Yeah, those micro led tvs look incredible. I've been content with my LG oled for a while, and probably won't upgrade anytime soon - but that microled might be the thing that gets me to upgrade when it drops.
@@UltramarineDad hey, I'll scrape together a couple extra hours at the office, sell my old card collection, and put a down payment on it in 2040. A man can dream
Glad the microled is moving in the right direction, sounds like it’ll still be awhile before they’re sold to consumers and have a reasonable price. But at least the tech is moving along and hasn’t been abandoned!
Yeah i'm glad to see they're making progress in getting the size down. MicroLED is basically going to be the be all end all of tv tech i think for a long long time once it's here. My current bet is we get MicroLED tvs at the sizes and prices of 2023/2024 QD-OLEDs in 2027.
I really wish they had filmed this video with HDR so we could get a sense of the brightness and color. I know not everyone has HDR screens to watch HDR RU-vid content on but ugh it would have been great for those of us who do lol.
Anti-glare might be good for some people, but it usually ruins contrast and clarity. Instead of glare you get a haze across the screen, and I think you can see that in the video. 🤔
I agree. The glossy screen still looks a lot cleaner / more contrasty. I don't mind the Anti-glare, but I still wish it made the reflections a bit darker.
So it's great they provide both options. I love the anti glare on my QLED, even with the lower clarity. Just not sure about the Samsung OS... this will be the thing, that kills the product for me.
That would be my concern too; however, Caleb is actually there staring directly at it (unlike us), and he said they look surprisingly similar. Definitely something i'd want to see for myself at Best Buy or something, but I'll take Caleb at his word for the time being.
Vincent from HDTVTest was saying that the matte effect made the images look a bit flatter and the depth perception was somewhat affected by this anti-glare screen.
nice you bring hdtv test name to the table! the only guy on this nasty hipócric sell out av comunity! vincent the only one always will tell how really it’s.
Well....Vincent is on LG's payroll since forever now. There are lost of videos on his channel as proof. So I doesn't trust that man with everything he is saying.
I think the reason many of us are not too fond of matte coatings isn't just that it might dull/ unsaturate the benefits of OLEDs, but the "wetness" that comes from a glossy display is something that stimulates our eyes, despite the reflections being a downside. It's like a car getting a nice polish and wax. Might it be too shiny and reflect everything? Yes, but it draws your eyes to it.
MicroLED is dazzling !!! True, it was all promotional videos that were shown on those TVs, but the picture was jaw dropping !!! Colour, sharpness, contrast, resolution... Mind blowing !!! As will be the price once they are available from selected dealers !
If the S90D doesn't have this coating then it's a win for everyone. People who want Glossy can get the S90D with 95% of the picture quality of the S95D and people who want a matte anti glare finish can get the S95D. The higher brightness allows the picture to pop through the matte screen but if there's a lower brightness/a dark scene pretty sure the matte one would lose.
Planning on getting a 98in TV into our basement was incredibly hard. Literally cut a same size panel out of towel board and had to get it down before the flooring went on the stairs because we'd lose the clearance. If Samsung gave people the option to have the micro LEDs shipped in pieces and assembled in house that would be amazing when these TV's actually get to a point where they cost less than a new car
That last one is why, people will buy it no matter, plus how many awards and sales they've done clearly show if they added DV it wouldn't boost it that much.
There are still too many questions: 1) Are you satisfied with the lack of 4K? 2) how strong is the modular design (how to deliver these TVs to the home, who will assemble them into a unit), this will depend on whether the joint lines between the individual modules will be noticeable. 3) how these TVs will perform after long-term use (we still don't have any real feedback).
I'm really excited for micro leds and I'm lookin forward to watch how it will evolve and I'll definitely buy it when it become available for consumers plus getting reasonable price point
I think 4K QD OLED is already the future , we just need uncompressed streaming and it gets no better than that . 8K makes sense on giant 140 inch plus displays , other than that its just a number ...
Don't know about 8K. They have issues even getting 4K. You do realize that 4K is 8.3 million microLEDs (if they do it perfect 1:1). And 8k is 33 million LEDs. Doubt that will ever happen and if, it will be decades away.
I've been holding off buying a new TV since 2016 when MicroLED was announced. (using a Panasonic Viera 50" Plasma, which still looks amazing). Hopefully they're affordable in 5-7 years.
Since MicroLed has been announced, i'm all over it! I really like what this technology is doing! Especially since it has all the benefits of an OLED but none of it's "downsides." Like a bright display and burn-ins. Of course, at this point it is still too expensive. At least for me. But seeing those screen sizes go down is already a first step. I have a 75" QN900B at this moment and i couldn't be happier! I've done more than 10yrs. with my 55" Samsung LED tv. So i'm pretty sure i can get that out of my current Samsung tv as well. Though i'm not sure i will be alive when i finally can afford that MICRO-LED tv, but we'll see how cost goes down with every year that goes by... 😎
Why won’t they give us a OLED Frame? It would be an instant buy for me to replace my current 65” Frame. Just feels weird to “upgrade” a TV in 2024 and not get a OLED panel
Micro-LED is the future. I've said it for thr last 7 years plus. It is whether or not thet can manufacture it at a cost effective price. It would end all debate on the best TV technology. I don't think they can make it affordable to the average meat bag. They tried to say this about OLED but, that was obviously not a decent problem. [That antio-glare coating creates a worse image wirh better glare though.]
FANTASTIC Caleb, thanks so much for your early invite / access to Samsung and CES 2024. The anti-glare screen looks interesting. Still not "hooked" on Samsung Tizen OS, oh dear god, when oh when will we see micro led screens move from "business to business" into commercial production and the living room.
I was hoping you'd give us a quick look at the QN90D mini LED, or any of the new Samsung mini LED TVs, and give us a quick rundown of what's new in them for 2024 as I think I'll be upgrading to one this year.
@@devonmccarroll6509 I've been watching a few RU-vidrs doing their CES walkthroughs and it's interesting when they do a tour of Samsung's booth because they all talk about the anti-glare OLED panel, the micro LEDs, the 8K mini LEDs but completely skip the 4K mini LEDs. I wonder if this is at the request of Samsung, like "Here's what we want you to cover on your channel" so they can push their 8K TVs more? Personally, after Samsung's OLEDs I think most potential buyers would be more interested in Samsung's upcoming 4K mini LEDs over the 8K ones as, let's be honest, 8K TVs are still stupidly expensive and still a waste of money due to lack of virtually any 8K content.
So the micro LED TVs, are those individual red, green and blue (and white?) LEDs for each pixel? Or are they all blue with a QD layer for the reds and greens? Would that even make a difference? I'm just trying to figure out if micro LED is truly the holy grail or if we'll be waiting for micro QLED next.
Don't tell that there is a reduction in contrast. In the shots where you're filming right from in front of yourself and the monitors, the anti-glare model is totally washed in the upper right corner.
Possibly but there will be competing technologies - it'll come down to cost. Contrast Ratio is already at 200,000 for the Sony X95L which is very high because IPS panels look identical to OLED with any ambient light and they only have contrast ratios of 1,000. Sony seems to be rolling out better Local dimming and highlights so if mini-LEDs are practically OLEDs without the drawbacks of OLED, what's the point of Micro-LED? The human eye is limited to the point that most engineers can't differentiate a LED from an OLED 99% of the time unless in a special environment. I have a 1,000 nit full window OLED and you don't want to know what I compare it to. Granted, it's the best implementation of that TV and 1,000 nits is nothing but I have a hard time telling them apart with OLED demos especially with ambient light.
That anti glare is something amazing me not being a huge Samsung fan they just caught my eye! Once Mirco-led becomes affordable to the consumer level... The Micro-led os going to break the tv market! The black levels on that micro-led looked oled level blacks .. 😮
so is microled going to be the future for tvs? I don't plan on buying a new tv until at least the next gen of xbox. maybe even a couple years into it when the devs start pushing the max capability of the next gen console.
The Samsung Micro Led Televisions 📺 Displays is truly looks very good 👍! I truly prefer the LG Micro Led Displays Television 📺 more for my heart's likely purchase in the next few years instead of the Organic QD-OLED or the WRGB Oled which are currently available for so much money 💰 right now! 😂❤
Even from the video, I would still take the glossy screen instead of sheen on the matte screen. It als ruins contrast and that "wetness", as Caleb mentioned. So no S95D for me it seems. Hope S90D will still have a new 3rd gen panel though, as I expect Samsung to use last year's panels for the S90D.
I'd like to know about the image processing on the S95D and S90D. Hopefully they've made significant improvements over their 2023 models. If Samsung can equal Sony's XR Clear processor (especially with low bitrate content) then I'm lining up for a 65" S90D.
Samsung's "The Frame" idea and overall design I think one of the industry's best. I nearly purchased for our bedroom last year, but picture specs and problems read online wasn't what I wanted. If the 2024 model have been improved? If yes, I will purchase. Do they have a 48 or 50" ?
I almost ordered one too until I saw how bad Samsung borked it with an irreversible firmware update that seriously broke it. Really wish one of these influencers would hold their feet to the fire until they fix it!
Samsung really did it when it came to the anti glare OLED that could pave way to future OLED TVs. But I think they should still make traditional glass screen. Not to mention get ready for Samsung to never go Dolby Vision and never release MicroLED unfortunately
Weird question to ask Caleb, but what's the rhyme or reasoning for these gorgeous TVs to have different style of STANDS? My eyes for some reason draw to the ones that are almost flushed to the bottom of the entertainment cabinet giving it a cleaner look. But I know it's not ideal for when putting in a sound bar that people will be pairing with their TVs. Any thoughts on what you're seeing at CES? I know it's a weird question to ask but it's something I'm noticing in the variety of theses TVs. Love the videos!
Anti-glare QD-OLED is a great concept but I gotta believe it's not only still not as good with bright rooms as QLED is but will also have a stupid price on it....especially in the 85" size...so with that I'm sure I'll still be buying the QN90C this year.
Is this anti glare the same as they used on older QD TVs where if you touch it with your finger once you will never be able to wipe off the fingerprint? Moth eye filter or something?
One thing people can’t see in a video that they will see in person: Look at 4:07 - The rabbit on the S95D is much brighter and more white. This is showing the improved processor over the S95C. There’s more areas also, but it’s not as bad as cameras are making it look. I’d say most should see it in person first and then make a final decision.
So sorry but that anti-glare coating is horrendous 😂 The ashy, haze that they add to screens is far more distracting than any reflections. It's also very easy for people who don't like glossy screens to do an after market solution but not the reverse.
Considering that the 110" MicroLED TV that samsung sells is about $150,000, I can't even imagine how much a 76" would be. I feel like it still couldn't be less than $50,000 if it became available for purchase. Though 76" is a significantly more reasonable size for most houses, so maybe somehow it'll be closer to the 97" G3 at $25,000?
@@katakisLives does "more reasonable" mean that it's actually reasonable? Or does it just mean that it's less unreasonable? Something being "more reasonable" means that it's the lesser unreasonable of the two being compared, no? was also talking about a 76" TV being more reasonable, or common among people buying big TVs.
@@00SNIVY00 I doubt many people are going to wind up getting TV's as huge as the ones being showcased right now, a friend of mine has a 50 inch television which is pretty much as large as most people would ever need. I'm not really talking about these crazy sized panels I'm talking about the technology more generally and most people are never gonna be able to buy a TV that costs the same amount as a high end sports car! for me a reasonable price would be (for a 40 inch panel) £1000 or slightly under.
they should just sell microLED tiles and we can assembled it up to budget and the size needed. hoping for 27" 4k or sub 27" 4k microLED. just how many tiles used?
I'm still torn between Samsung and Sony. I'm about ready to purchase a new TV and I understand Sony has the best processor on the market but I'm still unsure which brand to get. I currently have a 65" Samsung plasma that's about 13 years old and has been trouble free with zero issues. I don't know if I could get that kind of reliability from a Sony. Please enlighten me .
