Russia vs USA Military Strength In 2023 (Latest Updates) 

The US has nothing to be proud of, it has completely lost the strategic arms race. Russia can already destroy any American fleet when it is in its home port, without using nuclear weapons. In the eyes of Russian sailors, the US fleet is a flock of fat partridges that will not defeat a modern state, are not capable of defending themselves, but can lead a gay parade.

and you are so naive you still believe in 1990s technological of stealth in the 21st century... what cave do you live in... oh I forgot you live close to caves near Iraq and Afghanistan where stealth still looks modern

Why won't you lower the Russian economy more?? The Russian economy is at least $5 Trillions and 5th in the world, stop lying. Also we can know who is stronger by far from the Ukraine war, the US and NATO didn't have a single weapon that functions against Russia and Russia every weapon they have is far superior to the Junk that the US and NATO have. Long live Russia, the US will collapse alone in the next 3-5 years adding so much debt. Also, wasn't NATO supposed to win the Gaza war in 3 days? It has been almost 65 days since war started and you don't control anything in Gaza. Gaza with 0 help is way too powerful vs NATO and the US.

Compare Gaza vs the NATO and the US

Using the picture of a Su-57 is misleading. For one thing, only a handful of them exist and for another, they're a little more than prototypes - a limited production test run, manufactured on an improvised assembly line. No manufacturing processes for the Su-57 aren't properly set up for proper serial production. Its "real" engine hasn't been developed yet. Its passive sensor suit is a placeholder. It's increasingly starting to look like the Su-57 might never see serial production and will instead serve as technology demonstrate, and the knowledge gained will be used to develop the Su-75 which might become the Russia's primary fighter instead.

It's a war. Both sides suffer.

@@sergeypodobry Most of it is surplus. It is being replaced by newer systems. The US has also been purchasing or trading with other countries for equipment for Ukraine. This was actually the prefered way to arm Ukraine, but they don't want Soviet/Russian systems anymore.

LOL The amount of equipment lost in combat by Russia FAR exceeds the amount of equipment "lost" in donation to Ukraine by the US. Do you REALLY think that Russia still has 12,000+ tanks? Or 4,000+ aircraft? We know for certain that Russia has lost almost 2 dozen naval ships to Ukraine. AND a submarine. LOL Keep in mind.........those naval losses are to a country that doesn't even have a legit navy!!! 🤣🤣🤣

Why won't you lower the Russian economy more?? The Russian economy is at least $5 Trillions and 5th in the world, stop lying. Also we can know who is stronger by far from the Ukraine war, the US and NATO didn't have a single weapon that functions against Russia and Russia every weapon they have is far superior to the Junk that the US and NATO have. Long live Russia, the US will collapse alone in the next 3-5 years adding so much debt. Also, wasn't NATO supposed to win the Gaza war in 3 days? It has been almost 65 days since war started and you don't control anything in Gaza. Gaza with 0 help is way too powerful vs NATO and the US.

Not really. For the most part, the equipment that Ukraine receives is from the graveyards. There equipment graveyards in the US where equipment is stripped for parts and/or stored. That's what Ukraine receives. But if there is one big loser of equipment that is most definitely Russia

Well the data will be shown pre war because no one can decide what the true power of countries are during an ongoing war. So when the war ends Russia will no longer remain the 2nd strongest military.

So that would be 10k tanks still remaining and those 10k tanks are the modern tanks as the 2k tanks destroyed in ukraine are the bad t72s and also only 91 artillery losses for the russians

So, basically Russia has lost outdated equipment?

​@@rarescevei8268outdated, I mean the T90 isn't brand new, but it's not that old.

​@andrewsmall6834 also the t90 actually has minimal losses with only about 90 lost since the start of the war so that that's good for the russians in my opinion

Best Country at what losing to a third world country 😂

@@northernnctracker3159u mean us and Vietnam right?😄

How?

@@bennittotheburrito9606 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6-rN6F6pWeM.htmlsi=0U_PkAHs4KE6gRs4

😆😆

Agree. Must be #1

@@llll840 Only after they managed to capture a village in Ukraine they are fighting for several months already.

@@llll840 yeah, from the bottom up

@@llll840 Rank 20 or less

USA being number one is more laughable

Как же вас дурят ваши сми

С Авганистана убегали

Hah. Ok

@@hrsmpCheck out the oryx project! They are documenting all losses. There are 2475 Russian tanks destroyed or captured that are visually confirmed. You can double that to get the real figure as not everything is filmed and posted openly.

You have eaten CNN BBC 💩. There's no proof that Russians lost 10.000 tanks and half of their army

You can try and take on US then. We fkn dare ya to try. 😂😂😂

I'm not from Russia, this is just an obvious fact. The US has never fought in a real war. Aviation is useless against Russia since they have modern air defense. And more importantly they have largest submarine fleet. All warships sailing from the US in the event of war will be sunk.

@@nicocrestmere9688sure kid 😂

@Heythere12344 we simply ignore Russia and their hollow threats now. They are on the same level as N Korea. When they threaten nuclear devastation like every other week we just yawn and move on.

@@nicocrestmere9688 игнорировать сотнями миллиардов поддержки украины своим новейшим оружием с которым они не могут продвинуться? зхапвзхпавхз

They have the most nukes I don’t want any war with them very powerful.

@kevinwilliams1269 have you seen how well their equipment is upkept? I'm not worried about some old rusted Russian nukes. They would either be duds or they might accidentally nuke themselves because their arms are junk.

U do realize that was a ww2 parade 💀

@@Heythere12344 a parade where they used to show off all their military equipment and might. The only might they had left was 1 tank.

​@@nicocrestmere9688man USA is lost this war 30 countrys against Russia and Russia is going to win such embarrassed to the US and US is no more money and give up😂

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

Ты русский не так-ли)

Проспись

You sure? Even if you are right, that won't take long. As said, Russia is richer. It's also important to look at the alies both have. US has NATO, Russia has BRICS + North Korea and China ish.

True Russia is stronger. It's not tied up with 30+ countries like USA yet it has the most nuclear weapons which matters the most.

@@ravenhendrickx9245 all thing that i want to say is If the Russia's military power is not stronger, it's not weaker too

No, USA has much better military

@@slothniel8881 Lie 🤥

truth is he's not leading anything. He's a senile old man being wheeled around by his masters.

Lead... not leaded... And once he is no longer the President it will be "led"... Yeah english is funny

​@@drdelewdedits weird how the continuous and present tense are the same.

​@@veeeks2938well I don't think throwing money for Israel and Ukraine are that clever manuevers. Ukraine has no chance of getting its land back since their horrible counteroffensive. Israel will soon have to fight in a 4 or even 5 front war. And this time the technology and experience gap is not like the 1967. All adversaries are well-equipped and trained.

@@greatwhitebuckwheat791 yeah it will prevent WW3 so US and its allies can peacefully continue colonizing and murdering people.

NATO isn't fighting in Ukraine buddy. We're sending them some of our equipment from 30 years ago and that's enough to keep the so-called "second most powerful military in the world" from making any significant advances since last spring. If NATO were to directly go to war with Russia (and it somehow didn't go nuclear) then Russia would be defeated in a week

@@yomama629 The fact that the weapons of the West have again shown themselves to be on the bad side is a fact. Just what will the West do when the Ukrainians run out? In the meantime, Ukraine is just a weapons testing site. By the way, how are American bases in the Middle East doing? Or do they also have old weapons? American bases are being set on fire using regular drones. A shame. The West understood perfectly well that Russia would not retreat in Ukraine and Russia would complete the disarmament of the Nazi Ukrainian regime. And no Western weapons, no foreign mercenaries and instructors can do anything.

haha@@yomama629

🤣🤣🤣🤣 if NATO would fight with russia,there would be no russia in a week. 1 week is needed for NATO to destroy russia. so stop writing nonsense. and pray that NATO will not get involved

@@zagrepcanin82 If there is a war between Russia and NATO, then in 10 minutes the Canada-Mexican Strait will be formed and all of Europe will be on fire. As a Pole, I don’t want this. And if you think that you can hide from Russia’s nuclear power, then you are either stupid or sick.

because these guys have shown time after time their incompetents. they rely on a brand that's hollow now, with only crappy content. "Research? that's for nerds, not for us".

I don’t support Russia

@@sdavis9444 America is a war criminal

So do Russia China Iran Mexico N. Korea. Only american ones are ineffective

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6-rN6F6pWeM.htmlsi=0U_PkAHs4KE6gRs4

Because he knows usa pro GM🤮O and LG🤮BT, unhealthy body and soul

Just what I was thinking 😂 never knew the US was using T72 MRLS 😂

Tactical nuclear weapons include 1) Air-to-air missiles 2) Surface-to-air missiles 3) Artillery shells 4) Gravity bombs 5) Short-range missiles 6) Depth bombs 7) Torpedoes 8) Land mines Of the 8 categories I mentioned, at least the 2 is for anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense, for the interception and shooting down of enemy missiles and aircraft, which are surface-to-air missiles and air-to-air missiles and apparently short-range missiles also belong to this category. Therefore, the percentage of tactical nuclear weapons intended to intercept and neutralize enemy aircraft and ballistic missiles should not exceed 100 ÷ (8/3) = 37.....%. of all tactical nuclear weapons in the Russian and American arsenal. At least that's my own assumption. Russia is estimated to have ten times as many tactical nuclear weapons as the US. Russia has somewhere around 2,000 warheads. The US around 200. Therefore, from all this it follows that the number of tactical nuclear weapons intended for aerial targets must be around ~750 tactical nuclear weapons. And ~75 for the US. Which means that in a nuclear conflict between Russia and America, virtually no one will emerge victorious. Just let the numbers speak for themselves Russia ~4,255 air units America ~13,209 air units Russia 4,255x/200,000 = 75 0.021275x = 75 0.021275x/0.0212 = 75/0.021275 x = ~3,525 air units America 13,209y/200. 000 = -750 0.066045y = - 750 0.066045y/0.066045 = - 750/0.066045 y = ~11,355 air units

Why won't you lower the Russian economy more?? The Russian economy is at least $5 Trillions and 5th in the world, stop lying. Also we can know who is stronger by far from the Ukraine war, the US and NATO didn't have a single weapon that functions against Russia and Russia every weapon they have is far superior to the Junk that the US and NATO have. Long live Russia, the US will collapse alone in the next 3-5 years adding so much debt. Also, wasn't NATO supposed to win the Gaza war in 3 days? It has been almost 65 days since war started and you don't control anything in Gaza. Gaza with 0 help is way too powerful vs NATO and the US.

Go play Call of Duty MW 2 & 3 old man. You lost a war against Russia in Ukraine and you will lose in Palestine

Almost all 320 billion Western tech was destroyed by Russia

"lancet compilation" on utube waitin u

@@3gun142 I wonder how many HIMAR, Stuhna-P, Bayaktar TB2, Javelin, Storm Shadow, AHS Krab and M-777 complications there are? Plus F-16s and more ATACMS coming soon. Lots of compilations there, let alone drones.

@@whatwentwrong4599 very interesting buddy, when was the last time they mentioned bayraktars and all this scrap metal? year and a half ago? I wonder why? hahahaha. You Western idiots are not even aware of the real affairs on the field and write complete nonsense. in Ukraine the overthrow of the government or re-election in the spring is already in full swing

@@whatwentwrong4599 you have sponsored the murder of the Russian population in Donbass since 2014, and now you are sponsoring the murder of civilians in Palestine

@@greatwhitebuckwheat791🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈🤡

Не упоминаются например ракеты которые затопят все авианосцы США, гиперзвука нет, сколько их старых яд.ракет вообще взлетит неизвестно. Напрямую воевать боятся, а гибридные войны могут расшатать сами США. Свободу Техассу ски!

@@dmitriy7658 США заставили Путина отправить своих людей на верную смерть в Украину?

it's the ruble, lol...... btw, if you would know the meaning of peasants, Russia is a country with millions traditionally, opposite to the US with just a bunch. but ignorance will always be ignorance when ignorant people refuse to really study many sorts of stuff. orcs...

@@Maddog-xc2zv Ignorance is when idiots say that sanctions against Russia will lead to poverty in Russia. Sanctions against Russia and the seizure of its money in the banks of NATO countries led to Russia nationalizing all the property and enterprises of companies that supported sanctions against Russia. The bottom line is that Russia won the sanctions war with a profit of approximately 1.3 trillion US dollars. They will never tell you about this on your totalitarian Ukrainian TV.

@@greatwhitebuckwheat791🏳️‍🌈🤡🇺🇸

@@Heythere12344 💪🇺🇸💪

No

@@interpretolog yes 😘

@@trevorphilips3724 Nooooo 😁

@@interpretolog да да да 😘have insta or fb or other ?

@@trevorphilips3724 нет нет нет 😜 дааааа

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

Russia should be number 1 now

@@LloydTaray-bt7ho ofc it is 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

Russia number 30 😆 UKRAINE 🇺🇦🔱2

😁Punjabi khn se ud kar aagya😁

Where does the number come from? do you think Russia is not producing the best tanks in the world now?

I've studied this...photographic evidence of 2500 tanks...5000 is a reasonable estimate.. new made is still based on weak designs

@@dmitriy7658 clearly not, their T-90 got absolutely stomped by Javelins and the T-14 only exists on paper

@@yomama629 It was Abrams who was humiliated in Syria by an old Soviet RPG-7, burning the brightest.The T-14 is being tested in Ukraine.

@@dmitriy7658 surely not, as all the world see. who's buying russian military sh*t? nobody, and that's not only for tanks. you live in Alice's world, mate.

Russia has nothing to be proud of militarily speaking. All their military equipment is crap. Look at their tanks. They blow up with a hit from a little drone.

It hasn't left dock in years.

The Kuznetsov is really more of a smoke and fire producing machine than an aircraft carrier OR a "heavy aircraft cruiser". Or maybe it's more of a drag around toy for the Russian tugboats!! 😅😅

Why won't you lower the Russian economy more?? The Russian economy is at least $5 Trillions and 5th in the world, stop lying. Also we can know who is stronger by far from the Ukraine war, the US and NATO didn't have a single weapon that functions against Russia and Russia every weapon they have is far superior to the Junk that the US and NATO have. Long live Russia, the US will collapse alone in the next 3-5 years adding so much debt. Also, wasn't NATO supposed to win the Gaza war in 3 days? It has been almost 65 days since war started and you don't control anything in Gaza. Gaza with 0 help is way too powerful vs NATO and the US.

well said buddy

The 2:54 USA is the strongest country, next is China because like you stated Russia has lost a lot of troops, equipment, tanks etc on the battlefields of Ukraine.

I love your jokes, but you don't wanna say that near Ukrainians in the east right now

A lot of things are not taken into account here.Hypersonic missiles that fall through the window, and other technologies. The American army is cowardly, it can only attack weak countries.

@@hakinadedeji they're fighting a near peer conflict to a stalemate with Ukraine, a country with a third of their population and a tenth of their size. For the supposed second best military on Earth this is an absolute embarrassment. At the very least China has a far more capable military than Russia, they should be second

@@yomama629 I guess you are not so blindly biased to the point where you should know that if not for the mighty NATO pushing and supplying Ukraine, Zelensky would have signed the peace treaty more than a year ago before Boris Johnson dashed to him to stop it... It was this same "you can beat Russia" attitude that has killed so many Ukrainians and sent millions packing. I'm not saying they shouldn't fight for their land but there's a way you can surrender today and gradually diplomatically claim what is yours in decades to come.. Now your commander is saying everything is come to nothing.

@@yomama629 Did you intentionally write your post this way, or do you really think so?) Do you think Ukraine is fighting on its own against Russia? Do you even imagine the value of the intelligence data that the United States and other NATO countries provide Ukraine with? Data from satellites, reconnaissance aircraft, this strengthens Ukraine literally tens of times, even without all the equipment, weapons etc. provided. I don’t even know how to explain this if you really don’t understand. For example... if Ukraine and Russia were two teams in Dota playing against each other, and Russia had very famous, talented strong players who, on average, always beat Ukrainian players without problems, but suddenly a third party appeared, the admin which gives Ukrainian players eternal vision, the fog of war is forever removed for Ukrainian players, and they see EVERY movement on the ENTIRE map, and then the admin also gives Ukrainian players a bunch of useful items and gold. Something like this... besides, it’s no secret that the United States began to strengthen the Ukrainian army long before 2022. Since 2014, there have been huge injections of funds, and not publicly. Countless fortifications and ammunition depots were built. What's left of this now?

It's true

ah yes because the invincible Russian hypersonic missiles are doing so well in Ukraine against the patriot missile system

@@LittleBoy-n1x Russia does not use hypersonic missiles in Ukraine. Do you seriously think that Russia is fighting there with its most advanced weapons? You are a very naive person. In my opinion, I once watched a video of how the Russians destroyed 3 petrites, and in my opinion, not with hypersonic missiles, but with ordinary drones, but I don’t remember whether it was in Ukraine or not.

@@LittleBoy-n1x tell me honestly, is it true that in America everyone thinks and shows in the news that Russia is throwing all its last reserves and its latest advanced equipment into the war in Ukraine? 😄

@@antoniobanderos5409 1. what is a petrites 2. yes russia is using hypersonic weapons in ukraine the iskander and kinzhal missiles and russia has confirmed this multiple times along with there being video footage of this. 3. if you are referring to the patriot system then no, none of them have been destroyed and only one has been damaged but i think it is fully functional by now

I don't understand what's the point of a nuclear arsenal. We all have nukes but the land will be unusable. Whether we poison 1 mile or 1 thousand miles of land there still isn't a single radioactive area that has stopped being radioactive once it's been dropped.

How did you arrive at that conclusion? Because what we all saw in Ukraine is Russia's entire offensive being stopped by a bunch of Javelins and 18 HIMARS launchers (we have 800 of those btw), which is 30 year old equipment. In a conventional war between NATO and Russia you would absolutely see the difference, because our air power would annihilate all Russian assets in a matter of days. Russia has no ability to deal with our stealth aircraft, despite vatnik claims of S-400/S-500/"quantum radar" and other made up terms. They have no ability to deal with our naval power, or our combined arms capabilities which we have demonstrated extensively whereas Russia has demonstrated a total inability to coordinate assets on that level. We also have far greater intelligence capabilities, which matters a lot in a modern war. As for the nuclear arsenal, on paper Russia has more than the US, but NATO in total has more than Russia and the US alone spends more on maintaining our nuclear arsenal than the entire Russian defense budget. Our nuclear triad is also far more capable, the Russians use Tu-95's as their strategic nuclear bomber while we use the stealth B-2. Our submarines are quieter too. Russia is behind the West in every aspect

​​@@yomama629then how did the US lose to the Taliban who had no external support and fought with AK s and sandals?

​@@yomama629also didn't the launch of the minuteman III fail recently?

@@emmanuelatiegha9049 did it? when? what I know is Russia Space Force crashed their toy on the moon. Nicely done. Even India got it right.

it does, even if it's on a dry dock for long now

Turkey is a member of NATO, which is directly and openly hostile to Russia.

@@greatwhitebuckwheat791🏳️‍🌈🤡🇺🇸

🇺🇸💪🇺🇸