Тёмный
No video :(

Salomon v Salomon | Case Law | Company Law | Corporate Law | Reema Baruah (M.Com, LLB) 

Corporate Law
Подписаться 2,3 тыс.
Просмотров 23 тыс.
50% 1

Salomon Vs Salomon Case Law
1. "Exploring the Meaning of the Famous Salomon vs Salomon Case: What Students Need to Know"
2. "The Impact of Salomon vs Salomon on Corporate Structures Today"
3. "Exploring the Salomon vs Salomon Case: How It Changed Corporate Law Forever"
#salomonvssalomon
#corporateLaw
#reemabaruah
The Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd case was a landmark UK company law case decided in 1897. The case established the principle of corporate personality, which holds that a company is a separate legal entity from its owners. This means that the company's debts and liabilities are not the responsibility of its owners. The owners' liability is limited to the amount of their investment in the company.
The case arose from the insolvency of a company called Salomon & Co Ltd. The company was owned by Mr Salomon, who was also the company's sole director and manager. When the company went bankrupt, Mr Salomon's creditors sought to hold him personally liable for the company's debts. However, the House of Lords held that Mr Salomon was not personally liable for the company's debts. The court held that the company was a separate legal entity from Mr Salomon, and that he could not be held personally liable for the company's debts.
The Salomon case is a landmark case in company law, and it has been cited in many subsequent cases. The case established the principle of corporate personality, which is a fundamental concept in company law. The principle of corporate personality means that companies are treated as separate legal entities from their owners. This has a number of implications, including the following:
* Companies can own property, enter into contracts, and sue and be sued in their own name.
* The owners of a company are not personally liable for the company's debts. Their liability is limited to the amount of their investment in the company.
* Companies can be dissolved without affecting the personal liability of their owners.
The Salomon case is a complex case, and there are a number of nuances to the principle of corporate personality. However, the case is an important landmark in company law, and it has had a significant impact on the way that companies are formed and operated.

Опубликовано:

 

29 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 22   
@jesseholalde5670
@jesseholalde5670 6 месяцев назад
I have watched several different videos covering Salomon v Salomon, trying to understand it. Yours was the first video that I found that made it clear and understandable for me. Thank you.
@m.akmalwasim6047
@m.akmalwasim6047 Год назад
As a Law Professor, I wish to say more power to you. Excellent explanation
@CorporateLaw
@CorporateLaw Год назад
Thank you! 😃
@dimpho_by_grace
@dimpho_by_grace 11 месяцев назад
I am a law student from South Africa,this was so helpful Thank you!
@ninagrant2255
@ninagrant2255 4 месяца назад
Well understood, thank you.
@ThomasMendy-ve4ut
@ThomasMendy-ve4ut 11 месяцев назад
You are the best teacher, thank you so much and keep it up...
@mikelockey9860
@mikelockey9860 3 года назад
Good effort - well done. I suggest your narrator uses a microphone shield to prevent "popping".
@sofianawalu4925
@sofianawalu4925 Год назад
Thank you...very much
@rickynengwa7925
@rickynengwa7925 Год назад
Excellent explanation!
@flava2musiq
@flava2musiq 11 месяцев назад
Awesomely done
@shylajam9074
@shylajam9074 5 месяцев назад
Beautifully explained, fan of u from karnataka
@dr.prodipborah5997
@dr.prodipborah5997 3 года назад
Great initiative ba......
@amponsahappauagya6844
@amponsahappauagya6844 Год назад
Wow well explained. Thanks
@manishmondal1814
@manishmondal1814 2 года назад
It's awesome mam, thankyou
@yvettenzilamukwiza8711
@yvettenzilamukwiza8711 9 месяцев назад
So who sued in this case? Did Mr Salomon sue the Salomon ltd company hence the name of the case or am I missing something?
@CorporateLaw
@CorporateLaw 9 месяцев назад
The case is called Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd because it was a legal dispute between Mr. Aron Salomon, the founder and majority shareholder of A Salomon & Co Ltd, and the company itself. Mr. Salomon was the plaintiff in the case, while the company, represented by its liquidator, was the defendant.
@dewminibandaranayake2063
@dewminibandaranayake2063 Год назад
Niceeee😍😍👍
@mercychavula7139
@mercychavula7139 2 года назад
Well explained , thank you.
@pascomarvisnalumu127
@pascomarvisnalumu127 2 года назад
Wawo thanks
@toponsen9906
@toponsen9906 2 года назад
nice ❤️
@mided2119
@mided2119 Год назад
Why did Mr Salomon not form an ordinary (unlimited liability) partnership with his family members? . I understand ordinary partnerships are governed under the Partnerships Act 1890.
@CorporateLaw
@CorporateLaw Год назад
Mr. Solomon did not form an ordinary unlimited liability partnership with his family members because of the risks involved. In an ordinary unlimited liability partnership, all partners are personally liable for the debts and liabilities of the partnership. This means that if the partnership goes bankrupt, the partners could lose their personal assets, including their homes and cars. Mr. Solomon may have been concerned about the risks of unlimited liability for his family members. He may have wanted to protect their personal assets in case the partnership failed. He may also have wanted to give them more control over their own financial affairs.
Далее
Salomon v Salomon (1897)
7:51
Просмотров 151 тыс.
Salomon v Salomon: The “One-Man Company”
5:10
Просмотров 60 тыс.
Salomon v Salomon (Corporate personality)
2:53
Просмотров 26 тыс.
Introduction to Company Law
13:31
Просмотров 10 тыс.
Lee v Lee's Air Farming: Can You Hire Yourself?
6:11