Sanda Basics 01 

As a fighting style maybe, but a lot of martial arts skills aren’t necessarily fighting styles Consider tai chi, you would benefit a lot from the body mechanics of it if you practice something like Sanda

And then that's all you'll know. If someone takes you down instead of the other way around (which is quite likely if you're fighting someone bigger), then you're lost if you've never trained ground fighting.

​@@gailvalleymartialarts unless u do body conditioning n train them muscle religiously then of course u would lose. that's why it's called building a proper form

As long as you're fighting, that's better than watching this video and doing nothing.

sabias palabras

Mmm... sanda is a recopilation of techniques from kungfu but this is a deportive, have more sparring.

@@jmamvs544 more like "full contact kung fu"

@@carlosandres1835 i ser anyone

Thanks for the Russian militaries who mixed it with wrestling

@Crus Harold Sanda is kung fu. No reason to argue.

Depends on the situation. If I take somebody’s back, I’m applying the RNC. I’s not advisable to go to the ground (especially if your opponent has friends within reach, since they might jump on you as well), but BJJ has served plenty of people well in street fights.

I agree. keep the fight from going to the ground

Well, the reason BJJ is useful is because it will help you get back up from the ground if you are taken there.

In a civilized country if you stomp someone’s head in you get charged with murder. Bjj allows you to subdue a threat while not seriously damaging your adversary (if you don’t want to that is), this keeps you physically and legally safe. I’m not saying you should wrestle on the ground but statistically speaking you’re most likely to get attacked by a family member or friend so wouldn’t you prefer to just pin them as opposed to punching them or “stomping their face in”

@@user-kz7wj5fl9r in Sanda if you take the back, you can do a variety of technique, for example a good and devastating suplex

You mean taos or taolus. Katas are Japanese.

Of course not.

China never admit, they copy muaythai style, western boxing and grappling style Japanese, they modify, renamed sanda 😂😂

They literally created sanda after discovery ins their martial arts are garbage. The whole sanda is created to become a real martial art. They missed the opportunity to add BJJ into it to complete the art :( . Mis-opportunity.

@@StupidBadyXD They can always do it now, can't they?

@@StupidBadyXD lol yeah it's a shame, the story was at first grappling was allowed and it pretty much wrecked the stand up fighters (via points), similar to what happened in the ufc. But the administrators and competitors of sanda decided to solve that problem by not allowing take downs and ground fighting, compared to ufc's answer by making the fighters learn things like takedown defense

@@keps_ksk they do have takedowns they just can’t grapple

​​​​​@@StupidBadyXD - You're a dum dum! All martial arts are just that - an artistic form of fighting that has nothing to do with real fighting so that being said when it comes to combative sports, they are athletic forms of fighting which would be more realistic to fighting than said martial art whereas the fighting versions of BJJ such as GJJ are more than either one because they deal with reality so they would go into a whole other list such as reality based as the real Krav Maga and even San Soo Kung Fu and others who teach a more reality based system for warfare and the streets and in a lot of cases - as a prisoner. You obviously don't know crap kid! A very basic street fighter back in the old days who worked out and lifted and trained to fight and got into a lot of fights was more equipped to beat up a martial artist and even sport fighters and would learn the reality based systems better than others since they already had/have real life knowledge. EDIT: "Never be the best someone else is being; always be the best as only you could be!" You'll be original and this was what Bruce Lee was aiming for in his journey of being a warrior and only some could actually be real warriors.

To give it power when you throw your more dominant hand

@@firestone6692 Wouldn’t you get more power from a flat foot ?

@@someboi4903 no, I do Muay Thai and it's pretty much a similar stance. you need to keep at least one foot up. You can also keep your front foot stance uplike the way Sagat from street fighter does to generate power. If you don't, you don't have any power at all. Just like I'm boxing, when you throw a "cross", you see them pivoting with there hip and moving with the ball of the foot to generate power.

@@firestone6692 I can understand having the front foot on the ball, but I don't understand doing it on the rear foot.

@@someboi4903 it's all a matter of the preference. You should type it on the search bar. You will learn alot. It all depends on the person and how comfortable you are with that stance.

Nah it's just a basic fighting stance that exist in mma boxing kickboxing sanda and pretty much any other striking combat sport

Mmmm more like "human combat" stance

@Crus Harold Why would they adopt BJJ? That’s outside of traditional CMA. It makes no sense for them to adopt BJJ; if they did, just call it MMA and make the IWUF the IMMAF.

@Crus Harold im pretty sure its called the orthodox stance

@@user-kz7wj5fl9r Sanda has always been mixed martial arts. It took martial arts from the west, east, southeast, to create the best martial art it can be. To say it shouldn't adopt ground fighting like BJJ because it's not Chinese is stupid.