Rust Crash Course | Rustlang 

Please make a video on scala its brilliant programming.

Looking forward for Web Assembly.

Brad continues to be a god among boys in the coding tutorial space.

VueCLi3+TypeScript for udemy, pls!

On your way to 1.000.000 subs. Unbelievable!!!!!! Keep up your pace !!!!

C++ is so powerful but so much code to do the most simple things

@@TraversyMedia How about Julia Lang.? I heard it coming up on Rust.

The C++ of 20 years ago (C++98) is a different beast from C++17/20. They often look so different, that without knowing, they don't even seem to be the same language but rather like C and C++ when compared.

wow you can actually get a job with C++

@@shadowagent3 Like the majority of things that need performance and are not kernels, is written in C++.

I mean, that's just good life advice in general 😆

Have been thinking of that since his first mention of STD and finally..

yeah thats why lghdtv shouldn't exist

@@mokafi7 What is that

@@dimitriousdrake abone

Yep this

Thanks for the clarification.

He said that one advantage of Rust is that it's is NOT garbage collected and then contrasts this to Javascript.

@@FreeScience But then he goes on to explain how Rust works. But what he explains is not reference counting and automatic memory management on the stack. Instead, what he explains sounds very similar to how GC works. He is basically contradicting himself, which is confusing.

Bollocks. Memory management is equivalent to the halting problem, and can't be determined before runtime.

stinky poo

You missed such a pun. NoooooooOOoOoOOOOoOOOOoooOOOOOooOOOOo.

the language is not new actually

Wow @codedamn also watching Brad RU-vid videos, that's the beauty of internet.

And Pascal

And R

And Visual Basic

And MATLAB

And Julia

Meh. Rust is not that kind of "pratical" language. You need to understand it well or you're going to get frustrated at the compiler errors because you won't be able to understand them.

​@@brainplot Still you need to have an entry point. I've been wanting to learn rust for a couple of years now, but all the lack of accessible resources has turned me away ever single type up to know. To learn means to take something you don't know, and try to make it known, and from that point on you can venture deeper. That's especially true for programming since an inside out approach isn't really viable with the sheer amount of complexity you'd first have to master. I agree that it is important to learn all of this, but it's easier to do it from a point of partial knowledge to be able to put into relation

@@zeberast I learned Rust from the book. I was only watching this video because I'm interested in Rust and this ended up in my recommended videos. What's wrong with the book? It seemed pretty accessible to me.

@@brainplot As someone with a severe case of ADHD books dont really do it for me.

checkout 'rustup docs' in your cli ;))

The Rust Programming Language by Steve Klabnik (Author), Carol Nichols (Author)

The rust book is pretty good

Got eeeeeeeem

Maybe this can help you: evapo-rust.com ;)

@@angelpais8160 rofl

Everyone thought it, but you had to say it...

Doesn't Rust support variadic macros and if so than why isen't the println! macro using it. And if not why doesn't Rust support variadics as it seems quite essential.

Nope. Tuples have a limit of 12. Atleast from my small reading of tuples docs

Apparently I was wrong. Tuples only have less functionality with size above 12.

I see you're a man of culture, as well.

I see him change it to hello there.. ctrl + f 'General' now i'm here, well done.

Just putting a comment here because I am also interested in the answer to this question

const can only be used for constant expressions, that can be evaluated at compile time, so you can't assign a value from a function call to const variable

Thanks :) It depends on what you mean by "know". If we are talking fundamentals and enough to create a small project, maybe 12 languages. Enough to work as a professional dev with, I would say 4 or 5. This is just actual programming languages not frameworks, libraries, standards, etc..Once you learn a couple languages, it is easy to learn more, at least on a fundamental level.

dude i was to going to ask the exact question lol.. i always tell my friends " dude there is this youtuber "traversy media" he knows mostly every frk'n language

@Manoj Sethi EVERYTHING

@@TraversyMedia you are one of the most honest developers in the world :D Any senior software developer knows that knowing a language syntax doesn't mean being able to develop software professionally in that language. Mastering a language (which means beeing able to use it professionally) requires knowing and mastering the most important language's libraries and frameworks and the tooling. In my opinion this requires at least 1 year of full professional development in that language. So, you are really really honest.

​@@albertoplebani77 true that! i learned over 20 languages, where i know syntax, keywords and so on without looking up... but there are only very few languages I really mastered...

Your grammar is even more........questionable

Are you convinced Rust is the future because of the default print formatting?

@@kacperfilipek8461 it was a joke, rust is nice tho

Haha, thanks but I think we could get by without me...I do :)

This please. If your goal is to make a Rocket API for GETing and POSTing text, it's a breeze to use. For anything more advanced, the documentation is severely lacking. I've even reached out to Sergio Benitez himself, who was not interested in clarifying anything.

Still waiting too

Eh that's how python does it, therefore not odd :P

To me the biggest reason to learn Rust is Web Assembly. It is something that I see being huge in the future. However, it is also great for building systems level projects as it is not as hard as C/C++ but still very powerful.

Watch some No Boilerplate's videos. ;-) - basically it makes you write safer code. And the concept. of a "variable" actually comes from maths, in maths x doesn't change, does it. A function doesn't execute steps to get to a result, ie "imperative". A function implies x. f(x), mean this implies that. I'm probably not articulating this very well.

What is incorrect?

@@Mossmyr C/C++ and Rust share the same memory behavior. Both offer the same ability to use memory in unsafe ways, and both discourage that behavior. Rust's toolchain discourages unsafe behavior more actively whereas C/C++'s toolchains may only provide short warnings about the behavior. It's worth noting that C and C-style C++ will naturally lead to more more opportunities for errors; but it's worth remembering, it's not the language's fault when theres an error, it's the programmer's. Rust is great because it helps the programmers make fewer mistakes by default. To get the same level of support with C++, you often need additional static analyzer and warning level configuration for your compiler.

He might have confused it with the Go lang.

@@LamboPita With C++, you also have the problem that the "best way" to program in C++ can look like alot of things are "bolted" onto the language due to legacy. This is not the fault of C++, but to wanting to stay back compatible + new insights people get. And Rust takes the fruits of those insights. C++ is hard, because you not only need to know the "good way" to program things, but also the bad ways to fully understand everything and to avoid pitfalls which the compiler doesn't complain about. Rust is just lessons learned from the past 40 years + guard rails and the way you program that is the most easy is mostly the best way to do stuff. With C++ the easiest way can be the wrong way. Also move semantics in C++.... i think those things are easier in Rust to deal with memory issues. C++ will stay here, but it has battle scars and warts that you can't remove without making people mad about not being back compatible anymore. And tell me the truth... with soon 64 and 128 cores to be normal. You want to write multi-core programs in C++ or Rust for so many cores? Rust is the only Systems language that makes you feel confident of your multi-core application.

Quantum only has pieces that are built in rust, mainly the css engine. The browser built completely in rust is called servo. The plan is to eventually replace all of the c and c++ but it's not there yet.

And what a great endorsement of Rust. FFQ is so much faster and better than Chrome.

@@gosnooky that is part of the reason, though both browsers are getting better as far as performance is concerned.

I had to say it lol

Using std::whatuwant;

everytime

C++ developers all over the world right now don't know if they should be angry or laugh

@@elicoptericus Both I guess, some parts of STD are horrendous and hard to work with while others are amazing and make life much easier. Knowing which parts to use and how and which to avoid is 90% of what c++ programming is about.

What does that even mean?

Lord Swaggity artificial intelligence machine of IBM

lol i'm not sure you're being serious or sarcastic :D

I approve this joke.

Well done

​@@devviz the joke is clear as day

Beautiful