@@JC-jk3kl Yes that part he will bear no blame for , despite what all the gun enthusiasts with their double triple check of a fire arm fantasy land in this scenario say. His culpability if proved , will come from facilitating/effecting an unsafe work environment .
The mother says the family doesn't seek revenge?? They spent almost a million on a pr campaign complete with computer graphics reenacting the scene and lobbied the state to bring charges. That doesn't ring true at all.
No. If someone shows you that you are going to be using a fake sword that retracts when you push it onto something and then when it comes time to actually do the acting, and you pick up a real sword, it's not your responsibility to know the difference if it's all make-believe. There are many examples, when you are making a movie, which is all make-believe; such as a syringe with saline in it; once they hand you the syringe, your knowledge of it would only be what they tell you is in it, and if someone slipped a poison in it and you injected into someone, it is not your fault. It is the props manager, or whoever gave you that syringe that is responsible. The actor should not be taking every little part of the movie apart just to make sure everything is safe. There are assumptions that the people that manage different things are supposed to be responsible and know what is dangerous, or not.
Let's not forget that the victim was 42 y.o. Ukrainian but the average life expectancy in Ukraine is 26 years. She had a very long life by Ukrainian standards
He should not get any time, it’s not his job to load the guns used in scenes!!!!! That makes no sense at all!!!! You think Keanu Reeves unloads all the guns in John Wick to double check? Nobody in Hollywood does that, that’s why it’s a film department dedicated to it.
@@tatteredshield8120 Can you explain the details of that job responsibility in ensuring 100% that only dummies have been loaded into the gun . Might the actor just have to carry around their own box of dummies , and load them their selves. But then how can the movie set admin be sure that all actors are adhering to standards , and not letting increased probabilities with more human fallibility getting introduced . Gee maybe they can hire 1 person to oversee it ?
18 MONTHS? What? She was only one who knew there were live ammo. Mishandling live ammo is same as manslaughter. You don't need to pull trrigger but you know your ammo as armourer.
She's lucky. Most of us would be happy to have 1½ years of vacation to catch up on reading, watch TV and movies,and exercise. She'll have no bills to worry about and her meals will be cooked for her. She'll also have time to find out what the word "armorer" means and why they thought she should have taken care of the guns.
Only 18 months? She was responsible, she murdered that woman. U give an actor a gun that the actor thinks have blanks in it and blame the actor more than the one that loaded it? 18 months is a joke.
@@boogotti1173 more than likely and it’s sad she should have gotten more. Cause she knew that was a real bullet in there in my opinion I know ppl make mistakes but that’s a mistake that shouldn’t happen
Wow, now that Hannah is not in front of a jury holding her fate in their hands, shes not all dolled up and looking pretty trying to appear, what ... innocent? She looks horrible.
I just read and didn't realize that Hannah was remanded to the custody of the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility while awaiting the results of her appeal, which was denied. That would explain her appearance and clothing which I didn't even notice.
For what? It wasn’t his job to see if a gun has live ammo, he has done plenty of movies! Would Keanu Reeves be responsible if one of his guns in John Wick, had live ammo placed into it? Absolutely not!
No. If someone shows you that you are going to be using a fake sword that retracts when you push it onto something and then when it comes time to actually do the acting, and you pick up a real sword, it's not your responsibility to know the difference if it's all make-believe. There are many examples, when you are making a movie, which is all make-believe; such as a syringe with saline in it; once they hand you the syringe, your knowledge of it would only be what they tell you is in it, and if someone slipped a poison in it and you injected into someone, it is not your fault. It is the props manager, or whoever gave you that syringe that is responsible. The actor should not be taking every little part of the movie apart just to make sure everything is safe. There are assumptions that the people that manage different things are supposed to be responsible and know what is dangerous, or not.
IF She had the money that Alec Baldwin had she wouldn’t have gone to prison. The fact that Alec Baldwin has been doing movies involving firearms for 20+ years and hasn’t done enough training and education to know a live round from a blank is absolutely appalling. Actors like Alec Baldwin were rail against gun rights yet they make a living involving movies with guns. If that’s not the definition of hypocrisy, I’m not quite sure what is.
Not his job or responsibility to check gun for “correct” rounds. It was hers. Her main purpose on set and reason she was getting paid was to do just that. She f’ked up and now must face the music.
If someone shows you that you are going to be using a fake sword that retracts when you push it onto something and then when it comes time to actually do the acting, and you pick up a real sword, it's not your responsibility to know the difference if it's all make-believe. There are many examples, when you are making a movie, which is all make-believe; such as a syringe with saline in it; once they hand you the syringe, your knowledge of it would only be what they tell you is in it, and if someone slipped a poison in it and you injected into someone, it is not your fault. It is the props manager, or whoever gave you that syringe that is responsible. The actor should not be taking every little part of the movie apart just to make sure everything is safe. There are assumptions that the people that manage different things are supposed to be responsible and know what is dangerous, or not.
Most journalists don't take the time, yet alone, care to get these things correct. I did notice they certainly pronounced Hannah's full name correctly.
Hey here's a person who was trying to do their job and blew it. Accidents do happen. It's involuntary manslaughter because there is no intent. She didn't mean to hurt anybody. She may have been negligent. She's not mean spirited. She'll never get over it. She will just have to get better at living with it. A lot of life is that way. Take care and be well.
Did you not watch or read about the trial? It was due to her negligence that a live round ended up in that gun. However, Baldwin was also negligent for not checking the weapon prior to the 'shoot', no pun intended. They were both responsible for this tragic accident. I'm looking forward to his trial.
