I don't think we will see any attack on Kharkiv this year but I could be wrong.

@CyrilSneer123 I think if ukrainans defense continues to crumble we could see karkov lost this year

Kharkiv* Also. Russian taking Donetsk after 2+ years would be a major victory for the Ukrainians. As nobody before the war expected anything. If ukraine can limit it to just the current gains +donetsk Ukraine got a way better deal than anyone expected in 2022.

@RK-cj4oc karkov. The Russians will rename it. A victory would be Ukraine negotiating in 2022 and saving hundreds of thousands of lives and billions of dollars in property and maintaining good relations between nato and russia. Now all that is lost and for what? So Russia can get even more than they were asking in 2022? "They held off two years". That doesn't count for much when the outcome is the same.

I'm guessing that Ukraine is fighting because it doesn't want to be under brutal occupation and oppression by a barbaric, backward vicious Russian dictatorship that wants to wipe Ukraine from the map and steal Ukrainian resources and take away all freedom in Ukraine. Is that really so hard for you to understand?

​@@geofflepper3207 Steal Ukrainian resources 😂 What valuable resources do the have? Salo and vodka?

@@geofflepper3207 The only one who counts ukrainian resources is the west. For real, ukronazi propaganda tells it will be a genocide. Meanwhile russians are building new homes for refugees on Donbass. And freedom, while canceling the elections, is a joke.

Keep it in mind that those are poor Ukrainian men we are talking about. They had no say, they got sent there to die for an unwinnable cause.

The Russians have the initiative from 6months, this means they can chose where to deploy their mass. Ukraine has to spread its forces throughout the whole country so they get diluted. Clearly the losses are under counted from both sides, and 31. 000 kia means likely around 80-90k irrecoverable wounded. My feeling is more 150-160 total UA losses vs 300-350 RU losses (although I wouldn't be surprise that at the end numbers are actually way higher for both sides) It's likely that the Ukrainian active army at the front is around 200-250k men. Not enough to plug all the gaps

@@90PaMa Why do you think that Russia has more losses? Russia has a 1 to 10 advantage in artillery, drones, tanks, etc.

@@IgorGreenBird Well, Uncle Sam told them, why do they need mathematics, logic and common sense when there is Uncle Sam?

@@IgorGreenBird the visual confirmed losses is a strong indicator. There might be an undercount on UA side sure, but russia is the attacker and the attacker has always more losses. I'm very conservative in those counts, as the Russians tend to leave their wounded on the ground as they have more manpower anyways. The multipliers u brought are also not consistent troughout the entire war. On the whole Russia has and had more material but on the local sites this isn't necessarily the rule every day. P. S drones capacity was built only the last 6 months and their quality is highly debatable

Not true. Russia can't keep being in war mode. The economy will be massively hurt

even after 2024? I don't think so. Time is on Ukraine's side post 2024

​@@Xilir2009 The Russian economy is definitely not experiencing such a decline as the Ukrainian economy. Considering the conformism of a large part of the Russian population, as well as the fact that a large part of Russians hate Ukrainians more than they respect themselves, it is unlikely that this will cause Russia to move away from militant xenophobic expansionism to a more restrained and balanced position. Perhaps something will change if Western states significantly increases the supply of heavy weapons to Ukraine, but now the chances of this are not high.

It’s hard to tell, a year ago I would have answered that time is definitely on Ukraine’s side but it really depends on what its Western allies decide to do going forward and in particular wether military aid increases past Russian military procurement, that’s really all it boils down to.

​@@xxvxxv5588 It's strange that you write about Russians hating Ukrainians, they have relatives on both sides

Never going happen but Trump could be a problem

@@michaeldunham3385problem or solution?

@@michaeldunham3385 The NAT0 powers are impotent the Ukraine sent its last generation into a meat grinder and got nothing now they have no way of stopping the Russians from grinding them down. President Trump should just pull us out of NAT0 at this point.

@@michaeldunham3385 ukraine will lose stop living in your own world

Bot detected, opinion rejected

Yes...? What are you getting at?

Have you only just now found out about the war that has been going on for years?

Remind me, how many prisoners from Russia were send in unarmed in Bakhmut again? Don't act like Russia doesn't have a mobilization problem lmao

@@JaegerDreadful i am not saying that ruzzia didn t do that. But whole world laughted at them for doing that. Especially ukraine. Now look hot the tables have turned.

@@JaegerDreadful RU gets 1k soldiers a day. They enlist voluntarily.

@@vanjamenadzer sources : trust me bro

@@Sinvay I mean even according to western analysts the Russian military is growing fast. You can act this way, but it makes you look stupid.

The offensive may have sped up the passing of the aid. It wasn't a certainty, either. And it's not like the effects of that aid will magically appear overnight - it'll take time. Makes sense to me.

Maybe they where planing to lauch the offensive later, but launched it early bc of the American aid package

It's happening soon after the inauguration, rather than before it. As cynical as it sounds, it's not out of the area of possibility that timing is about internal reconsolidation of power.

They basically had Orthodox Easter and Victory Day so they waited the holidays to pass then start the offensive.

The timing of the offensive might just depend on when the ground had dried up and hardened.

good song

Yeah, if people start doubting the western narrative, its only because of russian propaganda, without it, everything would be perfect in the best of world

Is it due to the propaganda or is it due to the mass migration? Because Poland is very anti-immigrant and i wouldnt be surprised if most of their grievances is directed towards that. Of course, you are right about Russian propaganda, they've always been good at that but I highly doubt that it can influence a country like Poland that significantly without another factor supporting it

Slava TSMC p

@@mingQWERTY The problem is Ukrainians are not seen as similar to Middle Easterners, they are seen as much European as Poles. Yet in just a short amount of time, anti-Ukrainian media has raged Poland in recent years; I have seen a great hatred against Ukraine. But normal Poles are not promoting this kind of thing, so the only answer is Russian disinformation campaign.

Hmm could it be because of the mass migration that polish people dont like? Or the insane amount of cheap ukrainian wheat flooding polish and cezch economys leaving local farmers with no chance of competition? Always propaganda for you west washed west europeans 😂😂

Manpower Money Morale and Resources all favor Russia.

@@mrpilkington9710 Morale, I am not super sure about. The rest is probably true.

The only thing that determines whether russia gets some form of victory out of this or not, is western support. If people in the west actually made a real effort, russia probably would've already lost. But you have people whining constantly, in america, the republicans, in europe you had sholtz dragging his feet, afraid of putin's bullshit threats. If Ukraine had what it wanted in due time, things could've been completely different. But for this reason, all ukraine needs to turn the tide of war completely, is for the west to start doing what it's supposed to, which is not impossible, if Ukraine holds firm this year, it might give enough time for the west to catch up to what it should've been doing for the past 2 years... aka, turn the factories back on. Russia's economy is pathetic, despite the bullshit inflated gdp figures russian bots want to show you, in the long run, russia would never keep up with the west's economic might. It's an economy the size of Mexico's.

@@artonio5887 sounds like cope to me

@@artonio5887 Russia has ended any myth of western superiority all that is left is western cope. The west is going to take 7 years minimum to even begin to reach the levels of military industry of the Russians. The west has no factories to "turn back on" meanwhile Russia did have factories mothballed and has since reopened them increasing the gap between western and Russian military capabilities.

Ass

Turkey will lose its nato membership over the Greek and Cyprus issues if he keeps fiddling around

Corruption never changes.

Erdogan needs to fall, urgently

Tataric language didnt even recognise by Ukraine.

Yes, doctors fights for his life. Prognosis quite grim, he is shot multiple times in chest and stomach by a 71 years old man??? He was persistantly rejecting to sign that document with WHO. Not sure if it was CIA...

What did he do to,, deserve it,,? And how do you know its the CIA

@@StudSnob he rejected to sign some agreement with WHO... No need to tell you more... 71yrs oldman did it... It deletes my comments, so search urself

@@APOLON-bm7ym thank you

@@StudSnob u r welcome. Actually he was rejecting it for a while, and than 71yrs old grandad out of the blue, 5h00t him multiple times in chest and stomach. Doctors fight for his life ever since.... Dont know if he is still alive or how well he recovers...

It is much harder to enslave people while they are in colonial metropoly, not in colony itself.

So you're another of the Russian trolls who worship shovels and washing machines and can't think of anything else? Very strange obsession you have. Very strange cult you have. Maybe best you stop telling the world about your strange obsession.

It's very sad, 3 years and they can only push 20km into Ukraine.

@@SelfProclaimedEmperor Yes very sad, it's only 2 years and they're fighting NATO too.

​@@buddyroeWhat are you smoking Nato is berly even helping Ukraine

@@debater452 Only about 220 billion in aid and mercenaries, If not for NATO Ukraine would have been done within 1 year. Not to mention the training they're recieving from NATO. Ukraine is merely cannon fodder built up by NATO to take on Russia, NATO think they can weaken Putin and then have a cake walk when they step in openly. Not going to happen. Some debater you are - "What are you smoking" "berly" 😂😂

Был я в вашей Англии по сравнению с Россией помойка Вот кто технологически отсталый так это вы

Гиперзвуковая отсталость скоро будет ваш сенат проверять на защиту

@@user-ri9us8co7k 不要忘记自 2022 年以来是谁养活了俄罗斯。这不是一个有趣的故事。

​@@huwenkai440who feeds russia 😂😂??

Japanese military had far inferior technology? Only compared to the USA, UK and Germany, not compared to the Asian countries they were invading.

It was always what was going to happen, it's now about causing that many loses to Russia that they can't do it again.

you bots are going ham. your number percentages is up 1000% this last week. you seem very desperate there in mordor

@@LavithzInsulting is unique for doofus Like your kind.

Any territory loss will be seen by Russia as the west being weak, they already see the west as weak for letting Russia take Crimea for so many years and the west did little to take it back. From Putin's point of view, he doesn't care so much about the economic or lives cost, if he can gain some territory. Seriously, the west needs to wake up, especially the EU and US when it comes to giving Ukraine the means to push Russia out of Ukraine, the west setting rules on how the weapons can be used is an advantage in favour of Russia, they can strike any target but Ukraine is restricted on what targets they can attack with western weapons, that's quite the advantage in favour of Russia and seems crazy to have such rules in place.

@@Lavithz poor coping nafo troll look in the mirror you will find another nafo bot

Onky Russian trolls say that Russia is losing. Seems then that you qualify as a Russian troll. Why do you Russian trolls keep saying that Russia is losing the war? Very strange.

​@@geofflepper3207that made no sense.

Ur a troll

you are one to talk western bot

​@@prajwal1341 You sound like an ant saying to a lion "But you're an ant too so there - take that".

​@@CroatianUltraNationalistSays the unhuman bot

@@CroatianUltraNationalistthere’s no such thing as a “western bot” Russian bot 🤣🤣🤣

Kharkiv is the ukrainan name Kharkov the russian name We are in the west, so we use the ukrainan name

@@dtheundertale3799 No, name od the city is Khakov. I asked my friends from Kharkov and they confirmed it. Kharkiv is the name Ukrainian speakers prefer to use but not right!

@@CrysisMan96 gern geschehen

It figures that they'd delete it. lol

I wouldn't wish to anyone for Zelensky to come to their city and claim that it will not fall. Thats a bad sign

Why you support an illegal invasion? Why are you not speaking out?

we will see 🇺🇸🇪🇺🇺🇦

It is Harkov for true. Like Harkonen. Ch like in character is totally different. Nazi just repleced o with I, because it is how polish phonetics works.

@@iamaim2847Why would Nazis polonise a name? The countries hardest hit by the Nazis were Poland, Belarus and Ukraine

@@markuskristersson4663 I'm telling about another iteration of nazis. Who are renaming ukrainians cities to polish phonetics, disregarding how locals are saying it. Ukraina is totally harmed by Ukronazi the most. But it still lives deep under the regime. 12M ukrainians voted for the east until nazi banned representatives of majority from participation in elections. And now they are canceled elections completely, not to see how low support of this suicidal war is.

But the biggest enemy of UA is exactly time... RU can stretch this for few more years, UA can't afford it.

Same thing was said for every major city that fell. Its called copium. There are no reserves from which the Ukraines can draw. Until NATO puts its own troops on the line, which would be one of only 3 things that Russia would consider nuke worthy, I doubt anything but a Russian Victory and or Nuclear Winter

Thats high copium. Stop sniffing it bud.

Not impactful? Opening up a new front stretches Ukrainian forces and logistics at a time it's already stretched.

Thos is the most important development in the past year. Clearly Russians are confident to go in, i have a feeling they know Ukraine lost more than 30000 men.

Inshallah as the world crisis progresses the smartest thing people do lately is building a strong investment that isn't controlled by the government. Like digital currencies.

That is very true, thanks brother for that kindly advice I was having a tough time until I started.

I started back in 2019 then I had to sell off some landed properties No one's depends on salaries this days

That's really interesting! I've been thinking about investing in digital currencies lately but wondering how to do it, do anyone have any thought on that?

To avoid losses as a and enhance profits as a newbie you'll need to consult a professional

Какие великие державы должны вмешаться? 😅Президент России чётко сказал шаг вправо шаг влево получите ядерный удар по Лондону или Парижу или...

Ahhhh wish the UK didnt turn it back to red. Russia making such a mistake by striking britain would have lost them the Ukraine war.

@@RK-cj4oc you should ask your grandparents or some elderly people what they think about global thermal nuclear war. There used to be a time when we thought the end of the world was a bad thing. These days the worst thing some people can imagine is a country they hardly knew existed 2 years ago losing a war. PS: after looking into it further it appears that Britain is actually still green. So congratulations the escalation will continue and you might get your wish of Britain getting struck and a Ukrainian victory somehow. After that who knows.

@@jonathanjacob5453 Dont have to ask them. Because of russias imperialism the risk is right here. But why would we sit back and watch russia do terrible things while we know we are next? Russia has shown it is an aggressor. And just giving in because of the threat of violence will mean we keep giving in to russia untill it is Vilnus, Talinin, Berlin, Paris or Washington that will be the reason a nuclear exchange will happen. If russia is willing to cause this over Kyiv while being the aggressor. We should be equally willing to do it for our brothers in Ukraine who are in the trenches. In some fantasy land. If russia was to put down its weapons today. Russia would continue to exist. As nobody in the west wants some needless conflict. If russia said " let the UN send a taskforce here consisting of neutral nations and do a independent vote in each territory amd in return we will honor it it would happen. But because russia is controlled by people who somehow see us as the aggressor . While russia has waged war after war at this point. Russians should be our brothers. The ethnic russian is a european. Who ( should they ever want to) should join the EU and live with us with the West. While maintaining its own culture as well. One day going from Lisbon to Vladivostok would be a dream. The furthest reaches of European dominated culture. Plenty of our enemies are happy we are put against each other. Russia and the CSTO together with Nato would be a power that would not be attacked by anyone. But it can only happen by stopping the constant aggression from russia.

@@RK-cj4oc bla bla. The Anglo Saxon has dominated the world for 500 years. Now the party is coming to an end. They would rather blow the world up rather than except it. Good luck to all of us this is the most perilous time in human history.

@@RK-cj4oc Russia intends to defeat Ukraine on the battlefield. The West can either accept this or have it escalate to global nuclear war. Those are the only 2 options. There is no need for any rhetoric of ideology to be added to this.

Because then those Nato places that those missiles are fored from become legitimate military targets which will result in ww3.

Because unlike Iran, Russia has nukes, and you do not escalate warfare with nuclear powers.

because russia would be very quck to jump on the "enter a full scale war w/ NATO" train, and lemme tell you Russia is A LOT SCARIER to go to war w/ than Iran.

​@@aiapihud4344Russia is not scary at all. NATO is scary. More than half the world's military budget.

​@@SelfProclaimedEmperorpff you won't even see them fighting, it'll be all nukes and stuff it's GG well played for both side

They don't have the men to reinforce Kharkiv as is