Schmidt-Kupplung 

Came for the animation, stayed for the soundtrack

The 9 year old one? Yeah.

Needed moar detail!

Me i did 👍🏻

Yep. Still looking for a good video that shows the moving parts a little clearer. Trying the lego one next.

What are we watching next?

Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen and Umformtechnikanlagen have to be my fave

@@slaveNo-4028 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-l3_tRPRt9x8.html

@@slaveNo-4028 Fußbodenschleifmaschinenverleih. A shop or company that lends machines for floor sanding.

IKR? its great! Compliments to the composer!

Fuckin sick

@Johan Fouche sound go brrrrr

@Johan Fouche you must be so much fun. You probably feel like gods gift to the world, yet wonder why nobody can see it. Clear cut case of a incel.

@Johan Fouche If you connect With it and feel a vibe and you're dancing who really cares? you're missing the point completely

The HMMWV uses portal axles, which is what you were referring to. They don’t use the Schmidt coupling, but just a gear ratio with idler gears to have the input and output rotate in the same direction. My guess is that it’s simpler and more reliable that way. Correct me if I’m wrong, however Edit: After looking around I’ve seen that they don’t actually have idlers

Mag ich bezweifeln. Die ankommenden Drehmomente des Antriebsstrangs im Kfz und die zu bewegende Masse sind für diese Kupplung sicherlich nur dann verkraftbar, wenn die Materialstärken der einzelnen Hebel entsprechend dimensioniert und die unzähligen Gleitlager ausreichend geschmiert sind. Darüber hinaus benötigt diese Art Kupplung einen klaren Vektor, über welchen sie sich bewegen darf und wohin nicht, was Führungsschienen nötig macht. Da sind die üblichen Zahnräder und Gelenkkupplungen kleiner, leichter, wartungsärmer und belastbarer.

Way to go Slick Mike , that was really funny. I guess that much offset may occur from time to time, but it does seem a bit extreme.

I would guess better torque transmission and there's no reversal of rotation

How exactly do you expect to have a variable offset with two regular old gearwheels?

@@XxXaPadyXxX By creating a planetary gearbox. Let the outer gear circulate around the inner. I.e. move it along a circular segment. Thus you raise and lower that outer gear's axis. It solves this particular problem (lifting an axis vs the sheet), but if you are semantically picky, there is still no change in inter-axis offset.

@@XxXaPadyXxX if one moves in an arc it's possible, but not if you need linear movement.

@@axeman2638 or diagonal.

Only a single layer would operate at a fixed distance, tracing out a circle rather than being able to move. 2 layers gives you an extra degree of freedom, letting the distance change too. A third gets you nothing extra. Edit: Actually you probably can't. 3 linkages would be under-constrained. While 2 links can get to any point, the angles are fixed. With 3 links the angles are not fixed, and the intermediate layers would be able to move. Fix 2 points on a triangle with fixed sides and the last point stays still. If there are more points they can wave about. This movement would damage the mechanism.

Oldham is different

The old ham is the older of the two designs, but principals are the same or similar. Self alignment of axis’s.

nah, just for fun

Don't underestimate the randomness of the RU-vid algorythm

Nope

I am here because I am playing Lego with my niece.

It does.

200.000 views beweisen, dass es Technikinteressierten scheiß egal ist, wie das Wissen verpackt ist, solange der Inhalt stimmt just saying

old school gears can't provide the variable axis offset this mechanism does. chain is actually more complicated as it has more parts, more moving joints and more points of failure. not to mention you need a form of tensioner when the two axes are near each other (just like how a derailleur tightens the bike chain when you're in small cogs).

That's the Germans for ya!