Russian PK Series of Machine Guns 

I see you a man of culture.

I love that meme

Thx for reminding 😂

HARRY, HARMONE DOESNT LIKE YOU BUT..... HARRY: YEA, I ALSO LIKE MY HAIRY BUTT.

link to it lmao plz

The Lieutenant He was a tank crewman in the ww2 right?

The Lieutenant he also didn't even have a degree and or certification In engineering right? Just goes to show you that old Soviet ingenuity.

Some Random Guy Yes he Was if memory serves right.

Also the ak47 was just a copy of the German stg44

Kyle Broflovski ufff here we go.... again

He was a unique person in various fields.

He was a constructor and said that it was not his fault that his weapon appeared behind the borders of Russia but politicians. He created guns to protect his own country after WWII.

he also felt bad for inventing the most common war weapon in the world.

The STG44? cant patent the looks. bet the AK has a better design.

база данных ты еще один идиот . глупый дурак . во первых - хоть МП-44 и АК-47 и похожи внешне , но у них разный принцип действия . там , где у АК-47 находится газоотводная трубка , у МП-44 расположен шомпол . и школа русских оружейников ни капли не хуже немецкой . пистолет -пулемет Судаева до сих пор на вооружении некоторых стран мира , к примеру - Китая . а стволы третьего рейха сейчас никто уже не использует.

Fernando Marques Ahoy

OH YAAS MY KOMRADE VERY GUD OUR THINGS CAN STAND UP TO OUR BIAS HAMMERS OH YAAS KOMRADE

That man can make anything sound interesting and serious.

basically every russian gun ever made.

No, you cannot fix it with a hammer. Better have spare parts.

Most of them are chinese AK's bought with money from the CIA....

Well, how did he square that with the USSR being the main supporter of terrorism during the cold war? Not to mention, the USSR's use of State terrorism.

@@pieterwillembotha6719 Umm...the only ones i know that commited terrorist actions and supported by the soviet union was the PLO...

Wrong, the USSR shipped arms through Iraq, Libya and Syria to only find their way in the hands of CTs from Nicaragua, Peru, Bolivia, Cuba, Rhodesia, Angola, Namibia, Tanzania, Mozambique and South-West Africa. These are the only ones I can think of for now. @@command_unit7792

@@pieterwillembotha6719 Ну да, вы же из этих стран привезли рабов на свой континент? Советский человек не знал такого слова терроризм этого слова не было в лексиконе русского в принципе, хотя справедливости ради надо сказать что единичные случаи конечно были, до тех пор пока ваша сраная демократия не просочилась через наши границы.

and don't forget the heatseeking MAN-PADS we gave the afghans too...cuz that didn't come back to bite us...oh wait...

I think at that time it was Pakistan, not Saudi Arabia. Saudis are more involved now with Al Quaeda and ISIS

Omega Alpha saudi arabia have been involved in Afghanistan long bevore the war. They spread their sectarian wahabi bullcrap in afgh and created this wahabi-frankenstein monster. Don't underestimate their destructive role in Afghanistan

omega alpha the saudi fund alot for the mujihadeen in afghan

Both the US and the Soviets armed insurgents across the world for decades. What is your point Jamthis? It seems you are just biased as most are

the war against the PKM'S! i mean machines!

cocopud no just no that comment essentially mocks my entire youth in the military and even my nation which i say Russia should go back to

indeed

The purpose built simplicity by design is far from simple. Yes many Russian engineered arms are both simple to operate and maintain while also being relatively simple to produce. However assault rifles such as the AN 94 and other Russian weapons of revolutionary design disprove the moronic notion that simplistic weapons are of the only sort Russians are capable of or that engineering simplicity is easy. 'Crude' however is a description that I cannot agree with using any interpretation of the term.

Well we live in the west so idiots tend to underestimate it

Russia usually makes better firearm's than America

@@J_Dunihue Sure

The handle? What are you on about?

@@SvenTviking The carry handle, that's what he's on about.

LOVE the loader!!!

Also the ammo backpacks for the pkm Scorpion, and Predator.

Russian Design: very basic simple and works. western design: very complicated, needlessly expensive, needs a shit load more training to operate. so ya, go with Russian simplicity.

The tripod amazed me the first time I dealt with it. Lots of people thought it was titanium, til I stuck a magnet to it. Just a very light, well designed and made bit of work. The loader..Well, it's nothing new, but it did work better than the WW2 German one it was based off of.

J Ballew The thing is, you don't have to think about which side the cartridges are facing.

That's true ❗

To each their own. The M60 and MG3 are pretty amazing in their own ways.

I believe the Poles might have fixed/will soon fix that issue with the newest iteration of their UKM-2000 machine guns. They're modernised PKs retooled/rechambered(?) to fire NATO rounds with some additional changes to the guns themselves.

Truly M60 is closer to FG42

It is a good one. A modern GPMG that can feed from a near first gen Maxim belt, reliably firing a flanged cartridge, and still making most other GPMG's look ridiculous. It's barrel change is stupidly simple, when the feed tray is up, use a spent to flick over the locking wedge. Slap in a new barrel. Much as I liked shooting the D model Pig in the 80's, once I got to play with a PK/PKM, I was sold. Only the M1919/M1917 Browning holds a closer place in my heart. (Yes I've got more than a bit of trigger time with the Mg42/Mg3, and Mg34. They too are "neat" but not as absurdly well thought out as the PK).

if you're not a native speaker it's *IMPOSSIBRU!!!!*

da

I agree with Robert. Even immigrants that live in Russia for dozens of years aren't really fluent in this language. Russian is hard even for Russians sometimes. P.S. It comes from a Russian.

I am lucky my mom is a native speaker so she always corrects me when I mispronounce words.

@@deptusmechanikus7362 Я Поляк и я как-то научился говорить правильно.

DsHK was replaced by the NSV

@@PyromaN93 yeah i knew but Dshk still used mostly

maybe inexpensive?

Its inexpensive when you don't have to pay for the factory nor the materials... Actually ARs are cheaper to manufacture than AKs are. The only reason AKs are cheap is because they were made by state-owned factories and people who sell them didn't have to pay for it.

A political agenda in a nutshell

@Johnny Sinns maybe that guy speaks about civilian post-soviet products. But more probably he just was beaten by drunk gopnik and feel angry against everething russian now, lol. Or he just nationalist from one of russian empire former states and super-gopnik Stalin bullied that guy's whole country because of separatism or simping to nazi

Best equipment. Better than US

I hate the NFA. Hope it’s repealed someday.

What a nice country, you can buy yoghurt and machine gun at same place...

Texas jackrabbits are perfectly legal to take down with this.

*mg42

When he looked at it I already had polish swear words in my mind

Dragunov. Dragun in russian is Dragoon in English. Drag like drug. Gun like goon. Be healthy!

Commander Shepard man, he is not chechen, he's russian)) His name is Sergei Badyuk(Сергей Бадюк).

@@KGB_watch_you I like russians but not chechen

@@sweetkiller9696 me too, man)

@Azmol Hossain surely you're a simple munafik. Do not even dream. Chechnya is ok, don't worry.

@Azmol Hossain For what? There arent enough goats to fuck in Chechnya? Or your faggot Allah "god" and his cocksucking friend mohammad told you to?

The bullpup with a foreword handgrip and a backpack ammo supply gives you a major increase to handling, maneuverability, rounds available and accuracy when standing or kneeling. Can it get any better?

These are not military modifications, under specific conditions of use. Assault / support.

A question regarding the backpack ammo feeds, what is the length of the discarded belt ? Because if it's long enough the handler could trip over it while firing on the move and.....

@@casbot71 50 rounds each part if I recall it right. So, not that bad in the end.

the Chad Chechen warrior vs virgin Russian conscript

It's inevitable. Also agreed. Nice vid.

Unfortunately, Chad didn't last long in this scenario. Why? Russian Pinnochio.

I think those are pro-Russian

There is a difference between the Chechen Republic and Republic of Ichkeria. Chechen republic is pro Russian while Ichkeria are the rebels.

Larry said a truth.

I think the ideea is based more on experience rather than doctrine. In early days of its existance and in WW2, USSR had a lot of problems with unreliable equipment and 'sophisticated concepts'. Most of their air force was taken out without firing a bullet because air fields were destroyed so now they have planes that can land on broken roads. Their assault weapons like PPsh would jam so they placed orders for AK

Indeed , but it has kinda stuck with Russia and the US since WW2 and its been influencing the kind of equipment the nations buy and use. The Russian invasion of Georgia was massive but very slow and took ages to control of airspace despite being vastly superior. And the US have tried fast and hard blitzkrieg style invasions of Iraq , Afghanistan and to some extent Vietnam despite being able to "grind" the enemy in long offensives. There is a bit of inertia with the armies and navies taking a long time to change doctrines based on previous experience. The human wave doctrine of Russia and the superior firepower doctrine of the US , has been slightly changed over the last 100 years but the nations have had mostly the same style of warfare for almost 100 years now. I don't really have a point with all this just the musings of a armchair general.

with russia, they changed the doctrine after Vietnam war and afghanistan and Vietnam-Chinese border war. after ww2, instead of human wave, they use multiple force combined arms where they created mobilize battalion where infrantry work tight with armor vehicles and they know how important air superiority is and so on, both US and Soviet/Russia know mutiple tactic and doctrines. why US heavy based on air superiority and massive eletronic warfare, Russia have to relies on Infrantry since the end of day, machine can break down in -50 degree while human don't. and since US focus on Air superiority, Soviet counter it with air defense and electronical warfare. both side use doctrine to counter the other. that is why when they faced with non conventional warfare like Vietnam or Afghan, both face heavy casualty and defeat because their doctrine was not designed to counter it

Its still "human wave" doctrine its just the modern mechanized version with lots of tanks and mechanized infantry and paratroopers, like the soviet tsunami of tanks, BMP's and AK wielding hordes that gave NATO generals nightmares.They don't use as many and its not like the Stalin era "not one step backwards" waste of men but they use a lot more then most NATO countries. Hell in the Georgian invasion in 2008 the Russians sent as many paratrooper as the Georgians had regular infantry. Then 60 thousand men extra regular infantry plus tanks and APC's in addition to paras. Sure they have both modernized and use varied and mostly the same tactics, calibers and weapons etc but the Russians have a thing for lots o manpower and the US like their guns and bombs. Not like this is news , Russians and Chinese use lots of manpower and NATO use lots of planes and high tech stuff. I'm just generalizing but the only thing that only the US truly has is proper aircraft carriers, sure GB, China ,Russia etc have "carriers" but only the US have the proper ones with 100+ craft.

As a US astronaut said in an interview the American equipment has a lot more capabilities, while the Russian tech works even if half the thing has broken down. A note on proper carriers, the USSR fielded large number of "proper" anti-ship missiles. Take a look at the P-500 (1975), P-700 (1983) and Kh-22 (1962) systems. Thankfully no one has been stupid enough to try which would win.

Nasir Walker I DONT CARE!

Pechenegs (PECHENEGI) were a Central Asian tribe, like Mongols, who invaded Russia many times, until they were fully assimilated and became part of The Russian Nation (RN).

still my favorite channel tho

@@_Matsimus_ M249 AKJFBJASDVFKUGASVEWFEUV machine gun

@@WhiteSeaLeviathan Так им и надо, теперь они мыслят на Русском :)

The PKM replaced the RPD in service and its role. It weighs significantly less than any other GPMG in similar calibres. The PKM is used and designed more as a true GPMG than the L7 or M240 in Western armies. The PKP is just 'special'

Ofc only the Russian MoD knows what the Russian MoD wants/thinks etc, but I doubt the PKP 'Pecheneg' is just "special". I think the PKP complements the PKM, where the PKM remains a GPMG in a more traditional sense, and the PKP is a more mobile/infantry friendly variant. In an example, the PKM is set up as a defensive MG by standard infantry, and the PKP is issued to some Razvedchik or Desantnik for ops/patrol.

actually PKP mostly use by special force and airborne infrantry while PKM still serve as basic infrantry squad and vehicle mount.

The PKP is actually heavier than the PKM, even without a bipod attached - and lacks a quick change barrel. I don't really know how its supposed to be more infantry friendly. The forced air cooling is of dubious effectiveness. Needless to say I much prefer the PKM, for any role.

Alas being in the UK, my experience with firearms is limited to museum visits, history days, reading and Cadets, but I think I'd agree in keeping a standard PKM for any general purpose, and put Pecheneg as a weapon for the VDV, MorPekh and SpetsNaz units etc. By 'infantry friendly', whilst the weapon itself may be heavier, its forced air cooling would negate the need to carry spare barrels, and fumble with barrel changes in combat, thereby being a bit more combat practical - yes a good team could change a MG42 barrel in seconds, but that is still time not combat capable. When I was in Cadets, I found the L98A2 to be rear heavy/unbalanced (albeit my shooting experience was very limited), but from handing other weapons such as an old L1A1, I preferred that despite it being (from memory at least - this was some years ago) heavier overall, but more balanced for each hand. Also, as a newer weapon, the Pecheneg is doubtless being used for the Ratnik infantry suite, whereby its picatinny rails would allow integrating optics and such into the suit, more so than a 'legacy' PKM. The AK-74M3/MR 'Obves' is not insignificantly heavier than the standard AK-74M, but the extra weight from reworked parts allows the mounting of optics, grips, lasers, etc. and thus is attractive to the MoD looking forward to modernise (Idk yet whether the decision has been made for the new standard issue to be the AK-12 platform, or continuing the AK-74 with the M3/MR 'Obves' but I digress).

Simon Normand. Mugabe's 'minions' as you refer to them, won.

@@a.m.armstrong8354 actually it was a political settlement, but the fact remained that the Rhodesian forces still commanded the engagements. It had to be a political settlement. Go ask Lord Soames

Kharn1 Soviet army lol me too

I hope you will not gave one in your face

ALADIK))

Gabriel Vanasse I can look into it for sure :-)

SCAR HAMR AND SCAR PDW!!!

Barrel changes on the MG34 are just sexy.

You're god damn right. That is some +18 hentai right there.

The 7.62-mm machine gun of the Pecheneg PCP (GRAU-6P41 Index) is a Russian single machine gun developed on the basis of PKM. The basis of the design is taken by the 7.62-mm Kalashnikov machine gun. This made it possible to launch production with minimal costs in 1999, and also to simplify its operation. The trunk group ensures the shooting of at least 600 cartridges with long bursts without degrading the effectiveness of the shooting. With a long battle, the machine gun can fire up to 10,000 cartridges per hour without deteriorating combat characteristics and reducing the barrel's resource. In general, Pecheneg retained up to 80% of the total parts with PKM (receiver with all mechanisms, machine). Pecheneg can use the entire range of rifle cartridges 7.62 × 54 mm R. In the machine gun the system of forced air cooling of the barrel is used due to the energy of the powder gases. Adjustable gas removal mechanism allows exploiting Pecheneg in any climatic conditions. The trunk has an outer finning and is enclosed in a metal casing. Powder gases, leaving the barrel, create a vacuum zone in the front of the casing. In the rear part of the casing special ventilation windows are made. Thus, during firing along the barrel, cold air is continuously pumped. Constant cooling of the barrel reduces the scattering during shooting, and also increases the longevity of the trunk. The resource of the barrel is 25-30 thousand shots when firing in intensive regimes. The reinforcement of the trunk allowed to transfer the bipod from the gas chamber to the muzzle, which increased the support base and reduced the dispersion to 70%, but this position of the bipod is not always convenient, since it limits the sector of fire along the front without moving the arrow and / or arms. Alignment of the temperature field of the barrel allowed to increase its resource to the level set for the whole machine gun (or twice as compared to the PCM), and to reduce the withdrawal of the aiming point during long-term shooting to a value equal to no more than 0,001 parts of range. This allowed to abandon the second trunk (although the fastening of the trunk at Pecheneg remains quick-disconnect) and, in spite of the installation of an additional screen for the machine gun, to reduce the field weight of the weapon. In addition, the design of the Pecheneg machine gun can significantly reduce the harmful effect of the ascending flow of the barrel-heated air on the aiming line. The increased heat emission of a new machine gun is noticeable in the dark, even with the unaided eye, by the brightness of the glow of the trunks after the shooting of the entire ammunition.

Tummywubs the pkp pecheneg has a heavier fixed barrel. No need to carry a spare one.